US Student Visas Now Require Enhanced Social Media Screening—Here's What to Know
As of June 18, 2025, the US State Department has implemented new rules requiring applicants for student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas to submit their social media handles and make their profiles public during the visa review process. Consular officers have been directed to conduct in-depth reviews of applicants' online presence (particularly for individuals from countries deemed high risk by the state department), to identify applicants who the administration deems as inadmissible to the US.
'Students need to understand that their digital footprint could become part of their permanent US immigration record,' says Loren Locke, an immigration attorney at Locke Immigration Law, who previously adjudicated thousands of visa applications as a State Department consular officer. 'This means years of posts, comments, and friendships could be scrutinized.'
Perhaps the most dramatic development is what's happening at Harvard. As of late May, anyone seeking a US visa for any purpose tied to Harvard—students, staff, researchers, or even tourists attending campus events—are being flagged for 'enhanced vetting.' The move, framed by the State Department as a national security measure, is part of a pilot program that could expand to other institutions. And on July 23, the State Department announced an investigation into Harvard's eligibility to sponsor international students and researchers. Without that authority, granted by the government, Harvard would not be able to enroll new international students or host researchers and visiting professors from abroad.
Below, we break down everything you need know about applying for US student and exchange visas right now, according to immigration lawyers and experts.
Who does this affect?
The policy applies globally to all noncitizens applying for US student and exchange visas. Still, Harvard University became the first school to face enhanced scrutiny under a pilot program launched in late May. According to internal memos obtained by numerous media outlets, anyone applying for a visa connected to Harvard (which again includes students, scholars, visiting speakers, and campus event attendees) is now subject to a separate layer of national security review.
The administration has justified the move by citing alleged failures by Harvard to curb antisemitism and threats to campus safety following pro-Palestinian protests. On July 23, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a formal investigation into Harvard's eligibility to sponsor international students and researchers, even as the university fights the policy in court. A federal judge previously granted Harvard a temporary restraining order to prevent visa denials based solely on political affiliation or social media content.
Prepare for expanded screening and vetting
The screening process extends far beyond consular officers casually scrolling through applicants' Instagram accounts. Under the new rules, applicants must now provide a complete list of their online identifiers (usernames or handles) across platforms including Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and others. Officers will also look for mentions of the applicants in news articles, published scholarly articles, or any other searchable content.
According to a diplomatic cable sent by the State Department to embassies and consulates (and obtained by multiple outlets), consular officers are directed to comb applicants' online presence to look for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' It further instructs officers to look for any 'advocacy for, aid or support for foreign terrorists and other threats to US national security' and 'support for unlawful antisemitic harassment or violence,' while taking 'screenshots to preserve the record against possible later alteration or loss of the information.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
France calls on the EU to pressure Israel to come to the table on Palestinian two-state solution
Barrot spoke on the first day of a high-level UN meeting on a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is being cochaired by France and Saudi Arabia. The The aim of the conference, Barrot said, is 'to reverse the trend of what is happening in the region — mainly the erasure of the two-state solution, which has been for a long time the only solution that can bring peace and security in the region.' Advertisement He urged the EC to call on Israel to lift a financial blockade on $2.32 billion he says the Israeli government owes the Palestinian Authority, stop settlement building in the West Bank, which threatens the territorial integrity of a future Palestinian state, and end the 'militarized' food delivery system in Gaza by the Israeli-backed US Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has resulted in hundreds of killings. Advertisement Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. The United States has echoed its sentiment and on Monday called the conference 'unproductive and ill-timed.' 'The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement. 'Our focus remains on serious diplomacy: not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance.' Ahead of the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would France is now the biggest Western power and the only member of the Group of Seven major industrialized nations to recognize the state of Palestine, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same. More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe. At the conference opening, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called for all countries that have not yet recognized Palestine as a state to do so 'without delay.' 'The path to peace begins by recognizing the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction,' he said. Advertisement The other issue being discussed at the conference is normalization between Israel and the Arab states in the region. Prince Faisal bin Farhan, the Saudi foreign minister, stressed that normalization of relations with Israel 'can only come through the establishment of a Palestinian state.' With global anger rising over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation. President Trump on Monday called for Both Barrot and Farhan said Monday the United States is an essential actor in the region and that it was the president in January who secured the only cease-fire in the 21-month war. 'I am firmly in the belief that Trump's engagement can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' Farhan said.
CNN
17 minutes ago
- CNN
New documents show how passport and Social Security rules would change to enforce Trump's birthright citizenship order
After months of avoiding details about a divisive plan to end birthright citizenship, President Donald Trump's administration is rolling out a series of new documents that offer a stark glimpse into how it would implement an executive order that upends the century-old understanding about the benefits of being born in the United States. The trove of documents from half a dozen federal agencies in recent days are a direct result of a blockbuster Supreme Court decision last month that allowed the administration to develop plans for ending birthright citizenship – even though the effort has once again been placed on hold. Under those guidance documents, parents of newborns – including US citizens – might be required to jump through additional hoops to verify their own immigration status to obtain a passport or Social Security number for their children. Among the documents made public in recent days is one from the State Department that explains how officials would be required to 'request original proof of parental citizenship or immigration status' to proceed with processing a passport application. 'This information will be necessary to determine if those applying for a passport are U.S. citizens,' the three-page document reads. The Social Security Administration issued similar guidance as well. 'With respect to citizenship, an SSN applicant may currently demonstrate U.S. citizenship by providing a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth,' the document says. 'Once the EO takes effect, a birth certificate showing a U.S. place of birth will not be sufficient documentary evidence of U.S. citizenship for persons born after the EO takes effect.' It continues: 'To comply with the EO, SSA will require evidence that such a person's mother and/or father is a U.S. citizen or in an eligible immigration status at the time of the person's birth.' Other guidance documents from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Department of Agriculture lay out how those agencies would go about verifying the citizenship of children for various social services. The agencies appear to be leaning on a four-page document issued by the Department of Homeland Security's US Citizenship and Immigration Services, which says it's meant to 'address legal questions relevant to the implementation' of Trump's order. That memo mostly contains definitions, including ones on who would be covered by the policy and who would be exempted. Among those exempted from the president's policy, according to the USCIS memo, are children of asylees and refugees. Until now, it wasn't clear whether the Trump administration would subject those groups of non-citizens to the order. Signed by Trump on January 20, the executive order 'PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP' said that the federal government will not 'issue documents recognizing United States citizenship' to any children born on American soil to parents who were in the country unlawfully, or were in the states lawfully, but temporarily. Several rulings issued by federal courts this month have ensured that that policy will not take effect for now, and the guidance documents acknowledge that reality. 'However, the government is preparing to implement the EO in the event that it is permitted to go into effect,' the USCIS memo states. Immigration rights advocates who have taken Trump to court over his order stressed on Monday that the newly released guidance is meaningless so long as the courts continue to block enforcement of the policy. 'Nothing in this guidance remotely changes the bottom line that this executive order is unconstitutional and cruel. Everyone in the country remains protected by our class action, and we will keep fighting to ensure this order never goes into effect,' said Cody Wofsy, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, which convinced a federal judge in New Hampshire to block Trump's order via a class-action lawsuit. New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matthew Platkin, who is leading a multi-state challenge to Trump's policy, told CNN that 'whatever the promises in this guidance, we remain confident that President Trump's unconstitutional attempt to terminate birthright citizenship will never take effect given the nationwide injunctions that have issued here.' 'The most important message we want to convey is: expecting parents should know their babies remain protected – and that children born in the U.S. continue to be U.S. citizens regardless of their parents' immigration status,' said Conchita Cruz, the co-executive director of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, which also sued Trump over the executive order, told CNN. The guidance speaks to some of the practical concerns raised by Supreme Court justices during oral arguments in the case on birthright May, including those who ultimately sided with Trump on the issue of nationwide injunctions. Immigrant rights groups had argued that Trump's order would require every parent of a newborn child – including US citizens – to demonstrate their immigration status before obtaining a passport for their child. The memos point to changes in how parents would have to document their own citizenship status in the hospital after having a child. For decades, parents have been able to apply for a Social Security number as part of the hospital birth registration process. The Social Security Administration memo lays out a different process in which the agency would first attempt to establish parents' immigration status automatically. If that didn't work, parents would have to potentially take additional steps to verify their citizenship and obtain a Social Security number for their child. Questions about the practical implications of Trump's order prompted a key exchange between the administration's lawyer and Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Supreme Court's oral arguments earlier this year. 'On the day after it goes into effect – this is just a very practical question, how it's going to work – what do hospitals do with a newborn, what do states do with a newborn?' Kavanaugh, a conservative who sided with Trump on the issue of nationwide injunctions, asked the lawyer for the Trump administration. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued they wouldn't do anything different because, he said, it is federal officials who will determine whether to accept birth documents. 'How are they going to know that?' Kavanaugh pressed. 'The federal officials will have to figure that out essentially,' Sauer responded. 'How?' Kavanaugh continued. Sauer said that officials could require parents to demonstrate their citizenship. 'For all the newborns?' a skeptical Kavanaugh asked. 'Is that how it's going to work?' 'Again, we don't know,' Sauer said, 'because the agencies were never given the opportunity to formulate the guidance.' Kavanaugh sided with his fellow Supreme Court conservatives to rule in Trump's favor last month.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Harvard in talks with Trump admin to pay up to $500M over campus antisemitism
Harvard University could pay as much as $500M in a deal with the Trump administration following months of tense back-and-forths over billions in stripped federal funding and research grants, two sources familiar with the negotiations told The Post. Last week, Trump said the Ivy League school 'wants to settle' after seeing Columbia's funding restored in exchange for paying a $200 million fine to settle civil rights violations. The administration had clawed back $2.6 billion in federal funding earlier this year, saying the university had discriminated against Jewish faculty, students and staff by not protecting them from antisemitism on campus. The specific terms in the ongoing negotiations were not immediately made clear by either side, nor was a precise timeline given. However Trump said in June that the government could forge a deal with Harvard 'over the next week or so.' Harvard is still pursuing its lawsuit against the administration over the loss of federal research funds, which it claims could lead to damaged careers and the shuttering of labs on the Cambridge, Massachusetts campus. However Education Secretary Linda McMahon both expressed confidence of a future settlement. 'We're hoping that Harvard will come to the table,' McMahon told NewsNation's 'Morning in America' on Thursday. 'We're already seeing other universities that are taking these measures before investigation or before our coming in to talk to them.' This is a developing story. Please check back for more information.
