logo
Musk vs Trump: Did Vivek Ramaswamy 'Doge' a bullet by getting out in time?

Musk vs Trump: Did Vivek Ramaswamy 'Doge' a bullet by getting out in time?

Time of India15 hours ago

In Washington's latest episode of Tech Titans vs MAGA Caesar, D
onald Trump has turned on Elon Musk
—his former bromantic partner-in-disruption, SpaceX messiah, and self-appointed guardian of Western civilisation.
The trigger? Musk labelled Trump's much-hyped One Big Beautiful Bill 'a disgusting abomination' and warned that America was hurtling toward 'debt slavery.
'
Trump, never one to take offence lightly—or privately—responded with a MAGA-flavoured blitzkrieg. Contracts for Musk's companies? At risk. His reputation in conservative circles? Torched. 'Just another whiny billionaire,' Trump sneered, 'who forgot who made him matter.'
As the Trump-Musk bromance dissolves faster than a Tesla on Autopilot in Washington traffic, one man watches the fireworks from a safe, well-lit distance—sipping Perrier, adjusting his campaign blazer, and thanking his stars he got out early, having clearly absorbed Sun Tzu's timeless wisdom: 'The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.'—Vivek Ramaswamy.
Once the philosophical darling of the new right, Ramaswamy was handed a shiny new toy in Trump's second term—DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency.
A meme-ified federal Frankenstein, DOGE was Trump's idea of bureaucratic reform through Silicon Valley swagger. Musk was the co-head. Vivek was the 'sane one.' Together, they were meant to revolutionise Washington. Or at least yell at it until it agreed to be disrupted.
But like any startup built on vibes and vague mission statements, DOGE began to implode before it launched. Musk wanted to fire half of Washington via app.
Trump wanted press conferences with golden eagles and fog machines. And Vivek? Vivek quietly disappeared.
Officially, he left to run for Ohio governor. Unofficially,
insiders suggest he saw the writing on the Twitter wall
—that DOGE was less a reform movement and more a digital kamikaze mission, powered by ego, caffeine, and libertarian hallucinations.
And now, in hindsight, his exit looks less like a career pivot and more like a Sun Tzu manoeuvre. Because while Musk is now battling Trump, Congress, and his own booster-fuelled paranoia, Ramaswamy is free to reinvent himself as a centrist tech-whisperer in the Rust Belt.
MAGA enough to get the base. Moderate enough to avoid the madness.
Except MAGA, like any self-devouring revolution, doesn't forget. Or forgive.
Since stepping away from DOGE and softening his Trumpian rhetoric, Ramaswamy has found himself in the crosshairs of the same base that once anointed him their biotech Brahmin. Hardcore influencers have branded him a traitor. Conservative meme accounts now photoshop him next to Liz Cheney.
And in the subterranean rage economy of right-wing internet culture, he's been rebranded from 'America First entrepreneur' to 'globalist plant with a Harvard tongue.
'
The irony? The same mob now grilling Ramaswamy for 'disloyalty' is turning on Musk for 'disrespect.' In MAGAland, loyalty is a zero-sum blood sport, and the only acceptable exit is the one through public execution.
DOGE, predictably, has become a political punchline.
It was doomed from conception—run like a Reddit thread, branded like a crypto coin, and staffed by men who confuse spreadsheets with scripture. The only surprising thing is how quickly it crashed. Musk thought he could out-Trump Trump. But in MAGA-land, there can only be one sun god—and he's orange, not emerald-mined.
Ramaswamy, to his credit, didn't wait around to become collateral damage. He understood what Musk didn't: that proximity to Trump is radioactive.
Stay too long and you mutate. Get out early and you might just survive.
The result? Musk is in political freefall. Trump is in attack mode. And Ramaswamy? He's in Ohio, sipping Perrier and talking about 'innovation in public policy'—while ducking MAGA Twitter grenades and hoping they forget he ever existed.
Call it foresight. Call it cowardice. Or just call it good political hygiene.
Because as Sun Tzu said—he will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.
And in the dystopian sitcom that is American politics, that makes
Vivek Ramaswamy
the guy who ghosted the group chat before the firestorm—and lived to run another episode.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epstein's Former Lawyer Reacts To Musk's ‘Big Bomb' On Trump: ‘I Specifically Asked Him'
Epstein's Former Lawyer Reacts To Musk's ‘Big Bomb' On Trump: ‘I Specifically Asked Him'

News18

time25 minutes ago

  • News18

Epstein's Former Lawyer Reacts To Musk's ‘Big Bomb' On Trump: ‘I Specifically Asked Him'

Last Updated: Despite Trump's previous social ties to Epstein, no public documents released so far directly implicate him in Epstein's criminal enterprise. David Schoen, who briefly represented Jeffrey Epstein before his death in 2019, has publicly rejected Elon Musk's explosive claim that US President Donald Trump is named in the unreleased Epstein files. Schoen said he directly asked Epstein about Trump's involvement and was told there was none. 'I specifically asked him whether Donald Trump was ever involved in anything like that. He said no," Schoen said in newly reported remarks, responding to Musk's viral post on X claiming that 'Trump is in the Epstein files." Schoen said Epstein had first approached him in February 2019 but officially retained him just nine days before dying in federal custody. He noted that during this period, he saw no documentation or evidence suggesting Trump's involvement in any criminal behaviour tied to Epstein's sex trafficking network. Musk's claim has stirred political backlash and prompted House Democrats to demand answers from Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel. Lawmakers are seeking confirmation on whether Trump's name appears in redacted or undisclosed sections of the Epstein case files. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" said Musk in an X post. Notably, the feud between Musk and Trump has intensified in recent weeks, with Musk publicly withdrawing his support and calling for a probe against Trump. The US President responded by calling Musk 'a lunatic" who 'lost his mind." Despite Trump's previous social ties to Epstein, no public documents released so far directly implicate him in Epstein's criminal enterprise. Legal experts and investigators have noted that many names in the files are mentioned in passing, often without accusations or evidence of wrongdoing. The Department of Justice has not commented on Musk's claims or the Democrats' request for transparency. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: June 07, 2025, 00:00 IST

What Mark Cuban and other billionaires said on Donald Trump-Elon Musk breakup
What Mark Cuban and other billionaires said on Donald Trump-Elon Musk breakup

Time of India

time26 minutes ago

  • Time of India

What Mark Cuban and other billionaires said on Donald Trump-Elon Musk breakup

The public relationship between and US President unraveled on Thursday (June 5) following Musk's criticism of a key legislative initiative. The dispute, which escalated rapidly, saw both figures engage in public exchanges, leading to significant financial repercussions for Musk. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The exchange began when Musk, who departed his role at DOGE in May, criticised the Trump Administration's " Big Beautiful Bill ." Musk labeled the legislation the "Debt Slavery Bill" and the "Big Ugly Spending Bill." President Trump responded during a White House event, defending the bill and subsequently threatening to cancel government contracts associated with Musk's companies via a post on Truth Social. This led to a decline in Tesla shares . The public dispute between the two prominent figures has since drawn commentary from various business leaders, including , Bill Ackman, Vinod Khosla and others. Here's what business leaders said about Musk-Trump online spat Mark Cuban The former "Shark Tank" star Mark Cuban endorsed Musk's idea of creating a new political party. Cuban reshared Musk's poll on X with three check marks Bill Ackman Billionaire Bill Ackman backed both Trump and Musk on X, advising them to "make peace for the benefit of our country." 'We are much stronger together than apart,' he said with Musk responding, 'You're not wrong.' Paul Graham Y Combinator cofounder Paul Graham shared his thoughts X, saying, 'A lot of people seem to be treating this as if it were just a beef. But the underlying allegation is a very serious one. If it's true, Trump is surely going to have to resign,' he wrote in a post on X. Vinod Khosla Vinond Khosla, who has been a critic of Musk, supported the Tesla CEO on his stand on deficit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Despite our differences, I admire your speaking up on the deficit!' Notably, Khosla endorsed Kamala Harris and was engaged in verbal spat online with Musk multiple times. Anthony Scaramucci Anthony Scaramucci, who has been a critic of Trump, voiced his support for Musk. 'Elon is right about Trump," the former Goldman Sachs investment banker said in an X post. In a separate post on Friday, Scaramucci said that "Elon lasted 12 Scaramuccis," a tongue-in-cheek reference to his 10-day tenure as White House communications director before Trump fired him. Shaun Maguire In an X post, Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire praised Musk for sticking to his guns. 'Elon leaves it all on the field. And he puts what he believes in ahead of himself. How can you not be inspired by that,' he added. Gary Cohn According to Gary Cohn, IBM's vice chairman, things could be very different next week, cautioning against overreacting to the situation. 'If we've learned one thing over the Trump administration, this is a few hours, the world could be completely different a week from now. It's not like the White House is sitting there only worried about the Elon Musk situation,' he said on CNBC. JBL Tune Beam 2 Review: The TWS Earbuds That Punch Above Their Weight!

​Insular, paranoid: on Donald Trump, the U.S., legal migration
​Insular, paranoid: on Donald Trump, the U.S., legal migration

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

​Insular, paranoid: on Donald Trump, the U.S., legal migration

President Donald Trump's decision to ban citizens from 12 countries from entering the United States, citing national security concerns, is yet another attempt by his five-month-old administration to tear down legal migration. Mr. Trump's decision in 2017, during his first term, to ban citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries had triggered chaos and protests at America's airports, evoked criticism of the unstated racism and xenophobia, and led to legal challenges. This time, Mr. Trump has focused on mostly West Asia and Africa. Citizens from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen would be banned, while people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will face restrictions. The ban applies only to people outside the U.S. but those with active visas who leave the country could face difficulty during re-entry. Mr. Trump argued that the ban, which came days after the arrest of an Egyptian man for carrying out an attack on a group honouring the Gaza hostages, would help prevent terrorist attacks and keep out those who overstay their visas. Egypt, a close American ally, and Spain, which saw 20,000 of its citizens overstay their visas in 2023, are not on the list, but Chad, whose visa overstay number is as low as 400, is. Since his swearing-in as the President, in January, for the second time, Mr. Trump has taken a series of measures to crack down on migration. He has suspended the asylum system at the southern border and ended temporary legal residency for Haitians, Venezuelans and Cubans. He has also removed the legal status of thousands of foreign students and instructed U.S. diplomatic missions to pause scheduling new visa interviews as his administration prepares to vet the social media handles of students and scholars. His policies targeting international students have already spread chaos and uncertainty across America's universities. Now, the outright ban on citizens from a group of countries reinforces the erosion of the self-image of the U.S. — 'the shining city on a hill' as Ronald Reagan once called it — as a pluralistic, open society. Mr. Trump's claim that immigrants bring crime into the U.S. is ill-founded. Many of the people seeking entry into the U.S., from countries that had seen American military intervention, such as Haiti and Afghanistan, are fleeing war, persecution and systemic violence. They are not national security threats but victims in search of refuge. By shutting America's doors on them, and immigrants in general, Mr. Trump is not making the U.S. safer. Rather, he is turning a country, which historically welcomed immigration and has benefited from it, into an insular, paranoid, self-doubting republic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store