Forged dining card shared in posts targeting Pakistan ex-PM's sons
On the bottom of the image attached to the post, text highlighted with a red box reads: "We dont offer halal or Kosher food as per restaurant policy."
reposted over 1,300 times, while similar posts have also been shared on Facebook
Image
Screenshot of an X post taken on July 31, 2025, with a red X added by AFP
Khan, a former cricket star-turned premier, has been jailed since August 2023 on a slew of corruption charges his party says are politically motivated.
His supporters and senior party leaders have also faced a crackdown, with at protesters during a recent demonstration against his two years of incarceration (archived link).
Last year, a UN panel of experts found that Khan's detention "had no legal basis and appears to have been intended to disqualify him" from contesting elections (archived link).
His sons, Kasim and Sulaiman Khan, went to the United States in late July to campaign for their father's release from prison with Washington lawmakers, some of whom shared posts about their meetings on X (archived here, here and here).
Some social media users appeared to believe the menu was genuine.
"So the meat was pork," one wrote, adding that "the youth are indulging in forbidden food and lying".
Pakistan is a majority Muslim country, which means that the population largely adheres to halal practices -- consuming food that is slaughtered and produced according to Islamic law.
Muslims are prohibited from eating pork.
Warped logo, misspellings
But there are clear signs that the document was fabricated, including the URL provided which is "wwweapitolhillslub.org".
A Google search of the Capitol Hill Club leads to its official website hosted at www.capitolhillclub.org (archived link).
Closer inspection of the forged document also reveals that the club logo on the top-left corner is warped with missing letters, while the official logo seen on Capitol Hill Club website and their 2025 menus uploaded online shows the name clearly (archived link).
Image
Comparison of the club's logo on the circulated document (left) with the real logo as seen on Capitol Hill Club's website and menus online
All four menus listed on the official website also do not mention having a policy of not offering halal or kosher food.
In fact, two of the menus -- the "All Day Banquet Beverage & Breakfast" menu and the "Banquet Lunch" menu -- request that planners send allergies and dietary restrictions for guests.
Image
A comparison between the fabricated document (left) and the banquet lunch menu on the official website (right), with the highlighted portion on the right document done by AFP. The red X on the fabricated document was also done by AFP. Both screen captures were taken on August 7, 2025.
in the forged document, including the misspelling of the words "opportunity" as "opporennity", "members" as "eembefse", and "luggage" as "cluggage".
Repeated sentences and errors in punctuation are throughout.
The Capitol Hill Club has not responded to AFP's requests for comment.
AFP has repeatedly debunked misinformation around the jailed former prime minister.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
18 hours ago
- France 24
Thousands protest in Tel Aviv against Israeli govt move to expand Gaza war
Demonstrators waved signs and held up pictures of hostages still being held in the Palestinian territory as they called on the government to secure their release. AFP journalists at the rally estimated the number of attendees to be in the tens of thousands, while a group representing the families of hostages said as many as 100,000 people participated. Authorities did not provide an official estimate for the size of the crowd, though it dwarfed the ones at other recent anti-war rallies. "We will end with a direct message to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: if you invade parts of Gaza and the hostages are murdered, we will pursue you in the town squares, in election campaigns and at every time and place," Shahar Mor Zahiro, the relative of a slain hostage, told AFP. On Friday, Netanyahu's security cabinet greenlighted plans for a major operation to seize Gaza City, triggering a wave of domestic and international criticism. Foreign powers, including some of Israel's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated ceasefire to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the Strip. Despite the backlash and rumours of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained defiant over the decision. In a post on social media late Friday, Netanyahu said "we are not going to occupy Gaza -- we are going to free Gaza from Hamas". The premier has faced regular protests over the course of 22 months of war, with many rallies calling for the government to strike a deal after past truces saw hostages exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. 'A new crime' The Palestinian Authority (PA) on Saturday lambasted Israel's plan to expand its operations in Gaza. According to a statement carried by the official Palestinian news agency Wafa, PA president Mahmud Abbas said the plan "constitutes a new crime", and stressed "the urgent need to take action to stop it immediately". He also emphasised "the importance of enabling the State of Palestine to assume its full responsibilities in the Gaza Strip". In the same meeting that approved the Gaza City plan, the security cabinet adopted a set of principles for ending the war in Gaza that included establishing a new "administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority". The PA, conceived as a first step towards a Palestinian state, exercises limited administration over parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, but does not have a presence in Hamas-run Gaza. Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 37 people were killed by Israeli fire across the territory on Saturday, including 30 civilians who were waiting to collect aid. Israel's offensive has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel -- which triggered the war -- resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
France 24
18 hours ago
- France 24
Thousands rally in Tel Aviv against Israeli government's plan to expand Gaza war
Thousands took to the streets in Tel Aviv on Saturday to call for an end to the war in Gaza, a day after the Israeli government vowed to expand the conflict and capture Gaza City. Demonstrators waved signs and held up pictures of hostages still being held in the Palestinian territory as they called on the government to secure their release. AFP journalists at the rally estimated the number of attendees to be in the tens of thousands, while a group representing the families of hostages said as many as 100,000 people participated. Authorities did not provide an official estimate for the size of the crowd, though it dwarfed the ones at other recent anti-war rallies. "We will end with a direct message to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: if you invade parts of Gaza and the hostages are murdered, we will pursue you in the town squares, in election campaigns and at every time and place," Shahar Mor Zahiro, the relative of a slain hostage, told AFP. On Friday, Netanyahu's security cabinet greenlighted plans for a major operation to seize Gaza City, triggering a wave of domestic and international criticism. Foreign powers, including some of Israel 's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated ceasefire to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the Strip. Despite the backlash and rumours of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained defiant over the decision. In a post on social media late Friday, Netanyahu said "we are not going to occupy Gaza -- we are going to free Gaza from Hamas". The premier has faced regular protests over the course of 22 months of war, with many rallies calling for the government to strike a deal after past truces saw hostages exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. 'A new crime' The Palestinian Authority (PA) on Saturday lambasted Israel's plan to expand its operations in Gaza. According to a statement carried by the official Palestinian news agency Wafa, PA president Mahmud Abbas said the plan "constitutes a new crime", and stressed "the urgent need to take action to stop it immediately". He also emphasised "the importance of enabling the State of Palestine to assume its full responsibilities in the Gaza Strip". In the same meeting that approved the Gaza City plan, the security cabinet adopted a set of principles for ending the war in Gaza that included establishing a new "administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority". The PA, conceived as a first step towards a Palestinian state, exercises limited administration over parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank, but does not have a presence in Hamas-run Gaza. Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 37 people were killed by Israeli fire across the territory on Saturday, including 30 civilians who were waiting to collect aid. Israel's offensive has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, figures the United Nations says are reliable. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel -- which triggered the war -- resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
AFP
2 days ago
- AFP
Major climate-GDP study under review after facing challenge
But a re-analysis by Stanford University researchers in California, released August 6, 2025, challenges the conclusion of the climate paper (archived here and here). It found the projected hit to be about three times smaller and broadly in line with earlier estimates, after excluding an anomalous result tied to Uzbekistan (archived here). The saga may culminate in a rare retraction, with Nature telling AFP August 6 it will have "further information to share soon" -- a move seized upon by climate-change skeptics following the publication of the re-analysis and pre-print correction of the paper. Both the original authors -- who have acknowledged errors in their methodology and data processing -- and the Stanford team hoped the transparency of the review process would bolster, rather than undermine public confidence in science. Climate scientist Maximilian Kotz and co-authors at the renowned Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) published the original research in April 2024, using datasets from 83 countries to assess how changes in temperature and precipitation affect economic growth (archived here). Influential paper It became the second most cited climate paper of the year, according to the UK-based Carbon Brief outlet, and informed policy at the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, US federal government and others (archived here and here). AFP was among numerous media outlets to report on it. Yet the eye-popping claim that global GDP would be lowered by 62 percent by the year 2100 under a high emissions scenario soon drew scrutiny. "That's why our eyebrows went up because most people think that 20 percent is a very big number," scientist and economist Solomon Hsiang, one of the researchers behind the re-analysis, also published in Nature, told AFP August 5, 2025 (archived here). When they tried to replicate the results, Hsiang and his Stanford colleagues spotted serious anomalies in the data surrounding Uzbekistan. Specifically, there was a glaring mismatch in the provincial growth figures cited in the Potsdam paper and the national numbers reported for the same periods by the World Bank. "When we dropped Uzbekistan, suddenly everything changed. And we were like, 'whoa, that's not supposed to happen,'" Hsiang said. "We felt like we had to document it in this form because it's been used so widely in policy making." The authors of the 2024 paper acknowledged methodological flaws, including currency exchange issues, and on August 6 uploaded a corrected version, which has not yet been peer-reviewed. "We're waiting for Nature to announce their further decision on what will happen next," Kotz told AFP. He stressed that while "there can be methodological issues and debate within the scientific community," the bigger picture was unchanged: climate change will have substantial economic impacts in the decades ahead. Undeniable climate impact Frances Moore, an associate professor in environmental economics at the University of California, Davis, who was not involved in either the original paper or the re-analysis, agreed (archived here). She told AFP on August 5 that the paper's correction did not alter overall policy implications. Projections of an economic slowdown by the year 2100 are "extremely bad" regardless of the Kotz-led study, she explained, and "greatly exceed the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to stabilize the climate, many times over." "Future work to identify specific mechanisms by which variation in climate affects economic output over the medium and long-term is critical to both better understand these findings and prepare society to respond to coming climate disruption," she also noted. Image Riverbank dwellers carry banana produce over the dry Solimoes riverbed in the Pesqueiro community in Manacapuru, Amazonas state, northern Brazil, on September 30, 2024 (AFP / MICHAEL DANTAS, MICHAEL DANTAS) Hsiang said even smaller impacts on GDP should be considered "enough that it makes a lot of sense to invest in reducing climate change." "It's very cost effective," he told AFP. Heat stress on the economy manifests through various mechanisms, he said. For example, workforce productivity dips at high temperatures, risks of potential health complications rise, while machinery also deteriorates (archived here, here and here). "The very hottest countries in the world, near the tropics, we see this effect even more magnified," Hsiang said. "Every one degree of warming for them is a much larger impact on their economy." 'Final stages' Asked whether Nature would be retracting the Potsdam paper, Karl Ziemelis, the journal's physical sciences editor, did not answer directly but said an editor's note was added to the paper in November 2024 "as soon as we became aware of an issue" with the data and methodology (archived here). "We are in the final stages of this process and will have further information to share soon," he told AFP August 6. The episode comes at a delicate time for climate science, under heavy fire from the US government under President Donald Trump's second term, as misinformation about the impacts of human-driven greenhouse gases abounds. Yet even in this environment, Hsiang argued, the episode showed the robust nature of the scientific method. "One team of scientists checking other scientists' work and finding mistakes, the other team acknowledging it, correcting the record, this is the best version of science," he said. AFP has previously reported on other flawed reports and predatory studies on climate change.
