International Year of Glaciers' Preservation: save the glaciers!
The United Nations has designated 2025 as the International Year of Glaciers' Preservation to highlight the importance of glaciers and ensure that those relying on them, and those affected by cryospheric (1) processes, receive the necessary hydrological, meteorological, and climate services.
Glaciers are crucial for regulating the global climate and providing freshwater, essential for billions of people. However, due to climate change, driven mainly by human activities since the 1800s, these vital resources are rapidly melting.
The resolution calls on the international community to resolve conflicts through inclusive dialogue and negotiation in order to ensure the strengthening of peace and trust in relations between UN member states as a value that promotes sustainable development, peace and security, and human rights.
Contrary to calls on the international community to resolve conflicts through inclusive dialogue and negotiation, Canada has decided to militarize the Arctic, citing the war in Ukraine as a major factor. In fact, much of the Arctic Circle is located in Russia, Canada, and Greenland.
Last year the Canadian government affirmed that NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) will ensure Canadian sovereignty over the Arctic. However, NORAD, which is led by the United States and headquartered in Colorado Springs, is in power, while NATO is headquartered in Brussels. This decision by the federal government gives disproportionate control over the Canadian Arctic and threatens Inuit sovereignty and the balance of the already fragile Arctic ecosystem. The proposed militarization of the Canadian Arctic threatens to further weaken the ecosystem, which is being hit hard by climate change and melting ice.
Dramatic changes in the Arctic, including an increase in wildfires, the greening of the Tundra and an increase in winter precipitation, are documented in the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 2024 Arctic Report Card.
The report notes a growing scientific consensus that melting Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, among other factors, may be slowing important ocean currents at both poles, with potentially dire consequences for a much colder northern Europe) and greater sea-level rise along the U.S. East Coast.
Unfortunately, the Trump administration's plan to dismantle the nation's atmospheric research programs and could set U.S. forecasting back to dark age, warns hurricane, weather and ocean scientists.
We cannot negotiate with the melting point of ice, is one of the bottom lines of the report from the International Cryosphere Climate Initiative, which includes scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and WMO's Global Cryosphere Watch network.
These new findings corroborate recent WMO State of the Global Climate and State of Global Water Resources reports which also have also highlighted the alarming melting affecting the cryosphere.
A glacier is a large accumulation of mainly ice and snow, that originates on land and flows slowly through the influence of its own weight. Glaciers are found on every continent. They exist in many mountain regions and around the edges of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. There are more than 200 000 glaciers in the world, covering an area of around 700 000 km2 (RGI, 2023). Glaciers are considered as important water towers, storing about 158 000 km3 of freshwater (Farinotti et al., 2019). Glaciers are a source of life, providing freshwater to people, animals and plants alike.
Okjkull (Icelandic pronunciation: [kjktl], Ok glacier) was a glacier in western Iceland on top of the shield volcano Ok.[2] Ok is located north-east of Reykjavik. The glacier was declared dead in 2014 by glaciologist Oddur Sigursson due to its loss of thickness.
The plaque was installed on August 18, 2019,[5] with an inscription written by Andri Snr Magnason, titled A letter to the future, in Icelandic and English. The English version reads:
Ok is the first Icelandic glacier to lose its status as a glacier.
In the next 200 years all our glaciers are expected to follow the same path.
This monument is to acknowledge that we know
what is happening and what needs to be done.
Only you know if we did it.
Impact
Glaciers and ice caps are critical for sustaining ecosystems and human livelihoods. They provide essential meltwater runoff during dry seasons, supporting drinking water, agriculture, industry, and clean energy production, making these frozen reservoirs vital for global water resources. Climate and cryosphere changes, however, are disrupting the water cycle, altering the amount and timing of glacier melt, causing knock-on impacts on water resource availability while also contributing to sea-level rise.
As glaciers continue to shrink and snow cover diminishes, less water will be available for communities, particularly in seasonally dry regions. Increased competition for water resources is expected, with regions like China, India, and the Andes among the most vulnerable. Glaciers that have surpassed their "Peak Water" point-the stage at which meltwater runoff reaches its maximum-will gradually provide decreasing contributions to downstream water supplies, intensifying challenges for water security.
Over the past century, despite representing only 0.5% of global land surface area, glaciers have contributed more to sea-level rise than the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Between 2000 and 2023, glaciers are estimated to have lost an average mass of approximately 273 billion tonnes per year, which is equivalent to approximately 0.75 mm per year of global sea-level rise (The GlaMBIE Team, 2025).
The continuous retreat of glaciers signals the growing impacts of global warming and creates new hazards while intensifying existing ones. For example, melting glaciers are increasing the risk of hazards such as glacier lake outburst floods, ice avalanches and glacial debris flows, posing dangers to local and downstream communities. However, risk assessments are often not possible due to an absence of data (IPCC, 2019). Therefore, increased observation of the cryosphere is critical for effectively forecasting the impacts of cryosphere-related hazards.
___________________________________________
https://public.wmo.int/resources/campaigns/launch-of-website-international-year-of-glaciers-preservation-2025
(1) Cryospheric: The cryosphere is an umbrella term for those portions of Earth's surface where water is in solid form. This includes sea ice, ice on lakes or rivers, snow, glaciers, ice caps, ice sheets, and frozen ground (which includes permafrost).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Canada's digital tax revoked following Trump's condemnation
WASHINGTON, D.C.: On Friday, President Donald Trump announced that he was halting trade discussions with Canada due to its decision to proceed with a tax on technology companies, which he described as "a direct and blatant attack on our country." In a post on his social media platform, Trump revealed that Canada had informed the U.S. of its commitment to the digital services tax. The tax will affect both Canadian and foreign businesses that interact with online users in Canada and will take effect on Monday. "In light of this egregious tax, we are terminating ALL trade discussions with Canada, effective immediately. We will inform Canada of the tariff they will incur to do business with the United States within the next seven days," Trump stated. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney responded, indicating that Canada would "continue to engage in these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians. It's all part of the negotiation process." In fact by Sunday night, Canada had rescinded the digital tax in favor of continuing negotiations. This announcement marks the latest twist in the trade conflict that Trump has initiated since beginning his second term in January. Relations with Canada have fluctuated, especially after Trump previously hinted at the possibility of Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney met with Trump in May at the White House, maintaining a polite yet firm stance. Last week, Trump visited Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta, where Carney mentioned that both countries agreed on a 30-day deadline for trade negotiations. The digital services tax would have imposed a three percent levy on revenue from Canadian users for companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber, and Airbnb, applying retroactively and creating a potential US$2 billion liability for U.S. businesses by the end of the month. Discussions between Canada and the U.S. have also included addressing a range of steep tariffs imposed by Trump on goods from Canada. The Republican president had previously indicated that the U.S. would soon send letters to various countries regarding new tariff rates his administration plans to implement. Trump has already enacted 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum, 25 percent tariffs on automobiles, and a 10 percent tax on imports from most countries. He may raise these rates on July 9, following a 90-day negotiation period he initiated. Additionally, Canada and Mexico face individual tariffs of up to 25 percent, which Trump implemented to combat fentanyl smuggling, although certain products remain protected under the 2020 U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement established during Trump's first term.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Trump's anti-offshore wind ire leading US states to look north for Atlantic Canada clean power
Massachusetts is among the American states exploring sourcing electricity from planned offshore wind farms in Atlantic Canada, following the US market-stalling moratorium imposed on the industry by the Trump administration earlier this year. The state, home to the pioneering 800-megawatt Vineyard Wind 1 project brought online last year, is one of six in the US Northeast aiming to shift to renewable energy-based power grids before 2040. But a representative from the Massachusetts energy department suggested they were being forced to rethink options for reaching a targeted 5,600 MW of offshore wind power this decade since Donald Trump — who has long been a vociferous opponent of ' windmills ' — made good on a threat to halt a number of multi-billion dollar projects on ' day one ' of his second presidency. Maria Hardiman, spokesperson for the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, told Canada's National Observer her department was now in 'regular communication' around developing 'new energy sources,' including Canadian offshore wind that would allow it to lower electricity costs and boost energy independence in the state and the wider US Northeast. 'Building on our efforts to connect our regions through transmission, there are significant opportunities to construct new onshore and offshore wind projects across Canada and the [North American] northeast,' she said. 'We will continue to explore these partnerships to bring down energy bills and bolster the energy independence of our region.' Industry insiders say other states in the region, led by New York, are investigating tapping projects off the province of Nova Scotia, which is set for a first leasing of construction sites later this year. "These US Northeast states' options to meet their clean energy targets with onshore renewables are quite limited. So for this reason, large-scale Canadian offshore wind could come into the picture," says Aegir Insights' Signe Sorensen Yet, Massachusetts was the only state that would specifically comment on whether it was looking to source Canadian offshore wind power, when approached by Canada's National Observer. A spokesperson for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), a public-benefit corporation that handles power procurement for the state — which has a nation-leading target of bringing 9,000 MW of offshore wind onto its grid by 2035 — said it 'continues to be focused on advancing the offshore wind industry in the US.' 'We applaud Canada for growing its offshore wind industry which will help to spur additional innovation and support expansion in the North American market,' NYSERDA spokesperson Deanna Cohen told Canada's National Observer. States keeping projects low-profile Industry observers suggest many states have opted to progress projects in 'relative silence,' hoping that keeping a low profile will save their developments from Trump's anti-offshore wind ire. However, several market analysts believe Trump's pullback on what had been a steadily-maturing US offshore wind sector will mean there is a 'golden opportunity' for Canada to deliver power to key markets south of the border. 'The US, which was expected to become one of the world's main [offshore wind] markets, is now going in completely the opposite direction for political reasons,' said Signe Sørensen, an analyst with Danish offshore wind consultancy Aegir Insights. 'This could matter a lot to Canada.' The New England states have been 'spearheading the US build-out, procuring lots of offshore wind' as part of former US President Joe Biden's objective of adding 30,000 MW of production by 2030, she said. 'Delays to construction now will have ramifications far beyond Trump's term. 'These states' options to meet their clean energy targets with onshore renewables are quite limited,' said Sørensen. 'So for this reason, large-scale Canadian offshore wind could come into the picture.' John Dalton, president of Power Advisory, a US power sector consulting firm, told Canada's National Observer there was 'definitely a case' for future offshore wind production from Atlantic Canada being exported to New England. 'The Trump administration has largely derailed the realization of the [US Northeast's] electricity market's clean energy and offshore wind goals,' he said. 'States will be pivoting to other resources … with policymakers very focused on securing low [electricity] costs.' Nova Scotia offshore wind price 'very favourable' A price check between power purchase agreements finalized by US states with developers for wind farms now being built off the US — including the multi-billion-dollar Empire Wind 1 and Sunrise Wind off New York and Revolution Wind off Rhode Island, which would together power well over 1 million American homes — and a number of the proposed projects off Nova Scotia compares 'very favourably' the Canadian sector. 'The economics of Nova Scotian offshore wind would certainly be competitive with these and future US offshore wind projects,' said Sørensen, though she declined to provide hard 'levelized cost of energy' figures – the industry benchmark metric for the cost of a project over its lifetime compared to the revenue generated by purchase power agreements, citing commercial confidentiality. Aegir CEO Scott Urquhart noted: 'Nova Scotia has a huge area of shallow water that could house tens of gigawatts [tens of thousands of megawatts] with excellent economics. Looking at distance to markets, interconnections to the US are not a crazy idea — they've been doing similar distances off Europe for years.' Given the historically high electricity prices in the US Northeast and the fast-rising power demand forecast, Aegir calculations suggest Nova Scotian offshore wind supply could fit well with states' pursuits of a strategy led by greater diversification of clean energy sources. Atlantic Canada's rich wind resource Winds rush along the coastlines of Canada's Maritime provinces at speeds similar to those off Northern Europe — at roughly 40 km/h — where offshore wind farms have been generating power to the grid for more than 30 years and have led to the development of a sector employing over 300,000 people. Canada's Atlantic Economic Council said last year that offshore wind off Nova Scotia could become a $7-billion market by 2030, creating an initial 5,000 jobs amid other benefits for regional economies. Nova Scotia is set to hold its first auction, where waters would be leased to developers to harness a first 5,000 megawatts (MW) of energy, before the end of 2025. The Global Wind Energy Council, an industry body, said in its most recent annual report Canada could add a first 1,000 MW by 2034. But under the aegis of making Canada an 'energy superpower,' Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston has pitched a 40,000 MW project called Wind West as a means of meeting 27 per cent of the country's total energy demand. Multi-billion-dollar visions of a massive offshore wind-powered transmission trunkline running along North America's Atlantic coastline are not new. Several long-distance power transmission projects have been considered over the past decade, including the high-profile Atlantic Wind Connection backed by Google, Swiss green-energy private-equity house Good Energies, Japanese industrial conglomerate Marubeni, and Belgian transmission system operator Elia.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
A splash of paint, a flood of warnings: climate protest in a time of acceleration
On June 19, shortly after opening time at the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, a young man named Marcel walked up to Pablo Picasso's "L'hétaïre" and threw pink paint across its protective glass covering. It was a climate protest, part of a three-week 'action phase' by the group Last Generation Canada, which is calling on the Canadian government to establish a climate disaster protection agency. It's probably a safe bet that many people would have found Marcel's action incomprehensible. And not just because they find the tactic of targeting artwork baffling — but also because there is such a widening gulf between the escalating severity of our climate predicament and its declining priority in our politics and public opinion. What could possibly cause a young person like Marcel to do something so drastic and provocative? Doesn't he know we have tariffs to contend with and a world filled with more immediate crises? Climate change can wait, we seem to have decided. The drop in public priority is grossly out of sync with the worsening reality of climate change. The past years have seen a marked jump in global heating and most people are blithely unaware of the latest string of spine-chilling scientific observations. Groups like Last Generation stubbornly refuse to look away. And before we take a quick tour of the reasons people like Marcel might resort to seemingly-desperate actions, it's worth hearing from them directly. One of the other organizations loosely aligned with Last Generation was Just Stop Oil, based in the UK. And the reason it's in the past tense is that Just Stop Oil announced this Spring it has put down its cans of paint (and soup) and hung up the hi-vis vests used while disrupting traffic. 'It is the end of soup on van Goghs, cornstarch on Stonehenge and slow marching in the streets,' the group said in a statement. The organization's main goal was to stop the UK from issuing new licenses for oil and gas exploration. The Labour party pledged to stop the process and has maintained the policy in government. There has also been a severe crackdown on disruptive protests in the UK and activists have received lengthy prison sentences. But ultimately, 'We achieved what we set out to achieve,' says James Skeet, a spokesperson for Just Stop Oil. The drop in public priority is grossly out of sync with the worsening reality of climate change and the latest string of spine-chilling scientific observations. But climate activists stubbornly refuse to look away, writes Chris Hatch. Last Generation Canada has a more modest goal — a national climate disaster protection agency. The group highlights the need to tackle climate change and boost adaptation response for those 'whose homes, communities, lives and livelihoods have been destroyed by extreme weather, including wildfires worsened by the burning of fossil fuels.' After he was released by the police pending his court date, Marcel explained his decision to throw paint on the Picasso's glass casing (for the record, museum officials have confirmed no damage was done to the painting itself). 'Art is humanity, art is life,' said Marcel. 'There is no point in protecting a Picasso painting if no one is able … to appreciate it — if they themselves are not protected from the rising climate disasters around the world that are more frequent and more violent every year.' When Marcel goes to court, he will have some serious evidence to present, if the judge is willing to hear it. Acceleration The same day of Marcel's action in Montreal, 60 leading climate scientists released an assessment updating the critical indicators of climate change. 'The news is grim,' said Zeke Hausfather, one of the authors. There's been some dispute among scientists about whether climate change is getting worse at a constant rate or whether it's actually accelerating. That debate appears to be settled. 'Things aren't just getting worse. They're getting worse, faster,' Hausfather said. 'We're actively moving in the wrong direction in a critical period of time that we would need to meet our most ambitious climate goals. Some reports, there's a silver lining. I don't think there really is one in this one.' The scientists created an infographic highlighting the changes measured in 2024, compared to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) last report, which was issued just four years ago: Energy imbalance It sounds a bit wonky, but Earth's energy imbalance is actually pretty simple — a measure of how much heat our planet absorbs from the sun versus how much gets radiated back out to space. It's sometimes called 'the most important metric' in the world because it gets around short-term fluctuations in temperature and inexorably determines our long-term future. It 'is the most important measure of the amount of heat being trapped in the system,' Hausfather said. 'It is very clearly accelerating. It's worrisome.' In fact, another study published in May (this one conducted by 57 scientists) summarized satellite measurements and found that ' Earth's energy imbalance more than doubled in recent decades.' 'The large trend has taken us by surprise,' the authors write. 'It is rising much faster than expected, and in 2023 it reached values two times higher than the best estimate from IPCC … twice that predicted by climate models.' One-point-five is unavoidable Greenhouse gas emissions from burning oil, gas and coal set a new record in 2024. That means we're on track to blow through the remaining carbon budget to stay under 1.5 C of heating within two to three years. That won't come as a surprise to regular readers. But it puts the actions of campaigners like Marcel in perspective. It is, after all, the goal agreed by the nations of the world — 'a political limit countries have decided that beyond which the impact of climate change would be unacceptable to their societies,' said Joeri Rogelj, a climate scientist at Imperial College London. Sensitive Earth We could go on highlighting the wild divergence between the latest scientific observations and public understanding or government action. But let's tie things up with one last exhibit Marcel might offer the judge. The Earth's climate is showing itself to be more sensitive to carbon pollution than climate models had predicted. This question of sensitivity has probably been the biggest question mark in climate science — we know that the Earth heats up when we blanket it with greenhouse gases, but how much does the Earth react? All we've really had to go on are reconstructions of deep history and projections using computer models. But we now have enough years of satellite data that we can check how closely those models track results in the real world. The results were published this month, and the answer is sobering: ' bad news,' says lead author Gunnar Myhre from the CICERO Center for International Climate Research in Norway. When you compare NASA's satellite data of the Earth's energy imbalance to the models, you can clearly see that the models are underestimating the real world over the last decade (NASA CERES satellite observations shown in red and the average of models in black; individual models in faded grey). What this means, in the sterile language of scientific papers, is that 'increasing concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases likely will cause even more warming than most current models predict.' In plain language: we have to cut back fossil fuel burning even faster than we thought. The carbon budget to have any chance of staying below the outer limit of 2C is smaller than predicted. When Marcel stands before the judge, he won't just be defending a splash of paint — he'll be defending the right to sound the alarm in a world filled with pressing priorities. The science he brings isn't just abstract charts or distant projections. It's the brutal, accelerating reality we now inhabit: faster warming, tighter carbon budgets, and a dangerously sensitive Earth. His protest, disruptive as it may seem, is a response to something far more disruptive — the unraveling of the stable climate that made human civilization possible. The question dripping from Marcel's pink paint is whether we'll be more scandalized by the tactics of the messenger than by the message itself.
