logo
New homes target sparked renewed causes for Chepstow bypass

New homes target sparked renewed causes for Chepstow bypass

Campaigners for a Chepstow bypass say the revision of the blueprint for development in the Forest of Dean is an ideal chance to ensure the adequate transport infrastructure is included to avoid 'storing up problems for the future'.
Conservative councillor Nick Evans, who represents the Tidenham ward at the Forest of Dean District Council is calling on civic chiefs to listen to the 'overwhelming' response of residents in his area to a housing plan consultation, and back his campaign for a new bypass.
Cllr Evans, who has been beating the drum for a new Chepstow bypass since 2018, said that the message from residents in Sedbury, Tutshill and Beachley about the Local Plan was clear, and that as the plan needed re-writing following changes brought in by the Labour Government, this is an ideal chance to update the plan so it doesn't 'store up problems for the future'.
Fifty-nine objections and a further fifty-one observations to development in the most Southern ward of the District were raised by residents, with a great deal of these comments focusing on traffic congestion and the lack of services in the area.
'There was an overwhelming response to this latest consultation, as there has been to all the others about this local plan and its proposal to build a new village at Beachley,' he said.
'The message from local people is clear that with our roads and services as they currently stand, our area cannot cope with the developments that are proposed.
'Maps, statistics and reports don't provide the lived experience, that's why consultation is so important. People who live and work in this area are the ones who really know what it's like to have to deal with these ongoing problems on a daily basis and now is the time to listen to them.
'Unfortunately, the draft response that people will just be encouraged not to use their cars, and will need to work from home more is condescending and just doesn't match with the reality of people's lives.
'The working from home revolution over the last few years has made a change to traffic around Chepstow, just a bad one.
'It's now completely impossible to predict when there will be traffic congestion, and when an accident occurs, the whole area still becomes gridlocked.
'Without a Forest Gateway road to support this development, the lives of all these new residents, and those that are there already, will simply be made a misery.'
The district had initially planned to focus the new housing to be built in Lydney, Beachley and Newent.
The draft local plan anticipates building a new 1,300 homes in the Severnside town and 600 homes at Beachley Barracks.
But new rules set out by the Labour Government within weeks of the 2024 General Election means the District Council now needs to find space for an additional 5400 houses in the Forest.
And with the previous plan being unable to deliver this development, planners have to explore other ways to meet the new target, Cllr Evans says.
'With the Government sending the District's plan back to the drawing board, there is an ideal opportunity to finally recognise that this development simply cannot go ahead without a new road being built to support it,' he said.
'A great deal of preparation has already been done, and rather than tell people that they cannot use their cars, there is a real chance here to deliver a plan that will actually work, rather than storing up problems for future generations.'
District Council unanimously agreed at their meeting on April 17 to review the current agreed Local Plan Strategy and explore alternative strategic options for Local Plan preparation, which will be considered by councillors at a later date.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer to face PMQs ahead of major spending review
Keir Starmer to face PMQs ahead of major spending review

STV News

time44 minutes ago

  • STV News

Keir Starmer to face PMQs ahead of major spending review

Keir Starmer is set to face Prime Minister's Questions ahead of a major spending review on Wednesday. The Prime Minister will be questioned by opposition leaders immediately before chancellor Rachel Reeves unveils the UK Labour Government's £113bn spending plans over the next three years. Reeves is expected to announce significant increases in funding for the NHS, defence and education. Funding is also expected to be confirmed for the Acorn Project, a major carbon capture and storage scheme in Aberdeenshire. However, these increases could come at the expense of other public services or government departments. For example, the policing budget is expected to rise above inflation, but this could come with cuts elsewhere in the Home Office. Ahead of the announcement, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that any NHS funding rise above 2.5% could mean real-terms cuts for other departments or tax increases in the autumn budget. PMQs also comes just days after Starmer's Labour Government confirmed it was planning a partial U-turn on the highly unpopular decision to cut winter fuel payments for nine million pensioners last year. On Monday, Reeves assured the country that more pensioners will receive winter fuel payments from this winter as part of the Labour Government's £1.25bn U-turn. All pensioners in England and Wales with an income of or below £35,000 per year will benefit from the revised inter fuel payment – equivalent to around nine million people. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

South Wales Guardian

time7 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.

UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'
UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'

Reuters

time14 hours ago

  • Reuters

UK's Reeves to make $2.7 trillion bet on 'Britain's renewal'

LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will divide up more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public spending on Wednesday in a speech she hopes will foster a sense of national renewal and make clear the year-old Labour government's political priorities. In an address to parliament due after 1130 GMT, Reeves will set out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030. Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment. The choices she announces on Wednesday must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services. "This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it," Reeves is expected to tell parliament, according to speech extracts released by the finance ministry. Reeves said the government would "invest in our country's security, health and economy so working people all over our country are better off." Among the projects announced on Wednesday was likely to be a 39 billion-pound 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support, the finance ministry said. Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide. The right-wing Reform Party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now ahead of it in the polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month. While Britain's economy recorded the fastest growth of the Group of Seven advanced economies in the first quarter of this year, the International Monetary Fund has forecast that in coming years it will lag behind the United States and Canada and barely outperform the euro zone. Official data on Tuesday showed the jobless rate had hit its highest in nearly four years - which the opposition Conservatives blamed on Reeves' October decision to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights. Discussions between Reeves and government ministers have continued into this week over how big a slice their departments will receive of a pie whose size was set last year. Plans announced so far include 86 billion pounds on research and development, 16 billion pounds on public transport, 4 billion pounds on a new nuclear power station, 6 billion pounds on nuclear submarines and 4 billion on prisons. The final spending increases are unlikely to be shared out equally. Capital-intensive plans to raise defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product, announced by Starmer in February, mean other departments will see no real-terms increase in the pace of investment after this year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimates. Day-to-day spending on public services is due to rise by an average of 1.2% a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, while capital budgets will increase by an average of 1.3% in real terms through to 2029-30, according to the IFS. Both rates of growth are much slower than in the current financial year, when investment spending is set to jump by 11.6% and current spending rises by 2.5%. For day-to-day spending, increasing the health budget by 2 percentage points more than the average - as was typical when Labour was last in power before 2010 - would mean real-terms cuts of 1% a year for other departments, the IFS said. Chris Jeffery, head of macro strategy at Legal & General, Britain's largest asset manager, said the fact that the overall spending total was known limited the impact for investors. Instead, financial markets would be most focused on whether any proposed cuts looked realistic for the departments affected. "If they're imposing really large real-terms cuts in spending, then I think the market will come to the conclusion that these are less likely to be delivered than if they are less aggressive," he said. ($1 = 0.7409 pounds) ($1 = 0.7410 pounds)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store