Age verification UK explained: How is it impacting the UK?
This means that age verification tools are now being used on sites where they could access harmful content.
Here's all you need to know about the new rules and how they are being implemented.
Well done to everyone who campaigned to ensure age verification for pornography was in the Online Safety Act!
Today it comes into force and while no doubt there will be some who get around it, it means young kids in particular won't be stumbling on violent and harmful porn. pic.twitter.com/LGtISAmReC — Jess Asato MP (@Jess4Lowestoft) July 25, 2025
What is the Online Safety Act?
The Online Safety Act is a piece of legislation that received Royal Assent on October 26, 2023, with the aim of protecting children and adults online.
The Government website adds: "It puts a range of new duties on social media companies and search services, giving them legal duties to protect their users from illegal content and content harmful to children.
"The Act gives providers new duties to implement systems and processes to reduce risks their services are used for illegal activity, and to take down illegal content when it does appear.
Why is age verification being used on the internet?
As of July 25, internet platforms have a legal duty to protect children from harmful content.
Companies within the scope of the act must introduce safety measures as part of this, which include age verification.
The Guardian reports: "This means all pornography sites must have in place rigorous age-checking procedures."
They continued: "Social media platforms and large search engines must also prevent children from accessing pornography and material that promotes or encourages suicide, self-harm and eating disorders."
Platforms will also have to suppress other material that could be potentially harmful to children.
This could include "the promotion of dangerous stunts, encouraging the use of harmful substances and enabling bullying".
How is age verification utilised by platforms?
Ofcom, the media regulator, has set out a number of ways websites can verify the age of users.
This can be done through credit card checks, photo ID matching and estimating age using a selfie.
Whatever format platforms choose, they must be "technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair," BBC News reports.
Which sites will require age verification?
Pornhub and a number of other major adult websites have confirmed they will introduce enhanced age checks, BBC News reports.
Recommended reading:
Reddit has already introduced checks to stop people aged under 18 from looking at "certain mature content", while X and Grindr have committed to this as well.
Discord gives UK users a choice of face or ID scanning as a way to verify their age, after testing methods, and Bluesky says it will give UK users a range of different verification options, external.
BBC News adds: "Many more services which allow sexually explicit material may need to bring in measures to comply with the new rules."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage is on the side of Jimmy Savile, says minister
A Cabinet minister claimed Nigel Farage was on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile after Reform UK pledged to scrap the Online Safety Act. Mr Farage, the leader of Reform, demanded an immediate apology from Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, after the latter made the 'disgusting' claim on Tuesday morning. The Online Safety Act is intended to reduce online harm and protect children, but Reform has said it would scrap the legislation. Zia Yusuf, the former party chairman, said the Act did 'absolutely nothing to protect children' but worked to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-government speech'. Mr Kyle said that if Savile, Britain's most prolific paedophile, was still alive 'he would be perpetrating his crimes online'. He said getting rid of the law would help 'extreme pornographers' and people like Savile and claimed that 'Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side'. Mr Kyle told Sky News: 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he is going to overturn these laws. 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today he would be perpetrating his crimes online and Nigel Farage is saying that he is on their side, not the side of children…' 'Turning the clock back' Mr Kyle doubled down on the claim after he was challenged. He said: 'Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers, can get in touch via messaging apps with children. 'We have now asked to age verify the age at which people can have access to online content so we can protect children from unwanted, dangerous content and also those messaging services where people can get access directly to it. 'Nigel Farage wants to turn the clock right back when all of that, I have absolutely no doubt about it, people are perpetrating more crime online, more danger to children online and Nigel Farage has said he wants to overturn every single one of the laws that keeps children safe in our country.' Mr Farage called for an apology in a post on X shortly after Mr Kyle's interview. 'Peter Kyle's comments on [Sky News] are disgusting. He should do the right thing and apologise,' the Reform leader said. But Mr Kyle refused to back down. If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that. — Peter Kyle (@peterkyle) July 29, 2025 Savile died in 2011. The TV star and serial sexual abuser managed to conceal his crimes until after his death. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content including pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes introducing age verification for websites and ensuring algorithms do not work to harm children by, for example, pushing such content towards them while they are online. Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of a firm's global turnover, whichever is greater.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage is taking the side of Jimmy Savile and other child abusers by criticising Online Safety Act says cabinet minister in free speech row
A senior Cabinet minister accused Nigel Farage of being on the side of sick paedophiles like Jimmy Savile today amid a deepening row over online free speech. Peter Kyle also accused the Reform UK leader Nigel Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over the party's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. The Technology Secretary made the astonishing outburst as he defended the law, which came into effect last Friday and requires social media sites and search engines to take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content like pornography. Critics including Mr Farage claim that it is being used to stifle free speech by blocking people from seeing some political statements online, especially those by right-wing figures. But Mr Kyle told Sky News he had seen no evidence that the Online Safety Act 'goes too far'. He added: 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws. So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Mr Farage immediately labelled the comments 'disgusting' and demanded an apology. Former BBC television presenter and DJ Savile, who died aged 84 in 2011, is believed to have been one of Britain's most prolific paedophiles, whose crimes went undiscovered or unchallenged for decades. Asked to clarify his comments, Mr Kyle said: 'Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children.' Reform UK would scrap the Online Safety Act as a 'dystopian' infringement of free speech, the party announced yesterday. During the press conference, Mr Farage acknowledged that his party did not have 'a perfect answer' for what could replace the Act, but said his party had 'more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world' and would 'make a much better job of it'. Former party chairman Zia Yusuf said the Act, intended to reduce online harm, did 'absolutely nothing to protect children' but worked to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-government speech'. Addressing a press conference at Reform's headquarters in Westminster, Mr Yusuf said: 'We will repeal this Act as one of the first things a Reform government does.' The intervention came after it emerged that X blocked a powerful speech on grooming gangs by Tory minister Katie Lam in Parliament this year. Meanwhile, footage of arrests during asylum seeker hotel protests was also blocked 'due to local laws', according to the social media platform. After a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Leeds at the weekend, X users said the site blocked arrest footage. They were shown the message: 'Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.' Last week, the law changed to require websites to check users are over 18 before allowing them to access 'harmful' material such as pornography or suicide material. Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18million or 10 per cent of a firm's global turnover. Asked about concerns the law has seen posts wrongly removed from social media, the Technology Secretary told Sky News: 'I have not seen any evidence that the Bill goes too far at all.' He added: 'I will be monitoring the impact, but I have not so far seen anything that gives me concern for anyone about free speech grounds. 'We have very strident protections for free speech in this country.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Nigel Farage demands apology after Labour minister claims Reform leader is ‘on the side' of paedos like Jimmy Saville
NIGEL Farage today demanded an apology after a Labour minister sensationally claimed he is "on the side" of paedos like Jimmy Savile. Tech Secretary Peter Kyle sparked a blazing row by alleging the Reform Party leader's vow to repeal online safety laws amounts to backing predators gaining access to children. 2 2 Mr Kyle declared: 'If Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. "And Nigel Farage is saying he's on their side.' Furious at the inflammatory accusation, Mr Farage hit back, branding the comments "disgusting" and demanding a retraction. He fumed: "Peter Kyle's comments on Sky News are disgusting. "He should do the right thing and apologise." However, the Tech Secretary refused to back down, stating: "If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. "It is as simple as that." On Monday, Mr Farage pledged to scrap the Online Safety Act should Reform win the next election, arguing it risks erasing free speech "at the stroke of a pen". The Reform boss further claimed the legislation would drive children onto the dark web, insisting youngsters would use VPNs and end up accessing more dangerous corners of the internet than ever before. He said: 'The road to hell can be paved with good intentions." Friday saw the Online Safety Act come into full effect, with over 6,000 websites – including major social media platforms and porn sites – enforcing stringent age checks. The sweeping crackdown compels tech firms to verify users are 18 or older before granting access to adult content or distressing material linked to suicide, self-harm and eating disorders. Under the rigorous new measures, users may be required to scan their faces, provide official identification, or even share contact lists and email details. Mr Kyle today defended the Act, stating he has "not seen any evidence that the Bill goes too far at all". The Tech Secretary added: "I will be monitoring the impact, but I have not so far seen anything that gives me concern for anyone about free speech grounds. "We have very strident protections for free speech in this country. "This is not about free speech. This is about hateful, violent, extreme, misogynistic and pornographic material finding its way into children's feeds."
