National Library to dispose of 500,000 books from overseas collection
The National Library is set to dispose of half a million books from its foreign books collection to make room for more items about New Zealand.
The initial decision - made over six years ago - was met with public backlash. While a fraction of the books were saved, the rest will be pulped from today.
'There are compelling reasons to remove them,' National Library's Mark Crookston told Breakfast.
'It's a decision not taking lightly, they come from a lending collection, which is no longer being lent.
'Only 1% of the items were being lent in the years leading up to the decision in 2018. Over 80% have not been lent for 20 years.'
ADVERTISEMENT
But author Harry Ricketts, who's been fighting against the cull, says he's 'miffed' at the decision.
'It's partly a generational thing, someone like me comes from a generation in which [believes] - like the character in Ian Forster's Howards End – 'books', said Margaret, 'move by the holy word'.
'The physical object of a book is particularly important.
'The idea that somehow only 'our' books – what are 'our' books? – should be preserved – seems a rather dodgy criteria.'
Crookston said it was just 'good collection management' to not retain lending collection items much longer than they are required to be lent.
'This is just basic library practice that we learn in library school collection management 101.'
'They're just taking up space and taking up resources that can be better utilised for collections that are wanted.'
ADVERTISEMENT
The books are currently being stored in number of locations in Wellington and Whanganui.
Crookston estimated the volume of items would take up 'the square metreage of approximately a third of a rugby field.'
Internet Archive agreement scrapped
In December 2018, the then Minister of Internal Affairs approved the National Library's request to remove the items under the National Library of New Zealand Act.
An agreement was then made with the Internet Archive to export the remaining items to their offshore digitisation base, to provide online access as well as retain physical copies.
However, Crookston said the library has now withdrawn from this agreement.
"Responding to subsequent concerns about copyright issues, the National Library paused this project and now have withdrawn from this agreement."
ADVERTISEMENT
The remaining disposal options included transfer, sale, donation and destruction.
'While 15,000 collection titles have been transferred to other libraries, the experience with donating approximately 50,000 titles to book fairs in 2020 resulted in a modest pick-up from the public which reinforced the purpose of disposal in the first place.'
The National Library said from 2017 to 2020, less than 1% of the items involved were borrowed.
"Most of the titles have not been issued for the last 20 to 30 years," it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
National Library to dispose of 500,000 books from overseas collection
The National Library is set to dispose of half a million books from its foreign books collection to make room for more items about New Zealand. The initial decision - made over six years ago - was met with public backlash. While a fraction of the books were saved, the rest will be pulped from today. 'There are compelling reasons to remove them,' National Library's Mark Crookston told Breakfast. 'It's a decision not taking lightly, they come from a lending collection, which is no longer being lent. 'Only 1% of the items were being lent in the years leading up to the decision in 2018. Over 80% have not been lent for 20 years.' ADVERTISEMENT But author Harry Ricketts, who's been fighting against the cull, says he's 'miffed' at the decision. 'It's partly a generational thing, someone like me comes from a generation in which [believes] - like the character in Ian Forster's Howards End – 'books', said Margaret, 'move by the holy word'. 'The physical object of a book is particularly important. 'The idea that somehow only 'our' books – what are 'our' books? – should be preserved – seems a rather dodgy criteria.' Crookston said it was just 'good collection management' to not retain lending collection items much longer than they are required to be lent. 'This is just basic library practice that we learn in library school collection management 101.' 'They're just taking up space and taking up resources that can be better utilised for collections that are wanted.' ADVERTISEMENT The books are currently being stored in number of locations in Wellington and Whanganui. Crookston estimated the volume of items would take up 'the square metreage of approximately a third of a rugby field.' Internet Archive agreement scrapped In December 2018, the then Minister of Internal Affairs approved the National Library's request to remove the items under the National Library of New Zealand Act. An agreement was then made with the Internet Archive to export the remaining items to their offshore digitisation base, to provide online access as well as retain physical copies. However, Crookston said the library has now withdrawn from this agreement. "Responding to subsequent concerns about copyright issues, the National Library paused this project and now have withdrawn from this agreement." ADVERTISEMENT The remaining disposal options included transfer, sale, donation and destruction. 'While 15,000 collection titles have been transferred to other libraries, the experience with donating approximately 50,000 titles to book fairs in 2020 resulted in a modest pick-up from the public which reinforced the purpose of disposal in the first place.' The National Library said from 2017 to 2020, less than 1% of the items involved were borrowed. "Most of the titles have not been issued for the last 20 to 30 years," it said.
1News
03-06-2025
- 1News
Luxon responds after Bishop's music awards comments
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has responded after comments made by senior minister Chris Bishop at the Aotearoa Music Awards last week prompted criticism. And today Bishop said he was "frustrated and annoyed by the overt politicking" around a performance, but reiterated earlier comments that he should have kept his views to himself. Video footage from the awards evening on Thursday in Auckland showed Bishop responding during a performance by Stan Walker, which featured a large Toitū Te Tiriti banner on stage. Bishop admitted afterwards that he said something about performative acclaim and said, what a lot of crap. He said his comments referred to what he called the overtly political branding on display. Christopher Luxon ADVERTISEMENT According to its website, Toitū Te Tiriti's "intent is to demonstrate the beginning of a unified Aotearoa response to the Government's assault on tangata whenua and Te Tiriti o Waitangi". Luxon responded to the comments when asked on Breakfast today, saying Bishop had since said that he "should have kept his opinions to himself". "People have lots of different ranges and different reactions to music, and what they like and don't like. I like a lot of country music and people don't, sometimes, I find," he said. "Look, he said he should have kept his thoughts to himself, I'm comfortable with that." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has responded after comments made by Chris Bishop at the Aotearoa Music Award prompted criticism. (Source: Breakfast) Asked whether he would speak to Bishop about the issue, Luxon confirmed he already had. "I spoke to him on the weekend just to get his side of the story, but he came out before I'd even got a chance to talk to him to say he should have kept his thoughts to himself, that's pretty good." ADVERTISEMENT Luxon said musicians had "taken shots at politicians for centuries and politicians will respond for centuries," saying everybody had different musical tastes. 'It wasn't the right time or place' - Bishop Speaking to media at parliament, Bishop reiterated he "should have kept my views to myself at the time". Chris Bishop speaks to media at parliament. (Source: 1News) "But it is what it is," he added. Bishop said he would not apologise to Stan Walker. "It's not clear what I would be apologising for. My views are my views, and as I said I should have kept these to myself at the time, but we live in a democracy." ADVERTISEMENT He said he didn't have an issue with Walker as an artist, citing his frustration with the "politicisation" of the segment as the reason for his comments. "I was frustrated and annoyed by the overt politicking around it. It's not about Stan Walker, I actually quite like Stan Walker and quite liked his performance. Bishop said he was frustrated by the Toitū Te Tiriti banners that were on display during the performance, but admitted that it "wasn't the right time or place to express those views". "It's not about Stan Walker, or singing in te reo, or singing a waiata." Bishop confirmed he was holding a Heineken beer in his hand in the video, but emphatically denied having had too much to drink. Kiwi musician Don McGlashan was also seen on the video confronting Bishop about the "enormous amount of ranting". McGlashan told RNZ that at first he didn't realise who it was. "After a while I turned to him and said 'ah shut up you dickhead' and I looked at him and I thought, oh I know that face. Then he said 'what did you say to me?'". ADVERTISEMENT McGlashan said that he again told Bishop to "shut up you dickhead and he said 'I could say the same to you', and I said, well I wasn't talking and you were. And then I realised I was talking to the leader of the House". When asked about the confrontation with McGlashen, Bishop said the interaction was "ironic" given he was a huge fan of his work as a solo artist and with his band The Mutton Birds. "His political views are quite well-known, so it is what it is, he's entitled to his views the same way I'm entitled to mine," Bishop said.
1News
23-05-2025
- 1News
Kororāreka marae plea to restore original name for Russell denied
A submission to change the Bay of Islands town of Russell's name to the traditional Māori name of Kororāreka has been declined. More than 1800 submissions were received — 52% in support of the name change and 48% against it. Minister for Land Information Chris Penk said he consulted with colleagues across the Government to make his decision "given the close margin and the historical weight of the decision". "Through that process, it became clear there was insufficient support to proceed with the proposal," Penk said. Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa New Zealand Geographic Board publicly consulted on the proposal from the Kororāreka Marae Society, which lodged a name-change application in September 2021. The board considered three options: An outright change to Kororāreka; the dual name Kororāreka/Russell; or the alternative names option where both had equal standing. Kororāreka marae Society chair member Deb Rewiri expressed disappointment at the decision. "We [Tangata Whenua and Tangata Tiriti] are frustrated and astounded at this current coalition Government and their divisive behaviour when faced with doing the right thing." Rewiri said the board supported the name restoration along with most of the submissions; however, the opposing submissions "were for dual names to be carried, and that wasn't a consideration for the Minister". "We will continue to call our village by its rightful name." Rewiri told Breakfast in July 2024 that Kororāreka was "the only town in the Far North that did not carry its original name". Kororāreka Marae Society chairperson Debra Rewiri said the historical context of the traditional name is 'really significant' for Māori in the region. (Source: Breakfast) "There's something unusual about that when Paihia is Paihia and Waitangi is Waitangi … all the traditional names that were part of our history and in terms of Russell, it wasn't there. "Even though when our people, our Māori people, [came] into the village, that's all they'd call it, Kororāreka," Rewiri said. Penk said he wanted to "acknowledge the important work of the Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa New Zealand Geographic Board and thank everyone who took the time to make a submission".
