AGC to initiate contempt of court proceedings against Muhammad Shafee
Datuk Seri Najib Tun Hj Abd Razak, his lawyer, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah will hold a Press Conference.' At Putrajaya Palace of Justice—Low Boon Tat / The Star
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) will initiate contempt of court proceedings against prominent lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah over his public remarks likening proceedings at the Kuala Lumpur High Court to a "Nazi Germany-style hearing".
It said the remarks, made in the context of an ongoing case, constituted a serious and improper attack on the dignity, authority and independence of the judiciary.
"While lawyers are entitled to challenge judicial decisions through proper legal channels, making public statements that tarnish the image of the court or undermine public confidence in the administration of justice is unacceptable in our legal system.
"The Attorney General views this matter seriously as one that involves constitutional and institutional importance," it said in a statement on Friday (May 30).
The AGC emphasised that contempt proceedings will be pursued to uphold the rule of law, preserve the integrity of judicial processes as well as protect the judiciary from unfounded allegations and undue public pressure.
The statement was issued in response to recent media reports and a statement by Messrs Shafee & Co on Friday regarding the use of the term "Nazi Germany" during a press conference held outside the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Thursday (May 29).
Muhammad Shafee was responding to a question regarding a court order that temporarily stayed former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's judicial review proceedings concerning the existence of an additional document that would allow him to serve the remaining six years of his prison sentence under house arrest. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
10 hours ago
- Malay Mail
AGC: Anwar's constitutional bid to Federal Court is structural, not meant to provide personal immunity
KUALA LUMPUR, May 31 — The application by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer several constitutional questions to the Federal Court, under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution and Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, is not intended to create absolute immunity for any individual. According to the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), these questions raise new and unprecedented constitutional issues, particularly concerning the relationship between civil litigation and the ability of a sitting prime minister to effectively perform executive functions. The AGC stated that the eight questions include, among others, whether civil actions related to pre-office conduct can proceed if they undermine the Prime Minister's ability to govern. 'Whether the Constitution implicitly requires judicial threshold review in such cases, and whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution support procedural protection to safeguard the separation of powers and institutional stability,' the AGC said in a statement released today in Kuala Lumpur. The AGC clarified that these questions are structural in nature regarding constitutional governance, not about personal immunity. The AGC further explained that the constitutional reference process was established to enable the High Court and Federal Court to make conclusive determinations on such issues. The AGC respects the integrity of this constitutional mechanism and will evaluate any request for intervention based on legal merit and public interest, rather than politically charged sentiments. Furthermore, the AGC emphasised that any decision regarding the effect of constitutional provisions rests solely within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. On May 27, the Prime Minister applied to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court for decision. This application includes the question of whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by his former researcher, Yusoff Rawther, four years ago. Anwar also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution. — Bernama
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
PM Anwar's constitutional questions to Federal Court not aimed at absolute immunity
KUALA LUMPUR: The application by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer several constitutional questions to the Federal Court, under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution and Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, is not intended to create absolute immunity for any individual. According to the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), these questions raise new and unprecedented constitutional issues, particularly concerning the relationship between civil litigation and the ability of a sitting Prime Minister to effectively perform executive functions. The AGC stated that the eight questions include, among others, whether civil actions related to pre-office conduct can proceed if they undermine the Prime Minister's ability to govern. 'Whether the Constitution implicitly requires judicial threshold review in such cases, and whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution support procedural protection to safeguard the separation of powers and institutional stability,' the AGC said in a statement released today in Kuala Lumpur. The AGC clarified that these questions are structural in nature regarding constitutional governance, not about personal immunity. The AGC further explained that the constitutional reference process was established to enable the High Court and Federal Court to make conclusive determinations on such issues. The AGC respects the integrity of this constitutional mechanism and will evaluate any request for intervention based on legal merit and public interest, rather than politically charged sentiments. Furthermore, the AGC emphasized that any decision regarding the effect of constitutional provisions rests solely within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. On May 27, the Prime Minister applied to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court for decision. This application includes the question of whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by his former researcher, Yusoff Rawther, four years ago. Anwar also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution.
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Anwar's questions to Federal Court not aimed at seeking absolute immunity for anyone, says AGC
KUALA LUMPUR: The application by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer several constitutional questions to the Federal Court, under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution and Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, is not intended to create absolute immunity for any individual. According to the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), these questions raise new and unprecedented constitutional issues, particularly concerning the relationship between civil litigation and the ability of a sitting Prime Minister to effectively perform executive functions. The AGC said that the eight questions include, among others, whether civil actions related to pre-office conduct can proceed if they undermine the Prime Minister's ability to govern. "Whether the Constitution implicitly requires judicial threshold review in such cases, and whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution support procedural protection to safeguard the separation of powers and institutional stability," the AGC said in a statement released Saturday (May 31) in Kuala Lumpur. The AGC clarified that these questions are structural in nature regarding constitutional governance, not about personal immunity. The AGC further explained that the constitutional reference process was established to enable the High Court and Federal Court to make conclusive determinations on such issues. The AGC respects the integrity of this constitutional mechanism and will evaluate any request for intervention based on legal merit and public interest, rather than politically charged sentiments. Furthermore, the AGC emphasised that any decision regarding the effect of constitutional provisions rests solely within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. On May 27, the Prime Minister applied to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court for decision. This application includes the question of whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by his former researcher, Yusoff Rawther, four years ago. Anwar also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution. - Bernama
