Glasgow students win top ICAS award for accountancy
The award is presented annually to one outstanding accountancy student from each Scottish university offering accountancy programmes.
Read more:
'We had to take the emotion out of it' - Levy on sacking Postecoglou
Gail Boag, executive director of learning at ICAS, said: "Ethan, Craig, Millie and Aaron are exceptional students whose achievements reflect Glasgow's continued strength in accountancy education.
"We are proud to support and celebrate their success through the Charles Scott Prize."
Selection criteria vary by institution and are applied locally by academic departments, but each winner has demonstrated outstanding academic performance and potential within their cohort.
The Charles Scott Prize is part of ICAS' wider effort to support the next generation of Chartered Accountants, maintain high standards in accountancy education, and strengthen relationships with universities.
In addition to professional recognition, each winner receives mentorship opportunities, exposure across ICAS platforms, and connections to a global community of Chartered Accountants.
The award also includes a £150 cash prize.
The Charles Scott Prize honours Charles Alexander Scott CA and was established by his wife as a lasting tribute to academic excellence and the future of the profession in Scotland.
This year's winners represent all 12 Scottish universities offering accountancy programmes and will be promoted through ICAS' professional channels and given opportunities to engage with the wider Chartered Accountant community.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
44 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh Airport: Travel boss blasts 'unacceptable' delays for passengers during busiest summer on record
Edinburgh Airport recorded its busiest day ever in July as passenger numbers continue to soar. Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A travel agency boss has criticised Edinburgh Airport over the experience for passengers arriving in the city, saying delays reported by customers after landing at the airport were 'unacceptable'. Ken McNab, managing director of The Travel Company Edinburgh and In2Scotland, urged the airport to improve the appearance of the arrivals building, saying its "corrugated iron and wire' created a poor impression for visitors. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad His comments come as Edinburgh Airport recorded its busiest day on record, with 62,458 passengers passing through the airport on July 11. Mr McNab told the Edinburgh Airport Consultative Committee on Monday that in recent weeks it took his colleague one-and-a-half hours to get through the airport after flying into the capital from Dublin. This was due to hold-ups on the tarmac and problems finding the correct set of steps, Mr McNab said. 'That's unacceptable for the majority of customers,' he said. His concerns echo other recent criticisms of the airport by business leaders across Scotland, who took to LinkedIn to warn that without urgent improvements, the airport risks damaging Scotland's reputation among international visitors. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Gordon Robertson, Edinburgh Airport's chief communications and sustainability officer, said at Monday's meeting that while he recognised the concerns of passengers, those with negative experiences of arrivals remained in the minority. 'Scots feel proud about Edinburgh and I know some of this makes them feel less proud, but generally it is not the experience of the majority,' he said. Mr Robertson described the arrivals area as a 'functional hall'. But he said concerns about its appearance had been taken on board and were being factored into plans around the airport's planned redevelopment. Busiest summer on record Latest figures provided by the airport showed it had its busiest day on record last month, with 62,458 passengers on July 11. During peak hour a total of 3,600 passengers used the airport. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There were three other days in July when passenger numbers soared above 61,000. The airport's top five days in 2025 surpassed last year's daily record of 55,919 passengers. Passenger numbers for the latest quarter are up 6.3 per cent on the same period in 2024, with over 4.6 million customers using Edinburgh Airport between April and June this year. Mr Robertson said improvements to the departures process, including the move to axe the 100ml liquids rule, had made a significant difference to the running of operations during the summer months. He said previously the airport would have been 'swamped' by the passenger numbers seen this year. Holiday makers are now able to take liquid containers of up to two litres through security under the change coming into affect last month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Edinburgh Airport saw a record of 62,458 passengers on July 11 | Anadolu via Getty Images The move followed the installation of eight new X-rays machines as part of a £24 million investment to transform the airport's security process. Large electrical items, such as tablets and laptops, can also now remain in bags. Mr Robertson said lifting the limit on liquids had been 'fantastically received' and that passengers were embracing it with 'gusto'. The airport's figures, as of last month, show 94 per cent of passengers are passing through security in under ten minutes, compared to 87 per cent in the same month last year. Data collected by Edinburgh Airport through customer surveys shows passenger satisfaction sitting at 91 per cent - a slight fall of 2 per cent from the previous quarter. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Edinburgh Airport is undergoing significant expansion. In May, its chief executive said a five-year programme of investment was underway as passenger numbers continue to soar.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Land reform legislation is starting to take shape
Rona Macdonald says the Stage 2 process at Holyrood saw significant amendments made Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Land Reform (Scotland) Bill, aimed at reforming the law relating to 'large landholdings' and leases of rural land, has progressed to its final stage in the Scottish Parliament, following significant amendments during the Stage 2 process. Over 500 amendments were submitted by MSPs from both sides of the debate and considered by the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. The resulting Stage 2 Bill includes notable changes, particularly concerning large landholdings. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A 'large landholding' was previously defined as an area of land under the same or connected ownership exceeding 3,000 hectares with special rules for islands (for land management plans) or exceeding 1,000 hectares (for sale restrictions). The Stage 2 Bill makes this threshold consistent across the Bill so it applies to an area of land within the same or connected ownership exceeding 1,000 hectares and removing any distinction for islands. An important change states that when calculating total land size, any land within 250 metres of other land under the same or connected ownership is taken into account. Rona Macdonald is a Professional Support Lawyer, Turcan Connell Under the Bill, Scottish ministers will be empowered to make regulations requiring landowners to produce and publicly share land management plans. The list of those who can report alleged breaches of these regulations has been expanded in the Stage 2 Bill, and maximum fines for non-compliance raised from £5,000 to £40,000. The Stage 2 Bill also gives the new Land and Communities Commissioner (who will be a member of the Scottish Land Commission) greater powers for investigation and enforcement. The Bill introduces two major restrictions on the sale of large landholdings: Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prohibition on Sales Without Notification: Initially, the Bill proposed a ban on the sale of any part of a large landholding without prior notification to Scottish ministers, regardless of the size of the land parcel. This sparked criticism for potentially blocking small-scale sales. The Stage 2 Bill now permits partial land sales without ministerial notification, provided the area falls below a threshold to be set by ministers through further regulations. Prohibition on Sales Without a Lotting Decision: A more controversial part of the Bill is the requirement for the owner of a large landholding to obtain a 'lotting decision' from Scottish ministers before selling their land. Ministers must determine whether the land should be divided into lots, based on a community sustainability test. Initially criticised for lacking a time limit, the Stage 2 Bill now requires ministers to make a decision within six months. However, it does not say what happens if that deadline is missed, potentially limiting its impact. Ministers will be required to publish guidance explaining how they will make lotting decisions and how these are expected to work in practice. Few amendments were made at Stage 2 to the part of the Bill relating to agricultural tenancies and some elements (for example, tenant improvements, right to buy process and resumption compensation) may be reviewed more closely at Stage 3. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Bill has now reached its third and final stage, and MSPs can submit further amendments before the Scottish Parliament votes on the final version. The timetable for this final stage has not yet been announced and with Parliament in recess until 31 August, there will be no progress before then. Further changes are expected, and if the Bill is passed, secondary legislation will be required to implement several elements. Transitional provisions are also anticipated to ease the shift to the new framework.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
How indy fund could offer more than just a basic state pension
The NPF can also be designed to provide earnings-related pensions to all citizens in addition to a state pension. Discussion about the future of pensions in an independent Scotland has, so far, been limited to proposals to increase the state pension we will inherit from the UK. READ MORE: Scottish firm in legal clash with McDonald's and Napoli over Scott McTominay nickname While increasing the state pension would be affordable if Scotland had its own currency, it will not eliminate the demand for second pensions. Even if the state pension was increased to £400 per week, this would still provide a retirement income of only 54% of current median earnings. With such a drop in income at retirement for many, demand for second pensions will persist. This means we also have to consider second pension provision after independence. It is widely recognised that 'defined benefit' (DB) or final salary pensions offer greater certainty and security than the alternative 'defined contributions' (DC) type. The problem is that DB pensions have largely disappeared, particularly in the private sector. Our ambition for future pensions in Scotland should be to restore DB pensions. Creating an NPF is the only way Scotland could do this. We cannot rely on employers to revert back to providing DB pensions. They have disappeared primarily because all employer-based schemes suffer from a fatal flaw. Eventually, the number of pensioners exceeds the number of contributing workers and contribution income is no longer sufficient to cover the cost of pension payments. Investment returns must make up for the shortfall and employers eventually decide they will no longer bear the investment risks. An NPF would avoid this flaw because the worker/pensioner ratio is predictable based on national demographic trends. This makes it possible to calculate a contribution rate sufficient for contribution income to provide the cashflow needed to pay out pensions. The NPF can be designed as a 'pay-as-you-go' scheme. If there are three workers to every pensioner and the scheme was designed to deliver a DB pension of 50% of earnings the required contribution rate would be 1/3 x 50% = 1/6 (16.7%). Suppose the average earnings of three million workers were £30,000. Total wages = £90 billion and contributions of 1/6 = £15bn. The average pension would be £15,000 and one million pensioners would produce pension spending of £15bn; income and pension costs are equal. The NPF would be established by introducing auto-enrolment for all new workers after a defined date. As none of this group would draw a pension for 40 years or more, the initial contribution rate can be set at a lower level than might be necessary in 40 years' time. READ MORE: Trust selling Highland clan's land for £6.8m under investigation Even with an initial contribution rate of 15% the fund would grow quickly so that there would be a large fund available for investing in the Scottish economy and with capacity to meet its obligations to pensioners. Once the NPF has been established, existing workers can be offered the opportunity to transfer their second pension(s) into the NPF. Transfers between pension funds are already common. A transfer would be based on the cash value of existing pension(s), which then earns a credit for contributions into the NPF. Suppose a cash transfer is valued at £45,000 and the required annual contributions to the NPF based on current earnings are £4500 per year; the transfer value would earn a 10 years' credit. Transferring into the NPF would be attractive to those who have a DB pension as the value of their 'pension pot' (the total of their contributions and investment returns) would be converted into an earnings-related pension. In an NPF, the investment risks are pooled across the whole working population and employers. In addition, the state, with the benefit of issuing its own currency, can guarantee the fund. The state would function as the 'sponsor' of the NPF but, unlike a sponsoring employer, it cannot run out of money nor is it likely to cease trading. The guarantee would provide additional funds to the NPF in the event that cashflow into the fund was insufficient to pay all pension obligations. It is highly unlikely that a well-designed, well-managed and fully accountable NPF would ever need to call upon this state guarantee. It is intended that the NPF would be a provider of a DB-based second pension in addition to a state pension. The replacement of the flat-rate state pension inherited from the UK with an earnings-related state pension (SERP) would complete a new model for pension provision in Scotland. How much of total pension comes from the SERP and the NPF would be a matter for public consultation.
