logo
The EU's Common Agricultural Policy Has Created a Farming Crisis

The EU's Common Agricultural Policy Has Created a Farming Crisis

Yahoo20-03-2025

European farmers have been in the news in recent months due to high-profile protests against climate policies, which they argue put a disproportionate burden on their already thin margins, as well as European Union trade deals, which they claim expose farmers to unfair competition from global producers. Combined, the twin pressures have radicalized many in the sector, while putting a spotlight on the EU's climate and trade policies.
But less attention has been paid to a quieter but nonetheless significant risk facing European agriculture: the distortions introduced into the sector by the bloc's Common Agricultural Policy, or CAP, and their impact on the security of Europe's food supply.
The first iteration of the CAP was introduced by the six founding members of what was then the European Economic Community, or EEC, back in 1962. Its principal objective was to increase food production, which had fallen drastically in the immediate postwar years due to labor shortages and damage to agricultural land. The policy also aimed to raise farmers' wages and improve food security by offering farmers a 'guaranteed price for their produce and introducing tariffs on external products.' In the subsequent half century, the CAP has been pivotal in the transformation of European agriculture, helping to usher in an agri-business model that has increased production but at the cost of driving thousands of farmers from the land, degrading the environment and enriching big landowners at the expense of smaller ones. As a result, it now threatens the long-term security of the bloc's food supplies.
A key driver in the transformation of the bloc's agricultural model was the CAP reforms of the early 1990s, which saw a move away from the original price support system toward 'direct income support for farmers … based on the area of land cultivated or number of livestock maintained.' These changes inevitably favored bigger farmers, leading to 'land grabbing' by large producers and a major decline in the European model of family farming, according to ARC, a voluntary rural organization dedicated to preserving family farms across the bloc. The inequitable consequences of the reforms were belatedly acknowledged by the EU itself in 2013, when it pledged a more equal distribution of support by 'limiting the budget for big farms.'
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
But the rhetoric on greater equality has not translated into substantive change. A 2021 report for the European Parliament on the biggest beneficiaries of CAP funding found that between 2018 and 2021, a staggering 3.3 billion euros ended up in the coffers of 17 billionaires. Recipients included former Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis and British vacuum cleaner tycoon James Dyson. At a time when thousands of small farmers are struggling for survival or throwing in the towel, such largesse for the super-rich raises serious questions about the fitness for purpose of the CAP and the effects of multiple rounds of reform over the years.
Attempts to root out abusive practices in the bloc's food supply chain through CAP reform have also floundered in the face of both powerful special interests and the complexities of the EU single market rules. Food producers have long complained about the overwhelming power of the massive supermarket chains that maximize profits by relentlessly squeezing producers' profit margins. In response to unfair trading practices in the supply chain, the European Commission set up the much-vaunted Agricultural Markets Task Force back in 2016. Its final report contained a whole host of recommendations to reform how CAP regulates the relationship between food producers and retailers, in order to give farmers a fairer deal.
Yet almost a decade on, a major survey conducted by the food charity Sustain found that farmers still typically make a profit of less than one cent on staples like a loaf of bread or a block of cheddar cheese. Frustrated by lack of progress at the EU level, national governments, particularly across Eastern Europe, have tried to curb the power of supermarkets by imposing 'taxes, price caps and requirements to stock local produce.' However these moves have repeatedly fallen afoul of EU single market and competition rules, leading to confrontation with Brussels and ultimately a maintenance of the status quo.
Perhaps the biggest existential threat to the future of European agriculture over the coming decade, however, is rapid demographic change, with the average age of an EU farmer now around 57. Almost a third of land holders are already at or beyond retirement age, while only about 10 percent are under the age of 40. The demographic crisis in farming has been exacerbated by the CAP's drive to create ever-larger units, which has seen the number of farms in the bloc fall by more than a third since 2005. As a result, only those with already large holdings have the resources to afford the often astronomical price of farmland, creating a vicious cycle that increasingly excludes new and younger entrants.
The CAP's direct payments system also exacerbates the damaging phenomenon of 'land retention.' As Marian Picot, general secretary of the European Council of Young Farmers, or CEJA, explains, 'When people retire from farming they often choose to keep their land, to receive the payments that go with it as a source of income.' That further delays young farmers' access to land ownership. The CEJA cites overly burdensome CAP bureaucracy and difficulties in accessing credit as other major obstacles to entry into the profession. As a result younger people are now less engaged in farming, even though the amount of land devoted to agriculture has remained steady.
As land ownership is increasingly concentrated in fewer and larger holdings, environmentally damaging intensive farming methods are more likely to be employed, despite clear scientific evidence that 'agriculture must become more sustainable or it will be decimated by climate change' and pose a serious threat to food security across the bloc. The belated response from EU policymakers has been yet another reform of the CAP to facilitate the creation of so-called 'eco-schemes,' which are supposed to reward farmers 'for taking care of the climate, landscapes and the environment.'
However, a recent report by BirdLife Europe suggests that up to 48 billion euros of CAP funding is being directed toward measures that preserve the status quo, rather than drive change. In many cases national governments have deliberately prioritized weak eco-schemes that maximize payouts while achieving very little substantive reform, rendering the schemes at best largely ineffective and at worst counterproductive. What little good that may be achieved by such initiatives is also ultimately undermined by the realities of the CAP funding model. According to a major study carried out by the Nature Food journal in 2023, more than 80 percent of CAP income supports are channeled into livestock. As professor Paul Brehen—one of the lead authors of the report—explains, that is having 'a perverse effect on the food transition' by prioritizing emissions-heavy animal produce at the expense of more environmentally friendly and efficient plant cultivation.
In early 2023, with many key agricultural indicators—including emissions, farmers' salaries and demographics—still heading in the wrong direction, the EU introduced its latest round of CAP reforms designed to make EU farming 'fairer, greener and more results driven.' However, given the outsize contribution of the bloc's agricultural policy to the multiple crises now facing European farming, expecting the CAP to put the industry on an equitable and sustainable footing for the future may be akin to closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted.
John Boyce is an Irish freelance journalist with a background in international relations and Hispanic affairs. He writes for a variety of publications on Anglo-Irish, Spanish and European politics.
The post The EU's Common Agricultural Policy Has Created a Farming Crisis appeared first on World Politics Review.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

England set to learn inaugural Nations Cup opponents
England set to learn inaugural Nations Cup opponents

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

England set to learn inaugural Nations Cup opponents

England's Henry Pollock has been selected for this summer's British and Irish Lions tour of Australia [Getty Images] England look set to kick off their inaugural Nations Cup campaign with fixtures against Fiji, South Africa and Argentina next summer. Discussions are under way to play the Fiji "away" match at the Allianz Stadium in Twickenham before trips to South Africa and Argentina. Advertisement England will then host New Zealand, Australia and Japan the following autumn before a grand final. The Nations Cup will take place every two years, excluding years with a Rugby World Cup or a British and Irish Lions tour. While Nations Cup organisers have stressed plans are yet to be finalised, sources have told the BBC negotiations are ongoing to stage the England against Fiji match in Europe, with Twickenham a mooted destination. The Nations Cup top division will consist of the teams that make up the Six Nations, the four Rugby Championship teams, and most likely Japan and Fiji, although their participation is still to be rubber-stamped. Advertisement While the Six Nations and Rugby Championship will continue as normal, the summer and autumn windows will see each country play the six "other" teams, with three matches in July and three in November. The matches in those windows will be amalgamated into a table, with the winners crowned after a finals weekend at the end of November. However, discussions are ongoing about some sides playing one of their "home" matches on neutral territory to reduce travel. But instead of facing England in South Africa or Argentina, it's thought Fiji are open to playing in Europe given the number of their players operating in the northern hemisphere. Advertisement A match at Twickenham would also provide a significant financial boost and draw a big crowd. The Nations Cup was confirmed by World Rugby in October 2023, with the first iteration taking place in 2026 and relegation and promotion scheduled from 2030 onwards.

MAHA adviser: Report's citation errors ‘great disservice' to Trump, RFK Jr.
MAHA adviser: Report's citation errors ‘great disservice' to Trump, RFK Jr.

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MAHA adviser: Report's citation errors ‘great disservice' to Trump, RFK Jr.

Calley Means, a top adviser to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and proponent of Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, said Monday that flaws in a recent MAHA report were a 'disservice' to the Trump administration. Despite the issues, including false citations, Means defended the documents findings. 'Just to be super direct on the report, it was a great disservice to President Trump and Bobby Kennedy that that report had some errors in its citations,' Means told NewsNation's 'On Balance' host Leland Vittert. 'I think the reason it's primetime is because of the content of the report.' 'There was not one word of the MAHA report that was factually corrected — a couple footnote errors,' he added. The HHS report, focused primarily on digging into the root causes of chronic diseases in children, was heralded as a 'milestone' for Kennedy and the Trump administration's health care endeavors when it was released May 22. It cited hundreds of studies to highlighted four main factors as contributors to poor health: ultraprocessed foods, environmental chemicals, digital behavior and 'overmedicalization.' But the administration's celebration of its release quickly unraveled after the news outlet NOTUS found some of the studies cited did not exist or did not back up the report's conclusions. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt downplayed the citation problems last week and reaffirmed the administration's 'complete confidence' in Kennedy. 'I understand there were some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed, and the report will be updated,' Leavitt told reporters Thursday. 'But it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government.' Means similarly sought to highlight the report's findings despite the multitude of errors that it cited to reach its conclusions. 'The content of the report really explained that every major government piece of public health advice over the past 30 years has been fake in a real substantial way,' said Means, the brother of Trump's surgeon general nominee Casey Means. The health adviser, hired as a special employee to HHS earlier this year, told Vittert that he's currently working on a 'budgetary analysis' for the White House. 'We right now have double the rates of obesity and diabetes as Europe,' he said. 'If you take the rates of obesity and diabetes in the United States to European levels, we save trillions in cost.' A major focus will be on stopping the government from 'subsidizing' ultraprocessed foods, including through changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly referred to as food stamps. 'We have a fundamental, unmistakable, blaring problem with ultraprocessed food consumption,' Means said. 'And that's not because of personal choice, it's not because of free will, it's not the free market; we subsidize ultraprocessed food with free lunch subsidies, with agriculture subsidies, with our SNAP.' 'We are not only recommending ultra processed food with the dietary guidelines — which we're going to fix them, they still do — but subsidizing,' he said. The Means siblings have been prominent figures in the MAHA effort with both being quickly tapped for roles in Kennedy's HHS — but they have also drawn rebuke from the health chief's former vice presidential running mate Nicole Shanahan and others. Shanahan wrote in a post on social platform X last month that she was 'promised' neither would be appointed to federal posts if she supported Kennedy's confirmation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Record number of Russians support peace talks, end of war in Ukraine, poll shows
Record number of Russians support peace talks, end of war in Ukraine, poll shows

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Record number of Russians support peace talks, end of war in Ukraine, poll shows

The number of Russian citizens who support peace talks and an end to the war in Ukraine has reached a record high since the start of the full-scale invasion, according to a poll by the independent Russian pollster Levada Center published on June 2. Some 64% of the respondents favored peace talks, representing a 6% increase since March. Meanwhile, the number of people who supported the war's continuation decreased from 34% in March to 28% in May. Compared to previous survey results, in May 2023, 48% of respondents believed that the war should continue. In May 2024, this figure dropped to 43%. The news comes after the second round of direct peace talks between Ukraine and Russia occurred in Istanbul. The parties agreed on a new prisoner exchange, as well as the repatriation of 6,000 bodies of fallen Ukrainian soldiers. No agreement on a ceasefire was reached. The share of supporters of peaceful negotiations is higher among women (73%), people under 24 (77%), residents of villages and towns with populations under 100,000 (67% each), as well as those who believe that the country is going in the wrong direction (76%) and those who disapprove of Russian President Vladimir Putin's presidential performance (77%). The share of those who support continuing the war is higher among men (39%), respondents aged 55 and older (35%), residents of Moscow (40%), those who believe that things in the country are going in the right direction (32%), and those who approve of the activities of the current president (30%). A majority of respondents (73%) believe that Russia and Ukraine should address the hostilities' root causes and only then agree on a ceasefire. On the contrary, some 18% think that the parties will first reach a truce and ceasefire and then resolve all other issues. Only 3% of Russians believe Russia is an obstacle to peace. At the same time, 14% of respondents believe that the U.S. is to blame, while 36% each see Ukraine and European countries as major obstacles in peace negotiations. The center conducted the survey from May 22 to 28, involving 1,613 people aged 18 and older in 50 regions of Russia. Read also: Growing up under missiles — Ukrainian childhoods shaped by war (Photos) We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store