Support the Boksburg SPCA's 75th anniversary dinner.
This exciting event offers an excellent opportunity for companies to showcase their community commitment while enjoying an elegant evening of fine dining and entertainment.
The dinner features a sumptuous three-course meal, entertainment by artist Louise Ruzzier, exciting raffles, lucky draws, and a spin-to-win competition—all designed to raise funds for the SPCA's ongoing work in animal welfare and celebrate the society's milestone.
The SPCA is actively seeking donations and sponsorships from local businesses for raffle and auction prizes, as well as table purchases.
Businesses can secure tables and enjoy a night of celebration, networking, and philanthropy. This is a prime chance for businesses to increase their visibility and connect with the community while contributing to a worthy cause.
Major sponsors will receive a Section 18A tax certificate, offering valuable tax deductions alongside positive brand exposure.
'We are calling on Boksburg businesses to partner with us not just for the event but for ongoing support throughout the year. This dinner will provide an exclusive insight into the vital work we do daily to protect animals and serve the community. Supporting the SPCA at this milestone event will not only help the animals but also highlight your business's role in the community,' Ursula Spennato, Boksburg SPCA committee member previously said.
Individuals passionate about animal welfare are also welcome to attend and show their support.
'The SPCA has been serving animals and the community for many years. Reaching our 75th anniversary is a huge milestone, and we want everyone to celebrate with us. It would mean so much if people opened their hearts while enjoying a wonderful evening,' Spennato added.
For donations, sponsorship opportunities, or table bookings, contact Ursula at 082 441 4245 or Nadine at 065 377 3298.
Also Read: Investigation launched after crash involving Boksburg North SAPS vehicle
Also Read: GALLERY: Boksburg North SAPS detective branch staff receives recognition
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 days ago
- The Citizen
How cheap alcohol keeps hurting SA's poorest
The alcohol industry profits while heavy drinking causes widespread harm in poor South African communities. Recent comments by the South African Breweries (SAB) CEO Richard Rivett-Carnac, reported in Business Day, that minimum unit pricing for alcohol will punish the poor and turbocharge the illicit market, harming both the industry and public safety, must be challenged by fact. The fact is that the legal liquor industry is a major contributor to injury, disease and death in South Africa. Alcohol is a factor in about half of all homicides, traffic accidents and gender-based violence in this country. If the results of the SAB study into illicit alcohol are true – that illegal trade represents about a fifth of the total market – that still means that legally manufactured alcohol contributes up to four-fifths of the total alcohol harm in South Africa. The major damage is not occasional death from the wrong chemicals in illicit brews, but widespread harm from heavy drinking of all liquor products – whether they're legal or not. If the upper daily limit of what could be regarded as 'responsible drinking' is two standard drinks per drinker then, on average, drinkers consume 2½ times more than this and most of the excess is manufactured by the companies that now appeal to public safety as a reason not to introduce minimum unit pricing. ALSO READ: Saps probes officers after video shows police offloading beer bottles at liquor store SAB undercuts its words with its actions. Just one of its one-litre bottles of Castle Lager contains enough pure alcohol to push a drinker's blood alcohol content well above the legal driving limit of 0.05%. Those bottles are sold 2½ times cheaper per litre than the equivalent amount in three 330ml containers. This price difference is so large that it cannot be due to cost-savings in the manufacturing process and suggests a deliberate design to promote excessive consumption. There is evidence from South Africa that bigger containers encourage people to drink more. It is the price of these larger containers that will be most affected by the introduction of a minimum price per unit of alcohol. We must challenge the assertion that minimum unit pricing will punish the poor. ALSO READ: KZN woman arrested for R120 000 illicit alcohol A 2018 study of alcohol-related mortality in South Africa found that the death rate from alcohol in poorer communities is 4½ times higher than wealthier ones. Many people in poorer communities drink to escape the hardships of daily life in the absence of recreational alternatives. High rates of misery make it far harder for a person to 'drink responsibly' than someone experiencing the good life. The alcohol industry capitalises on their misery, flooding their communities with large quantities of liquor at lower prices. It is this behaviour that punishes the poor, not the proposed introduction of minimum unit pricing. Where minimum unit pricing has been introduced in other countries like Scotland and Wales, it has achieved its aim of reducing the prevalence of heavy drinking, with positive health benefits for poorer consumers. ALSO READ: Mlindo The Vocalist releases his long-awaited album on Mandela Day as a way of 'giving back' With the introduction of minimum unit pricing, there may be some growth of the illicit market, which could affect tax revenues but that must be dealt with in the same way that illicit cigarettes should be – with effective enforcement of a track-and-trace system from the point of production to the point of sale. However, the liquor industry's claim of massive growth in illicit sales is dubious, given that legal alcohol sales have grown substantially over the past decade. There is no evidence of significant erosion of the market. The role of extra taxation of the liquor and tobacco industries is to make them pay for the damages they cause to society. Government should not be confused by perverse logic. If the liquor industry caused less harm to our society in the first place, Treasury would need less money to pay for its damages. NOW READ: Report reveals 1 in 5 alcoholic drinks are fake: Here's how to spot them
The South African
5 days ago
- The South African
Agency sets record straight on SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions
Numerous complaints about unauthorised SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions has the agency reaching out to beneficiaries. SASSA CEO Themba Matlou said this past week that the agency has no authority to make any SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions. So, why has there been such a spate of this occurring in the last month? The SAPS has been alerted to anyone misrepresenting themselves as a government agency. Image: File By way of clarification, the South African Social Security Agency assures clients that it is not allowed to make deductions without notifying the recipient beforehand and receiving consent. If you have not received your full grant amount for the month of August, you must contact SASSA immediately to rectify the situation. Recently, several SASSA beneficiaries have come forward alleging that their grants are arriving with R165 already deducted, reports The Citizen . Due to the sheer number of complaints, the concern is that this has moved beyond a few isolated incidents and there are nefarious actors at play. You should never have any money deducted from your SASSA payment without giving consent beforehand. Image: File 'I can tell you outright that we are not allowed to make SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions from a beneficiary without their consent. That is the regulation. Your money is your money. Once we give you the money, we have no control over that,' clarified Matlou. 'However, of course, there will be these unscrupulous chance-takers who will try to take advantage of SASSA grant recipients. A possible reason could be funeral policies being deducted from immediately after the SASSA Grant payment. But the agency does not offer any such policy. And the agency does not allow anyone to advertise policies using its branding,' Matlou explained. Anyone using the SASSA branding in a misleading manner will be investigated in court. Image: File Furthermore, Matlou admitted that these unauthorised SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions have been brought to the agency's attention. And it has handed investigations over to the SAPS to try find these people. It is a serious offence to misrepresent yourself as a government entity. As such, if you think you've fallen prey to unauthorised SASSA Old-Age Grant deductions, here's what you can do: SMS your ID number, full name, the name of the financial service provider, policy duration and reason for disputing the deduction to 34548 . . WhatsApp SASSA on +27 82 046 8553 Call the SASSA helpline on 080 060 1011 or visit a local office in-person. or visit a local office in-person. You may also want to contact your bank and/or third-party insurer if you think our profiles have been compromised. Try contacting SASSA for assistance on the following provincial numbers: Eastern Cape: 043 707 6300 Gauteng: 011 241 8320 Mpumalanga: 013 754 9446 Limpopo: 015 291 7509 North West: 018 388 4006 Free State: 051 410 8339 North West: 053 802 4919 KwaZulu-Natal: 033 846 3324 Western Cape: 021 469 0235 Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
06-08-2025
- The Citizen
19-year lease, no rent payment and R1.3m power bill: Businessman's battle with Gauteng municipality
The business occupied the municipality's property without a lease agreement, and even sublet the property to third parties. The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has ruled in favour of the Lesedi Local Municipality against a business that had been occupying the municipality's property without signing a lease agreement. 19-year lease, no rent payment and R1.3m power bill: Businessman's battle with Gauteng municipality The municipality approached the court in a bid to force Heidelberg Beer Festival CC, run by Bouwe Wiersma, out of the Heidelberg Heritage Museum. Wiersma opposed the municipality's application, saying he had been 'in peaceful and undisturbed possession of the property and had operated a business there under a 19-year lease term, which was an improved term of the initial five years'. ALSO READ: How to get rid of a squatting tenant He told the court he had occupied the building since 2016 and commenced business operations in 2019. The businessman did apply to lease the property from the municipality. The municipal council approved the lease of the property to Wiersma; however, no lease agreement was concluded. He proceeded to occupy the property without signing a lease agreement and further sublet the property to third parties to conduct their business without the municipality's consent. Electricity charges The municipality argued that Wiersma did not settle the electricity charges until the municipality cut the electricity supply. The business to which he sublet parts of the property was forced to spend money on a generator. He further refused to move out of the property despite the municipality's numerous correspondences and multiple court actions against him. ALSO READ: Here's a list of what your landlord is responsible for in your rented flat The businessman even lodged a complaint with the municipality regarding the building's condition and also notified the South African Police Service (Saps) in writing of these concerns. In response, the municipality instructed Wiersma to cease business operations and vacate the premises on safety grounds for the public. Only the business that was subletting from Wiersma moved out, but he remained. 'Municipality's application not urgent' The municipality then approached the court in an attempt to evict the businessman, arguing that he had failed to pay electricity charges, with arrears exceeding R1.3 million. The businessman argued that the municipality's application was not urgent as the building's condition 'does not endanger the public who may be patrons at the business'. On Monday, Judge Makamu ordered Heidelberg Beer Festival CC to stop conducting business at the Heidelberg Heritage Museum with immediate effect. ALSO READ: Your rights when you rent a place to stay 'The building was declared dilapidated by members of the Saps after the respondent lodged a complaint. Nonetheless, the respondent now claims that only the Rotarian building requires attention and that the portion he occupies is safe. However, the inspection report clearly refers to the Heidelberg Heritage Museum as a whole,' said Judge Makamu. 'The respondent has no legal basis to oppose this application, as it is an unlawful occupier. However, the Municipality's inaction from 2019 to 2025 – a period of six years – suggests that it condoned the respondent's continued presence on the property, whether expressly or by inaction.' The business was ordered to move out of the museum within seven days; failing which, the Sheriff of the Court will evict it. He was also ordered to pay costs. READ NEXT: Nearly one in five tenants behind in rentals
