logo
Venezuela Is Holding an Election. In Another Country's Land.

Venezuela Is Holding an Election. In Another Country's Land.

New York Times25-05-2025

On Sunday, Venezuela plans to hold an election for governor and legislators to represent Essequibo — a sparsely populated, oil-rich territory.
But there's one problem. Essequibo is internationally recognized as part of neighboring Guyana, not Venezuela.
Most countries and the 125,000 people who live in Essequibo all agree: It belongs to Guyana, a country of about 800,000, not Venezuela, a nation of roughly 28 million.
In staging legislative and regional elections on Sunday, including in Essequibo, Venezuela's autocratic president, Nicolás Maduro, analysts say, is seeking to legitimize his rule abroad and also within his deeply dissatisfied nation, where the military's loyalty is reportedly fraying.
Last year Mr. Maduro declared victory in a presidential election but did not provide any evidence to support his claim. Instead, tallies collected by election monitors showed that his opponent had won in a landslide. Many countries, including the United States, did not recognize Mr. Maduro as the winner.
Of particular concern to Venezuela's government, according to analysts, were vote counts the opposition collected from military barracks showing that a large portion of the armed forces voted against Mr. Maduro.
Mr. Maduro is using the vote in Essequibo to stir nationalistic sentiment and build support for his government, said Benigno Alarcón, the director of a research center at Andrés Bello Catholic University in Caracas, which conducts voter surveys.
Claims to the Essequibo region are deeply ingrained among many Venezuelans who believe the land was historically theirs under Spanish colonial rule and do not consider a 19th-century agreement that ceded the area to Guyana as legitimate.
The Essequibo election 'is a way of trying to unify the people and especially the armed forces against a common enemy,' Mr. Alarcón said.
But most people who live in Essequibo speak English, identify culturally as Guyanese and say they want to remain part of Guyana — the only country most have ever known. Even under Spanish rule it was considered a remote outpost. Across Guyana, shops and cars are plastered with stickers proclaiming the country's ownership of Essequibo.
In recent years, Mr. Maduro has ramped up claims to the region, which comprises about two-thirds of Guyana and includes enormous offshore oil blocks where Exxon Mobil is expanding production.
In 2023, Mr. Maduro reignited the long-running dispute by holding a referendum asking voters whether his government should pursue its claim to Essequibo. The vote was seen as an effort to help divert attention from Venezuela's political and economic crises.
The country's electoral authority said that 95 percent of voters had approved of making the claim, but observers said that turnout was actually low.
Now Mr. Maduro is again stoking a geopolitical crisis as a way to shift the domestic conversation, analysts said.
While most Venezuelans favor taking back the Essequibo, Mr. Alarcón said their trust in the government's intentions and capacity to do so was low.
'It is an issue that has been losing connection with the people, because a lot of time has passed,' he said. 'We have been discussing this for 100 years. Many people already feel that this is a very difficult issue to reverse.'
On Election Day, Venezuelans along the border region with Guyana will choose among four candidates for governor, including the governing party's candidate, Neil Villamizar, a Navy admiral. Voters will also select eight legislative representatives from the region.
It is unclear exactly how Venezuela plans to administer elections in a territory governed by a different country, and Venezuela's electoral authority has not provided clear information.
'It doesn't make any sense,' Mr. Alarcón said.
Guyana's national security minister, Robeson Benn, has said that border security was tightened and that the authorities would arrest any Guyanese person supporting the election.
The modern-day dispute over the Essequibo dates back to 1899, when a Paris tribunal determined the internationally recognized border. But many Venezuelans say the decision was null and void, because it involved a secret deal that Venezuela did not participate in.
Longstanding tensions eased under former President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, who largely abandoned the issue.
But that was before an oil boom turned Guyana, long one of South America's poorest countries, into a global energy powerhouse and made its economy one of the fastest growing in the world.
By contrast, Venezuela, which holds the world's largest oil reserves, was once buoyed by a thriving oil sector. But years of U.S. sanctions, mismanagement and infrastructural decay have left it in ruins. Unlike Mr. Chávez, Mr. Maduro must contend with a collapsed economy and widespread public discontent.
In 2020, the dispute between the two countries over Essequibo was taken up by the United Nations' top court, the International Court of Justice, where it is still pending. This month, the court ordered Venezuela to refrain from electing officials to oversee the area. But Mr. Maduro has rejected the court's jurisdiction over the issue.
In recent months, Guyana has reported several armed attacks against its soldiers along the Venezuelan border and denounced what it called an illegal incursion by a Venezuelan naval vessel into disputed waters where Exxon Mobil is developing a vast offshore oil field.
Venezuela's government has denied those reports and accused the opposition of conspiring with the United States and Guyana to topple the Maduro government.
As tensions mount, Guyana has ramped up military ties with the United States, which has a strong interest in protecting Exxon Mobil's multibillion-dollar investments in Guyana's oil reserves.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this month at a news conference in Georgetown, Guyana's capital, where he stood alongside Guyanese President Irfaan Ali, that there would be 'consequences' if Venezuela took military action against its neighbor.
'It would be a very bad day for the Venezuelan regime if they were ever to attack Guyana or attack Exxon Mobil,' Mr. Rubio said.
Yet even Venezuela's opposition has seized on the territorial claims. María Corina Machado, the most prominent opposition leader, visited the area by canoe in 2013 to advance Venezuela's claim.
It is possible that Mr. Maduro will try to negotiate some type of agreement with Guyana, said Phil Gunson, an analyst with International Crisis Group who has been based in Venezuela for more than two decades.
'It may be that what Maduro is really trying to do is to harass the Guyanese so much that they eventually decide to buy him off with some portion of the oil revenues or a portion of territory,' he said. 'And maybe Venezuela can then declare victory and the whole thing will calm down.'
In Guyana last Sunday, every boat, vehicle, home, building and fence will be plastered with Guyanese flags said Vilma De Silva, an elected official in Essequibo. Venezuela is holding its election one day before Guyana's Independence Day.
'Our region is high on the alert,' she said 'We're here and we're not giving up any mountain. We're not giving up any tree. We're not giving up any river that belongs to the Essequibo. It's ours.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Transgender troops face ‘crushing' decision as Trump ban deadline looms
Transgender troops face ‘crushing' decision as Trump ban deadline looms

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Transgender troops face ‘crushing' decision as Trump ban deadline looms

Transgender active-duty service members must decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out by Friday under the 30-day deadline announced last month by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a life-altering decision that those interviewed by The Hill said is nearly impossible to make. 'It's crushing,' said Cmdr. Emily 'Hawking' Shilling, who has served in the Navy for almost two decades. 'It's heartbreaking.' A naval aviator with 60 combat missions under her belt, Shilling oversaw a staff of about 200 people before she requested voluntary separation last month and was placed on administrative leave. In her latest fitness report, Shilling's commander described her as an 'inspiring leader' with 'boundless energy' and 'unmatched enthusiasm.' 'People excel under Hawking's leadership,' they wrote, referring to Shilling by her callsign. The report and Shilling's own experiences contradict how President Trump and administration officials have sought to frame her and other transgender troops' service. Trump's Jan. 27 executive order to boot transgender people from the military states they cannot satisfy the 'rigorous standards' needed to serve, and that allowing their participation threatens military readiness and unit cohesion, an argument long used to keep marginalized groups — including Black, gay or female Americans — from serving. A 2016 RAND Corp. study commissioned by the Pentagon found that allowing trans people to serve had no negative impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness or readiness. Shilling, who currently serves as president of SPARTA Pride, an advocacy group for transgender service members, said she is complying with the Trump administration's policy despite believing it to be unlawful and challenging it in court. She stressed that her views do not reflect those of the Department of Defense or the Navy. Shilling's lawsuit, filed in February with six other trans service members, argues that 'banning ready, willing, and able service members does not further the objectives of the United States Armed Forces.' A federal judge in Washington state, where the suit was filed, sided with the service members in a March ruling that temporarily blocked the administration from enforcing Trump's order. But after an emergency application from the Justice Department, the Supreme Court ruled in May that the Trump administration could begin enforcing its ban on trans military service. 'My oath is to the Constitution and to obey all lawful orders,' Shilling said in an interview. 'The only way that I can challenge whether or not something is lawful is through the courts, and so I actually see this as an extension of my duty, of my oath.' 'I believe this is unlawful, and in the meantime, while I challenge it, I'm going to obey the orders,' she added. 'I'm out-processing; I'm doing all my paperwork; I'm doing everything I'm being told to do, and I'm also challenging it, saying, 'I don't think that this is lawful. Courts, please make a verdict on it.' And I will honor whatever they decide.' Cmdr. Blake Dremann, another plaintiff in Shilling's lawsuit, has also begun the voluntary separation process, though he said it hasn't felt like much of a choice. He requested his separation start at the end of December, when he will hit 20 years of service and be eligible for regular retirement. 'As far as navigating anything else, it has been really just trying to figure out, 'OK, where do I want to live? What do I want to do? How am I going to handle this?'' said Dremann, a naval supply officer. 'I thought I had another 10 years to figure out what I was going to do afterwards.' Dremann recently returned to the U.S. from Guam, where he had supervised a team of sailors and junior officers repairing submarines for forward deployment on the USS Frank Cable. The assignment, he said, was part of a milestone tour that would have set him on a path to becoming a Navy captain. Under the Trump administration's new policy, 'That's been taken away from me,' he said. A member of the Navy since the early aughts, Dremann served under the Pentagon's long-standing ban on trans service members that was lifted in 2016 under former President Obama, as well as under 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' which prevented gays, lesbians and bisexuals from openly serving, Trump's 2017 trans military restrictions and now, the more stringent 2025 ban. 'This is the fourth time the military has had a policy that requires me to leave the service,' he said. 'This will probably be the one that gets me.' Dremann said he would be open to returning to the Navy once he separates if the Trump administration's policy were reversed in the near future. 'I even took my physical readiness test for the year,' he said. Others hesitated to say whether they would return. 'Unless there were specific policies put in place to prevent, like, what's going on now from happening in the future, having that being a case where let's say, everyone's offered a way back through the next administration, four to eight years later, you can run into this entire situation again,' said Abi, a member of the Air Force based in Alaska who asked that her last name be withheld over privacy and safety concerns. Her wife, Elizabeth, said she would be similarly uneasy with Abi someday returning to the military. The Trump administration's policy, she said, had betrayed their trust. Trump's 2017 policy barring transgender troops from serving made an exception for some who had already started to transition. The latest policy makes no such exception, deeming any service member with a current diagnosis, history or symptoms of gender dysphoria unfit for military service. 'To turn around and say, 'I know we said that you could do that, but now that you have, we are choosing to punish you for it.' It's like, what else could they do that with?' Elizabeth asked. With just under five years of service, Abi said there is no real incentive to opt for voluntary separation. A Pentagon memo issued in February said some trans service members could receive separation pay at double the rate of those who were involuntarily removed, but eligibility requires at least five years of continuous active-duty service. For now, Abi and Elizabeth are biding their time. They are looking to relocate, possibly to California, where Elizabeth has family, but cannot make concrete plans — including finding work — until they know when Abi will be discharged. 'It's very scary to be in such an unknown position,' Abi said. Army Reserve 2nd Lt. Nicolas Talbott said he similarly has no plans to voluntarily separate, a decision that, as a reservist, he must make by July 6. 'Most of the incentives for voluntary separation are geared toward folks who have more time and service than I do,' he said. 'So, for me personally, I'm watching to see if any new guidance or any new policies come out. But really, we're just kind of preparing to see what the involuntary separation process is going to look like.' 'I hate the verbiage being used as voluntary versus involuntary,' he added, 'because this isn't really voluntary for any of us. This is not what we wanted.' Talbott said he's hopeful the policy will again be blocked in court. Like Shilling, he is the lead plaintiff in a challenge to Trump's executive order. A district judge sided with Talbott and more than a dozen other plaintiffs in March, blocking the administration from implementing Trump's order, describing it as 'soaked in animus.' An appeals court temporarily halted the order as it weighs whether to grant a longer pause. 'I'm kind of trying to do my best to hold down the fort for everyone,' Talbott said. 'That's what I try to stay focused on. I have a job in the military, I have my civilian job as well, and things need to get done. You know, the world does not revolve around this case; the world does not revolve around me by any shape of the imagination, and I have jobs to do, and I have responsibilities, and that's what I try to stay focused on.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Watch: Colombian presidential candidate shot twice in the head
Watch: Colombian presidential candidate shot twice in the head

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Watch: Colombian presidential candidate shot twice in the head

Credit: Social media A Right-wing Colombian politician campaigning to become the country's next president is fighting for his life after being shot twice in the head and once in the leg. Miguel Uribe, 39, was standing in a park and addressing supporters in the capital, Bogota, when a gunman opened fire. He was in the middle of his address when he was shot in the head, with the sound of gunfire prompting supporters to flee in panic. Video footage showed Mr Uribe slumped against a white car, his clothes drenched in blood. The suspected gunman – who is reported to be just 15 – was arrested by a security guard at the scene. He was allegedly armed with a 9mm Glock-type pistol. Mr Uribe, a senator for the Democratic Centre party, was airlifted to hospital, where he had emergency brain surgery. Maria Claudia Tarazona, his wife, appealed to Colombians to pray for his survival. 'Miguel is currently fighting for his life. Let us ask God to guide the hands of the doctors who are treating him,' she said. The motive for the assassination attempt is not yet known. The authorities have offered a reward of three billion peso (£540,000) for information about who was behind it. Mr Uribe, a staunch critic of Gustavo Petro, the Left-wing president of Colombia, announced last year that he intended to run in next year's presidential election. His family has been touched by violence in the past. His mother, a prominent journalist, was killed in 1991 during a rescue attempt after she was kidnapped by the Medellin cartel, run at the time by Pablo Escobar, the notorious drug lord. Colombia has a long history of political violence and is home to armed guerrilla groups as well as drug-dealing cartels. President Petro condemned the shooting as 'an attack not only against his person, but also against democracy, freedom of thought, and the legitimate exercise of politics in Colombia'. Marco Rubio, the US Secretary of State, called the attack 'a direct threat to democracy'. He blamed the attack, without providing examples, on 'the violent Leftist rhetoric coming from the highest levels of the Colombian government'. 'President Petro needs to dial back the inflammatory rhetoric and protect Colombian officials,' Mr Rubio said. Mr Uribe, who has been a senator since 2022, is from a prominent political family in Colombia. One of his grandfathers was the country's president from 1978 to 1982. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Russian forces launch 49 drones and 3 missiles in overnight attack on Ukraine
Russian forces launch 49 drones and 3 missiles in overnight attack on Ukraine

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russian forces launch 49 drones and 3 missiles in overnight attack on Ukraine

On the night of 7–8 June 2025, Russian forces attacked Ukraine with 49 Shahed-type unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), including decoy drones, an Oniks anti-ship missile and two Kh-59/69 guided air missiles. Source: Ukraine's Air Force Details: The Air Force reported that 40 Shahed-type UAVs were neutralised: 22 were shot down using fire weapons, and 18 disappeared from radar. The primary targets were Kharkiv and Donetsk oblasts, with strikes recorded at five locations. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store