Chipman-area murder trial delayed over additional evidence
Joshua McIsaac and Erica Blyth were supposed to go on trial on April 23 for first-degree murder in the death of Brandon Donelan..
However, on Wednesday, Court of King's Bench Justice Richard Petrie agreed to delay the trial to allow Crown and defence lawyers time to review additional evidence that has surfaced in the case.
"An adjournment of a trial of this magnitude is a big deal. It's something we try to avoid at all costs," said Crown prosecutor James McConnell, noting the impact on the victim's family.
"It's not something that we would raise lightly, but in order to have a fair trial, unfortunately, it's unavoidable."
Donelan's body was found in a wooded area between Minto and Chipman on March 31, 2022, about two months after he'd been reported as missing.
McIsaac and Blyth were jointly charged with first-degree murder, and six weeks had been set aside later this month for their jury trial.
McConnell agreed to review the new evidence and return to court on April 23 to provide it to defence lawyers for their own review.
A publication ban prevents CBC News from reporting on the nature of the evidence ahead of the trial.
Nathan Gorham, lawyer for McIsaac, and TJ Burke, lawyer for Blyth, both agreed to the delay, and confirmed their clients would waive their Charter right to be tried within a reasonable time.
Given the amount of new information that must be reviewed, both parties agreed not to schedule new trial dates until sometime after their next appearance.
McIsaac and Blyth appeared at the Burton courthouse in person for Wednesday's proceedings. The two have been in custody since being charged in June 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
4 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Crown in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial won't appeal not-guilty verdicts
Article content The Crown will not appeal the not-guilty verdicts in the Hockey Canada trial. Article content That was confirmed Thursday afternoon by Daniel Brown, lawyer for former Ottawa Senators forward Alex Formenton, one among five members of the 2018 Team Canada world junior championship squad who were acquitted of sexual assault after an high-profile eight-week trial in London. Article content Article content The Crown contacted the defence teams on Thursday and 'confirmed that they will not be proceeding with an appeal,' he said. Article content Article content Michael McLeod, 27, Carter Hart, 27, Formenton, 25, Dillon Dube, 27, and Cal Foote, 26, were each charged with one count of sexual assault stemming from what happened inside a London hotel room on June 19, 2018, when they, along with the rest of the gold-medal winning team, were in London for a Hockey Canada gala and golf tournament. Article content McLeod faced a second charge of sexual assault for being a party to the offence. Article content All five men were cleared of the charges in a 91-page decision by Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia. Article content Article content The allegations came from a now-27-year-old woman whose identity is protected by court order. She met McLeod and others at Jack's Bar on Richmond Row where they were celebrating. She returned to the Delta Armouries Hotel with McLeod for consensual sex. Article content Article content She testified that after their encounter, she found herself facing as many as 10 men in the hotel room and went along the sexual encounters. However, she said she was drunk and terrified, and described how her mind disassociated from her body to cope. Article content But the players countered saying the woman was a willing participant in the sexual activities. They described she begged them to have sex with her while naked on a bed sheet on the floor and taunted them when they did not. Article content Some of the sexual acts described were brief in nature, but all of them, the judge ruled, were consensual. In the case of Foote, there was no clear evidence he even touched the woman when he did the splits over her.
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Sask. man convicted of murder found guilty again; judge finds testimony ‘frankly unbelievable'
A Saskatoon man has been convicted of second-degree murder for the second time. Brandin Brick, 33, has once again been found guilty in the 2018 killing of James Chaisson. ADVERTISEMENT Surveillance footage showed Chaisson getting into Brick's car outside the 7-Eleven at 22nd Street West and Avenue P North. A Crown witness testified that Brick shot Chaisson when he was inside the vehicle. The Crown believes Brick targeted Chaisson because he was in a rival gang. Brick was granted a new trial by Saskatchewan's Court of Appeal after claiming his lawyers didn't give him an opportunity to testify. But when he did take the stand — claiming the shooting was a drug deal gone wrong — the judge didn't buy it. Brandin Brick, 33, has once again been found guilty in the 2018 killing of James Chaisson. Brandin Brick, 33, has once again been found guilty in the 2018 killing of James Chaisson. Brick said Chaisson got into his backseat to buy drugs. As he drove away, Brick testified Chaisson suddenly pulled out a gun and shoved the barrel into his ribs, demanding drugs. Brick said he slammed on the breaks, Chaisson dropped the gun and Brick took a 'clean shot.' 'I frankly find this unbelievable,' Justice Timothy Keene wrote in his decision. Justice Keene said the mechanics of the shooting, as described by Brick, 'defy physics.' The judge ruled the Crown had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Brick 'had the state of mind required for murder.' Brick is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 15. Second-degree murder comes with a life sentence with no chance of parole for at least 10 years.
Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
Crown will not seek appeal of world junior sexual assault acquittal
Crown prosecutors will not file a notice of appeal in the high-profile world junior sexual assault trial after five men were acquitted last month, Global News has learned. The Crown had 30 days to notify the Court of Appeal for Ontario if it would seek a challenge of Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's July 24 acquittal of Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote. Several lawyers involved in the case told Global News they received confirmation Thursday that the Crown will not be appealing the verdict. A spokesperson for the appeal court also told Global News it has not received a notice of appeal. The Crown's right to appeal is more restricted than someone found guilty of a crime, the Ontario government's website indicates. To appeal an acquittal, the Crown must show there was a significant error of law that had a substantial impact on the acquittal, it said. Story continues below advertisement The men, who were each charged with sexual assault in January 2024, were acquitted by Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia last month following a trial that began in late April in London, Ont. McLeod was also found not guilty of being party to the offence of sexual assault. In her July 24 ruling, Carroccia said the Crown couldn't 'meet its onus' on any of the charges before her. The five men were accused of engaging in non-consensual group sex with a then-20-year-old woman in June 2018. 'In this case, I have found actual consent not vitiated by fear. I do not find the evidence of E.M. to be either credible or reliable,' said Carroccia of the female complainant, known as E.M. in court documents as her identity is protected under a standard publication ban. 'With respect to the charges before this court, having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial on the whole, I conclude the Crown can not meet its onus on any of the counts before me.' 5:01 Morality highlighted after Hockey Canada trial Court heard the team was in London for events marking its gold-medal performance at that year's world junior hockey championship, and that the complainant was out with friends when they met at a downtown bar on June 18, 2018. Story continues below advertisement After being with McLeod and his teammates at the bar, E.M. would go on to have consensual sex with McLeod in his room in the early morning hours of June 19. Court heard that E.M., who testified she was drunk and not of clear mind, was in the washroom after she had sex with McLeod and came out to a group of men in the room allegedly invited by McLeod in a group chat. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy It was then that the Crown alleged several sexual acts took place without E.M.'s consent. Defence lawyers suggested E.M. wasn't as drunk as she said she was, wanted a 'wild night' with the players, was 'egging' them on to have sex with her and accused her of having a 'clear agenda' at the trial. When reading out her analysis, Carroccia said there were 'troubling aspects' regarding E.M.'s evidence. On several occasions, she referred to it as 'her truth' and not 'the truth,' which Carroccia said, 'seemingly blurs the line between what she believes to be true and what is objectively true.' 'Although the slogan, 'Believe the victim,' has become popularized as of late, it has no place in a criminal trial. To approach a trial with the assumption that the complainant is telling the truth is the equivalent of imposing a presumption of guilt on the person accused of sexual assault and then placing the burden on him to prove his innocence,' she said. Story continues below advertisement 'That is antithetical to the fundamental principles of justice enshrined in our constitution and the values underlying our free and democratic society.' 3:56 Why the judge acquitted all 5 former Hockey Canada players in sex assault trial Karen Bellehumeur, E.M.'s lawyer, told reporters July 24 her client was 'very disappointed' with the judge's assessment of her honesty and credibility, but felt it was 'important to see the process through to the end, even if it meant opening yourself up to intense scrutiny and unjustified criticism.' The Crown's goal throughout the proceeding was to see a fair trial for everyone involved, Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham said that day. Yet defence lawyers struck a different tone, with some calling the decision a 'resounding vindication' and the Crown's case a 'hopeless prosecution' brought forward due to public pressure. What's in store for the men's futures is unclear; majority were playing in the NHL when they were charged. The league said shortly after the verdict they were 'ineligible' to play while it reviewed Carroccia's ruling. Story continues below advertisement The National Hockey League Players' Association said ruling the players ineligible while the NHL further evaluates is inconsistent with the league and players' union's collective bargaining agreement.
