Birmingham council faces legal action over decision to close adult day centres
An application for a judicial review has been brought in the names of Robert Mason, 63, and Jenny Gilbert, 50, who attend day centres for adults with physical and learning disabilities in the city.
The legal challenge argues there was an overreach by the commissioners, in breach of the Local Government Act, when they refused to allow three separate applications by elected council members to 'call in' a cabinet decision to close four day centres for further scrutiny.
James Cross, acting on behalf of Mason, his uncle, who attended a day centre in Harborne for 45 years, said the commissioner had 'made a mockery of local government' by overriding the established process and preventing full scrutiny of the closures.
'From our point of view, the local democratic process was removed because of their direct intervention,' said Cross. 'Scrutiny is essential for local democracy, especially when a cabinet decision is made by 12 people out of 101 councillors.'
After the council declared itself effectively bankrupt in 2023, the government appointed a team of six commissioners to oversee its daily running for up to five years, until October 2028. Collectively they have been paid nearly £2m in fees and expenses by the council since being appointed.
They are led by Max Caller, nicknamed 'Max the Axe' for his tough approach to pushing through cuts at cash-strapped local authorities.
There was an outcry in March when four of the nine council-run adult day centres in the city were closed as part of swingeing budget cuts, with the MP for Birmingham Edgbaston, Preet Kaur Gill, saying the commissioners had 'shut down democratic scrutiny' by refusing the call-in requests.
Caller said there was 'pre-decision scrutiny' over the day centre closures, and it would have cost the council £100,000 a month to delay.
Cross said: 'I put forward a proposal for Harborne day centre where it would be turned into a community hub, so that outside of the day centre hours it could be used to generate income. They just didn't want to know.
'There's no innovative thinking, it's just straightforward, yes, we'll cut that. But it's short-term gain in terms of finance, for long-term pain, because you're just kicking the situation further down the road.'
A court hearing on 21 July will determine whether the judicial review can go ahead.
With increasing numbers of councils struggling financially, there are now commissioners in place at six other local authorities: Croydon, Tower Hamlets, Nottingham, Slough, Woking and Thurrock.
Jonathan Carr-West, the chief executive of the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU), said the commissioner model was 'very much the favoured mechanism of the last government and is being continued by this government' to intervene in struggling councils.
'When people say that it takes away local democratic control, that's true, that's explicitly what it does because, in a way, the point is to say: we're going to send in people who don't have to worry about being elected and can make the really tough decisions,' he said.
'In Birmingham, where they've entirely defunded cultural services, where they've cut children's services by a further 25%, local politicians just wouldn't be able to make those tough choices. [Commissioners] are not accountable or invested in the long term.'
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
He said commissioners 'very much operate within a certain managerial paradigm, and they're not intended to be there to innovate'. Analysis by the Local Government Chronicle last year found that almost 70% of commissioners sent into struggling councils were male and more than a quarter had not worked in local government for four years or more.
Carr-West said the use of commissioners was not a 'scalable' solution to the problems facing councils. 'It feels like a sticking plaster approach, and possibly one that stores up problems for the future, rather than actually a real transformation process,' he said.
'We still have a third of councils across the country saying: 'If nothing changes in the way we're funded, we will go bust within the next five years'.
'Well, you can send Max Caller to two or three councils, but you can't send him to a third of the councils in the country. It can't be a system-wide approach to rescuing local government.'
In June, the local government minister, Jim McMahon, said he was minded to send commissioners to run Croydon council as its finances were 'deteriorating rapidly'.
The move led to a backlash among councillors, with the executive mayor, Jason Perry, saying 'unelected Labour commissioners could override local democratic decisions, including forcing tax hikes and cuts'.
The commissioners in Birmingham have been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
MP resigns as trade envoy over northern Cyprus visit
A Labour MP has resigned as the UK's trade envoy to Turkey amid controversy over a visit to Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus. A government spokesman told the BBC Afzal Khan, who represents Manchester Rusholme, had stepped down from his position on Friday. Mr Khan said the trip to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which is not recognised by the UK Government, was to visit his nephew and to receive an honorary degree. He said he had paid for the trip himself. Turkish troops have occupied the northern section of the Mediterranean island since 1974. Shadow foreign minister Wendy Morton told the BBC that she welcomed Mr Khan's resignation, but said Sir Keir Starmer should have sacked him earlier.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘I'm proud to have made this stand': over-60s arrested at Palestine Action ban protest explain their decision
In recent weeks, hundreds of people have been arrested for taking part in demonstrations organised by the campaign group Defend Our Juries. Their alleged crime is calling for an end to the ban against Palestine Action, which has been proscribed as a terrorist organisation by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary. One striking detail among those detained is their age. Half of those arrested at the largest protest yet, in Parliament Square in London on Saturday, were 60 or older. Some said they had taken part to give a voice to younger people who have more to lose by breaking the law, some simply felt they must challenge the government's stance. The Guardian has spoken to some of these protesters. 'The government is looking [like] such idiots,' said Deborah Hinton, a former magistrate. 'I mean when people say, 'What's your status?', and then I say, 'Well, I'm on bail for terrorism', they look at me as if the situation is farcical. I think they [ministers] are making themselves look an absolute joke.' Hinton was arrested at a 19 July demonstration in Cornwall arranged by Defend Our Juries (DOJ). A former member of the Parole Board, she was awarded an OBE in 1994 for services to the community. She said she was already involved with DOJ because she was worried about the erosion of free speech and the right to protest, but the banning of Palestine Action was a 'red line'. She said: 'In my view, Palestine Action is not a terrorist organisation. I lived through the IRA and the bombing in London when you had to leave shops and leave museums because bombs might go off any minute. Frankly, that is what a terrorist organisation is. This is not a terrorist organisation, it's a direct action organisation, like the suffragists, like the Greenham Common women, like many other organisations. 'If people do direct action and they cause criminal damage, then you arrest the people, you charge them [under existing laws], and that's that.' As well as free speech concerns, her longstanding support for the Palestinian cause led her to risk arrest. 'What's going on in Gaza has gone beyond anything that one could possibly have imagined,' said Hinton. 'I can't even think about it, it's too awful.' Hinton said she was shaking as the officers moved down the line of placard holders arresting each person as they went. An officer then told her that if she put down her placard she could leave without further action. 'I knew I couldn't do that, but it was such a temptation because it was so terrifying,' said Hinton. 'I've been a very law-abiding citizen and very respectful of authority all my life but I knew I had to do this and it was my duty to do this.' Hinton said it was right that her generation were putting themselves on the frontline. 'Young people are going to jeopardise their careers,' she said. 'They won't get a visa to go to the [United] States. They won't get a visa to go to most other countries because they'll have terrorism on their record. 'People like me, who are elderly, we can afford it. I'm very sorry not to go and be able to visit my niece in America but it's not the end of the world. Young people shouldn't be doing this, we should be doing this. We should be taking the responsibility.' John McGowan, a Catholic priest, said that when Yvette Cooper was in opposition he felt she 'spoke for me'. But asked what he would say to the home secretary now, he replied: 'For goodness sake, don't call these people terrorists because they're not terrorists. 'The focus shouldn't be on Palestine Action. The focus should be on what the government isn't doing for the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.' McGowan, a Carmelite and parish priest of St Joseph's in Chalfont St Peter, was one of 532 people arrested at the demonstration in Parliament Square on 9 August, the largest against the proscription of the organisation to date. He said he had written in his diary a week or two before the protest that he would like to be arrested in support of the cause, so when the demonstration was announced it was the opportunity he was looking for. He attended wearing his Roman collar, identifying himself as a priest, and met a Baptist minister there who was also arrested. After being detained, McGowan was placed in a police van where there were two female officers that he said were 'polite, and almost apologetic. I sat down, and I felt very calm and almost serene.' When the van drove away, he said people cheered in support of him and the two other protesters in the vehicle, banging on the van and making the heart sign to them. 'It was a strain, but exhilarating as well. It was an extraordinary day, I've never had a day like it in my life but I'm glad I did it. In my conscience, I was clear it was the right thing to do so I take that as my guiding light. If I get a criminal record, I don't care.' He said he was not expecting any recriminations from the Catholic church and had experienced a moving response from his congregation. 'I was in two minds whether to tell the people in my church what I'd done but I'm the kind of person that likes to share these things and so I did,' he said. 'I was really nervous but at the end of mass I said: 'Look, I went to the demonstration, I got arrested' and they applauded me. I was almost in tears.' A former British army colonel and ex-military attache, Chris Romberg cut an unlikely terrorism suspect even among hundreds of other retirees arrested in Parliament Square in relation to Palestine Action. Yet it is this background – along with the fact that his father and grandparents fled Nazi Germany in 1938 – that motivated him to join the protest, leading to his arrest under the Terrorism Act. 'This year saw the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp by British forces. What they found shocked the British people,' said Romberg, who himself saw action in the Falklands war with the commando regiment and was mentioned in dispatches. 'What we are seeing now in Gaza, 80 years on, is equally shocking. As a former officer in the British army, I am horrified that the government is misusing our armed forces to be complicit in the genocide rather than to end it.' Claims by Cooper that those protesting 'don't know the full nature' of Palestine Action have also struck a nerve. 'The impression I get is that people are now extremely distrustful of the government,' said Romberg, who left the army in 2007. 'That the home secretary should speak like that and say that she has information but can't tell us what it is reminds me of the Monty Python sketch about the Piranha brothers, where there is a man who had his head nailed to a coffee table because he had broken an unwritten law but they wouldn't tell him what it was.' The former diplomat's last two appointments were as defence attache at the British embassies in Jordan and Egypt, and he speaks knowledgeably about the region. Since leaving the army, he became active in supporting the Palestinian cause. Recently, he joined the group Holocaust Survivors and Descendants against the Gaza Genocide, other members of which stood together under a banner during the protest on Saturday. It was the first time that he has been arrested in his life. Before taking part, he reflected a lot on what he was about to do. 'It wasn't a decision I took lightly and the organisers, Defend Our Juries, made absolutely sure that everybody realised the implications of what they were doing, and yet people felt strongly enough that they were able and were prepared to take that risk.' Richard Whitmore-Jones readily admits he 'doesn't particularly approve' of the methods deployed by Palestine Action, the direct action group proscribed last month. 'I was brought up to respect property,' he said. Yet in his next breath, the retired company director makes an argument few might expect from a former executive at the multinational beverage company Diageo. 'I was certainly in horror of vandalism but I have to admit that people have not been listened to on Gaza. There have been enormous marches in London and they have not been reported accurately or were kept off the front pages. 'Palestine Action's methods sit very uneasily with me. It's difficult to accept that vandalism is the only way to go. However, I feel we have to do something and I support their stand against genocide.' Whitmore-Jones, from East Sussex, was arrested on Saturday having also been previously arrested at another protest organised by Defend Our Juries, returning with the same placard stating: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' He has been bailed to appear at a police station in October. As for the decision to put himself in line for arrest not once but twice, Whitmore-Jones cites being part of a generation whose parents fought fascism in the second world war, which in his own case included an RAF father who became a prisoner of the Japanese. 'I am astonished that we now have a government that has been supporting exactly the sort of actions, in Gaza, which Britain sought to prevent 80 years ago. My father's sacrifice, which he saw as being to prevent other peoples from being invaded and treated badly, appears to be contrary to what our government is doing,' he said. For much of his working life, Whitmore-Jones was with Diageo, rising to become a property manager and office services manager at the company, retiring in 2003 shortly after it was taken over. He 'came late' to activism for Gaza, going on his first ever march when he was 72. 'I felt better for doing something, though I realised I was doing very little really,' he said, before the proscription of Palestine Action changed everything again for him. He shrugs off the suggestion that he was now making a sacrifice by facing a potential terrorism conviction and the life-changing limitations that come with it, insisting: 'Look, I'm 74, I don't have a mortgage to get, I don't have a job. I will be a little bit upset about not being allowed to go to America, but I really will live with that. It's the young people that are brave.' As for his family's views of what he is doing, Whitmore-Jones said: 'It's gone from amusement to absolute firm support and I'm very pleased with the attitude of my children.' Family, in a way, is also at the heart of his motivation for seeking to oppose Israel's actions in Gaza: 'This is about children the age of my grandchildren having their limbs and their lives taken away.' After leading a 'wonderful, full life', the TV screenwriter Trevelyan Evans, who has written for a number of BBC sitcoms, is unafraid of being called a terrorist in the courts. 'I'm very proud to have made this stand, whether I'm convicted or not,' he said. He was among the 532 people, many of them 'old fogies', arrested last Saturday. 'People in my demographic are standing up for those people who can't risk having a conviction on their records for a terrorism offence,' he said. He felt compelled to take part in the protest to stand up for 'the people of Gaza and Palestine who are being massacred' and to oppose the group's proscription, which he called an 'obviously ridiculous judicial overreach on behalf of the government'. 'They just slapped this ban on them in order to suppress opposition,' he added. Before the demonstration began last weekend, he jokingly said he got his 'materials for terrorism' ready on the green in Parliament Square. His tools of choice? A pen and piece of paper. 'I never realised being a terrorist could be so much fun,' he said. 'Being out in the open air and meeting new people in a nice central location … it was a convivial atmosphere.' After the silent portion of the protest ended, Evans said people were 'handing out sandwiches and sun cream' until an officer with 'seven of his friends came round' and told him he was being arrested. They then started to carry him out of the square. 'I hadn't been carried around like that since I was at school,' he said. 'The policeman said: 'You're a bit heavy.' He had to call one of his friends over to help carry me. I thought that was a bit of a liberty.' After this, he was placed in a police van, which he had all to himself. 'I think, on behalf of the Metropolitan police, it was quite generous.' Evans is on bail awaiting charge. He said the government's decision to ban Palestine Action represented a 'kind of creeping authoritarianism [which is] eventually going to hit a wall, because it's inherently contradictory'. 'If you extend draconian laws, eventually you're going to look pretty stupid. I can see that the government laid itself a trap and walked straight into it.'
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If Labour gives £2.3bn of our cash to retired British Coal staff, it has truly lost the plot
How big is the black hole in Britain's public finances? The respected think tank National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr) has just forecast a £50bn gap, which the Chancellor will be forced to plug by lower spending or higher taxes. Meanwhile, as Rachel Reeves tries to balance the books by saving every penny, her deputy, Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, casually told Parliament in July that he is 'considering proposals' to hand out £2.3bn of taxpayers' money to the 40,000 members of the British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme (BCSSS). He added: 'I will be looking at those issues in more detail over the summer, and I hope to say more in the autumn.' What is this possible £2.3bn giveaway? The BCSSS, for above-ground managers, and its sister scheme, the Mineworkers' Pension Scheme (MPS), for those below ground digging out coal, were set up after the coal industry was nationalised in 1947, at a time when it employed 700,000 people. By privatisation in 1994, British Coal had shrunk drastically to just 13,000 staff. The BCSSS and MPS became stand-alone trusts, with the Government guaranteeing all pension entitlements, including annual inflation increases. In return, the Government receives half of any 'surplus' calculated at the three-yearly actuarial valuations, with the other half used to increase pensions. The average BCSSS pension of £15,000 a year is over twice the average MPS pension of £7,000, reflecting much higher pay for British Coal managers compared to the miners. The taxpayers' share of surpluses was also calculated at privatisation, which remained in both schemes as a reserve against poor investment performance. The £2.3bn the Government is now 'considering' giving to BCSSS members is the taxpayers' share of surpluses at privatisation, which under the BCSSS rules will be paid back to the Government in 2033 – in only eight years' time. The BCSSS trustees' argument for a £2.3bn giveaway is that last October, as revealed by Telegraph Money, the Government gave £1.5bn of taxpayers' money to the 112,000 MPS members, boosting their annual pensions by 32pc. This was all part of the rhetoric to end what Labour called an 'historic injustice' and fulfilled Labour's election manifesto pledge, repeated by Ed Miliband at the 2024 Labour Party conference. The BCSSS Trustees' argument simply rests on ' the similarities between MPS and BCSSS'. But the £1.5bn given away to MPS members didn't 'belong' to them in the first place. Just like the BCSSS' £2.3bn, it was the Government's share of surpluses at privatisation. Under the MPS rules it would have been paid back to the Government in 2029. Since privatisation in 1994, all BCSSS and MPS members have received every last penny of the pensions promised to them, including inflation increases. More than that, under the rules set up at privatisation, half of valuation surpluses have been given to members as 'bonus' pensions. To add insult to injury, after receiving the £1.5bn, the MPS trustees are now lobbying for all of any future surpluses to go to members, rather than half going to the Government. And handing over the £2.3bn of taxpayer money to the BCSSS members would not be in exchange for giving up the Government guarantee. If that money is to be handed over, it should at least be on the understanding that BCSSS pensions become a defined contribution plan, entirely dependent on the performance of scheme assets like other private sector schemes. But the trustees say they would 'not consider giving up the guarantee in exchange for the investment reserve… The guarantee does not form part of our discussions with the Government. It will remain in place, whatever decision the Government makes'. This would be an extraordinary case of: 'heads BCSSS members win, tails taxpayers lose'. As guarantor, the Government must step in to make payments if there is a future deficit. Once money is used to increase pensions the only way any future deficit to be plugged is for taxpayers to write a cheque. And because 85pc of BCSSS and MPS assets are in 'risky', that is, not index-linked bonds to match liabilities, any current surplus could easily become a deficit. The Government, and specifically Mr Miliband, still have some serious explaining to do about the £1.5bn already handed over to MPS. If Labour hands over another £2.3bn of taxpayers' money – £3.8bn in all – then surely this government will lose any shred of fiscal credibility left. Rachel Reeves should tell Darren Jones, in plain language, to stop 'considering' this proposal and say a polite 'no' to the BCSSS trustees, and the Labour MPs pushing it.
