Nashville mayor proposes 13% bump for schools budget. Here's what it would do
District leaders gathered to talk through the proposal before the Metro Nashville Council budget committee on May 22. Tensions ran high at times during the two-hour hearing. The conversation revolved around staff raises and continuing programs initially funded by federal pandemic relief money, among other things.
MNPS Director Adrienne Battle, Chief Financial Officer Jorge Robles and Board of Education Chair Freda Player were on hand to discuss the proposed $1.3 billion operating budget for the 2026 fiscal year, which begins July 1. Several members of the MNPS board and representatives from Metropolitan Nashville Education Association were also present, looking on from the public gallery in the council chambers.
Here are five key takeaways from the discussion.
The mayor's proposed budget includes plans for a 3% cost-of-living adjustment, also known as COLA, to employee salaries. That totals out to around $18.6 million. The budget also designates $9.2 million for step increases to salaries.
If the budget is approved, Robles said, both teachers and non-teachers would see around a 5% raise between the COLA and step increases.
During the pandemic, public school districts nationwide received a large influx of federal funding known as Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief, or ESSER.
A total of $425 million flowed into MNPS through the relief fund. Some of that was used for one-time expenses as pandemic disruptions shuttered schools and forced them to switch to virtual learning. However, MNPS also used the money to place nurses in every school — something district and city leaders seek to continue as the final federal dollars are spent.
Around $15 million is earmarked in the Metro Public Health Department budget to continue staffing nurses in schools.
The proposed MNPS budget also includes $65.5 million to sustain other items initially funded by ESSER, representing the largest total cost outlined in the proposal. The funding includes added mental health resources for students, college and career readiness programs, summer school options, tutoring and more.
Here's a look at other larger costs in the proposed budget:
$44.8 million total for employee compensation (includes step raises, COLA and other costs)
$20.4 million for school-based supports for children with special needs, English learners and others
$14.6 million for textbooks
Battle also highlighted the district's ongoing push to use employees known as classroom associates as substitute teachers. The classroom associates are full- and part-time employees assigned to specific schools who are also fully trained on safety protocols and have access to professional development training.
Battle said the model has been "highly successful" and has provided stability for teachers and students alike.
"The number one piece of feedback that we received from our schools is: 'This is great. We love it. It's effective,'" Battle said.
MNPS spokesperson Sean Braisted said the district now has more than 500 classroom associates. The district also has a pool of traditional substitutes who can be assigned on a day-to-day basis.
Braisted said traditional substitutes who worked more than 50% of the 2024-25 school year will be offered automatic renewals. Those who fell short of that requirement will be asked to reapply to substitute in the upcoming school year.
Councilmember Courtney Johnston kicked off a lengthy exchange with MNPS leaders by leveling criticism at the district for not submitting a line-by-line budget ahead of the hearing.
"This is, by percentage, the largest amount of money that we allocate every year," Johnston said. "This is not a budget, so it's really hard to come with educated questions around specific things."
Battle said the district submitted documentation as requested and that it also publishes a budget book each year for the public to see. She explained that MNPS operates differently than other city departments because it's governed by an elected school board that has to approve the district's budget before it can be released. She said that cycle repeats each year.
Player also chimed in to explain that the district often waits for state approval for certain allocations, and that district leaders were working up until last week to add those items to the proposed budget.
"This is not new," Battle said.
Johnston also blasted the district for using pandemic relief funds to create programs that now must be accounted for in the operating budget, saying it left taxpayers to "pick up the tab." Battle said the programs reflect heightened needs for students driven by the pandemic.
"It costs more when you're providing those unique services," Battle said. "They deserve it. They deserve to have their needs met in that way. So that is what you're seeing in some of the trade-off there."
Johnston also said the MNPS budget has increased "exponentially" since 2019. Councilmember Burkley Allen later commented that the overall budget for Nashville has increased by 70% since 2019, while the MNPS budget has increased by around 60% in that same period.
Councilmembers will conduct several more budget and finance hearings and work sessions in the weeks to come before finalizing the city budget. The full council will vote on the budget within the month of June. The school board will then vote on the finalized budget ahead of the start of the new fiscal year on July 1.
Rachel Wegner covers education and children's issues for The Tennessean. Got a story you think she should hear? Reach her via email at RAwegner@tennessean.com. You can also find her on Twitter or Bluesky under the handle RachelAnnWegner.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville schools: Inside the mayor's 13% budget increase proposal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
2026 Social Security COLA estimated at 2.7%. Why seniors still fall behind.
Social Security recipients are still forecast to see a 2.7% bump in their monthly checks next year, the same as last month's estimate, based on the latest inflation report, a new analysis showed. The Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), the index used to calculate the annual adjustment to Social Security benefits, increased 2.5% in July. Overall inflation rose 2.7%, flat from June. The Federal Reserve's inflation goal is 2%. The annual adjustment, also known as the cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA), to Social Security benefits is meant to help seniors maintain their purchasing power over the years, but that hasn't always worked, said Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst. "Prices on the items that older Americans use the most remain elevated," she said. Categories that see higher levels of inflation than the overall rate include housing, medical costs, transportation and groceries. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' most recent weighting for older consumers, these categories when added together comprise more than 85% of household budgets of consumers age 62 and older. Why is July COLA estimate important? The actual Social Security COLA estimate that the Social Security Administration typically announces in October is based on inflation data in the third quarter, or July, August and September. So July is the first month that will be considered for the 2026 COLA calculation. Here's how COLA is calculated: CPI-W for July, August and September are averaged, and then compared against the average of the same three months in the prior year. The percentage of difference is what the Social Security Administration uses to determine the annual COLA adjustment. CPI-W largely reflects the broad index the Labor Department releases each month, although it sometimes differs slightly. Last month, the overall consumer price index rose 2.7% and the index for urban wage earners increased 2.5%. Social Security's future The Social Security Office of the Chief Actuary estimates President Donald Trump's tax package moves the insolvency date for the Social Security trust fund forward by about three months from 2033 to 2032. Part of that is due to the increase in the standard deduction for those age 65 and older from 2025 through 2028. The higher standard deduction means less overall tax liability for most Social Security beneficiaries, but it also means lower revenues received by the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds from the taxation of benefits. 'Congressional legislators did not include any provision to replace these program funds that were formerly earmarked for the payment of current Social Security and Medicare benefits,' Johnson said. According to Social Security Trustees, a 25.8% cut in 2034 benefits would be necessary. Johnson calculates a 25.8% reduction could cut lifetime Social Security income for beneficiaries at an average age of 65 in 2025 by $176,400 over a 25-year retirement. How many people receive Social Security benefits? In July, 74.36 million people received Social Security, according to the Social Security Administration. These beneficiaries include retired workers, disabled workers, survivors of deceased workers and those receiving Supplemental Security Income. The average monthly benefit was $1,863.12 in July. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.
Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
Indiana wants flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars
Indiana wants more flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars designated for improving struggling schools, boosting programming for students learning English, and other specific initiatives. Why it matters: If approved, the flexibility could change where the dollars get directed and how they're spent, raising concerns that the money could flow away from students and schools in need of extra support. Driving the news: Late last month, the U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to states inviting them to seek waivers from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) — a decades-old law meant to improve quality and address educational inequities. Indiana, Iowa and Oklahoma had already submitted flexibility waivers to the department. The big picture: The invitation for states to seek flexibility is in line with larger efforts to move money and decision-making away from the Education Department. President Trump signed an executive order in March to dismantle the department, and nearly half the workforce was slashed that same month. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said Trump is "taking the bureaucracy out of education so that more money flows to the states." "Better education is closest to the kids, with parents, with local superintendents, with local school boards," she said in an interview with Fox News in March. "I think we'll see our scores go up with our students, and we can educate them with parental input as well." Zoom in: Indiana's waiver request asks for flexibility in spending the nearly $25 million in annual school improvement funds it receives, allowing it to spend those dollars at more schools — beyond those identified as needing improvement. It's also asking to receive its title funds — those meant for specific programs, such as professional development, supporting at-risk students, and English language acquisition — in a block grant, allowing those dollars to be used for any of the eligible title programs. Doing so would reduce time spent on compliance, the state says. Currently, the Indiana Department of Education allocates approximately $2.5 million annually in staff time to meet ESEA compliance requirements, according to the application.
The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump to Washington: Drop dead
Disdain for Washington is the birthright of every American, indeed the entire English-speaking world. In his two-volume travelogue, 'North America,' English novelist Anthony Trollope described the still-incomplete city he found in 1861 'as melancholy and miserable a town as the mind of man can conceive.' He paints a picture of a transient, small city with neither robust commerce nor gracious society, and it didn't get any better from there. 'So men ate, and drank, and laughed, waiting till chaos should come,' he wrote. 'Secure in the belief that the atoms into which their world would resolve itself would connect themselves again in some other form without trouble on their part.' Mark Leibovich could lift that whole and use it in his next book. Which all makes sense, because no city of any significant size would have ever sprung up on the marshy banks of the Potomac and Anacostia rivers. Denied a great harbor, like nearby Baltimore, in order to be built inland and sheltered from invasion — which didn't even work — neither was Washington afforded a pleasant climate like the nearby foothills of the Blue Ridge. But Washington, born of a compromise between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, wasn't supposed to be a marvelous place to live and work. It was supposed to belong to no other region, a geographic leftover to which the unlovely work of government could be relegated. Like putting a power plant downriver from a city, Washington was supposed to do important, dirty work, not be beloved. Add in the very American tendency to resent those with pretenses to authority, especially when they use that authority to take people's money to spend poorly and devise rules that they do not follow themselves, and Washington was born to be disdained. But there is no class of people in the world with a more robust contempt for Washington than New Yorkers, the city that had the capital when it was traded away in 1790. It is congenital for them. Archetypal New Yorker Nora Ephron, who lived in Washington during her brief marriage to celebrity journalist Carl Bernstein, called it a city 'where ideas went to die.' Indeed, there is a whole journalistic subgenre of New Yorkers dumping on Washington. Once, in a pool report about then-President-elect Barack Obama visiting The Washington Post in 2009, a New York Times reporter even got in a jab at 'the nondescript soviet-style building at 15th and L.' A fair swipe at a city the architecture of which juxtaposes neoclassical grandeur with what appears to be a collection of Hampton Inns with metal detectors. New Yorkers particularly resent Washington's pretensions. A twelfth the size of the Big Apple — smaller than flyover places like Oklahoma City and Indianapolis that would never dare to rival New York — where does Washington, some middling city full of bureaucrats, hack pols, nerds and sticky-faced middle schoolers gawking at lunar capsules, get off? So, Donald Trump, a person who could have been produced by no city other than New York, is being very true to his roots as he declares a kind of summer-weight martial law for Washington. Citing a statute that allows the president to nationalize the city's police when 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist,' Trump has taken command of the cops and called out the National Guard. The emergency, Trump says with a New Yorker's gift for restraint, is 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' There is less violent crime in Washington than when he started his first term eight years ago, but as presidents have learned too well, an emergency is in the eye of the declarer. Congress, which is actually responsible for D.C. according to the Constitution, will no doubt assert its rightful authority here and push back against this unprecedented overreach. Right after they get done stopping the emergency tariff powers, the emergency immigration powers, the emergency energy powers and the drug emergency powers. No, we know that Washington is still Trollope's Washington. But now, they don't even eat, drink and laugh as they wait for the atoms of their world 'to connect themselves again in some other form without trouble on their part.' It's all joyless livestreams, lukewarm, protein-rich quinoa bowls and 6 a.m. cold plunges. There isn't even any smoke in the smoke-filled rooms. If Republicans love to hate Washington, though, the Democrats have the opposite problem: They hate to love it. Dems have spent nearly 40 years committed to the cause of statehood for the District, a constitutional no-no that is still irresistible to them for the promise of three Electoral College votes, two new senators and another seat in the House that would all be blue in perpetuity. The party line is that Washingtonians are some kind of American Gazans, denied self-governance by colonizers. But getting Americans to care so much about a place that is known as 'Hollywood for ugly people' is a tough pull, especially when it's a company town where the company never has a recession. And so, Washington lives out its destiny as 'someplace else,' a city whose character is defined by its transience — a place where all the most notable residents are from someplace else.
