‘The epitome of slow fashion': Tweed's youthful makeover in Scotland
MacLeod became a weaver two years ago, joining residents on the islands of Lewis and Harris, off Scotland's north-west coast, in helping to rejuvenate the tweed industry after a significant period of decline.
'It's a good thing to keep the tradition going.'
Tweed is a symbol of Scottish heritage and has 'always been part of the culture' on the Outer Hebrides, added MacLeod, who hails from the island of Scalpay, which is connected to Harris by a bridge.
It is now 'an attractive sector to be in', he said.
He left the Hebrides for seven years to work in banking, but the pull of his roots proved too strong.
During the day, MacLeod now works for a small local cosmetics company. In the evenings, he puts on a podcast and patiently begins to weave.
Only the steady hum of his machine disturbs the calm of the old stone barn.
Harris Tweed, traditionally made from 100 percent wool, is the only fabric protected by a 1993 Act of Parliament.
It must be 'handwoven by the islanders at their homes in the Outer Hebrides, finished in the Outer Hebrides, and made from pure new wool dyed and spun in the Outer Hebrides'.
The weaver spoke of his 'satisfaction' once the tweed is finished.
The tweed, once associated with the British aristocracy, goes to the spinning mill for a quality control check, where the slightest flaw is flagged up.
Finally, it receives the precious 'Harris Tweed' stamp – a globe topped with a cross – certifying the fabric's provenance and authenticity, issued by the Harris Tweed Authority (HTA).
The tweed then leaves the island for procurement by discerning companies abroad, including luxury brands such as Christian Dior, Chanel, and Gucci.
Several trainer brands, such as Nike, New Balance, and Converse, have also used it for limited edition products.
The traditional staples are jackets, caps, and bags, but the fabric can also be used for furniture.
There are 140 weavers, according to the HTA, which launched a recruitment campaign in 2023 and offered workshops to learn the trade following a wave of retirements.
This know-how, often passed down from generation to generation, is now being nurtured by a different profile of weaver.
'It's nice to see younger people coming in,' said Kelly MacDonald, director of operations at the HTA.
'When I joined the industry 22 years ago, there was a severe period of decline. I was wondering: 'Is there going to be an industry any more?''
But the industry is now enjoying a 'resurgence' and 'significant growth', with more than 580,000 metres of tweed produced in 2024.
'We are always looking at new markets,' she said, and tweed is now exported to South Korea, Japan, Germany, France and other countries.
It is no longer dependent on the US market, as it once was, and should be largely shielded from the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.
Tweed has 'modernised', said Cameron MacArthur, who works at Carloway Mill, one of the three spinning mills in the west of the Isle of Lewis.
He is only 29, but has already worked there for 12 years.
The mill, with its large machines, looks as if it has not changed for decades. But MacArthur has seen it evolve to embrace a younger workforce and newer fabrics, meaning it is no longer just the ultra-classic Prince of Wales checks or dark colours that are on offer.
'Nowadays, we're allowed to make up our own colours … and we're just doing different things with it, modernising it, making it brighter,' he said, showing off rolls of turquoise blue and fuchsia pink.
'We're so busy … it never used to be like that,' he said, adding that he was 'proud' to be working with the local product.
MacDonald said tweed was an antidote to environmentally unfriendly 'fast fashion'.
'How nice to own a product where you can actually look on a map to a tiny island and say, 'That's where my jacket was made.' That's so rare now, and I think people really engaged with that,' he said.
'Every stage of the production has to happen here, but from start to finish, it is a really long process. We are the epitome of slow fashion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
31-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Trump sells the EU more energy and protection, muscling Russia out
The United States has sought to formally position itself as Europe's biggest seller of protection and energy security following a $750bn trade deal on Sunday. The deal, clinched by US President Donald Trump and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, imposes a 15 percent tariff on European pharmaceutical, automobile and semiconductor exports to the US, to balance a European trade surplus, von der Leyen said. Tariffs of 50 percent, which Trump previously imposed on European aluminium and steel, will also remain, while the European Union will not impose any reciprocal tariffs. The bloc also committed to spending $250bn a year on US energy exports over and above present levels until 2027, and 'hundreds of billions of dollars' on US weapons. The deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, called the deal 'anti-Russian' since it appeared to seize what was, before the Ukraine war, Russia's biggest energy market. The next day, Trump shortened a 50-day deadline he had issued to Russian President Vladimir Putin on July 14 to reach a ceasefire in Ukraine. 'I'm going to make a new deadline of about … 10 or 12 days from today,' Trump told reporters, pulling the deadline back from September 2 to about August 9. A third round of talks between Russia and Ukraine last week produced no ceasefire, only another exchange of prisoners of war. For the first time, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy instructed his negotiators to seek the return of Ukrainian children Russia has abducted from occupied territories since the start of the war. Kremlin newswire TASS reported that civilians would also be exchanged, without elaborating. Weapons for Ukraine Although Trump has not said what he will do when his deadline for a ceasefire agreement expires, it represents an about-turn on his position in February, when he considered Ukraine the main obstacle to peace. 'President Zelenskyy is not ready for peace if America is involved,' he wrote then on his Truth Social account, 'because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations.' Zelenskyy welcomed the shorter deadline, calling it 'an extremely significant statement'. 'Every night there are strikes, constant Russian attempts to hurt Ukraine,' Zelenskyy said. Russia has pounded Ukraine's cities with combined drone and missile strikes every night for the past week. Ukraine shot down or electronically suppressed 791 out of 891 drones Russia launched between July 23 and 29, almost 90 percent, but fewer than half the missiles – just 20 out of 42. That difference in ratio underscores Ukraine's difficulty in intercepting ballistic missiles, against which only US-made Patriot interceptor missiles are effective. Ukraine's European allies have been signing onto a framework agreement reached this month between the US and Germany, whereby allies donating Patriot systems to Ukraine are given priority placement in purchasing new ones. Lithuania said it was ready to help supply $35m in Patriot systems to Ukraine, following Germany, Norway, Denmark and Sweden. Germany's defence minister, Boris Pistorius, said three Patriot batteries had been sent to Ukraine. In April, Zelenskyy said he was seeking 10 batteries. Zelenskyy said he had signed $72m in new state contracts for interceptor drones last week, which are among its most effective weapons against Russia's kamikaze and spy drones. 'A plan has been approved to reach the amount of 500 to 1,000 interceptors [drones] per day,' he said. The US also approved foreign military sales of Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Hawk air defence systems to Ukraine on Thursday. Russia makes gains as Zelenskyy faces protests Russia appeared unfazed by these moves, driving onwards to seize a series of Ukrainian villages during the week, with the worst fighting happening around Pokrovsk, in Ukraine's east. The Russian Ministry of Defence said its troops had captured Varachino in Sumy on July 23, and probably seized Novoekonomichne in Donetsk, northeast of Pokrovsk, on Friday. Zeleni Gai fell on Saturday, and Boykovka and Belgiyka on Monday, all in Donetsk. On Tuesday, Russia seized Novoukrainka and Temirovka in Zaporizhia. A Russian military expert told TASS that it now had control of a 5km section of border with Russia. Zelenskyy faced his first wartime protests during the past week, after stripping the country's top anti-corruption authorities of their independence. The move followed an attempt by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) to indict members of the State Security Service (SBU) for corruption. Zelenskyy saw this as a Russian attempt to undermine one of Ukraine's most effective military services. The SBU has launched a series of successful long-range strikes inside Russia, targeting energy infrastructure and weapons factories. Perhaps its most famous operation was Operation Spiderweb, which destroyed dozens of Russian long-range bombers on the ground in June. However, Zelenskyy's move offended not only Ukrainians, who protested. The EU temporarily froze 1.7 billion euros in aid to Ukraine, and von der Leyen advised Zelenskyy to 'preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law'. On July 24, Zelenskyy said he had signed new legislation that would 'ensure the strength of the rule of law system, and there will be no Russian influence or interference in the activities of law enforcement'. NABU and SAPO were involved in drafting the new bill, and the EU backed it. 'We welcome the Ukrainian government's decision to act,' said a spokesperson for Brussels. On Sunday, Zelenskyy said he had increased the SBU's funding. Its personnel limit was raised from 31,000 to 41,000, with up to a quarter of that number in its Special Operations Centre. SBU operations appeared to have continued unabated. Ukraine's drones intercepted Russia said it shot down 105 Ukrainian drones overnight on Friday. The drones appeared to have targeted railway power lines and regional airports, and succeeded in causing rail service delays and temporary airport shutdowns in southwest Russia and the Caucasus – Vladikavkaz, Grozny, Magas, Mineralnye Vody, Nalchik, Stavropol, Sochi and Tambov. The governor of the Leningrad region said at least 10 Ukrainian drones were downed near the city on Sunday. Pulkovo airport was closed during the attack, and the city's annual Navy Day parade was cancelled, but a navy drill went ahead, watched by Putin on television. On Monday, pro-Ukrainian hackers disabled the computers of Aeroflot, the state airline, grounding more than 50 round-trip flights and bringing Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport to a standstill.
Al Jazeera
29-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Now that countries have capitulated on tariffs, Trump will be back for more
Governments have been falling over one another to offer concessions to United States President Donald Trump as his August 1 tariff deadline looms. On Sunday, the US president scored his biggest victory to date, as European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen, like the leader of a vassal state paying homage to an emperor, travelled to Trump's private golf course in Scotland to offer him tribute. It came in the form of an entirely one-sided tariff pact in which Brussels accepted a huge tariff hike and pledged to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on US fossil fuels and military products. The pact has changed the balance between two of the largest economic powers in the world. The EU has simply rolled over without a fight. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou described it as a 'dark day' for the union, while a European diplomat bemoaned by saying 'those who don't hang together get hanged separately.' The economic impact on the rest of the world is likely to be worse still. Trump has declared economic war on friends and foes alike. Many countries are facing higher tariffs than the EU and are less capable of defending themselves. By giving in, Brussels has made it harder for other countries to stand firm. A 40 percent tariff on Laos or 36 percent on Cambodia, for example, will be devastating to the export industries which US corporations encouraged them to build in recent decades. And without a united front, other countries are reluctantly coming to the table. Last week, Trump announced a deal with the Philippines for 19 percent tariffs on all goods exported to the US and no tariffs on imported US goods; it was unclear if Manilla had fully agreed to the arrangement before the US president made it public. Indonesia's deal is even worse, with the country forced to give up controls on its critical mineral exports and aspects of its emerging digital sector – both of which are critical to its economic development. For Brazil, US demands go beyond the economic realm, with Washington going as far as trying to interfere in the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro. While the provisions of different trade deals vary, they all follow the same strategy: Bullying governments to change their rules and regulations in favour of US corporate interests, especially those of oligarchs who surround the president. Trump's trade negotiations style might be highly erratic, but his is a clear-cut end goal: To upend the world economic system, replacing rules which were already unfair with the absolute dominance of the biggest bully. The immediate impact of this restructuring will be bad for the countries that submit to it, but this won't be the end of the story. By giving Trump what he wants, they have strengthened his hand, and he will be back for more. Already, the EU has little clarity around a range of additional tariffs the US president might bring in and how they will affect the 'deal' that's been made. Canada ditched its digital services tax on Big Tech to get a deal, only to be hit by higher tariffs. The Philippines now faces a higher tariff than it did in April, despite making concessions. And the UK thought it had a deal on steel, only to discover it didn't, really. There's no fairness in any of this. The only way out is to stand up to Trump; he does not respect weakness. As a minimum, for countries that have signed a deal, that means implementing as little as they can. Governments that can retaliate should do so. That does not necessarily mean matching tariff for tariff, a policy which could inflict serious self-harm, but rather using the tools that show their strength best. The EU has ample power to challenge the US services trade, and should have retaliated by limiting US corporate access to, for example, government contracts, financial markets and intellectual property protection. In failing to take such action, the EU showed a profound misunderstanding of the moment we're in. Von der Leyen seems to think Trump is a temporary anomaly who can be contained while we wait for a resumption of business as usual in four years. But in Europe and the US, the public has had enough of a corporate-dominated global economy. There's no return to that world. Retaliatory policies like the ones mentioned above can not only maximise the pain directed at Trump's oligarchic friends, but they can also help unwind the power of the monopolies which are at the heart of our deeply unfair, unsustainable economy. This last point is important. Because if we want Trump gone, as millions of Americans do, we will not get there by handing him unnecessary victories. Trump won power by building a bridge between those angry at a corporate-dominated economy and the corporate barons themselves. It was an impressive feat. But the alliance will only last as long as he's winning. The question now is how governments can best protect their economies long-term, and that must come through regaining sovereignty, not handing it over to the bully in the White House. What's more, such action can show Trump for the corporate lobbyist he really is and lay a path to his eventual downfall. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
28-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Did the EU capitulate to Donald Trump's tariff threats?
Trade agreement announced in Scotland gets mixed reaction in Europe. The United States and European Union say they have struck a trade deal. It will impose 15 percent tariffs for the EU but not the US, and there are pledges for huge US energy and weapons contracts. EU supporters say it averts a trade war. Critics say it is a capitulation. So, who is the winner? Presenter: James Bays Guests: David McWilliams – economist Alan Tonelson – US economic policy analyst Mujtaba Rahman – managing director for Europe at Eurasia Group
