logo
AI may cause a college graduate job crisis. What should young people do?

AI may cause a college graduate job crisis. What should young people do?

Miami Herald23-05-2025

There's comforting news for veteran office workers and professionals, but bad news for recent college graduates. When it comes to the future of jobs, new data suggest that artificial intelligence (A.I.) may threaten young people's employment prospects more than any other group.
Recent studies show that we're very close to a college graduate unemployment crisis, because entry-level white collar jobs are the easiest to be replaced by artificial intelligence. Most graduates entering the workforce do repetitive research and number-crunching jobs — precisely the ones A.I. does best.
Unemployment among U.S. college graduates has risen 30%, from 2% to 2.6%, since September 2022. By comparison, unemployment among the general population has grown by only 18%, from 3.4% to 4%, according to Federal Reserve Bank of New York data.
The ADP Research Institute, which specializes in labor market data, said in a report that 'finding a job has become harder' for young college graduates. This is not due to an oversupply of graduates: In fact, full-time student enrollment at U.S. higher education institutions has fallen in recent years, as The Wall Street Journal reported on May 19.
A recent survey of 3,000 executives by LinkedIn, the social media platform, found that 63% agreed A.I. will eventually eliminate the jobs currently done by entry-level employees.
Curious about how A.I. will impact all jobs — including mine — in the future, I contacted last year's co-winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics Daron Acemoglu. In a wide-ranging interview, he told me that he doesn't think experienced attorneys, accountants, physicians, teachers or journalists will lose their jobs to A.I. — at least not over the next 10 years.
'I would not want an A.I. to represent me in court,' Acemoglu told me. 'We're not going to see the end of lawyers, accountants, auditors, marketing professionals. These are deeply complex jobs.'
He added that current A.I. models and the ones that are likely to be developed in the near future will be able to handle parts of these jobs, but not replace humans entirely.
'The same for physicians,' he said. A.I. is getting better and better at diagnosis, but there is a lot of tacit knowledge that doctors gain through experience that A.I. will find hard to replicate, he added.
A doctor learns a lot from a patient's body language, or from the way a person describes his pain, or from the way different parts of the body react when touched, Acemoglu explained.
But when I asked him about A.I.'s impact on young people's employment opportunities, he started by saying, 'Well, I'm worried, I wouldn't hide that from you.'
As for what advice he's giving his students and other young people these days, he said they should focus on specialization and flexibility.
'The advice I would give is to build very specialized skills that they can be excellent in some domain, so that they are a potential partner for AI, not a target,' he said. And flexibility is essential, too, 'because you need to change what you do as technology changes,' he added.
Acemoglu, who teaches at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), says a small group of technology barons who dominate the industry are partly to blame for the college graduate unemployment problem. They are creating A.I. programs to help companies cut costs by eliminating jobs, rather than focusing on increasing productivity and creating more jobs.
I confess that, after speaking with Acemoglu and other experts in recent months, I'm less optimistic than I used to be. When I wrote my 2018 book 'The Robots Are Coming,' about the future of jobs in the age of automation, I was a cautious techno-optimist.
I tended to believe the technology industry mantra that new technological breakthroughs always end up creating more jobs than they destroy. But now? I'm not so sure.
Think about it: When Henry Ford rolled out the car manufacturing assembly line in the early 20th century, sure, carriage makers and stable hands lost out. But whole new industries were created to build roads, bridges, tires and other car parts. But today, when a supermarket replaces a human cashier with an automated checkout machine, that job usually just disappears.
To be sure, having a college — or, better, a graduate — degree is more important than ever. Even the latest figures show that those with college diplomas are much less likely to be unemployed than the general population.
But it's imperative for high schools and colleges to teach students, in addition to specialized skills, how to use A.I. as a tool in their careers — not just as an enhanced Google search engine.
That would help college graduates get jobs that until recently were reserved for people with two or three years of work experience. Without that, A.I. may end up hurting recent graduates more severely than it affects older, more experienced workers.
Don't miss the 'Oppenheimer Presenta' TV show on Sundays at 9 pm E.T. on CNN en Español. Blog: andresoppenheimer.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Biden coverup demands ‘Watergate' hearings, Democrats' Hispanic exodus and other commentary
Biden coverup demands ‘Watergate' hearings, Democrats' Hispanic exodus and other commentary

New York Post

time8 hours ago

  • New York Post

Biden coverup demands ‘Watergate' hearings, Democrats' Hispanic exodus and other commentary

Conservative: Biden Coverup Demands 'Watergate' Hearings 'Missing from the hand-wringing' over 'the massive coverup of Joe Biden's mental decline,' fumes Kenneth L. Khachigian at The Wall Street Journal, 'is a demand for accountability.' No! 'If Congress takes seriously that it should act when Americans are cynically hoodwinked,' then 'it must begin an investigation into the coverup that matches or exceeds the Senate Watergate Committee hearings.' Crucially, were decisions with 'potentially catastrophic international consequences' made by 'an enfeebled President Biden' or by the 'Politburo' aides who hid his true state? Advertisement Get going: 'Each day that an investigation is delayed,' central players 'might be destroying records, replacing cellphones and following Hillary Clinton's example by wiping their email servers.' Liberal: Democrats' Hispanic Exodus Fresh data 'has underscored the extent of Hispanic defection from the Democrats over the last two presidential cycles,' observes the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Amazingly, 'Democratic support dropped by a gobsmacking 46 points among Hispanic moderates, from +62 to +16, between 2016 and 2024.' Advertisement Much like white moderates, they 'are voting their ideology and political views, not their group identity.' These voters think Democrats 'moved too far left on economic issues' and 'cultural and social issues.' Hispanic moderates are 'tough on crime,' 'support law enforcement,' oppose 'gender ideology in public schools,' and 'want cheap, reliable energy.' 'Considering that moderates are the dominant ideological group among Hispanics,' Democrats can 'either adjust or risk losing even more support among Hispanics who are no longer content to vote their identity.' From the right: Hail Elon's Space Exploits Advertisement 'What makes [Elon] Musk so important' is not his 'troubled venture into government,' but how he's 'reviving a spirit of exploration on a big scale,' cheers the Washington Examiner's Byron York. The United States reduced then abandoned 'space exploration after the peak moment of Apollo' decades ago. Now Musk's 'hugely ambitious' Starship program, 'which is designed to go to Mars,' is 'the heart of the American space program.' Yes, 'Musk has received the most public attention' for his DOGE work, a role ' he proved entirely unsuited' for, bringing him 'constant attacks.' Advertisement But 'Americans owe him a debt of gratitude for almost single-handedly restoring a sense of ambition and purpose to' space exploration and exploitation, 'a great field of US achievement.' Libertarian: Don't Pardon 'Gold Bars' Menendez With a tweet charging 'it was the Democrats who started weaponizing the Justice Dept.,' argues Reason's Billy Binion, 'Bob Menendez, the disgraced former senator from New Jersey,' is obviously angling for a presidential pardon before heading to prison this month after his conviction for 'accepting almost $1 million in bribes in exchange for, among other things, favors that benefited foreign governments.' No way: The pardon power exists 'to give a lifeline to people who may have been railroaded by the government, which sometimes gets creative and fanatical in its attempts to punish people. It is not supposed to be a get-out-of-jail-free card for well-connected, powerful people who can flatter the president.' And 'Gold Bars' Menendez 'as a senator, was one of the most powerful people in the country.' Financial analyst: Universities' Big Squeeze 'The nightmare scenario for elite universities is here,' warns Semafor's Liz Hoffman. 'Top universities are financial titans,' except 'they make a lot of money but spend almost all of it.' Now the Trump administration threatens not their 'federal grants and contracts' but their lucrative 'tax-exempt status' and the OK to admit 'students from abroad,' who now 'make up as much as one-quarter of undergraduates at elite colleges and tend to pay sticker price, while American students get discounts.' Advertisement Yes, many have huge endowments — 'too much' of that money is 'tied up in assets that can't be sold quickly' such as 'private equity, private credit, real estate, and venture capital.' Now 'Wall Street investors are expecting endowments to look to sell portfolios of these stuck investments for cash in the coming weeks.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

US, China trade row could ease after Trump-Xi talks: Treasury chief
US, China trade row could ease after Trump-Xi talks: Treasury chief

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US, China trade row could ease after Trump-Xi talks: Treasury chief

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that President Donald Trump could speak with China's Xi Jinping "very soon," and that such a call could help break the logjam in the trade talks between the world's two biggest economies. Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating a deal reached last month in Geneva -- negotiated by Bessent -- to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days. China's slow-walking on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed to make cars and chips have fueled US frustration, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday -- a concern since confirmed by US officials. But Bessent seemed to take the pressure down a notch, telling CBS's "Face the Nation" that the gaps could be bridged. "I'm confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call that this will be ironed out," Bessent said, however noting that China was "withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement." When asked if rare earths were one of those products, Bessent said, "Yes." "Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with" Xi, he said. On when a Trump-Xi call could take place, Bessent said: "I believe we will see something very soon." Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports. New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent. China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125 percent to 10 percent. In an interview with ABC's "This Week," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said China was "slow-rolling the deal," adding: "We are taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation." "Our president understands what to do. He's going to go work it out," Lutnick said. sst-gl/md

Immigration Research Shows Stephen Miller Wrong About American Science
Immigration Research Shows Stephen Miller Wrong About American Science

Forbes

time18 hours ago

  • Forbes

Immigration Research Shows Stephen Miller Wrong About American Science

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller attends a press briefing at the White House on ... More February 20, 2025. Miller, the chief architect of the Trump administration's immigration policy, argues that American scientific achievement owes little to immigrants. A significant body of research disputes that contention. (Photo by) Stephen Miller, the chief architect of the Trump administration's immigration policy, said recently that American scientific achievement owes little to immigrants. A significant body of research disputes that contention. Miller's argument and a statement by Vice President JD Vance about the Apollo Program seem designed to justify the administration's restrictions on international students and high-skilled immigrants. On May 31, 2025, in a statement on White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller wrote, 'During the middle of the 20th century—when the U.S. achieved unquestioned global scientific dominance—there was net zero migration. From the 20's to the 70's the foreign-born population was cut almost by half while the overall population doubled. (Until Hart-Celler kicked in).' Contrary to the implication of Miller's statement, American science owes a great deal to immigrants in the post-war period. Between 1945 and 1974, 16 of the 30 U.S. winners of the Nobel Prize in physics were immigrants, according to a National Foundation for American Policy analysis. In 1954, the Atomic Energy Act established an award recognizing scientific achievements in atomic energy. Italian-born Enrico Fermi won the first award. Five of the first eight winners of what became the Enrico Fermi Award (named after his death) were immigrants. Four of the nuclear scientists who came to the United States from Europe in the 1930s later received a Nobel Prize for physics: Felix Bloch, born in Switzerland, won it in 1952, Emilio Segre (Italy) in 1959, and Maria Mayer (Poland) and Eugene Wigner (Hungary) won the award in 1963. Despite the immigration restrictions imposed by Congress in 1921 and 1924, U.S. universities and others found ways around some of the quotas as fascist governments drove many brilliant individuals out of Europe. Immigrants Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard signed a letter used by Russian-born economist Alexander Sachs to convince President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to start the Manhattan Project. Breakthroughs by Niels Bohr, born in Denmark, and Enrico Fermi were crucial in developing the atomic bomb. In the end, immigrant and U.S.-born scientists working together turned theory into reality in the race to build the bomb before Nazi Germany. Between 1945 and 1974, 15 of the 36 U.S. Nobel Prizes in medicine, or 42%, were awarded to immigrants. That tells only part of the story. Albert Sabin, an immigrant from Poland, and Jonas Salk, the son of an immigrant, developed the vaccines that ended polio as a threat to Americans. Both men were in America due to family immigration. 'Without Sabin and Salk, American children would continue to be paralyzed for life by polio,' Michel Zaffran, director of polio eradication at the World Health Organization, said in an interview. 'Their contribution is quite simply immeasurable.' Immigrants have been awarded 40% of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in chemistry, medicine and physics since 2000, according to an NFAP analysis (updated through the 2024 awards). Enrico Fermi in His Laboratory (Photo by © CORBIS/Corbis via Getty Images) The 1924 Immigration Act, which reduced the flow of immigrants by approximately 90% and blocked Jews, Eastern Europeans and Asians, proved disastrous economically for America. According to research by New York University economists Petra Moser and Shmuel San, the restrictive immigration quotas of the 1920s significantly reduced invention in the United States. 'After the quotas, U.S. scientists produced 68% fewer additional patents in the pre-quota fields of ESE-born [Eastern and Southern European immigrant] scientists compared with the pre-quota fields of other U.S. scientists,' write Moser and San. 'Time-varying effects show a large decline in invention by U.S. scientists in the 1930s, which persisted into the 1960s.' Moser and San said the results show that U.S. scientists benefited from the presence of immigrant scientists but suffered after U.S. immigration restrictions blocked their entry. 'A firm-level analysis of changes in patenting reveals that firms which employed ESE-born [Eastern and Southern European immigrant] scientists in 1921 created 53% fewer inventions after the quotas,' according to Moster and San. 'A text analysis of U.S. patents indicates that invention also declined more broadly. After the quotas, 23% fewer U.S. patents describe inventions in ESE [Eastern and Southern European immigrant] fields compared with other fields.' UPENN Wharton economics professor Zeke Hernandez said one would expect similar consequences today should U.S. immigration policy block the entry of international students and foreign-born scientists and engineers. 'America's innovation machine would be decimated,' said Hernandez. 'Sixteen percent of inventors in the U.S. are foreign-born, but they account for 36% of all patents.' He points out immigrants are 80% more likely than the U.S.-born to start new businesses, and they are founders of over half of startups that achieve a $1 billion valuation. Over 70% of the full-time graduate students in key technical fields at U.S. universities are foreign-born. According to economist Zeke Hernandez, 'You don't have to have compassion for foreigners to know that getting rid of immigrants is bad for us.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store