
R.I. man falsely arrested twice settles lawsuit with Woonsocket for $550,000
Advertisement
In an email, Woonsocket City Solicitor Michael J. Lepizzera Jr. wrote 'city is pleased that the matter is behind Mr. Blackie, the officer involved and the Woonsocket Police Department.'
Get Rhode Island News Alerts
Sign up to get breaking news and interesting stories from Rhode Island in your inbox each weekday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'The city wishes the best to both Mr. Blackie and its WPD officer,' Lepizzera wrote.
Related
:
According to the ACLU, an apartment in Woonsocket was broken into in August 2022, and a resident there, William Grover, told authorities the person who entered was known to him by the name, 'Black.'
'Later, officer Hammond met with Grover and asked multiple times if Mack Blackie was the perpetrator. Mr. Grover — who knew both 'Black' and Blackie — explicitly stated it was not Blackie, a Liberian, and even described the differences in physical characteristics between the two men,' the ACLU said.
Advertisement
Hammond then failed to set up a photo lineup as he had promised so Grover could identity 'Black,' according to the ACLU.
'Instead, Hammond falsely wrote in his witness statement that 'Grover positively identified the suspect male as being Mack Blackie,'' the organization said in a statement. 'Additionally, he later falsely stated in his application for an arrest warrant that Grover told another Woonsocket police officer that Blackie broke into the apartment. Blackie was arrested soon after.'
Blackie, who was homeless at the time and had a medical condition that required attention, was held overnight and collapsed in court, and then taken to a hospital for several days, the ACLU said. Several months later, he was re-arrested and charged with felony breaking and entering and assault, the organization said.
'Because he was on probation at the time, Blackie was incarcerated for 18 days without bail as a probation violator,' the ACLU said. 'When bail was finally set, he could not afford the $100 cash required for release, resulting in his continued incarceration for an extra 13 days, until an employee of a non-profit organization where he volunteered posted the money for his bail.'
Grover realized Woonsocket police arrested the wrong man when he saw Blackie in a courthouse hallway in February 2023 and he alerted the prosecutor, the ACLU said. The charges were dropped and Hammond was later suspended for 10 days and demoted.
'This was an inadvertent mistake by one WPD officer who failed to follow defined WPD protocol and procedures,' Lepizzera wrote on Thursday. 'This however did not involve intentional misconduct.
'Notably, the officer in question quickly acknowledged the shortcomings of his investigation and readily accepted responsibility,' Lepizzera added. 'Not only did he accept responsibility, but he voluntarily agreed to a demotion from detective to patrol officer.'
Advertisement
City police leaders and officials have previously acknowledged Blackie was wrongfully arrested and apologized to him in 2023.
'I want to give credit to the officer for acknowledging his mistake and quickly resolving any personnel issues that arose from this event,' Lepizzera wrote. 'For so many years we have heard public outcry across the state with respect to long drawn out disciplinary disputes involving police officers invoking the Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights (LEOBOR). To his credit, this officer did not invoke his legal rights under LEOBOR and stayed the course by not only accepting responsibility with words but also by his actions.'
ACLU cooperating attorney Joshua Xavier said in a statement the case is 'a stark reminder that our government continues to fall short of living up to the promises guaranteed by our Constitution.'
'While this settlement brings some measure of accountability over the unlawful actions taken by the police against Mr. Blackie, nothing will ever remove the deep distress and psychological pain he suffered and continues to suffer as a result of being arrested twice, criminally charged, incarcerated, and prosecuted for crimes he did not commit, including a felony,' Xavier said. 'Mr. Blackie spent 31 days in prison — 31 days of his life that he will never get back.'
Material from a previous Globe story was used in this report.
Christopher Gavin can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Groups demand that Denver's Flock license plate cameras be turned off
DENVER (KDVR) — There is a growing controversy surrounding the use of automatic license plate reading cameras in Denver. They are also known as Flock cameras, which law enforcement uses in a number of crime-fighting tactics. Denver voted to not extend its Flock camera contract: Are ICE access concerns valid? Some groups are claiming the cameras' databases are being used to help U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers track undocumented immigrants. The American Civil Liberties Union is among the organizations that want Denver to stop using the cameras. 'Flock databases, and their sharing capabilities create the potential for local law enforcement agencies to be violating state law when they are sharing their databases openly with other agencies and other jurisdictions outside of the state of Colorado for immigration enforcement purposes,' ACLU Denver Public Policy Director Anaya Robinson said. 'Flock, effectively, is creating a nationwide surveillance system,' Robinson added. There are 17 civil rights and advocacy organizations that said the Denver Police Department's Flock camera data logs had been searched more than 1,400 times for ICE since June 2024. DPD said Monday, once it realized searches had been conducted by other law enforcement agencies with ICE, DPD turned off those agencies' ability to search Denver's flock data. Mayoral spokesman Jon Ewing said the city had no knowledge of the city's cameras being used to track undocumented immigrants. 'We use these cameras for people who commit crimes. We're not talking about civil immigration enforcement. It is not permissible under Colorado law or local law to do the job of civil immigration enforcement,' Ewing said. DOJ sues Colorado, Denver for so-called 'sanctuary laws' 'DPD continues working to address community concerns about the Flock ALPR (automated license plate recognition) program. DPD will continue using our Flock ALPR system because of its demonstrated impact in helping to solve crimes and hold offenders accountable. DPD is not aware of any misuse of its data,' a spokesperson for the Denver Police Department's Media Relations Units said. The concerned groups, though, say they will continue their push to have the cameras turned off. Robison said the organizations are willing to have conversations with Denver about the future use of the camera system. Mayor Mike Johnston's office says it's setting up a task force to address community concerns. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Can you flip off a cop? Here's what the law says in Oklahoma
Traffic stops can get frustrating for drivers in a hurry, and sometimes lead people to do or say things they may regret later. But is lashing out, maybe just by flipping off the officer who pulled you over, a punishable offense in Oklahoma? In recent years, the Oklahoma City Police Department has taken a firm stance against members of their agency using the gesture after a metro officer flipped a driver off in 2023. But what are citizens able to do without facing a fine or consequence? Here's what to know about the legality of the action, how the Constitution may come into play, and what to know next time you're interacting with police in Oklahoma. Can you flip off a police officer during a traffic stop? In short, yes. Though it's impolite, it's not against the law according to a few legal precedents. This decision came in 2019, after Debra Cruise-Gulyas was pulled over in 2017 during a routine traffic stop in Michigan. The officer, Matthew Minard, pulled her over for speeding and gave her a ticket for a non-moving violation, a lesser charge. Cruise-Gulyas, in turn, gave him a two-word statement with her middle finger while driving away. Minard pulled her over again and raised the violation to a speeding ticket. Cruise-Gulyas then sued Minard on the grounds there was no probable cause for seizure during the second stop, thus violating her Fourth Amendment right; upgrading her ticket to a higher offense due to the gesture, thus violating her First Amendment right of freedom of speech; and that it overall violated her right to due process as set by the 14th Amendment. First Amendment protected speech The district court presiding over the case sided with Minard, who stated that the second stop was a continuation of the first. But, when Cruise-Gulyas took the case to the Appellate Court, the Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled in Cruise-Gulyas' favor in 2019. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton stated that 'Fits of rudeness or lack of gratitude may violate the Golden Rule. But that doesn't make them illegal or, for that matter, punishable or, for that matter, grounds for a seizure.' Sutton later noted "Any reasonable officer would know that a citizen who raises her middle finger engages in speech protected by the First Amendment." What to do during a traffic stop While different states have different rules for drivers' duties during a traffic stop, experts generally agree on a few steps drivers should take to ensure the traffic stop remains calm. The American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma recommends that if you're pulled over by police, you should take the following steps: Stop the car in a safe place as quickly as possible. Turn off the car's engine. Turn on the internal light. Open the window partway. Place your hands on the wheel. The ACLU also encourages people to stay calm during the traffic stop and not to run, resist or obstruct officers. More: Do you have to roll your window down during a traffic stop? ACLU, police weigh in The Oklahoma City Police Department recommends many of the same actions, including lowering your window to speak with the officer. If you're afraid during the stop, the police department's website also suggests you can lower your window a few inches, ask to speak with a supervisor or call 911. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Is it illegal to flip off a cop? Here's what Oklahoma law says Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
An American Man Is Opening Up About Regretting His Vote For Trump After He Was Stopped By Border Patrol
A California man who alleges border patrol agents racially profiled him during a stop in June said in a story Monday that he feels guilty about voting for President Donald Trump in the last presidential election. 'I truly believe I was targeted because of my race,' Jason Brian Gavidia told NBC affiliate KNBC on Monday. 'I believe I was racially profiled. I believe I was attacked because I was walking while brown. Where is the freedom? Where is the justice? We live in America.' Related: Gavidia is one of five people represented in a class action lawsuit by the ACLU of Southern California accusing the Trump administration of racially profiling people while conducting immigration enforcement activities. Last month, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to stop indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven California counties. However, the administration petitioned the Supreme Court last week to lift the order. Related: A video taken on June 12 and published by the Los Angeles Times days later shows two masked border patrol agents in sunglasses pushing Gavidia against a metal gated fence outside a tow yard. 'I am an American, bro,' Gavidia can be heard saying in the video. Related: 'What hospital were you born in?' an agent yells. 'I don't know, dawg,' Gavidia responds, before offering to show his ID. The lawsuit alleges that border patrol agents twisted Gavidia's arm during the public questioning and took his phone. The border patrol agents eventually let Gavidia go, but he was left traumatized from the experience. 'Every time I see it on video, it's like a bad memory that's in my brain,' Gavidia told KNBC. Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has issued a series of confusing statements regarding the incident. When reached for comment by the LA Times back in June, she claimed Gavidia had been 'arrested' for assaulting border patrol agents. When the Times noted that Gavidia had not been arrested, McLaughlin backtracked, clarifying he had only been questioned and it was actually his friend who was arrested. On Wednesday, McLaughlin sent another conflicting statement to HuffPost, claiming Gavidia 'was arrested for assaulting a law enforcement officer and interfering with agents during their duties.' HuffPost has reached out for additional clarification. McLaughlin's statement to HuffPost also asserted that 'any allegations that individuals have been 'targeted' by law enforcement because of their skin color are FALSE.' Related: Gavidia is one of many Trump supporters who still got caught up in the president's ruthless immigration enforcement policies, despite voting for him in the last election. He told KNBC he now feels guilty about his vote in the last election and believes 'it was a mistake' because Trump 'ran on lies.' 'If this was going to happen, do you think we would have voted? We're humans. We're not going to destroy our community,' Gavidia said. 'We're not going to destroy our people.'This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: