Ludhiana man sentenced to life for murdering mother after argument over food
Ludhiana: A local court sentenced a person to life imprisonment for the murder of his mother after an argument with her over food. The court of additional sessions judge (fast track court) Sandeep Singh Bajwa also imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on the convict.
On Oct 15, 2017, Shimlapuri police booked the accused, Munish Kumar of Paras Ram Nagar, Bathinda, currently residing in Shimlapuri, under section 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Court for killing his mother. According to the prosecution, on that date, Chander Parkash, the complainant, recorded a statement with the police that they are two brothers and three sisters. His younger brother, Munish Kumar, aged about 25 years, was unmarried and was unemployed for the past three years.
Their father is a retired railway employee and works in AC Market. Munish often argued with their parents when asked to find work and would even beat their mother, Raj Rani.
On Oct 14, 2017, their father went to Bathinda, and he left for work at 12 noon. At home, only their mother, Raj Rani, and Munish were present. Around 9.27pm, the complainant received a call from Munish who confessed that around 3pm, he argued with their mother over food.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
When she refused to give him food and taunted him, Munish, in anger, pushed her into the bed box and slit her throat with a sharp iron saw blade. The complainant rushed home and found his mother's dead body inside the bed box with her throat cut.
He informed their father and other relatives and requested the police to take legal action against Munish.
Police booked the accused for murder, later arrested him, and after completing the investigation, presented a chargesheet against him in court.
During the trial of the case, the accused pleaded false implication and claimed he never committed the murder of his mother.
The court, after appreciating the evidence on record, held that the circumstances presented by the prosecution establish a clear and continuous chain of events, indicating that the accused, Munish Kumar @ Maanshu, was the last person present with the deceased, Raj Rani. It observed that this is supported by the testimony of the complainant, Chander Prakash (rosecution witness 1), and other circumstances.
"The accused has failed to offer any explanation regarding the injuries sustained by Raj Rani, including the fatal throat slit, nor has he produced any evidence to support his defence.
These factors collectively point to the conclusion that the accused is responsible for the murder of Raj Rani," the court observed. It held that, therefore, the issue is decided in favour of the prosecution and against the accused.
MSID:: 121491595 413 |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
2 journalists held for blackmail, and extortion: Noida Police
Noida Police Tuesday said they arrested two journalists for allegedly blackmailing a news channel's owner and extorting money from him. A senior police officer told The Indian Express, 'The accused had extorted Rs 2.26 crore from the owner of the news channel by blackmailing and threatening to implicate him in a false case if he did not pay the remaining amount (Rs 62.74 crore). Three separate cases have been registered against them (based on complaints) by the channel's officials.' Police produced the duo before the Gautam Buddha Nagar District Court in the afternoon. They were sent to 15-day judicial custody. The complainant, Jagdish Chandra (75), owner of Bharat24 in Noida's Sector 62, alleged that the woman, Shazia Nisar, had been 'threatening to implicate' him in a 'false rape case' unless he paid her Rs 65 crore. Adarsh Jha — who used to work for a digital portal till a few days ago — has been 'helping' her, he claimed. The FIR reads: 'Shazia Nisar, 30, has been working as an anchor in my channel since 2022. She has been blackmailing me by threatening to implicate me in a false rape case and commit suicide. She has been illegally demanding Rs 60 crore from me. In the last year, she has taken Rs 2 crore 26 lakh through cheques several times. I have evidence of this (transaction). Adarsh Jha… is helping her blackmail me.' When contacted, Chandra said, 'She (Nisar) is a blackmailer. The law of the land will take its course. Her services have been terminated.' The officer quoted above said, 'Apart from the complaint filed by the channel owner, two more complaints were filed by the channel's consulting editor Anita Hada and HR head Anushri Dhar.' Officers from Noida's Sector 58 police station raided Nisar's home — she lives in Delhi — on Monday and arrested her. Police claimed that Rs 34.50 lakh in cash, three mobile phones, two laptops, and a Scorpio car were seized from her home. Police, simultaneously, raided Jha's home at Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, and arrested him. Chandra approached the police on June 8. His channel executives — Hada and Dhar — filed their complaints against Nisar on June 9. Hada said allegations of harassment made by Nisar were incorrect. 'Had that been the case, she would have filed a complaint against him… I would have supported her,'' she emphasised. Asked why they didn't approach the police earlier instead of paying her, she said, 'We were worried that this would harm the reputation of the company. According to police, Chandra, who is also Chief Editor and Chief Executive Officer of Bharat24, also filed a complaint against Nisar's mother. She has not been arrested, police said. Police have booked Nisar, her mother and Jha for extortion Station House Officer, Sector 58, Noida, Amit Kumar said 'We took them into custody on Monday'. 'When asked about the money in her account, she (Nisar) did not have a proper explanation for it… it was a compensation, she told us. We produced them before the court today,' said Kumar. Neetika Jha is a trainee reporter with The Indian Express, Delhi. She covers crime, health, environment as well as stories of human interest, in Noida and Ghaziabad. When not on the field she is probably working on another story idea. On weekends, she loves to read fiction over a cup of coffee (cold coffee if it is summer). The Thursday Murder club and Yellow face were her recent favourites. She loves her garden as much as she loves her job. She is an alumnus of Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. ... Read More
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Discoms: Power theft by e-rickshaws leads to losses of Rs 120 cr a yr
E-rickshaws in Delhi cause power losses of up to Rs 120 crore each year, officials from the city's power distribution companies said. According to sources, there are around 1.6 lakh e-rickshaws plying in Delhi but only about 50,000 are registered. 'In Delhi, it is estimated that over 60% of e-rickshaws are involved in power theft, resulting in a loss of 15-20 MW across the city, translating to an annual loss of around Rs 120 crore… This not only causes revenue loss but also leads to safety hazards,' said a senior official. On Sunday, two men were killed in a fire that broke out at a house in East Delhi's Dilshad Garden while two e-rickshaws were being charged. Last week, fire had erupted at an e-rickshaw charging station in the Ghonda in Northeast Delhi. Discom officials said the rickshaws were charged in batches 'as part of an organised illegal network controlled by local strongmen'. 'E-rickshaw owners/drivers pay a fixed fee of Rs 200-300 per day per e-rickshaw to the parking and charging mafia… The operators use illegal wiretapping from low-voltage mains to steal electricity. Some strongmen own several e-rickshaws and rent them to drivers,' said a senior discom official. Some of the areas where frequent power thefts by e-rickshaws have been witnessed across the city are Mandawali, Minto Road,Karol Bagh, Jama Masjid. Sangam Vihar, Batla House, Sarai Kale Khan, Tagore Garden, Paschim Vihar, Civil Lines, Mukherjee Nagar, and Narela. 'E-rickshaws are not dangerous; however, their illegal charging through direct theft and the use of sub-standard batteries are significant safety hazards. Exposed electricity wires left open during illegal charging and non-adherence to safety standards often cause sparks and short circuits. These exposed live wires also pose a danger to the public, especially children playing in these areas during the daytime. Such open wires have led to electrocutions in the past,' said officials. Officials said that this also leads to stress on the existing network causing possible breakdowns and voltage issues, inconveniencing other consumers in the area. The Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) has a special tariff category for e-rickshaw charging at Rs 4.50 per unit to encourage legal connections.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'15 hotel fire: HC orders BMC to pay 50L each to kin of 8 victims
Mumbai: Nearly a decade after a fire at Hotel City Kinara, Kurla West, claimed 8 lives, Bombay HC Tuesday ordered BMC to pay 50 lakh each compensation to their families, nailing it for gross negligence in discharge of its duties. Justices Burgess Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla said Kinara was granted an eating housing license without it obtaining any fire NOC from the fire brigade. "This, in our view, was one of the most egregious breaches committed not only by the owner... but also by BMC," they said, adding it was even more shocking that even after BMC became aware of the lack of fire NOC, did not take any action in that regard. They said BMC officials' deliberate inaction and negligence in fulfilling their duties led to loss of lives at Kinara. On Oct 16, 2015 the fire broke out around 1.20pm in the mezzanine. Among the dead were seven students, between 18 and 20years, of Don Bosco Institute of Technology and the eighth, a civil engineer (32). The court heard a 2018 petition by the victims' parents and wife to quash the Lokayukta's Feb 27, 2017 order which dismissed their complaint seeking investigation noting that Rs 1 lakh each compensation is disbursed. The HC quashed the Lokayukta's order. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The judges also said all the victims "had a full working life ahead of them". HC said by initially granting eating house license to Kinara without a FIR NOC and thereafter not taking action when it was discovered that Kinara was operating without a fire NOC, BMC committed gross negligence and acted totally in breach of its statutory duties. Justices Burgess Colabawala and Firdosh Pooniwalla said had BMC "promptly discharged its statutory duties by acting upon the fire safety violations and cancelled Kinara's licence, seized the LPG cylinders and prohibited the use of loft area/mezzanine floor for serving patrons, "the fire would definitely not have occurred. " "The loss of life of the petitioners' children/husband, has resulted in violation of their fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, as far as the petitioners are concerned, the loss of life of their children/husband has caused immense trauma and agony to the petitioners," said the judges in the verdict. The judges noted in three routine inspections—in Sept 2012, March 2013 and Sept 2015 —BMC found that Kinara was infringing various conditions of its licence. There was no letter from the chief fire officer granting permission to run it. It was using space outside the licensed premises to prepare Chinese food. The mezzanine floor was used for service instead of storage. One Martin Mathews' complaint to Vinoba Bhave police regarding storage of illegal LPG cylinders was forwarded to BMC but assistant commissioner of L ward "did not take the complaint seriously". In response to an RTI query, the fire brigade informed activist Nicholas Almeida that Kinara had no fire NOC. Advocate Godfrey Pimenta learnt from HPCL Kinara was not a registered customer of Laxmi Gas Agency. The judges agreed with senior advocate Naushad Engineer and advocate Jayesh Mistry for the petitioners that a higher standard of care was imposed on BMC to ensure public safety. They disagreed with advocate Anil Sakhare for BMC that there was no proximate cause link to acts of omission and/or commission of municipal officers and the fire and fatalities. The judges set aside the Lokayukta's order saying it failed to consider the Rs 1 lakh compensation each paid by the state govt to the families was only ad-hoc compensation. The judges said all victims "had a full working life ahead of them". Since the students were studying engineering (IT) or mass media and Arvind Kanaujia was employed at Sterling Engineering Consultants, "it would be safe to presume that, during their whole working life, they would earn a good salary". The judges said compensation of at least Rs 30 lakh each would be payable. Considering inflation and interest over 10 years, the compensation payable, in 2025, would be Rs 50 lakh. They directed BMC to pay each petitioner within 12 weeks failing which it "shall carry interest at rate of 9 % per annum...".
