2 No-Brainer Retail Stocks to Buy Right Now
Investors have become nervous about the retail sector due to a host of concerns. These include the impact of tariffs on consumer spending and a potential recession.
You can see the effect on stock prices. The S&P 500 Retail Composite has lost 1.8% this year through June 18. During this time, the S&P 500 index gained 1.7%.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
That makes this a good time for investors with a long-range view to examine retail sector stocks. These two stocks head the list for those who can tune out the short-term noise.
1. Home Depot
Home Depot (NYSE: HD) generates the highest sales among home improvement retailers. Its nearly 2,350 stores produced about $160 billion in sales for the latest fiscal year, which ended on Feb. 2. Its nearest competitor, Lowe's, has roughly 1,750 stores that had about $84 billion in sales.
Home Depot's large size confers certain advantages. These include its ability to offer a wide breadth of products at attractive prices.
But its business is tied to the broad economy and housing market. People will put off major construction during difficult economic times.
With high prices for basic items making consumers cautious along with high interest rates dampening demand for projects, Home Depot's top-line growth has suffered. Fiscal first-quarter same-store sales (comps) fell 0.3% for the period ended on May 4. Management expects comps to gain a tepid 1% for the year.
The short-term sales picture doesn't look great, and tariffs add another level of uncertainty. However, people will return to buying homes, which they often remodel.
Similarly, existing homeowners will do major construction projects at some point out of necessity or desire. Once they do, it seems likely homeowners and contractors will shop and spend more at Home Depot.
The stock's price fell 1.9% over the last year through June 18, lagging the S&P 500 index's 9% gain. Home Depot's shares trade at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 24, about the same level as a year ago. However, that's lower than the S&P 500's 29 P/E multiple.
2. Target
Target (NYSE: TGT) has also seen sales affected by the same macroeconomic forces and tariff policies. These may affect short-term sales and costs even further. And the company's top line has also been hurt by boycotts following management's decision to pull back on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
The combination caused fiscal first-quarter comps to drop 3.8%. Lower traffic was responsible for 2.4 percentage points of that, and decreased spending accounted for the balance. The period ended May 3.
But management has taken steps, albeit delayed, to rectify the situation and alleviate the boycotts. This includes having discussions with various groups.
Between boycotts and economic uncertainty, it's not too surprising that management lowered its earnings expectations for the year. It currently projects adjusted earnings per share of $7 to $9, down from the $8.80 to $9.80 range management provided when Target reported fourth-quarter results. The company earned $8.86 a share in fiscal 2024.
Nonetheless, I'm not concerned about the larger economic forces hurting long-term performance. At some point, consumers will feel comfortable spending more money. When they do, they'll undoubtedly turn to Target for its differentiated and exclusive merchandise.
Patient investors can take advantage of the situation by purchasing the stock at an attractive valuation. Target's share price has dropped more than 33% in the last year. The stock's P/E has declined from 16 to 10 during this time.
Should you invest $1,000 in Home Depot right now?
Before you buy stock in Home Depot, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Home Depot wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
13 minutes ago
- National Post
Ottawa considering 'combination of approaches' to 20% military pay hike
OTTAWA — Defence Minister David McGuinty's office says it's considering a 'combination of approaches' to boosting pay for armed service members, including introducing retention bonuses for 'stress trades.' Article content 'This investment represents an almost 20 per cent increase to the overall CAF compensation envelope,' McGuinty's spokesperson Laurent de Casanove said in an email statement to The Canadian Press. Article content Article content 'The Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces are actively working on how best to implement this investment, looking at options that include a combination of approaches such as retention bonuses for stress trades, increased starting salaries for junior members, and a broad-based salary increase.' Article content Article content While McGuinty's recent public commitment to grant the Canadian Armed Forces a '20 per cent pay increase' won praise within the defence community, it has also led to confusion — and some experts are saying they want to read the fine print. Article content Military pay scales are complicated and are based on rank, profession, deployment and other conditions. There are many ways to roll out a boost in compensation. Article content Charlotte Duval-Lantoine, a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said she thinks this will not amount to an across-the-board pay hike. Article content 'What is clear to me from this statement is that they are looking at all the options,' she said. 'We're still in that big question about what it looks like because a pay raise versus specialty pay versus an adaptation of the compensation package overall — not in salary — are not the same thing.' Article content Article content She said the way the pay pledge was communicated initially was 'risky' since the details were not readily available, and that has led to confusion among military members and expectations of a blanket pay hike. Article content Article content Gary Walbourne, former ombudsman for the Department of National Defence, called McGuinty's promise 'vague at best.' Article content 'There's nothing clear in this message,' he said. 'A 20 per cent increase overall to CAF compensation envelope, what does that mean? Is it coming in benefits? … Is it going be on a cyclical basis? What's the percentage increase? Is it based on seniority, rank, merit?' Article content The former watchdog for military personnel said it sounds like the Liberal government wants to implement a pay boost quickly, but 'the mechanisms that they apply to it is going to complicate it and once the bureaucrats get their hands on it, well, I can see a slowdown coming.' Article content If CAF members don't see a 20 per cent pay bump after the minister's announcement, he said, it will be 'deja vu all over again' for military personnel who have been let down in the past by lofty promises followed by implementation that 'sucks big time.'
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
‘This is a Chaos Trade,' Says Investor About Palantir Stock
The international storm clouds have grown darker throughout 2025, with geopolitical flashpoints popping up left and right. In part due to these tensions, Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) – which touts its capabilities in the defense and security sectors – recently reached an all-time high this week. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The company has been riding a supercharged wave of growth, demonstrated in its most recent earnings report. Record revenues and a 'Who's Who' of clientele – including NATO, Qualcomm, and a slew of others – have given investors plenty of confidence in Palantir's ability to continue growing. Of course, the big (perhaps, only) caveat when it comes to Palantir is the company's inflated valuation, which is trading at an EV/EBITDA ratio north of 700x. One investor known by the pseudonym Weebler Finance thinks that the expensive Palantir is appropriate, in no small part because it could be a safe harbor during times of turmoil. 'While Palantir appears overvalued by traditional metrics, its explosive growth trajectory could justify its high multiples if geopolitical catalysts continue,' explains the investor. Weebler points to the company's Maven Smart Systems, a central component of its defense-related AI offerings. Maven has seen its usage double in less than half a year, which the investor notes is a strong indication that sovereign nations are going to increase their engagement with Palantir. 'I believe that this exponential ramp-up reflects growing institutional dependence,' adds Weebler. 'The company is uniquely positioned to actually benefit from crisis-driven demand.' Moreover, the investor notes that Palantir's products become 'deeply wired into core workflows,' meaning that replacing the company is no easy feat. Regarding its valuation, while admittedly expensive, Weebler believes that PLTR's share price can be justified if the company can achieve 75% EBITDA growth year-over-year for 2025. Pointing out that Palantir grew by 210% in 2023 and 120% in 2024, this seems like a reasonable assumption to Weebler – especially given the situation around the world. 'Palantir is a company primly suited to thrive in times of geopolitical turbulence,' concludes Weebler Finance, who rates PLTR a Buy. (To watch Weebler Finance's track record, click here) Wall Street offers a mixed picture when it comes to Palantir. With 3 Buy, 10 Hold, and 4 Sell ratings, PLTR has a consensus Hold (i.e. Neutral) rating. Its 12-month average price target of $104.27 has a downside of ~25%. (See PLTR stock forecast) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
If Canada is seeking an ideal nation-building project, it should invest in First Nations infrastructure
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak is national chief of the Assembly of First Nations. At a time of growing global uncertainty – amid trade disruptions, rising inflation, climate change and international instability – Canada is looking for ways to strengthen its economy, create good jobs and build lasting resilience. Investing in First Nations infrastructure directly supports these national priorities and represents one of our greatest collective nation-building opportunities. Every person in Canada deserves clean water to drink, reliable infrastructure to support their families and a strong foundation to build a future. Yet for far too many First Nations, these basic needs remain out of reach owing to generations of underinvestment. According to the Assembly of First Nations' report "Closing the Infrastructure Gap," an estimated $349.2-billion is needed to bring First Nations infrastructure in line with the rest of Canada by 2030. Delays would only increase the cost and limit the potential returns. And there would be significant returns. Additional research, supported by the Conference Board of Canada, shows that improving First Nations infrastructure would generate $635-billion in economic output, boost GDP by $308.9-billion, and create 330,000 jobs annually across Canada over seven years. Prime Minister Mark Carney has even acknowledged the 'potential economic opportunity' of closing the infrastructure gap. On the campaign trail, Mr. Carney argued that doing so would, on its own, have a larger positive impact on Canada's economy than the negative effects of Donald Trump's tariffs, underscoring both the urgency and the scale of this opportunity. New federal legislation would cut internal trade barriers, advance 'nation-building' projects Beyond the economic data, these investments would also mean that children could sleep safely in their own homes, enjoy clean water in every community, use reliable transportation to access high-quality healthcare and education services, and take advantage of connectivity that allows young people to fully participate in Canada's economy. This would be nation-building in the fullest sense. First Nations are not waiting. Across the country, First Nations are already leading major nation-building projects, from the Clear Sky Connections broadband project linking 63 Manitoba First Nations, to new water systems in Listuguj Mi'gmaq territory, to the Squamish Nation's Sen̓áḵw housing project in Vancouver. These projects meet urgent needs while driving growth, clean energy, and digital connectivity that benefit the entire country. They show what's possible when communities have the resources to build. But to fully close the infrastructure gap nationwide, sustained federal investment is essential. Opinion: Canada needs to attract private investment in infrastructure – and Indigenous communities hold the key As governments put forward legislative proposals to advance major infrastructure projects, proposals that come at the expense of First Nations rights are not the path forward. Any development must respect inherent and treaty rights as recognized and affirmed by the Constitution, and must reflect the Crown's duty to consult and obtain free, prior, and informed consent, as affirmed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Today marks National Indigenous Peoples Day and the four-year anniversary of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Yet instead of advancing reconciliation, Canada is pushing legislation like Bill C-5 without hearing from First Nations rights holders. At this week's AFN National Virtual Forum, leaders raised serious concerns about the bill's impact on First Nations rights. Chiefs called for that same urgency to be directed toward the infrastructure our communities actually need – homes, schools, clean water, roads and internet. Chartrand on Bill C-5: 'We do have to have consent from Indigenous rights holders' Fast-tracking development while sidelining rights-holders doesn't advance reconciliation – it undermines it. Attempts to override rights and exclude First Nations from decision-making reflect a narrow and incomplete vision of nation-building, and risk sidelining one of Canada's most transformative opportunities for shared prosperity. The path forward is not to build first and address rights later. True national interest requires full participation and consent of First Nations rights-holders from the start. Canada must prioritize sustained investments in First Nations-led infrastructure that strengthen community resilience and contribute directly to Canada's economic, climate and long-term sustainability priorities. By any measure, investments in First Nations infrastructure meet the definition of national interest. The government's own proposed framework includes priorities like economic growth, resilience and clean growth, all of which would be directly advanced by such investments. If Canada is serious about building a stronger, more secure and more prosperous future, let's start with fast-tracking the construction of new homes, modern schools and clean water systems in First Nation communities. Let's fast-track internet access, all-season roads and community infrastructure that has long been neglected. Let's work in true partnership, through full consultation, shared legislative development, and recognition that Canada's future is tied to the success of its First Peoples. That is how you build a country – by ensuring the foundations are strong for everyone. The future of Canada depends on it.
