logo
Public hearing focuses on whether to define male, female in Nebraska law

Public hearing focuses on whether to define male, female in Nebraska law

Yahoo08-02-2025

At left, Abbi Swatsworth, executive director of OutNebraska, leads a Feb. 7, 2025, news conference in support of transgender Nebraskans at the Nebraska State Capitol. At right, State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, center, stands at a news conference after introducing her "Stand With Women Act" to define male and female in state law on Jan. 10, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — Dozens of Nebraskans, with a majority in opposition, testified Friday on legislation seeking to create sex-based definitions of 'male' and 'female' in state law, on a bill largely aimed at K-12 and collegiate sports, bathrooms and state government.
Legislative Bill 89, from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha and introduced at the request of Gov. Jim Pillen, would adopt the 'Stand With Women Act.'
The bill would define sex in Nebraska as binary — male or female — based on whether someone 'naturally has, had, will or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes' either eggs (female) or sperm (male) for fertilization.
The legislation mirrors a 'Women's Bill of Rights' that Pillen enacted by executive order in August 2023 and multiple similar orders from President Donald Trump over the past few weeks.
'This is not a political issue,' Kauth told the Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee. 'This is an issue of common sense, adherence to biology and establishing protections for women and girls.'
Kauth received supportive testimony from Pillen, the Nebraska Family Alliance, Alliance Defending Freedom, Nebraska Catholic Conference and a couple of high-profile student-athletes, including Selina Soule, a former track and field athlete from Connecticut, and Rebekah Allick, a member of the Nebraska volleyball team.
'Maybe I'm too long in the tooth,' Pillen testified. 'We just need to move back a generation and have common sense.'
Michelle Jud spoke against the bill on behalf of Rainbow Parents of Nebraska, a recently formed coalition of parents advocating for LGBTQ youths and their families.
'As parents of queer kids, we knew from the moment our children came out to us that they would face more challenges than most,' Jud said. 'We didn't know how hard we would have to fight to protect their basic rights.'
Jud echoed a fellow 'rainbow parent' Friday in saying that being queer is the 'least interesting thing' about their children, who are artists, singers, poets, multi-sport athletes and leaders in student government.
More than 100 people testified, and about 20 spoke in favor. Opponents stretched the hearing well into the evening, led by transgender youths and adults, parents, multiple nonprofits and the school board president of the Omaha Public Schools.
'We are here, and we will not be erased,' said Jessie McGrath, a native of Max, Nebraska, veteran and transgender woman who lives in Kauth's district.
Amos Sobotka, a Nebraska native, who is transgender, said his gender transition gave him 'peace' and that passing Kauth's LB 89 would risk his livelihood, family and community.
'I was raised to believe that all people have value here,' Sobotka said. 'I did not come all this way to be degraded and dismissed, and I refuse to accept this travesty.'
Kauth's bill, and an amendment she unveiled Friday, would require public K-12 schools, postsecondary institutions and state agencies to designate all bathrooms for use by females, males or families. Restrooms could also be single occupancy and be gender neutral.
The amendment strips placing such requirements on private schools, a decision Kauth said she reached while crafting the amendment with the national Alliance Defending Freedom.
Public schools, and private schools that compete against or are part of an athletic association with public schools, would need to designate sports teams as for males, females or mixed. Female students could participate in male-only sports if there is no female alternative, such as football or wrestling.
One of Trump's executive orders called for executive agencies to schools or colleges that allow trans student-athletes to participate. On Thursday, a day after Trump signed that order, the National Collegiate Athletic Association reversed allowing trans student-athletes to compete in women's sports.
Kauth said that while she is 'thrilled' about the Trump policy, it can be overturned, and states need specific legislation.
State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston, who opposed a 2024 bill from Kauth that was limited at the time to just K-12 sports, restrooms and locker rooms, said he likes Trump's executive order, describing it as straightforward and that it 'took no prisoners.' That Kauth bill fell short by two votes of advancing.
'I will see how this plays out in the next 30 days and defer on any state legislative action,' Riepe said in a Wednesday text.
NCAA President Charlie Baker told a U.S. Senate panel in December that he was aware of fewer than 10 active transgender student-athletes out of the NCAA's 510,000 participants.
Jeff Stauss, an assistant director for the Nebraska School Activities Association (NSAA), said eight students have applied since 2018 under an existing Gender Participation Policy for the NSAA, the group most public and private schools in the state coordinate with for school athletics.
The policy requires transgender student-athletes to provide affirmation on their gender identity. Trans female students must also demonstrate through medical examination and physiological testing that they do 'not possess physical… or physiological advantages over genetic females of the same age group.'
Trans girls must also take one year of hormones or go through gender reassignment surgery, which was banned in the state after Oct. 1, 2023.
Kauth led the legislative push for that prohibition as well, which also mandated months of gender-identity-focused therapy for youths with gender dysphoria before minors could access puberty blockers or hormone blockers.
Jane Erdenberger, president of the Omaha school board, said the previous restrictions could lead to at least a two-year delay for trans girls before they could even be considered for athletic participation. She said Kauth's new bill interferes with an OPS vision that every student is daily prepared for success and learning.
Kauth has said school districts can choose whether to use the NSAA model, such as Kearney or Norfolk Public Schools requiring sports participation based on a student's sex at birth. No public school officials spoke in favor of Kauth's bill.
Stauss said NSAA doesn't release specific information about its applications, such as how many were accepted, 'to protect the privacy and legal rights of the students and their families.'
'The NSAA is aware of President Trump's executive order and we are monitoring the legislation in the Nebraska Unicameral,' Stauss said in a statement to the Nebraska Examiner. 'The NSAA will comply with any new federal or state law.'
Allick, the Husker volleyball player who testified, joined Kauth in January to unveil the Stand With Women Act. Allick said Friday that there were real-world problems to address — such as children dying, human trafficking, homelessness and hunger — but that women and girls need protection.
'Forgive me for my brazenness and insensitivity to this right now, but women have fought too freaking hard to have space in politics, doctors' offices, classrooms and sports for all to be taken over yet again by men,' Allick said.
The UNL student-athlete said those with gender dysphoria need compassion, but she said she didn't want to see a penis in her locker room. She told the committee not to sacrifice women's safety or opportunities or wait until something tragic happens before acting.
'My locker room is a safe space,' said Allick, who still competes at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 'It is a place of sisterhood, a place to talk about love lives, hardships, period cramps, things that women talk about and only women understand.'
Kauth said whether even one girl or woman is made to feel threatened or unsafe, or if they lose an opportunity, is, 'by definition, a problem.'
Soule, from Connecticut, is one of the lead plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit against trans-inclusive sports policies in her state. She told the committee not to let future student-athletes compete against trans student-athletes, as she did in high school.
'I remember what it was like in the lineup for the race to get into my blocks wanting to win but knowing the outcome long before the start of the race,' Soule testified.
Soule said lawmakers risk the 'complete eradication' of women's sports if they don't step in.
Former student-athletes Emma Haith, from Burke High School and UNL, and Dahly Long, from Omaha Central High School and a senior social work major at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, spoke against the bill.
Long said LB 89 fosters exclusion rather than fairness, and Haith, citing her faith as a Catholic, said she believes in treating all people with dignity and compassion.
'They [sports] teach teamwork, discipline and inclusion,' Haith said at a noon news conference. 'This bill contradicts those values by targeting transgender youth and denying them the opportunities that benefit all young people.'
Greg Brown, an attorney, professor of exercise science at the University of Nebraska at Kearney and a fellow of the American College of Sports Medicine, said that to say 'sex is complicated' is 'intentionally disingenuous about a universal and simple truth.'
'Human beings are either male or female,' Brown said. 'Every human that has ever existed owes their existence to the unification of the male gamete sperm with the female gamete ova. There's no other option when it comes to human procreation.'
Brown said that includes intersex people, about 0.02% of people, he said, who have a sex development disorder.
Male student-athletes also have an advantage as young as 8 years old, Brown said.
'When someone says, 'Well, it's only a few trans women,' they're asking us to accept unfair male advantages in the female sporting category,' Brown testified.
Freshman State Sen. Dan Lonowski of Hastings aided Kauth with his questions, saying he understood where she was coming from. He served as a wrestling coach for 35 years, but it wasn't until about five years ago that girls competed, when he saw physical differences.
Kauth's bill could offer intersex people accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, though under questioning from State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha she said she didn't know if intersex people were covered already or what accommodations would exist.
'Is it your opinion that trans people have a mental disorder?' Cavanaugh asked Kauth.
'Yes,' she replied.
Cavanaugh asked how the Legislature could direct the University of Nebraska to adopt her bill, as under the Nebraska Constitution and state law the Legislature can't dictate how NU manages its facilities — that's up to the NU Board of Regents.
Kauth said enforcement would be like any other law or school policy, leaving wide latitude to colleges, universities and public schools how to implement the directives.
Erin Feichtinger of the Women's Fund of Omaha and Abbi Swatsworth of OutNebraska said that this enforcement model would open up all women to the subjective view of what is 'female.' Swatsworth said the bill reminded her of the Jim Crow era, and she questioned whether people could be forced to 'prove' their gender before being allowed to enter a bathroom under the law.
Kathy Wilmot of Beaver City, an NU regent who testified in favor of the bill for the Eagle Forum, and in her personal capacity, told the Examiner that regents aren't currently considering a policy such as Kauth's.
State Sen. Megan Hunt of Omaha voiced concern about putting into law that 'women are weaker when we know not all women are weaker than all men.' She questioned what legal implications adding those findings could have for other cases 'down the road,' such as equal employment or fair pay.
Kauth, who chairs the Legislature's Business and Labor Committee, said Hunt's questions were 'quite a stretch' and that whether women were 'weaker' was in Hunt's words, not her own.
'If that's not your intention, I'm happy to have you correct the record right now,' Hunt said.
Kauth responded: 'Physically and biologically women and men grow differently, and women are consistently less strong than men.'
The committee took no immediate action on Kauth's bill. If advanced, the bill would require at least 33 votes in the 49-member Legislature to overcome a promised filibuster.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.
Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.

President Donald Trump wants to tweak a traditionalfeature of the American dream: a college degree. Trump has continued to escalate his battle with Harvard University, threatening to cut off the Ivy League school from federal funding if it does not meet the administration's demands, which include eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and cracking down on campus activism. The latest threat against Harvard, however, floated shifting funding to trade schools, an alternative path to a four-year college degree. "I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land," Trump wrote in a May 26 post on Truth Social. "What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" The White House's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, added onto the president's comments in an interview with Fox News: "Apprenticeships, electricians, plumbers, we need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University. And that's what this administration's position is." Over the past few years, a growing number of Americans have started to question the value of a college degree due to high costs and a tough labor market, making trade schools and apprenticeships a favorable alternative. It marks a shift in the standard American dream, in which a four-year college degree had been viewed as a step to middle-class success. However, Jon Fansmith, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, told Business Insider that taking funding away from Harvard and other research institutions isn't the answer to boosting investment in trade schools. "The money that he is talking about withholding from Harvard is money that Congress provided to research agencies to perform advanced scientific and biomedical research," Fansmith said, adding that Harvard earned grant money because "they had the best researchers, the best laboratory facilities, the best understanding of how to advance that science," he continued. "You can't simply take that money and use it for another purpose." Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, told BI that "American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs." 'Two very separate stories' Higher education doesn't have the same draw that it once did. Some Gen Zers previously told BI that despite being taught that college was the primary path to success, they felt they could make a living by directly entering the workforce or going to trade school. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . That's why Trump's push to invest more in trade schools is important, Fansmith said — they help Americans get a stable career to support themselves and their families, and the federal government can help support those schools by asking Congress to approve more funding, not redirecting the funding unilaterally. "There are two stories here. One is this administration's attack on Harvard, and the other is, what is the role of trade schools, and is there a need for more support for trade schools? And as much as the president's trying to conflate the two, those are two very separate stories," Fansmith said. While Trump's big spending bill proposes some provisions to expand Pell grant eligibility to short-term programs, it does not detail a significant funding increase for trade schools. The Trump administration's rhetorical focus on trade schools isn't new. Before he won the 2024 election, Linda McMahon, now Trump's education secretary, wrote an opinion piece in The Hill advocating for the expansion of Pell Grant eligibility to workforce training programs. "Our educational system must offer clear and viable pathways to the American Dream aside from four-year degrees," she wrote. Trump also signed an executive order on April 23 to strengthen and expand workforce development and apprenticeships programs, which McMahon called a "significant step in ensuring every American can live their American Dream." Congress' role in rethinking education For years, Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for greater access to postsecondary education options, like free community college, and there has been bipartisan agreement on the need to boost apprenticeships and workforce programs without redirecting funding from higher education institutions. Amid the heightened focus on alternatives to a four-year college degree, the New York Federal Reserve said in a recent report that college still pays off; the median worker with a college degree earns about $80,000 a year, compared to $47,000 for a worker with just a high school diploma. Trump hasn't yet implemented his idea to redirect Harvard's federal funding to trade schools, and it's unclear how, or if, he will attempt to follow through. While he has already withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and other schools across the country for failing to meet his administration's political demands, the moves have been met with lawsuits, and Fansmith said it's likely more legal action would ensue should Trump attempt to move around funding without congressional approval. "We're talking about spending money that Congress said would go to support really critically needed research into things like cancer and Alzheimer's and diabetes, and other things that impact everyday Americans' lives, and give it to trade schools," Fansmith said. "Trade schools are great schools. They have lots of benefits. They deserve a lot of federal support, but not just to make a political point at the expense of Harvard." Jason Altmire, president and CEO of Career Education Colleges and Universities — a group that represents for-profit colleges — said in a statement that Trump's focus on trade schools "is an investment in America's workforce." "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," Altmire said.

How a Times Reporter Eluded a Ban on the Word ‘Gay'
How a Times Reporter Eluded a Ban on the Word ‘Gay'

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

How a Times Reporter Eluded a Ban on the Word ‘Gay'

In the In Times Past column, David W. Dunlap explores New York Times history through artifacts housed in the Museum at The Times. The Advocate, a national L.G.B.T.Q. newsmagazine, took The New York Times to task in its issue of Dec. 9, 1986, for what the magazine regarded as this newspaper's indifference, if not hostility, to the gay community. Among the articles in The Advocate was 'The 'G' Word,' about The Times's refusal to adopt the word 'gay.' At the time, there was an explicit prohibition in The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage: 'gay. Do not use as a synonym for homosexual unless it appears in the formal, capitalized name of an organization or in quoted matter.' Gay men found this rule to be demeaning. I know, because I was one of them. As a closeted young reporter on The Times's Metro desk, however, I didn't stand a chance of persuading the publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger (1926-2012), or the executive editor, A.M. Rosenthal (1922-2006), to overturn a ban they had put in place in 1976. So I waged guerrilla warfare instead. Whenever I wrote articles of particular concern to gay readers, I peppered the text with 'gay' as much as I could — in accordance with the stylebook rule. I also tried to limit use of the clinical, antiquated 'homosexual.' The point was not to be subversive, but to leave readers with the impression that my articles were written in idiomatic English. For instance, 42 years ago, I covered the transformation of a former New York City public school in Greenwich Village into what is now the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center. 'Homosexual' appeared only once in the article (apart from the headline, 'Sale of Site to Homosexuals Planned,' which I didn't write). But 'gay' appeared six times, in the names of organizations and in direct quotations. That 1986 Advocate issue is in the Museum at The Times, as is a copy of the old stylebook, opened to the 'gay' entry. The editor to whom the book belonged, Thomas Feyer, drew an 'X' through the entry in June 1987, when the rule was superseded by a memo from Allan M. Siegal (1940-2022), an assistant managing editor. 'Starting immediately,' Mr. Siegal wrote, 'we will accept the word gay as an adjective meaning homosexual, in references to social or cultural patterns and political issues.' That made my life easier, in many ways. Today, the stylebook says: 'gay (adj.) is preferred to homosexual in most contexts.'

Indian Delegate Says Pakistan Must End Terror Camps Before Talks
Indian Delegate Says Pakistan Must End Terror Camps Before Talks

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Indian Delegate Says Pakistan Must End Terror Camps Before Talks

A senior Indian lawmaker said his government should not hold talks with Pakistan after their worst military confrontation in decades until action is taken to close down what he called terrorist training camps in the country, and that the US should not be involved as a mediator. Shashi Tharoor, who is leading a team of officials dispatched to capitals around the world to present India's perspective on last month's conflict, said the idea of any external mediation was unacceptable because it implied equivalence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store