Sister Pie, a beloved bakery in Detroit's West Village, to go on hiatus
Sister Pie, the beloved Detroit West Village bakery known for its stunning pies, announced it is going on hiatus.
A favorite place for pie, cookies and other notable baked goods, Sister Pie stunned its fans on Wednesday, announcing on social media that it's closing, at least temporarily.
Owner Lisa Ludwinski, acclaimed author and 2019 James Beard Award finalist, cited a need for 'a period of rest and radical reconfiguration, of exploration and experimentation,' according to a Facebook post.
Ludwinski stated the need to make 'temporary, necessary changes to our operations.' Sister Pie's last day for regular business will be June 8.
'Although the spirit of Sister Pie is alive and well, I've arrived at the conclusion that the business isn't working in its current state,' Ludwinski wrote.
While Ludwinski said multiple factors contributed to the decision, one was 'most urgently in the form of a financial crisis,' though she did not elaborate.
'The year 2025 (so far) has been about confronting truth, sometimes courageously and in community, and at other times, under a blanket. As a business owner and a leader, I'm learning, reminiscing, mourning, growing, and searching for hope in the midst of challenge and chaos,' the post read.
Following the Facebook post are more than 200 comments ranging from well wishes to advice on finding its way into retail markets and sadness that the closure is happening.
During its closure, Ludwinski says they will fulfill special orders and do occasional pop-ups and events 'to keep the roof over our heads.'
Sister Pie's baking classes will continue throughout the closure.
While Ludwinski didn't say how long Sister Pie would remain closed, she encouraged fans to support its staff and visit the bakery in the next couple of weeks.
Ludwinski is known for her pies and other baked goods that hail from the Sister Pie shop, which opened in 2015. Hallmarks of Ludwinski's pies are a crust featuring a thick, crimped decorative edge, rich golden color and a buttery taste paired with a flaky texture.
Ludwinski's delightful 'Sister Pie: The Recipes & Stories of a Big-Hearted Bakery in Detroit' (Lorena Jones Books, $25) was published in 2018.
The cookbook shares the story of Ludwinski's distinctive pies and other baked goods, including savories, and her beloved Sister Pie bakery in Detroit's historic West Village. The year the book came out, the New York Times noted it as one of 'The Best Baking Cookbooks of 2018,' as did the Chicago Tribune.
Sister Pie and Ludwinski have received accolades nationwide, including Ludwinski's James Beard Award nomination for Outstanding Baker in 2019 and 2020 and as a semifinalist in 2017 and 2018 in the same category. A huge shout-out in Bon Appetit magazine carried the headline 'We'd Visit Detroit Just to Eat at This Pie Shop.'
After spending half a dozen years in New York working at Christina Tosi's Milk Bar and Brooklyn's Four & Twenty Blackbirds, Ludwinski returned to Michigan and started Sister Pie out of her parents' home.
After winning $50,000 in the 2014 Comerica Hatch contest, Ludwinski opened Sister Pie in 2015 on the corner of Kercheval and Park in Detroit's West Village.
On Friday, Ludwinski is to appear at 6 p.m. at a sold-out event at the Loom in Wyandotte for 'An Evening with Lisa Ludwinski of Sister Pie,' discussing recipes from her cookbook along with samples.
Sister Pie baking classes include learning how to make pie dough, scones and other baked goods. Space is still available in some of the classes. For information, go to sisterpie.com.
Contact Detroit Free Press food and restaurant writer Susan Selasky and send food and restaurant news and tips to: sselasky@freepress.com. Follow @SusanMariecooks on Twitter.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Sister Pie, beloved bakery in Detroit, to go on hiatus
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Local creamery under new ownership in Lancaster County
STRASBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — A local creamery with an adjoining general store and inn is now under new ownership. The Strasburg Creamery, located at 1 West Main Street in Strasburg, Lancaster County, announced earlier this week that it is now under new ownership. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now According to the Facebook announcement, three couples who were born and raised in Lancaster County – Tyler and Amber Martin, Jeremy and Jenna Peifer, and Brian and Lindsay Funk, decided to purchase the local staple after hearing that the creamery was listed for sale. 'As the years passed, each of us began our own businesses in the town of Strasburg, and our connection to and appreciation for the community continued to grow,' the new owners shared on Facebook. 'Thus, when we heard the creamery was for sale, we started dreaming and praying about purchasing this local landmark and reviving it as a hub for our community.' For those who don't know, the Strasburg Creamery building is also home to a general store, and the Strasburg Village Inn. According to the new owners, during the winter 2026 they will renovate the general store, which will be followed by the grand re-opening of the Strasburg Creamery and the Village Inn by the summer of 2026. It is important to note that although the creamery will have a re-opening next summer following renovations, the owners will still be serving its high-quality ice cream when their doors open next month in July. 'Whether you'll be visiting the creamery for the first time or arriving with decades of your own memories to share, we look forward to enjoying an ice cream cone with you soon,' Strasburg Creamery added. abc27 news will keep you updated as more information becomes available. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China
Palantir (PLTR, Financials) CEO Alex Karp said Thursday that artificial intelligence poses serious risks and that the ongoing AI arms race will ultimately be won by either the United States or China. There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win, Karp told CNBC's Squawk on the Street. He emphasized that the U.S. currently holds an advantage due to corporate willingness to embrace new technologies, but said Western allies, particularly in Europe, are lagging behind and must learn from the U.S. approach. In the interview, Karp also addressed a recent New York Times report suggesting Palantir is assisting the Trump administration in gathering data on American citizens. He denied the claim, stating, We are not surveilling Americans. The Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm has gained 74% year to date as investors bet on the company's growing role in U.S. government contracts and defense applications. While the stock continues to outperform broader tech peers, Karp acknowledged investor concerns around its valuation. You don't like the price, exit, he said. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
OpenAI Appeals ‘Sweeping, Unprecedented Order' Requiring It Maintain All ChatGPT Logs
Last month, a federal judge ordered OpenAI to indefinitely maintain all of ChatGPT's data as part of an ongoing copyright lawsuit. In response, OpenAI has filed an appeal to overturn the decision stating that the 'sweeping, unprecedented order' violates its users' privacy. The New York Times sued both OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023 claiming that the companies violated copyrights by using its articles to train their language models. However, OpenAI said the Times' case is 'without merit' and argued that the training falls under 'fair use'. Previously, OpenAI only kept chat logs for users of ChatGPT Free, Plus, and Pro who didn't opt out. However, in May, the Times and other news organizations claimed that OpenAI was engaging in a 'substantial, ongoing' destruction of chat logs that could contain evidence of copyright violations. Judge Ona Wang responded by ordering ChatGPT to maintain and segregate all ChatGPT logs that would otherwise be deleted. In a court appeal, OpenAI argued that Wang's order 'prevent[s] OpenAI from respecting its users' privacy decisions.' According to Ars Technica, the company also claimed that the Times' accusations were 'unfounded', writing, 'OpenAI did not 'destroy' any data, and certainly did not delete any data in response to litigation events. The order appears to have incorrectly assumed the contrary.' 'The [Times] and other plaintiffs have made a sweeping and unnecessary demand in their baseless lawsuit against us,' COO Brad Lightcap said in a statement. He added that the demand for OpenAI to retain all data 'abandons long-standing privacy norms and weakens privacy protections.' On X, CEO Sam Altman wrote that the 'inappropriate request…sets a bad precedent.' He also added that the case highlights the need for 'AI privilege' where 'talking to an AI should be like talking to a lawyer or a doctor.' we have been thinking recently about the need for something like "AI privilege"; this really accelerates the need to have the conversation. imo talking to an AI should be like talking to a lawyer or a doctor. i hope society will figure this out soon. — Sam Altman (@sama) June 6, 2025 The court order triggered an initial wave of panic. Per Ars Technica, OpenAI's court filing cited social media posts from LinkedIn and X where users expressed concerns about their privacy. On LinkedIn, one person warned their clients to be 'extra careful' about what information they shared with ChatGPT. In another example, someone tweeted, 'Wang apparently thinks the NY Times' boomer copyright concerns trump the privacy of EVERY @OPENAI USER – insane!!!' On one hand, I couldn't imagine having a ChatGPT log sensitive enough data that I'd care if someone else read it. However, people do use ChatGPT as a therapist, for life advice, and even treat it as a romantic partner. Regardless of whether I'd personally do the same, they deserve the right to keep that content private. At the same time, the Times' case isn't as baseless as OpenAI claims. It is absolutely worth discussing how artificial intelligence is trained. Remember when Clearview AI scraped 30 billion images from Facebook to train its facial recognition? Or reports that the federal government uses images of vulnerable people to test facial recognition software? Yes, those examples exist outside of journalism and copyright law. However, it highlights the need for conversations about whether companies like OpenAI should need explicit consent to utilize content rather than scraping whatever they want from the internet.