AMERICAS U.S.-China framework underwhelms
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today
I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, opens new tab, and you can follow us on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
After all the hype, this week's trade talks between the United States and China turned into something of a damp squib, producing a 'framework' for progress and little in the way of concrete details. Investor attention will now quickly switch to today's U.S. consumer price inflation report and two big auctions of long-term Treasury debt, including $39 billion of 10-year Treasury notes.
I'll discuss this and the rest of today's market news below. Plus, today's column explains why Italy's surprising bond market revival challenges its reputation as a debt outlier and what this means for the rest of the G7.
Today's Market Minute
* U.S. and Chinese officials said on Tuesday they had agreed on a framework to get their trade truce back on track and remove China's export restrictions on rare earths, while offering little sign of a durable resolution to longstanding trade tensions.
* Billionaire businessman Elon Musk said on Wednesday he regretted some of the posts he made last week about U.S. President Donald Trump as they had gone "too far".
* Several U.S. cities braced for protests on Wednesday against Trump's sweeping immigration raids, as parts of the country's second largest city Los Angeles spent the night under curfew in an effort to quell five days of unrest.
* Beijing's restrictions on rare earth exports have exposed the West's dependency on Chinese supplies of these esoteric metals and the magnets they help power. Part of the solution may be to simply use less of them, says ROI metals columnist Andy Home.
* Seismic shifts in immigration are distorting the U.S. employment picture, making it harder for investors and policymakers to know exactly how much the labor market is actually slowing. Find out more in the latest from ROI markets columnist Jamie McGeever.
U.S.-China framework underwhelms
U.S. markets were underwhelmed by the outcome of the U.S.-China talks, with stock futures slipping back into the red early Wednesday.
Chinese stocks (.CSI300), opens new tab, (.HSI), opens new tab, by contrast, took a more positive view of the London talks and advanced almost 1% to a three-week high. The CSI Rare Earth Index (.CSI930598), opens new tab jumped nearly 4%, as Chinese rare earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth (300748.SZ), opens new tab said it had obtained export licences to regions including the U.S., Europe and Southeast Asia for products including magnets, motor rotors and components.
There are currently few details available about the discussions between Washington and Beijing.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the framework puts "meat on the bones" of a stalled agreement in Geneva last month, with the aim of removing restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earths and magnets and some of the recent U.S. export restrictions "in a balanced way".
But there was no additional information about the sky-high bilateral tariffs imposed - and paused - in recent months. Whatever agreements the two parties came to will now go back to their respective presidents for approval.
In the background, JPMorgan lifted its end-of-year forecast for China's onshore yuan , citing moderating risks around the trade war and a global theme of so-called de-dollarization.
The U.S. investment bank revised its dollar/yuan target to 7.15 from 7.30, seeing a "gentle downtrend" to 7.10 by mid-2026.
There was better news on the trade front back in the Americas. The United States and Mexico are negotiating a deal to reduce or eliminate Trump's 50% steel tariffs on imports up to a certain volume, industry sources said late Tuesday. That appeared to underscore the rise in Mexico's peso this week to its best level since August last year.
Meanwhile, MCSI's all-country stock index (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab managed to eke out another small gain to hit a new record high, which is impressive given the latest world economic forecasts.
The World Bank slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by 0.4 percentage point to 2.3%, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind".
In its twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, the bank lowered its forecasts for nearly 70% of all economies, including the United States, China and Europe, as well as six emerging market regions.
While the World Bank stopped short of forecasting a recession, it said growth this year would be the weakest outside of a recession since 2008. It forecast that GDP growth would average just 2.5% by 2027, the slowest pace in any decade since the 1960s.
Speaking in Beijing, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said coercive trade policies will fail to resolve financial imbalances and that the risk of mutual damage is so great that all sides must weigh policy adjustments to resolve the tensions.
Nevertheless, over in the UK, the blue chip FTSE100 (.FTSE), opens new tab rose to within a whisker of record highs set in March as investors awaited UK finance minister Rachael Reeves' latest government spending review on Wednesday.
Reeves will allocate more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public spending to different departments, outlining the government's priorities for the coming year.
The FTSE was helped by sterling's swoon this week after softer data on wages and jobs raised expectations for at least two more Bank of England interest rate cuts this year. The pound remained on the backfoot on Wednesday, near its weakest level against the euro in a month.
Elsewhere, Tesla shares climbed more than 2% ahead of the bell after its billionaire owner Elon Musk said he regretted some of the posts he made last week about President Trump.
But domestic U.S. tensions simmered as several U.S. cities braced for protests against Trump's sweeping immigration raids.
On the economic front, U.S. consumer prices are likely to have increased moderately in May given the relatively low price of gasoline, but tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods, potentially spurring underlying inflation pressures.
Core CPI inflation is expected to have hit 0.3% last month, which would push up the annual core rate to 2.9% from 2.8% in April.
Make sure to check out today's column, which looks at the remarkable drop in Italy's bond market risk premium versus Germany's.
Chart of the day
China holds a near monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors, and its decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended global supply chains. In May, Washington responded by halting shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licences that had been previously issued. Two days of talks in London between the two biggest economies attempted to break this logjam.
Today's events to watch
* U.S. May consumer price report (8:30 AM EDT), US May Federal budget (2:00 PM EDT)
* UK finance minister Rachel Reeves to announce multi-year spending plan
* U.S. Treasury auctions $39 billion of 10-year notes
* U.S. corporate earnings: Oracle
* European Central Bank board member Piero Cipollone and Irish central bank chief Gabriel Makhlouf speak
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain ready to implement US tariff deal, trade minister says
LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Britain is ready to implement its side of a tariff deal with the United States and is hopeful for a proclamation from U.S. President Donald Trump to put the agreement into effect in the coming days, trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said on Thursday. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Trump on May 8 agreed to reduce tariffs on UK imports of cars and steel to the U.S., with Britain agreeing to lower tariffs on beef and ethanol, but implementation of the deal has been delayed. Reynolds met U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday and discussed the implementation of the deal. Asked on Thursday if there would be an update by the end of the week, Reynolds said he was "very hopeful". "We're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House are ready to go on their side, we'll implement (our) part of the deal," Reynolds told reporters. Reynolds said he would issue a government order known as a statutory instrument to implement the changes to reciprocal tariffs. Officials said that the update on implementation was likely to come early next week. One of the details to be ironed out before the deal can be implemented is steel quotas. Reynolds added that he wanted to make sure the tariff reductions applied to every bit of the UK steel industry, as the U.S. finalises quotas that will place supply chain requirements on British steel exports to the United States. The bioethanol industry has warned its future is under threat, with Associated British Foods (ABF.L), opens new tab deciding on the fate of a plant later this month. Reynolds acknowledged the deal could increase competition but said the industry was already struggling. "We are very sensitive to the ethanol issue... (but) they're losing a lot of money already," Reynolds said, adding regulatory tweaks could help, but that for financial support: "any intervention I make has to be a clear route to profitability." "So there are much wider issues for these partners than just the U.S. trade deal."
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's tax-cut bill could hold back US critical minerals projects
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill would make it harder for American critical minerals companies to compete with China because it eliminates a tax credit for boosting domestic production of nickel, rare earths and other materials used in advanced electronics and weaponry. With Trump and Republican lawmakers aiming to cut government support for green energy projects, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a version of his "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month that eliminates the so-called 45X credit. The Senate is now debating the bill. Former President Joe Biden's 2022 climate change law, the Inflation Reduction Act, created the 10% production credit - a reduction in corporate taxes for critical minerals extraction and processing. The tax break also covers solar, battery and wind projects. The version of the bill that passed the House treats government incentives for wind turbines the same as those for mining projects that many view as crucial for national security. Critical minerals companies now say their projects are collateral damage to the political feud over renewable energy. The tax credit is already law and part of the current federal budget. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which scores the cost of legislative proposals when asked by Congress, has not studied how much would be saved by removing the credit. The Republican majority in Congress is seeking savings to fund other priorities such as tax cuts, defense and balancing the budget. This month, the hard-right House Freedom Caucus said it "will not accept", opens new tab attempts to "water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation." Miners, though, say they need the credit to compete with China. Beijing has halted exports of some critical minerals, used its control of rare earths to strike a trade agreement with Washington, and flooded global markets with cheap supply of nickel, cobalt and lithium. The traditionally conservative mining industry now finds itself in the unusual position of needing Washington's support to grow and, in some cases, survive. The owner of the only U.S. cobalt mine went bankrupt this year after Chinese miners depressed global prices of that metal. "If we do not have that tax credit, critical minerals producers in the U.S. are at risk of succumbing to closures," said KaLeigh Long, founder and CEO of Westwin Elements, which is building the country's only commercial nickel refinery. Westwin might not be able to service its debt without the tax credit, Long said, noting the company's loans were modeled using the expectation it would be permanent. Last month, Long wrote a letter asking the Senate to keep the credit. It was co-signed by 30 industry executives. Any changes the Senate makes to the bill must be reconciled with the House version before being sent to Trump. Several House members have admitted they did not read the entire bill before voting for it, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green, a Georgia Republican, and Congressman Mike Flood, a Nebraska Republican. House Democrats unanimously voted against the bill but their criticism has focused on tax cuts they say will widen the deficit while requiring cuts in health care, food assistance, education, scientific research and other programs. "There's so many issues right now under consideration in Congress and this one isn't breaking through, but it will certainly break through when we have a shortage of minerals in five years," said Jeff Green, a critical minerals industry consultant. Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat who voted for the IRA in 2022, said in a statement to Reuters that cutting the credit would "kill jobs ... just to fund tax breaks for the ultra-weathy" and would be a "bad deal" for the country. Trump, who has issued several executive orders aimed at boosting U.S. minerals production, has not commented publicly on the 45x debate. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. "The tax credit just adds a phenomenal bump to a project's economics and gives us advantages that China already gives its own companies," said Alex Grant, CEO of magnesium processing startup Magrathea, who signed the letter. China controls most of the world's production of the metal, used in alloys for steel and aluminum. Abigail Hunter, executive director of SAFE's Center for Critical Minerals Strategy, described the tax credit as the "only tool currently available to support industry exposed to market manipulation." The House version also removes any remaining IRA funding for the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO), which under Biden awarded billions of dollars in loans to Nevada lithium projects from ioneer ( opens new tab and Lithium Americas ( opens new tab. Potential for the LPO's closure led miners to rush to finalize loans last year, as Reuters reported in August. Republican senators this week said they were in discussions about how to extend some green energy tax credits, especially for businesses with large capital investments. No firm commitments have been made. For Mahesh Konduru, CEO of minerals processing startup Momentum Technologies, the credit is one way for Washington to show industry support. "We need to have the appropriate tools to build, nurture and grow that supply chain inside the United States," he said.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
More funding will not improve Britain's utterly incompetent police
One of the major factors contributing towards the growing sense of decay in Britain's public realm – what some have started to call 'scuzz' – is successive governments trying to cook the Treasury's books by running national policy through councils by stealth. Most voters doubtless assume, not least because politicians continue to pretend, that their council tax is about paying for things like bin collections, road repairs, and urban beautification, all of which have been cut and cut again over recent years. But in reality, many councils spend up to 70 per cent or more of their budgets servicing policies, such as social care and services for children with special needs, which are set in Whitehall. Yesterday's spending review was another case in point. Rachel Reeves announced an increase, albeit one that police chiefs think will be woefully inadequate. But dig into the details, and it becomes clear she expects that to come in large part from increases in council tax. It's a cunning setup, in low political terms. Voters will see their taxes going up – but who can they blame? Their local authority, in the first instance, rather than the Chancellor. Perhaps their local police and crime commissioner too, if they know that PCCs get to set an additional policing 'precept' on council tax bills. The diffusion of authority makes it harder for people to hold anyone accountable, either for the increase or for the state of policing. When PCCs were introduced by the Conservatives, the idea was that they would help to increase scrutiny of the police by replacing anonymous boards with a single, elected individual who could champion the public interest. Yet public awareness of the posts is so low (turnout in PCC elections is invariably risible) that this seldom happens in practice. Whilst some PCCs have been more effective than others, as a whole they have done little to halt or even slow the growing alienation between voters and police forces which seem, too often, to have very different priorities. Last year, analysis by the Daily Telegraph found that, years after the shocking stat was first reported, it is still the case that in almost half the country the police solve literally zero burglaries – a fact which sits very uncomfortably next to high-profile reports of sending six officers to arrest two parents for complaining about their child's primary school on WhatsApp. And whenever there is serious public disorder, there is almost always a gulf between the swift and muscular response overwhelmingly favoured by voters when polled and the hands-off, softly-softly strategies employed by police chiefs. Ultimately, it's one more thing for the Conservatives to learn, from their most recent period in government, how not to do it. Driving change in the culture of the police is certainly possible. New Labour did it, and after 14 years of Tory-led government we are still living with the forces they forged. But it takes active pressure from the top, not farming the job out to minor functionaries nobody has heard of. In the meantime, and as with so much else in Britain, we're going to be stuck footing a bigger and bigger bill for a state which works less and less well.
