logo
Oil tanks nearly 6% as Iranian retaliation against US spares energy supply

Oil tanks nearly 6% as Iranian retaliation against US spares energy supply

Yahooa day ago

Oil futures slid nearly 6% on Monday as Iran appeared to spare the energy market while the country launched missiles targeted at a US air base in Qatar in retaliation for US bombings on Iranian nuclear sites.
Brent crude (BZ=F), the international benchmark, dropped to $72 per barrel. West Texas Intermediate (CL=F) also fell almost 6% to trade below $70 per barrel.
The declines came after Iranian state media said it launched missile attacks against a US air base in Qatar, matching the number of bombs dropped by the US over the weekend, in a move the Associated Press said signaled "a likely desire to deescalate."
Prior to the retaliatory move, Wall Street weighed various scenarios after President Trump announced on Saturday that the US struck three Iranian nuclear facilities, including the threat of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for oil flows.
On Monday morning, President Trump posted on social media: "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!"
"The main reason for this stability is that energy infrastructure has largely been spared from direct attacks, with number of oil tankers transiting through the Strait of Hormuz remaining steady," JPMorgan's Natasha Kaneva and her team wrote on Monday morning.
On Sunday, futures spiked after Iran's parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, but the final decision rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The oil market is now factoring in "a one-in-five chance of a material disruption in Gulf energy production flows, with potential for crude prices to reach the $120-130 range," Kaneva wrote.
"Yet, beyond the short-term spike induced by geopolitics, our base case for oil remains anchored by our supply-demand balance, which shows that the world has enough oil," she added. She also noted that "with fewer reliable partners in the Middle East and limited regional appetite for a broader conflict, Iran faces a constrained set of options and a heightened set of risks as it deliberates its course of action."
Other possible retaliatory moves from Iran could include supporting Yemen's Houthi rebels in renewed attacks on commercial shipping, or going after energy infrastructure in neighboring countries.
If crude climbs into the $120 to $130 range, analysts predict gasoline and diesel prices could rise by as much as $1.25 per gallon.
"Consumers would be looking at a national average gasoline price of around $4.50 per gallon — closer to $6.00 if you're in California," Lipow Oil Associates president Andy Lipow said in a Sunday note.
The key issue isn't just the potential for supply disruption, but how long it lasts, Rebecca Babin, senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, told Yahoo Finance on Sunday.
"If infrastructure is hit but can be quickly restored, crude may struggle to hold gains," she said. "But if Iran's response causes lasting damage or introduces long-term supply risk, we're likely to see a stronger and more sustained move higher."
Last week, JPMorgan analysts noted that since 1967 — aside from the Yom Kippur War in 1973 — none of the 11 major military conflicts involving Israel have had a lasting impact on oil prices.
In contrast, events directly involving major regional oil producers, such as the first Gulf War in 1990, the Iraq War in 2003 and the imposition of sanctions on Iran in 2018, have all led to meaningful and sustained moves in oil markets.
"During these episodes, we estimate that oil traded at a $7–$14 per barrel premium to its fair value for an extended period," JPMorgan's Kaneva wrote.
They added that the most significant and lasting price impacts historically come from "regime changes" in oil-producing countries, whether that be through leadership transitions, coups, revolutions, or major political shifts.
"While demand conditions and OPEC's spare capacity shape the broader market response, these events typically drive substantial oil price spikes, averaging a 76% increase from onset to peak," Kaneva wrote.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies (OPEC+) had raised output in the months leading up to Israel's strike on Iran on June 13.
Ines Ferre is a Senior Business Reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK to buy 12 nuclear-carrying F-35A jets from the United States and join NATO nuclear mission
UK to buy 12 nuclear-carrying F-35A jets from the United States and join NATO nuclear mission

CNN

time15 minutes ago

  • CNN

UK to buy 12 nuclear-carrying F-35A jets from the United States and join NATO nuclear mission

The United Kingdom is to purchase 12 F-35A jets, which are capable of carrying nuclear weapons, from the United States. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer will make the announcement during Wednesday's NATO summit, as he calls on NATO members to do more to support the alliance. 'The UK's commitment to NATO is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure,' Starmer will say, according to Downing Street. 'But we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come.' The announcement follows repeated criticisms by US President Donald Trump that NATO countries are not spending enough on defense. The fifth-generation fighter aircraft, built primarily by US manufacturer Lockheed Martin, is one of the most advanced fighter jets on the planet – but it is also one of the most expensive. The decision to acquire aircraft with the capacity to carry nuclear weapons also represents a major strengthening of Britain's nuclear posture. It means that in addition of UK's existing sea-borne nuclear deterrent, the country will also now join NATO's dual capable aircraft nuclear mission. 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted,' Starmer will say. According to the British government, the decision will support 20,000 jobs in the F35 program in the UK, with 15% of the global supply chain for the jets based in Britain.

Why KKR Stock Rocketed Almost 5% Higher Today
Why KKR Stock Rocketed Almost 5% Higher Today

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why KKR Stock Rocketed Almost 5% Higher Today

A top institutional investor was aiming to sell but is now backing off from that plan, according to a media report. This sharply increased confidence in the veteran investment company's stock. 10 stocks we like better than KKR › The equity of sturdy investment company KKR (NYSE: KKR) made for a fine investment all its own on Tuesday. Its stock price leaped by nearly 5% that trading session, thanks to news of a big institutional investor's reversal on a planned sale (which likely would have pushed the stock's price down). KKR's share gain easily beat the slightly over 1% advance of the S&P 500 index. That sizable investor is China Investment Corporation (CIC), the country's sovereign wealth fund. Before market open, Bloomberg, citing unidentified "people familiar with the deal," reported that CIC has canceled a planned sale of several stakes it held in U.S. investment management companies. This list included top names in the sector -- in addition to KKR, positions in Carlyle Group and TPG were to be sold. The sell-off was planned earlier this year as a move to reduce exposure to U.S. businesses. However, at present CIC is no longer interested in such a divestment. The financial news agency didn't cite any reason or reasons for this. U.S. investment bank Evercore was recruited by CIC to broker the sale, Bloomberg and another, earlier article from Reuters stated. Neither China Investment nor Evercore responded to Bloomberg's requests for comment on the matter. Similarly, KKR, Carlyle Group, and TPG haven't yet made official statements regarding it, either. A foreign investor getting cold feet about selling U.S. equities is entirely plausible; earlier this year the world grew increasingly worried that the "punitive" tariffs initially imposed by the Trump administration would damage the U.S. economy. Those concerns are fading quickly, so potential sellers like CIC might be feeling more confident about our country's growth prospects. I wouldn't buy or sell any stock purely on the basis of an institutional investor's move, so I firmly believe folks should hold or ditch KKR entirely on its fundamentals. Given that, it's a wily, veteran company that plies its trade very effectively -- and to me, therefore, is always a consideration for a buy. Before you buy stock in KKR, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and KKR wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $676,023!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,692!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 793% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends KKR. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why KKR Stock Rocketed Almost 5% Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Middle East tensions could unleash a 2-part worst-case scenario that hits stocks, Morgan Stanley says
Middle East tensions could unleash a 2-part worst-case scenario that hits stocks, Morgan Stanley says

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Middle East tensions could unleash a 2-part worst-case scenario that hits stocks, Morgan Stanley says

The worst-case scenario for stocks could come out of tensions between Israel and Iran, Morgan Stanley said. The bank said its bear case for stocks was oil prices spiking near the end of the business cycle. Oil prices climbed in the heat of the Israel-Iran conflict, but have cooled after the cease-fire. Tensions in the Middle East could spark a series of dire developments for the stock market, strategists at Morgan Stanley said this week. In a note to clients, the bank pointed to the conflict that's unfolded between Israel, Iran, and the US over the last 12 days, with Israel and Iran agreeing to a cease-fire on Monday. Tensions, though, contributed to a spike in oil prices in the last week. While crude is back down, a big jump higher in oil stemming from any Middle East conflict is something that could raise the risk of a recession and lead to the most pessimistic outcome for stocks, the bank said. "The bear case scenario for equities tied to the recent events in the Middle East would be that oil prices rise significantly, thereby posing a threat to the business cycle," strategists wrote. Morgan Stanley's bear-case scenario has two parts that "materially" raise the risks posed to markets, the note said. Oil prices rise at least 75% on a year-over-year basis. That implies Brent crude trading around or over the $120 per barrel range, strategists said. In order for oil prices to trade that high, it would probably require "sustained" disruption to oil supply in the Strait of Hormuz, they added, a key passage for oil exporters in the Middle East. Crude prices dropped significantly from their highs last year, and have also cooled from their recent spike after Iran's limited retaliatory strike on a US base in Qatar and the subsequent cease-fire with Israel. Brent crude, which rose as much as 14% during the 12 days of the conflict, traded around $66 a barrel on Tuesday. The international benchmark was down 20% from last year's levels. West Texas Intermediate crude, which rose as much as 10%, traded around $66 a barrel, down 18% year-over-year. The oil spike needs to occur late in the business cycle. Oil price spikes that have occurred late in the business cycle have historically led to recessions, according to Morgan Stanley's analysis. To be sure, while Morgan Stanley sees spiraling oil prices as highly negative for markets and the economy, such a scenario isn't analysts' base case. "Through last week, the year-over-year rate of change on crude was negative. Thus, while we're respectful of the risks, there's a long way to go on this basis," strategists wrote. The bank remains positive on stocks overall. While geopolitical events have historically sparked volatility in equities, the S&P 500 rose an average of 9% in the 12 months following major conflicts dating back to 1950, according to Morgan Stanley's analysis. Prior to the cease-fire, other Wall Street forecasters were eyeing the risk of a more dramatic oil price spike and its potential effects on the US economy. On Monday, JPMorgan analysts said they saw oil prices rising as high as $130 a barrel if conflict between Israel and Iran were to disrupt energy production in the Persian Gulf. Torsten Sløk, the chief economist at Apollo Global Management, said he saw rising oil prices contributing to stagflation, a scenario where the economy slows while inflation remains stubbornly high. "In short, higher oil prices exacerbate the ongoing stagflation shock stemming from tariffs and immigration restrictions," Sløk wrote in a June note to clients. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store