China ramps up exports of refined fuels as margins rise
Shipments in July of middle and light distillates, which include diesel and gasoline, are forecast to reach 26.63 million barrels, or 859,000 barrels per day, data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler shows.
This figure is up from 796,000 bpd in June and the highest since the 1.06 million bpd in March 2024, the data shows.
China's refiners have substantial spare capacity to ramp up output while their unused export quotas will allow them to take advantage of rising profit margins for refined fuels, especially gasoil, the building block for diesel and jet kerosene.
The crack spread, or profit margin, for producing a barrel of 10 ppm gasoil in Singapore ended at $20.43 a barrel on Monday, up from the prior close of $21.00.
The margin is down from the 16-month high of $22.85 a barrel from July 18, but is 56% higher than the low so far this year of $13.05 on March 25.
China's gasoil exports are forecast at 6.22 million barrels in July by Kpler, the highest since June 2024 and up from just 3.56 million last month.
Data from LSEG Oil Research is slightly more bullish, with gasoil exports pegged at 6.55 million barrels for July, more than double the 3.13 million recorded for June.
China's exports of other middle distillates, such as jet kerosene, also rose in July, with Kpler estimating shipments of 9.59 million barrels, up from 8.65 million in June and the most since January.
There is also scope for China to increase shipments in coming months, as refiners still have unused export quotas.
Total export quotas granted by Beijing to refiners amount to 45 million metric tons and official customs data shows total refined product exports of 27.19 million in the first half of 2025, a decline of 9.7% from the corresponding period in 2024.
China's refiners have been increasing output, with throughput rising 8.5% in June to 15.15 million bpd, official data showed on July 15.
That was the highest daily processing rate since September 2023 and it is likely that refiners are seeking to take advantage of rising prices for refined fuels while processing crude secured when oil prices were trending lower at the start of the second quarter.
China is also shipping more gasoline, with LSEG estimating July exports of 6.7 million barrels, up from 5.7 million in June and the most since March.
The profit margin for gasoline in Singapore has not been as strong as that for diesel, ending at $7.43 a barrel on Monday, up from $7.41 at the previous close.
The margin is down from the year's high so far, of $11.83 a barrel on May 9, but is still double the low of $3.68 hit on January 21.
The current pricing for refined fuels is enough to encourage further Chinese exports in coming months.
The case may be further supported if new European Union sanctions targeting Russian fuel exports do result in a shifting of flows around the globe.
The EU is banning imports of refined products made from Russian crude, which will mainly impact refiners in India, who have been buying discounted Russian oil and exporting fuels to both Europe and Asia.
While Chinese refiners also buy Russian crude it will be easier for them to show which individual plants do not use Russian oil, and therefore can still export to Europe.
Currently hardly any Chinese refined products end up in Europe, but it becomes a possibility if Indian refiners are forced to look for new markets outside Europe, and European buyers are forced to look for new suppliers.
Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Take a deep dive into the inflation numbers and the RBA's decision not to cut rates seems inexplicable
The latest inflation figures confirm that the Reserve Bank wrongly kept interest rates steady at its meeting earlier this month as the official measure of inflation fell to 2.1%, while the monthly indicator dropped outside the RBA target band at 1.9%. The one thing you won't hear from the Reserve Bank after the release of the June quarter inflation figures is an apology. Because, to give credit to the RBA, in its May statement on monetary policy, it predicted inflation of 2.1%. That it did predict this inflation and yet still kept interest rates steady tells you something about how punishingly timid it has been. In June, not only was the official CPI at 2.1%, meaning it has now been below 3% for a year, but the core measure of inflation (the trimmed mean) fell from 2.9% to 2.7%: If the graph does not display click here Even more astonishing is that in a majority of capital cities, inflation is now below 2% – yep, below the Reserve Bank's target range: If the graph does not display click here And if you want even more confirmation of just how low inflation is at the moment, the monthly measure of inflation – which in November will take over as the official measure once a few more items are added – rose just 1.9%: If the graph does not display click here All of this is very good news for those who were struggling with rising prices in 2022 and 2023. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It is less good news for the opposition. The shadow treasurer, Ted O'Brien took to the parliament on Monday and told the treasurer that 'inflation remains too high'. If that is the case then we need to change the English language as well as economics to redefine 'high'. Even when you compare our core inflation with those in other major economies, Australia is doing well. If the graph does not display click here Core inflation is the measure that the RBA mainly focuses on because it gives a less erratic view of what is happening. What it does is top and tail (or 'trim') the 15% biggest price rises and falls. This time around, that means, for example, the trimmed inflation measure does not include fuel or lamb prices which fell the most, and at the other end of the scale it mostly ignores the jump in secondary education cost and also electricity prices which jumped 8.1% this quarter. The reason electricity jumped was the end of state-based subsidies – especially in Western Australia and Queensland. If the graph does not display click here The Bureau of Statistics notes that without these subsidies electricity prices across Australia would have risen just 0.4% in the June quarter. But even still, electricity costs on average 14% less than it would without the subsidies. So you can bet the government will be very happy it extended its scheme: If the graph does not display click here That the RBA did not cut rates earlier this month is even more inexplicable when you dig deeper into the figures. The RBA always looks at the price increase of services rather than goods, because services are more closely linked with wages (because you need workers to do the services). In the year to June service prices rose just 3.3% – that is back at the level they rose in 2011 to 2014 – a period when the RBA cut interest rates eight times: If the graph does not display click here And the level of inflation is also very broad. The prices of about two-thirds of all items counted in the CPI basket rose less than 3% – that's a very solid level: If the graph does not display click here This of course does not mean all things are hunky dory and life is a sweet basket of chocolates and strawberries. Pleasingly the prices of non-discretionary items – those things we have to buy, such as food, petrol or insurance – are now rising the slowest, but there is still a lot of catching up to do after the past four years. Since June 2022, which was about the same time the RBA began lifting rates, wages have risen 14% – well behind the 22% increase in the price of those necessities. That makes for a lot of people still feeling worse off than they were then: If the graph does not display click here But overall, the story is very good. Inflation should no longer be such a concern that the RBA holds off on cutting rates until it gets more information. But unemployment is now rising above 4%; when you combine that with inflation falling close to 2% that equals an interest cut. And even though they won't, when they do cut in August, the RBA also should apologise for making everyone wait six weeks longer than they needed to. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cars sold in Australia still use more petrol and emit more toxic fumes than advertised, new real-world testing shows
Car companies continue to sell vehicles in Australia that use much more petrol and emit more toxic fumes than advertised, despite repeated investigations identifying discrepancies in marketing. The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) on Wednesday released the latest results from its 'real-world' testing program, a four-year $14m government-funded scheme that scrutinises claims made about vehicles' fuel consumption and emissions. The country's peak motoring body said it had tested 114 popular cars, vans and utes since the program began in August 2023 and found more than 77% of these vehicles used more fuel than advertised. In its most recent study, the AAA said 25 of the 30 cars tested used more petrol than advertised, showing consumers could not rely on the fuel consumption and emissions information provided at point of sale. Eleven of the cars used 10% or more fuel on the road than they had in the manufacturers' laboratory testing which was used as the basis for advice to consumers, the AAA said. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The Hyundai Kona Hybrid recorded the greatest discrepancy – using 5.2 litres per 100km in the AAA's testing on the road, compared with its laboratory result of 3.9 litres per 100km – a difference of 33%. Hyundai declined to comment. It was followed by the Kia Stonic, which used 26% more fuel on the road; the Hyundai i30 Hybrid, which used 17%; the Toyota Fortuner, which used 16%; and the Kia Sportage Hybrid, which used 14%. Kia was contacted for comment. Toyota declined to comment. The AAA said its latest round of testing also found six of the 30 vehicles produced noxious emissions above current Australian regulatory limits, despite these same vehicle types having met those limits in lab tests. These were the Toyota Fortuner, the Suzuki Vitara, the BMW X1, the Ford Ranger, the Toyota Hi-Ace LWB and the Toyota Hi-Ace SLWB. BMW and Ford were contacted for comment. Suzuki said it was unable to respond by deadline. The AAA's managing director, Michael Bradley, said it was becoming clear carmakers continued to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing and 'too often' overstated their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance. 'Some vehicles perform as advertised, but most do not,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The AAA said its testing program will expand in scope from August when it began releasing the results of its electric vehicle testing, checking the distance they could travel on a single charge in 'real driving conditions'. Bradley said 'range anxiety' continued to be a significant barrier to the uptake of electric vehicles and that the AAA hoped its results would give Australians greater confidence in buying this type of car. The organisation said 'independent, real-world data' was becoming increasingly important, after the introduction of the federal government's national vehicle efficiency standard. Introduced by the Albanese government in its first term, the standard is designed to bring more fuel-efficient cars into the market by penalising manufacturers of high-polluting vehicles if they exceed an emissions cap. The AAA's testing scheme was put into place after a 2015 scandal involving Volkswagen, when it was found the manufacturer had misled consumers who may have deliberately bought vehicles based on incorrect claims of lower emissions. The AAA says it tests cars on roads in and around Geelong, using strict protocols to ensure fuel consumption and emissions results are repeatable and to minimise the influence of human factors such as driving style and variable traffic flows.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Disastrous moment Australia's first rocket launch goes horribly wrong
Australia, we have lift-off. An Australian-made rocket has been launched from home soil for the first time, only to crash moments later. The 14-second maiden flight in Bowen, north Queensland, was hailed a 'major step' toward Australia joining a potentially lucrative global space industry. To mark the milestone, a jar of Vegemite was the only occupant of the 23-metre, 35-tonne Eris rocket. Spectators at the coastal town of Bowen near Townsville gathered while thousands around the world watched via YouTube channel Aussienaut when it launched about 8.30am. The rocket took off with plumes of smoke erupting from underneath before hovering in the air briefly and then crashing into the ground nearby. There were no injuries or environmental impacts, the Gold Coast-based company said. 'Off the pad, I am happy,' CEO Adam Gilmour posted on LinkedIn. 'Of course, I would have liked more flight time, but happy with this.' He later posted on Facebook: 'For a maiden test flight, especially after an extended 18-month wait on the pad for final approvals, this is a strong result and a major step forward for Australia's sovereign space capability.' The flight was brief but was still set to provide vital data. 'Space is hard. SpaceX, Rocket Lab and others needed multiple test flights to reach orbit,' Mr Gilmour said in a statement. 'We've learned a tremendous amount that will go directly into improving our next vehicle, which is already in production. 'This was the first real test of our rocket systems, our propulsion technology, and our spaceport - and it proved that much of what we've built works.' Gilmour Space Technologies is looking to design and manufacture rockets to carry satellites into space, using new hybrid propulsion technology. If successful, the company's rockets are set to carry small satellites to orbit for business and government in a low cost service - one that is in growing demand globally. 'Satellites and communication are worth billions and billions in the global space economy,' Swinburne University of Technology's Rebecca Allen told AAP. 'And it would mean huge benefits for the Australian economy and jobs if the rockets are to be manufactured here. 'In terms of a developed nation we are considered pretty far behind where we should be - this is definitely bringing us up closer to where we should be.' The launch had been delayed for months because of weather conditions and technical issues. It was set to take off on Tuesday afternoon and was 10 minutes out from launching, only to be halted because of high winds. Australia's attempt to enter the space race didn't last long but Dr Allen agreed it was a success. 'The launch is a major milestone for the space industry here. It's huge,' she said. 'Once this rocket is more reliable and fully able to undertake launches to lower orbit, it means we are not relying on another country to access space.' Gilmour Space Technologies was recently awarded a $5 million grant from the federal government to assist with the launch after receiving $52 million in Commonwealth funding to lead a space manufacturing network in Australia.
