Panchayat Raj officials survey hilltop hamlet for laying road in Anakapalli district
The engineering officials and staff led by Deputy Executive Engineer (Panchayat Raj Projects), Chintapalli, D. Suresh Reddy and J.E. Kiran, conducted a survey at the hilltop hamlet of Jajulabandha in Arla panchayat of Anakapalli district for the preparation of Detailed Project Report (DPR) for laying of a BT road from Pithrigedda to Jajulabandha.
The officials visited the hamlet after the 'Spotlight' story titled 'Diseases haunt A.P.'s verdant hills' published in The Hinduhighlighted how seasonal diseases are affecting the tribal people and their travails in carrying the sick in dolis in the absence of roads to the hilltop hamlets.
They told the villagers that they would prepare the DPR and cost estimates and submit a proposal for the road work to the government.
'We conducted a Differential Global Positioning Survey (DGPS) survey on June 4. We visited the hamlet trekking from Pithrigedda to Jajulabandha on June 3. We are in the process of preparing the DPR, which will be submitted to the State Technical Adviser (STA) of PM JANMAN in about a week for approval. It will pass through various stages to reach the Empowered Committee. The entire process will take three to six months,' Mr. Suresh Reddy told The Hindu.
'The road from Arla to Pithrigedda was sanctioned under the MGNREGS in December 2024. The work is in progress and is expected to be completed in six months,' he said.
'The government sanctioned ₹1 crore under MGNREGS for laying a road from Arla to Jajulabandha in 2023. The officials built only four culverts and showed in the records that they had spent ₹28 lakh. The tribal people staged protests to highlight the apathy in laying the road, after which the work was stopped,' said K. Govinda Rao, district executive committee member of CPI(M.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme labour budget cut to 12 crore person-days in Tamil Nadu
Around 88 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) in Tamil Nadu have to be accommodated, as of now, within the reduced labour budget of 12 crore person-days during 2025-26. The State government had originally proposed 35 crore person-days, adopting a 'bottom-up' approach from village panchayats. Centre's nod However, the Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj is optimistic of the Union government's approval for an increase in the labour budget for the State in the course of the current year. The reason is not far to seek. During 2024-25 too, Tamil Nadu was allotted only 20 crore person-days. Eventually, the Centre gave approval for around 10 crore more person-days, taking the total number of person-days generated to 30.61 crore. Target and performance of select districts District Person-days allocated during 2025-26 (in lakh) Person-days generated as on June 6, 2025 (in lakh) Person-days generated during 2024-25 (in lakh) Tiruvannamalai 110 12.26 229.66 Villupuram 81 3.85 178.63 Cuddalore 75 7.65 155.82 Tiruvallur 64 5.5 128.94 Pudukkottai 60 4.99 126.01 Madurai 54 1.41 118.69 Virudhunagar 49 2.95 99.88 Dindigul 46 1.84 97.22 Krishnagiri 44 2.65 100.47 Sivagangai 42 1.72 84.74 An official of the department says that after achieving 9.6 crore (80%) person-days, a proposal will be sent to the Union Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) for an increase in the labour budget. Delay in wages Early this year, the delay in the payments of wages made the headlines, prompting Chief Minister M.K. Stalin to take exception. As the MGNREGS is a Central government scheme, the Union government bears the entire wage for unskilled labour. Out of a total unskilled wage expenditure of ₹8,375 crore during 2024-25, the beneficiaries have been paid ₹8,347 crore. A sum of ₹28 crore is yet to be released by the MoRD. As for the current year, ₹122 crore has been paid to the beneficiaries in wages and ₹170 crore is yet to be credited into their accounts, and it will be done shortly, the official points out, adding that the actual sanction has been taken for ₹944.56 crore. On Wednesday, the Tamil Nadu government notified the revised schedule of wage, which has been increased from ₹319 to ₹336. The workload has been increased proportionately, according to an order issued by the State Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj.
The Hindu
16 hours ago
- The Hindu
Uttam vows to intensify battle against AP's ‘illegal' Banakacherla project
HYDERABAD The Telangana government will intensify its determined fight against the Polavaram (Godavari)-Banakacherla (Krishna-Penna) Link Scheme proposed by Andhra Pradesh to protect Telangana's river water rights,, Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy Reddy said on Friday. He stated that the State Government had written multiple letters to the Centre already highlighting the serious violations by AP and demanding immediate intervention. In a letter to Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil on January 22, he had explained how AP was going ahead with the Banakacherla project to divert Godavari water to Rayalaseema and South Coastal Andhra by proposing a 150 tmc ft capacity reservoir at Bollapalli in Guntur district. In an informal interaction with the media, he pointed out that the project was unveiled by AP during a press conference on December 29 last year without submitting a Detailed Project Report (DPR) or seeking any mandatory approvals. He stressed that AP had not obtained technical clearances from the Central Water Commission (CWC) and approvals from the Godavari River Management Board (GRMB), Krishna River Management Board (KRMB) and the Apex Council, as mandated by the AP Reorganisation Act 2014. 'No project on inter-state rivers could proceed without these approvals. AP is brazenly bypassing all statutory mechanisms,' Mr. Reddy said and accused AP of misusing Sections 46(2) and 46(3) of the APRA 2014 to seek funds from the Union Finance Ministry under the backward regions development clause. He made it clear that these sections could not override Part IX of the Act, which deals with inter-state river water management, requiring technical clearance, inter-state consultations and Apex Council approval before proceeding with any project. He noted that AP's project was also violating the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (GWDT) Award of 1980, which apportioned 966 tmc ft water to Telangana out of a total of 1,486 tmc ft. Mr. Reddy alleged that AP was trying to grab unquantified and unallocated 'flood waters' that belong to both the States. 'These so-called 'flood waters' are not extra water that AP can claim. They are subject to equitable sharing and any diversion directly impacts Telangana's drought-prone regions', he said adding that he had mentioned all these aspects in his letters too. Stating that AP had neither shared any proposal with Telangana nor provided any DPR for scrutiny by the relevant boards. He noted that AP had not sent the project's DPR along with its multiple letters to the Union Finance Ministry and the Ministry of Jal Shakti seeking funds and termed it an an attempt to mislead the Centre and push the project without scrutiny. He also faulted the previous Bharat Rashtra Samith (BRS) Government for keeping quiet on the Rayalseema Lift Irrigation Project and expansion of the Pothireddypadu Head Regulator (PRP). Harish Rao's counter Meanwhile, BRS leader and former minister for irrigation T. Harish Rao rebutted Mr. Uttam Reddy stating that it was the BRS Government that had secured a National Green Tribunal (NGT) stay order on RLIP and it was the Telangana Congress leaders who had kept quiet when late Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy had expanded the capacity of PRP four times officially in 2007.
News18
a day ago
- News18
‘Reconsider Indus Waters Treaty Suspension': Pakistan Sent 4 Letters To India, 3 After Op Sindoor
Last Updated: In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together' Pakistan has so far sent four letters expressing concerns over suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and urging India to reconsider the decision. After the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, India's Secretary of the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Debashree Mukherjee, wrote to Pakistan's Water Ministry Secretary, Syed Ali Murtaza. The letter unequivocally stated that India remains a victim of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. India cited this context, alongside technical arguments, in communicating its decision to suspend its participation in the IWT. PAKISTAN'S LETTERS The first was dispatched in early May, before the launch of Operation Sindoor. Since then, three additional appeals have been sent by Murtaza. According to sources, all correspondence has been routed through the Ministry of Jal Shakti to the Ministry of External Affairs. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together". HOW IWT SUSPENSION HELPED INDIA India has since accelerated work on strategic water infrastructure projects related to the Indus river system. A key initiative is a 130-kilometre canal designed to link the Beas River to the Ganga Canal, with a proposed extension to the Yamuna River. The nearly 200-kilometre project includes a 12-kilometre tunnel, potentially enabling Yamuna water to reach Gangasagar. States such as Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and Rajasthan are projected to benefit from this initiative. The government has stated that the work is progressing rapidly and is expected to be completed within two to three years. A Detailed Project Report (DPR) is also being prepared. WHAT IT MEANS FOR PAKISTAN Sources suggest the suspension of the treaty could significantly affect Pakistan's Rabi crops, while the Kharif season will remain relatively unaffected. Beyond agriculture, the disruption could impact daily life, potentially leading to a water availability crisis. Pakistan has reportedly approached the World Bank to mediate. However, the World Bank has so far declined to intervene in India's internal decision to suspend its participation in the treaty. India has emphasized the need to revisit and renegotiate the treaty to reflect 21st-century realities. The original treaty, drafted in the 1950s and 1960s, is increasingly viewed as outdated due to changing hydrological patterns, glacial melt, population growth, and the need for sustainable energy and water management. Despite India's push for modernisation, Pakistan has resisted renegotiation. According to Indian officials, this stance itself contravenes the treaty's provisions. Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India has also announced a range of diplomatic and strategic responses, including the suspension of its participation in the IWT. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:
