New climate change targets for Scotland unveiled
A new set of targets to tackle climate change in Scotland over the next 20 years has been unveiled by the Scottish government. Annual targets were abandoned by Scottish ministers last year after they were repeatedly missed but the pledge to reach net zero by 2045 was retained.The new target states emissions need to fall by an average of 57% over the next five years and by 69% by 2035, when compared with 1990 levels.The targets will be met using a carbon budgeting system and the proposals will be voted on by MSPs in the autumn.
The Scottish government want to move to a system of measuring emissions using carbon budgets over five-year periods instead of annual targets.Ministers say this will make measuring progress less prone to annual variations such as extreme weather or a global pandemic.The approach is used in other parts of the world including France, England and Wales.If the targets are agreed then the Scottish government will publish a new plan on how it plans to achieve them. The most recent data, for 2022, shows that planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions in Scotland fell by 50% against the 1990 baseline year.
Gillian Martin, cabinet secretary for climate action and energy, said: "Scotland is now halfway to our 2045 climate change target and is ahead of the UK as a whole in reducing long term emissions."These carbon budgets will set clear limits on emissions for the coming decades in line with the independent advice of the UK Climate Change Committee."When we publish our draft climate change plan later this year, it will set out the policies needed to continue to reduce our emissions and meet our first three carbon budget targets."It will not ask the impossible of people. We will not sacrifice people's health or wealth."Addressing farmers at the Royal Highland Show in Edinburgh, Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said the Scottish government will not be following independent advice to cut livestock numbers to reduce planet warming gases.
Are climate change targets being missed?
The Scottish government had set its original climate change targets in 2019 – which included reducing emissions by 75% by 2030.Two years later, ahead of the UN's COP26 climate talks in Glasgow, then First Minister Nicola Sturgeon described the targets as "amongst the most ambitious anywhere in the world".But they were ditched in 2024 after the government's independent advisers, the CCC, warned that they were no longer achievable.Claire Daly, head of policy and advocacy at WWF Scotland, welcomed the carbon budget approach but warned they would need to be backed up by action."These commitments will remain merely lines on a page without strong action to back them up, including measures to support clean heating in our homes and the transition to more climate - and nature - friendly agriculture," she said."Future generations cannot afford any more missed climate targets and this carbon budget must be set for success with strong policies to reduce emissions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cockermouth Old Courthouse owner denies removing support pillars
The owner of a historic courthouse has denied accusations he removed pillars from the building before it collapsed into a rear section of Cockermouth Old Courthouse fell into the River Cocker in Cumbria in 2023 and the Grade II-listed building has yet to be MP for Penrith and Solway, Markus Campbell-Savours, claimed in Parliament the building's owner ignored advice about removing the support pillars and now wants the taxpayer to foot a repair bill of between £1m and £ Old Courthouse's owner, Samiul Ahmed, said he did not remove the pillars and said he only wanted support from the council. The Old Courthouse is about 190 years old and has not been used since its collapse meant a nearby bridge had to be closed to traffic over safety concerns, leading to weeks of disruption through Cockermouth. Campbell-Savours also claimed the damage to the building had led to an increased risk of flooding in the town."There is clearly a responsibility on the Environment Agency to reduce flooding risks in the town but right now they are being impeded in their ability to do that because of the difficult access to a dangerous building," he said. But Mr Ahmed claimed the MP's comments were nothing more than a PR stunt."I didn't remove any pillars," he said."It's an investment. We bought it and we want to fix the building and get it back into use."When asked about whether he wanted the taxpayer to pay for the repairs, Mr Ahmed said: "Why would we want that? We just need support from the council."Mr Ahmed claimed he already had plans to repair the building and turn it into residential said he was unable to proceed with the plans because representatives from Cumberland Council refused to meet with him, a claim the council March 2024, the local authority said it was planning to complete the urgent works to the building and would recoup the costs from Mr earlier this year, it said it had "no plans to undertake any physical works on the building" because it remained in private ownership. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Jonathan Reynolds risks ban from practising law over CV scandal
Jonathan Reynolds risks being barred from practising law after the scandal over false claims on his CV, The Telegraph can reveal. The solicitors' watchdog decided not to prosecute the Business Secretary over allegations that he lied about his legal career after it found a lack of evidence to justify the move. However, The Telegraph has learnt that several concerns raised about Mr Reynolds's claims were investigated 'no further' because the incidents in question took place more than two years ago. If those 'time-barred' matters were ever substantiated, they could be held against Mr Reynolds if he tries to qualify as a solicitor in future. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said the revelations proved that the Business Secretary had not been cleared of wrongdoing. He said: 'Reynolds hasn't been cleared of breaking the law. The SRA [Solicitors Regulation Authority] have just decided not to investigate because it happened more than two years ago. 'The evidence of his persistent false claims over many years is clear for everyone to see. If the SRA investigated, they would have found him bang to rights.' 'Safe on a technicality' Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'The Business Secretary repeatedly lied about being a solicitor and was caught out. In the private sector he is destroying he would long have been sacked. 'He may think he's safe on a technicality, but it's unclear how any hard working businesses can trust him now.' Backlash over the Business Secretary's CV erupted in February after it emerged he had said on several occasions that he worked as a solicitor before becoming an MP. In fact, he did not qualify for the title because he never finished his training contract with Addleshaw Goddard, a law firm, having quit in 2010 to run for Parliament. The SRA initially said it would not be taking any action after Mr Reynolds updated his online CV to remove a claim he held the legally-protected role. But it launched a fresh investigation for 'further information' about the Business Secretary's conduct after Mr Jenrick demanded action with a 'view to prosecuting'. Under Section 21 of the Solicitors Act 1974, it is illegal for any unqualified person to take or use 'any name, title, addition or description' implying they are qualified to act as a solicitor. Prosecutions for breaches of this kind are subject to strict time limits, meaning the case must be brought within two years of the alleged offence or six months from its first discovery by the prosecutor, whichever expires first. Insufficient evidence for prosecution The SRA confirmed last week that it had closed its investigation into Mr Reynolds, arguing it was neither proportionate nor in the public interest to bring criminal proceedings. In a letter to Parliament's standards watchdog in May, seen by The Telegraph, the regulator said it had found insufficient evidence to justify a prosecution. But it revealed that it had not looked 'further' into some of the concerns raised because they related to matters that occurred more than two years ago. If substantiated, it said these incidents could be 'relevant' if Mr Reynolds tries to qualify as a solicitor in future. The letter said: 'A number of the concerns investigated demonstrably occurred earlier than the two year period stated in section 26. 'As such matters are time-barred and could not be the subject of a lawful prosecution under section 21, the SRA has determined to investigate and consider them no further for this reason. 'Time-barred matters, if substantiated, could however be relevant should Mr Reynolds apply in the future to be admitted as a solicitor.' Mr Reynolds previously claimed on his website and in the Commons that he worked as a solicitor in Manchester before becoming an MP, and implied that he had held the role in a post on Twitter, now X, in 2011. He made the same claim in a campaign leaflet for the 2015 general election, at which he was re-elected as MP for Stalybridge and Hyde. He also previously stated on his LinkedIn profile that he was simultaneously a 'solicitor' and a 'trainee solicitor' between 2009 and 2010. The Telegraph revealed that he was warned a decade ago not to lie about his legal career, but dismissed the concerns, accusing the complainant of 'reading too much' into his comments. In its letter to Daniel Greenberg, the parliamentary standards commissioner, the SRA said any unqualified person wilfully referring to themselves as a solicitor was 'potentially a serious issue'. However, it said: 'Taking account of the explanations offered, our investigation did not find evidence sufficient to justify the bringing of a prosecution in evidential terms. Nor was it considered that a prosecution would be proportionate or in the public interest. 'Generally, the SRA would be more likely to regard the public interest as justifying a prosecution (if justified by our analysis of the evidence and explanations offered) where the person has engaged directly with consumers of legal services, public protection being a fundamental aspect of our regulatory remit; or where there were a material risk of repetition.' A source close to the Business Secretary said: 'Mr Reynolds was happy to cooperate with an investigation by the SRA, which has now concluded with no further action. He is pleased to continue working hard on the post-Brexit trade deals the Conservatives failed to deliver.'
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newry: Planning permission granted for £17m civic centre
Planning permission has been granted for a £17m civic centre in Newry Mourne and Down District Council project has been the subject of extensive objection, including from the Catholic Church who are concerned about its proximity to the near 200 year old Newry centre is part of a broader city regeneration scheme that includes a 15 acre park, a theatre and a road bypass and is supported by the Belfast Region City council say the wider scheme will increase vibrancy and footfall in the city centre and stimulate further Thursday's decision objectors say they will consider whether to judicially challenge the decision. The project seeks to relocate 215 council staff in the city onto a single site on what's currently a multi-story car park in the Abbey Way area. As the council operates a hybrid working model the building is expected to cater for 162 staff on a daily basis. The building would provide space for council meetings, weddings, office and meeting rooms, and an innovation the planning process the project has received more than 2,600 objections relating to traffic and parking, need, design, scale, flood and ecology concerns and the processing of the application. A decision on planning approval has been deferred on a number of May, a proposed approval was deferred after objectors highlighted concerns in relation to the way the project's planning application had been the overriding objection to the scheme has been in relation to the removal of car parking spaces adjacent to the city's cathedral and main shopping street, Hill building, which is more than 5000 sqm would be around 45 minutes from the cathedral. On Thursday, the council's planning committee heard representations from the project's promoters and team behind the proposal said the project was sympathetic to the gothic style cathedral in terms of design and choice of materials. It was highlighted that the current multi-story carpark where the building is to be located is poorly used and 136 spaces would be retained immediately say this isn't enough to cope with demand during weddings, communions and funerals at a near 200 year old Cathedral or to serve Hill Street businesses and shoppers. Objectors have also questioned aspects of the project's planning application in terms of what they perceive to be errors, gaps and missing or outdated planners said they were satisfied with the information provided and recommended morning's meetings were split in two. An initial meeting hearing evidence in support and objection and a second meeting which saw planning committee members vote on the matter. At the beginning of this second meeting committee members took legal advice in closed session. When the meeting reopened, Alliance Cllr Cadogan Enright withdrew from the meeting."I think there's other councillors here should be doing the same," he put to a vote committee members approved the scheme by four votes to one with one abstention. Outside the chamber, Sinn Féin's Cllr Declan Murphy said he believed the civic centre and the other regeneration schemes will drive investment."This has been scrutinised more than any other application that has been in front of me," he said. "Everyone had their view heard. Our view was that we were satisfied with what has been proposed."Newry will be transformed over the next five years – with the civic centre, the southern relief road, the city park, the new theatre and streetscape a huge amount of public and private money is being invested."This will attract more investors to the area and it will be transformative," he added. The SDLP's Cllr Declan McAteer agreed."That one part of Newry stood out to me as it was completely dead," he said. "As it is it is an absolutely ugly carpark. We can put something in, a centre that people can focus on."The innovation hub also fills a gap on the Belfast-Dublin axis and will really put Newry on the map. And if there are problems around parking we can resolve them." However, Canon Francis Brown from the cathedral said he was disappointed with the decision."All the parishioners are opposed to this building," he said. "It's far too close to the cathedral which is 200 years old. We're all very disappointed."Andy Stephens of Matrix Consulting has been representing the objectors at planning meetings. He says consideration will now be given in relation to what happens next."It's not the end of the road," he said. "Obviously there is a decision that has to be issued. We'll take a look at that and then take advice and see what the outcome of that advice is. "The only remedies in Northern Ireland for third parties is to judicially challenge – there's no third party right of appeal like in the south. We've three months to launch those proceedings."
