logo
Bishop Sipuka urges interfaith leaders to take action for the poor at G20 Forum

Bishop Sipuka urges interfaith leaders to take action for the poor at G20 Forum

IOL News3 days ago
President of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) and Chairperson of the National Church Leaders' Consultation, Bishop Sithembele Anton Sipuka.
Image: Theolin Tembo
President of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) and Chairperson of the National Church Leaders' Consultation, Bishop Sithembele Anton Sipuka, delivered rousing remarks that left attendees giving him a standing ovation at the G20 Interfaith Forum.
The IF20 forum, which convened religious leaders, civil society organisations, government officials, multilateral institutions, and scholars to explore collaborative solutions to pressing global challenges, concluded on Thursday.
The IF20 event is intended to reflect and reinforce South Africa's G20 Presidency theme: 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability'.
'These four days in Cape Town have shown us that we - Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, traditional African spiritualists, and all faith traditions represented here - we have all chosen to go far, together.
'We came to Cape Town under the banner, 'ubuntu in action', focusing on vulnerable communities. Ubuntu has taught us that our humanity is interconnected - I am, because you are. This week, we have discovered something profound: Ubuntu is not just a philosophy; it is a prophecy.
'It calls us beyond mere acknowledgement of our connectedness, to active responsibility for one another's dignity,' Sipuka said.
Sipuka highlighted how all the various interfaiths have all heeded the same divine call 'in different sacred languages'.
'This forum has held up a mirror to our souls, as religious leaders, and what we see is both inspiring and convincing. We have confronted uncomfortable truths about ourselves as faith leaders. Too often, we claim to serve the God of the poor, while those poor view us with suspicion. Why? Because our proximity to power has sometimes made us complicit in systems that perpetuate injustice.
'It is easy for religious leaders to be co-opted by those in power, for the benefits of that, and in exchange lose our prophetic stance, to stand and be the voice for the voiceless. This sometimes results in religious leaders living in mansions, while their congregants queue for food parcels…'
Sipuka said that it was important for religious leaders to model the very leadership and action that they are seeking from those they shepherd, and to put words into action.
'As we part, my wish is that we could commit to transforming our educational approaches. Let us commit to establishing an interfaith educational partnership that teaches not literacy and numeracy but social, emotional, and spiritual intelligence - true cross-cultural religious literacy.
'May our madrasas, church schools, temple institutions, and community centres become laboratories of ubuntu, places where children learn that difference is not division, but a tapestry of diversity created by the pleasure and joy of Divine design.'
Sipuka added that they haven't gathered to issue another statement or calling on officials to act as 'the poor are tired of our calls, the poor are hungry for our commitment'.
'My hope is that, as interfaith leaders, we could commit ourselves to action. My wish is that every faith community represented here could take the initiative, not waiting for perfect conditions and not waiting for external funding, but beginning where we are, with what we have, for who we serve.
'Rather than setting rigid timelines that may become empty promises, let each of us return home, and begin… what matters is not the speed of our response but the sincerity of our commitment.'
Deputy Minister of Social Development Ganief Ebrahim Hendricks said that he did not doubt that the discussions at the forum would have positive effects in its wake.
'In our beloved South Africa, faith communities have and continue to play a crucial role in advancing the National Development agenda. At the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, members of our communities have witnessed extraordinary acts of courage and love.
'They demonstrated acts of solidarity and support for the most vulnerable population at the time of their greatest need, and I think the interfaith communities in South Africa, and all over the world, must be complimented for saving many, many lives because of their direct intervention,' Hendricks said.
'The aim is to harness and deepen the partnership that exists with faith communities… In truth, South Africa is still a work in progress, and it is daily challenged to keep building bridges in spite of the various obstacles.
'In conclusion, I want to thank the IF20 for throwing their weight behind South Africa in the run-up to the G20 conference in November, and I am sure what you have decided here will help us conclude a very successful G20,' Hendricks said.
Vice President of G20 Interfaith Forum Association, Katherine Marshall, closed the forum by saying that they have heard a lot about ubuntu throughout the forum, but that they should heed Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool's reminder that there is a hard edge to ubuntu, 'which is that 'I am my brother's keeper''.
'I think we all leave with a powerful sense of what we can do, and what we must do together. I started out talking about something that always echoes in my mind, NATO - No Action, Talk Only.'
She also thanked all of the attendees and the organisers who assisted in pulling the IF20 event together.
theolin.tembo@inl.co.za
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hlabisa is a lesson on getting things done behind chaos
Hlabisa is a lesson on getting things done behind chaos

The Citizen

time16 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Hlabisa is a lesson on getting things done behind chaos

While the GNU continues to be chaotic, Cogta Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa has kept calm and done the unthinkable. The GNU presents a laugh a day. In the last month, Andrew Whitfield got axed, setting an awkward precedent for President Cyril Ramaphosa's defence chief. While bus drivers are taking their own lives, having not been paid since January, a dialogue is on the go that increasingly seems to be evolving into a monologue. Gayton McKenzie has been doing his thing, whatever that might be on the day, and team DA is patting themselves on the back for outsourcing state work to the banks. And we all applauded it, such is our disdain of home affairs. Oh, and the ministers appointed to fix load shedding were busted doing what we already knew they were doing; burning diesel as ferociously as Christians burned Beatles albums. Amid all the chaos and lack of time to consider which connected cadre should feast on which deal, some real good has been done; Transnet even seems to be on the rise, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's revelations are promising to unlock some gems and South Africa's economic kingpin, Thabo Mbeki, has finally found some guts to start saying some things. Amid the chaos, some things are improving The weather is perfect for sowing the seeds of ideas that may be great for the country and good for the fiscus, even if they aren't politically popular. In a country where a small minority are being squeezed for funding, it's difficult to make financially prudent decisions. But since that money isn't getting to the people it's supposed to, it makes it somewhat easier. Add to that the warring internal factions and it shouldn't be surprising that as the castle of patronage comes down, a couple of things can be improved with the resources. A minister who seemingly gets this and has largely kept a calm demeanor throughout the GNU is Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) Velenkosini Hlabisa. During lockdown, we learned just how much power Cogta has and Hlabisa has been wielding it pretty impressively. ALSO READ: IFP reaffirms GNU role, slams NPA and urges reforms within justice system Halbisa takes on municipal functionality On natural disaster management, he's done the unthinkable in South African terms; enhancing the implementation of a 10-year-old framework. It shouldn't be impressive, but since we tend to have a kink of jumping from one policy to the next, doubling down and anchoring a belief in a policy's execution is quite a brave and functional thing. When last have you heard a minister insistent on implementing the plan of a predecessor and making it work? Hlabisa genuinely seems to want to do what's good for the people and when it comes to preventing them from dying, that's quite nice. I'm not sure if it's because nobody knows how to get in his way or whether it's just not profitable to impose themselves on him, the minister has been given some room to manoeuvre and it appears he knows this. It shouldn't be surprising that he's taken on what is probably going to be the most difficult reform of this administration; municipal functionality. Ten years ago, you wouldn't dream of anybody in Jacob Zuma's cabinet thinking of claiming that the national government is bloated, let alone municipalities. ALSO READ: Cogta warns municipalities against wasting R1.2 billion disaster relief Now, the minister is having a right go at the state of municipal affairs and fairly so. It's not like John Steenhuisen is going to criticise anybody's literacy because it will come off poorly, but the way Hlabisa puts it makes it pragmatic in the eyes of the public. 'You can't monitor billions if you can't read,' he said. Why on earth we're even in a position where he's got to say that is beyond me, but thank goodness somebody has finally said it. What's most exciting about this shake up is that it's clearly a long term investment and he's set milestones allowing him to take his time on the matter. It shows a degree of seriousness rather than politricking and perhaps we don't see the results in his lifetime. It feels so good to hear a minister commit themselves to a long term solution to an issue that nobody has really tried to address in 30 years. There's a saying about great men planting trees and I really hope this one grows. We could do with the shade. READ NEXT: Almost 40 municipalities facing sanctions from Treasury over mismanagement

BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South
BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South

Cole Jackson and Dr Iqbal Survé | Published 2 days ago The G20 (Group of 20) was established in 1999 in the wake of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis as an informal platform bringing together Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors from the world's leading developed and emerging economies to address global economic and financial stability. While its early discussions centred primarily on broad macroeconomic concerns, the G20 has since broadened its scope to cover a wider range of global priorities, including trade, climate action, sustainable development, health, agriculture, energy, environmental protection, and anti-corruption efforts. BRICS was established in a similar fashion, as quoted by Cole Jackson: ' The BRICS grouping has, to a large extent, grown naturally considering the global climate during its formation and in today's context. BRICS was formed in 2009. Its formation follows the 2007/08 financial crisis, caused by a period of dramatic economic downturn in the United States (US)--due to the housing market collapse and a subprime mortgage crisis–leading to a global recession. Many countries, the world over, bore the brunt of this recession, especially those countries in the Global South already battling economic difficulties.' The G20 comprises BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia) and other countries in the Global South (Argentina & Mexico). These presidencies and officials often overlap between countries in the Global South, G20, BRICS (and its associated institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB)). This in essence, means more than a quarter of members are BRICS or Global South affiliated. However, due to the United States (US) & Canada, for example, being part of the G7 they need to collaborate and deliberate with many of these countries having BRICS/Global South agendas to fulfill. Reforming Global Governance G20: Includes both developed and emerging economies and increasingly acknowledges the need for reform in global financial institutions (like the IMF and World Bank). BRICS: Actively pushes for a multipolar world and reform of institutions to reflect the voices of emerging powers and developing nations. Global South: Wants a fairer system where their voices are heard and interests are not sidelined by traditional Western powers. Promoting Inclusive and Sustainable Development G20: Advocates for sustainable development, climate finance, and reducing inequality, especially through multilateral cooperation. BRICS: Prioritises development-led growth, infrastructure financing (e.g., through the New Development Bank), and South-South cooperation. Global South: Seeks development financing and capacity building on their terms, focusing on health, education, and infrastructure. G20: While not centered on the Global South, it increasingly includes dialogues on cooperation between developing countries. BRICS: Champions South-South cooperation as a means to share resources, technology, and strategies among developing nations. Global South: Sees South-South partnerships as more equitable alternatives to Western aid or conditional loans. Multipolarity and Economic Sovereignty G20: Includes rising powers like India, China, Brazil, and South Africa, reflecting a shift away from unipolar dominance. BRICS: Promotes a multipolar world order with diversified centers of power. Global South: Seeks to reduce dependency on the West and build regional blocs and alternative financial institutions. Climate Justice and Energy Transitions G20: Has focused on climate change mitigation and adaptation, though progress varies. BRICS: Supports climate action but emphasizes common but differentiated responsibilities. Global South: Advocates for climate finance, technology transfer, and the right to develop. The growing alignment between the G20, BRICS, and the Global South reflects a strategic shift towards a more inclusive and multipolar global order. With overlapping memberships and shared priorities—ranging from global governance reform and sustainable development to climate justice and economic sovereignty—these groupings increasingly influence one another. BRICS and the Global South have injected fresh urgency and purpose into G20 deliberations, pushing for a system that better represents emerging economies and developing nations. As this alignment deepens, it strengthens efforts to reshape international institutions, promote equitable growth, and ensure that the voices of the Global South are not only heard but also acted upon. Written By: Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Cole Jackson Lead Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Chinese & South American Specialist * MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates

SACC calls for transparency and unity ahead of National Dialogue
SACC calls for transparency and unity ahead of National Dialogue

The Star

timea day ago

  • The Star

SACC calls for transparency and unity ahead of National Dialogue

The South African Council of Churches (SACC) has expressed concern over the upcoming National Dialogue Convention, calling for greater transparency, inclusivity, and accountability in the lead-up to the event scheduled for August 15 and 16, 2025. In a statement following an emergency meeting of its national church leaders on August 11, the SACC said the gathering was held to reflect on the 'diverse views of the Christian leaders in the SACC and establish a united response to the country's temperature as relates to the National Dialogue.' The intervention from the SACC comes as momentum around the National Dialogue is threatened by a growing number of withdrawals and concerns around the process. Several prominent legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group, announced their withdrawal last Friday. ActionSA, AfriForum, the Solidarity union, and the Freedom Front Plus have also pulled out of the National Dialogue, raising further questions about the inclusivity and legitimacy of the process. The church leaders believe that postponing the National Convention 'would have been a wise route to consider,' to allow space for reflection and alignment around the core needs of the South African people. Such a delay, they said, could help to 'maximise unity through an inclusive journey from the start.' The SACC said in a media statement dated 2 July 2024: 'It is our experience that for such an effort to be successful, it does need to be protected from narrow political interests; and must be seen and experienced as being in the control of the people rather than a few who speak on behalf of others. It must be inclusive of all sectors of society to ensure its legitimacy in the eyes of the people.' They warned that 'the concerns raised about the readiness to host the National Convention in their totality must be addressed to build confidence in society.' They said this can only happen through 'transparency, accountability, and adherence to all procurement laws.' The SACC said the dialogue must be guided by societal ownership and leadership, and that any misdirection of resources 'needs to be clearly spelt out' with 'appropriate steps' taken. Calling on the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) to lead with integrity, the SACC said: 'At this juncture, the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) should provide moral leadership that will unite us all.' They added that the group was formed 'to make sure that in everything related to the National Dialogue, it becomes the face of its leadership, and the voice of reason to speak truth to all actors at all times.' The SACC acknowledged the latest public commitment from EPG co-chairs, Prof Tinyiko Maluleke and Mr Roelf Meyer, who said: 'The EPG will be reaching out to the foundations and the Presidency to seek solutions to the issues they have raised. ''The EPG will also be reaching out to the political players who have opted out of the process. Such is the nature of an authentic National Dialogue that the door must remain open for everyone to join the process.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store