Best Memorial Day Deals Under $50 Still Live: Maximise Your Shopping Budget With These Bargains on Tech, Home Essentials and More
If you didn't get a chance to wrap up your shopping in the last couple of days, you're in luck. Many of the best Memorial Day deals we've seen this year are still available for picking. There are also plenty of lingering deals from retailers like Amazon, Best Buy and Home Depot, but many of these offers will end in near time.
If you've already finished shopping for big-ticket items like TVs, appliances or camping gear, tons of wallet-friendly deals can still be found on tech and daily essentials to stretch your remaining budget. Shop these deals now to score some serious savings before prices bounce back.
Bookmark this page and check back often -- we're refreshing it regularly as deals end, sell out or get last-minute markdowns. And if you're hunting for even lower prices, be sure to explore our curated list of Memorial Day deals under $25.
Memorial Day deals under $50
Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K: $30
Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K is a great way to convert any 4K TV with an HDMI port into a smart TV. Whether you have a TV that doesn't have smart features or if you just don't like the smart TV interface of your current TV, the Fire TV Stick 4K is the product for you. With this $20 discount off of the $50 list price, the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K is an even better value.
Details
Save $20 $30 at Amazon
Close
JBL Go 4 ultra-portable Bluetooth speaker: $40
The JBL Go 4 is a tiny but mighty Bluetooth speaker. You can take it anywhere as it has a small loop that you can use to attach to your backpack, keychain or anywhere else. It's small enough to put in your pocket or purse, but it doesn't skimp on sound with 5 watts of power and ample volume. The battery lasts seven hours, so you don't have to worry about it running out of power quickly.
Details
Save $10 $40 at Walmart $40 at Amazon
Close
ESR 3-in-1 wireless charger: $36
This multi-device charger from ESR is perfect if you've been wanting to reduce the number of cables in your charging setup. It supports the Qi2 standard and will have your iPhone, Apple Watch and AirPods ready to tackle the day all at once.
Details
Save $37 $36 at Amazon
Close
Ugreen 4-port 65W charger: $30
Ugreen's Nexode series has some of the best chargers we've seen. This particular adapter has a 4-port design (three USB-C and one USB-A) and can be used to charge more than just phones. It's also compatible with laptops and handheld consoles.
Details
Save $13 $30 at Amazon
Close
Targus Universal Adapter: $16
If you're often jet-setting from one country to another or have friends and family that visit often, then this universal travel adapter is something you need. It has a portable design, safety shutters and international compatibility, making it a must-have.
Details
Save $17 $16 at Amazon
Close
More Memorial Day deals under $50:
What else should I know about Memorial Day deals?
Glad you asked. If you're looking for even more savings, here are the best still-available Memorial Day deals under $25. You can also take a gander at some of the best Memorial Day bargains being offered by Amazon and Walmart. For a grand overview, check out our roundup of the ultimate sales and lowest prices still available after Memorial Day weekend. Keep in mind that the holiday has passed, so the deals won't be around for much longer.
How we choose the best Memorial Day deals under $50
Many of us at CNET have covered shopping events for over five years, including Black Friday, Prime Day, Memorial Day and countless others. We've gotten good at weeding out scams and superficial deals, so you see only the best offers from all over.
When choosing deals to show you, we look for real discounts, quality reviews and remaining sale time. Our team of experts has tested countless products to ensure we're only sharing the best options under $50.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
15 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Landmark House v. NCAA Settlement Approved by Judge, Allowing Colleges to Pay Athletes
A federal judge in California finally approved a $2.6 billion settlement for college athletes that upends a century-old tenet of college sports—the notion that schools cannot pay the athletes that play for them. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Friday ushered in a new era—a professional era—for college sports by signing off on a plan for the NCAA and the five most prominent sports conferences to settle a class-action lawsuit with current and former college players. The deal will give backpay to some, as well as creating a system in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes. Schools are poised to begin implementing the new model this fall. The decision has been months in the making, drawn out in its final weeks by the judge's insistence that the NCAA find a way to stop current athletes from losing their roster spots. The settlement would 'enable NCAA schools to share their athletic revenues with Division I college student-athletes for the first time in the history of the NCAA,' Wilken wrote in her 76-page opinion. She added that it was 'expected to open the door for Division I student- athletes to receive, in the aggregate, approximately $1.6 billion dollars in new compensation and benefits per year, with that amount increasing over the next ten years.' Each school that elects to share revenue with athletes will start by distributing more than $20 million in the coming academic year. That amount will reach about $32.9 million per school by 2034-35, the end of the injunctive-relief settlement, Wilken wrote. The settlement brings the biggest changes yet to college sports, which until recently had banned athletes from earning much more than a scholarship, room and board. It comes on the heels of years of upheaval that have included loosened restrictions on off-the-field compensation for players, liberalized transfer rules and blockbuster television deals for schools and the chaotic conference realignment that followed. Yet during all of that time, many college sports leaders had still resisted paying athletes directly from the billions of dollars in revenue they helped generate. Now, that restraint is off. Schools have been readying for months for the settlement effects to land on their athletic departments, most immediately by transforming how they recruit and manage rosters in football and basketball. 'People have been doing a lot of work on a contingent basis to try to create the infrastructure that's envisioned by the settlement,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said ahead of the final approval. 'It'll definitely be rocky and kind of messy coming out of the gate, because big things are that way.' Private equity has already been circling college sports, pledging to inject capital into schools but also to advise them on how to grow their sports business. And athletic departments are openly wrestling over what the ruling means for the future of Olympic sports on campus. Most of these sports do not generate much revenue, but American campuses serve as the primary Olympic training ground for Team USA. The settlement largely immunizes the NCAA against similar claims, a provision the association considered essential as it seeks to move past decades of court battles over payments for players. But it will almost certainly not end litigation over the shape of college sports. It isn't clear whether the money needs to be distributed equitably in accordance with Title IX, the federal statute that requires publicly funded institutions to provide equal opportunities to male and female athletes. Aside from preparing for schools to distribute roughly $20 million a year to athletes, the settlement didn't specify how exactly much should be allocated to each sport. The majority will likely go to football, the financial engine of most athletic departments, as well as men's basketball. Female athletes have raised questions over the payouts they are set to receive and what fair compensation looks like for them going forward. 'This settlement doesn't come close to recognizing the value I lost,' LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne said in an unsuccessful attempt to object to the settlement. There's also the open question of whether athletes getting paid by their institutions are working for them—a distinction that could open up schools to more legal challenges. But even without employee status, the settlement will transform the relationship between players and schools. Write to Louise Radnofsky at Laine Higgins at and Rachel Bachman at
CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon.com (NasdaqGS:AMZN) Announces US$5 Billion AWS Expansion in Taiwan
recently announced the launch of its AWS Asia Pacific Region in Taipei, marking a significant $5 billion investment targeting technological expansion. This, along with ongoing investments in data centers in North Carolina and Chile, highlights Amazon's commitment to enhancing its cloud service capabilities. The stock's 12% rise over the past month aligns closely with the broader tech market's positive sentiments, reinforced by the general economic confidence shown by a strong May jobs report. The company's expansion efforts in AI and cloud infrastructure undoubtedly contributed positively to market performance, mirroring broader sector gains. Buy, Hold or Sell View our complete analysis and fair value estimate and you decide. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. The recent announcement of Amazon's AWS expansion in Taipei, alongside its significant investments in North Carolina and Chile, enhances the company's cloud infrastructure. Over the past three years, (NasdaqGS:AMZN) has achieved a robust total return of 79.00%, reflecting strong investor confidence. This is in contrast to the tech industry, where Amazon's one-year performance matched the broader US Multiline Retail industry at a 13.3% return, showcasing its resilience in a competitive market. The AWS and AI expansion initiatives are likely to fuel future revenue and earnings growth, with analysts projecting revenue growth at 8.9% per year. The focus on operational efficiency in fulfillment services is expected to bolster margins, positively impacting profitability. However, significant investments may present cost challenges, affecting earnings forecasts if these ventures do not yield projected outcomes. Amazon's current share price of US$185.01, compared to the analyst price target of US$239.33, indicates potential upside, with a 22.7% gap to the target. Analysts voice varied expectations, highlighting the necessity for investors to align these insights with their own assumptions. Maintaining confidence in Amazon's capacity to innovate and expand effectively will be crucial in realizing projected financial outcomes. Gain insights into historical outcomes by reviewing our past performance report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:AMZN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
