UT System chancellor leaves to lead University of California
University of Texas System Chancellor JB Milliken will leave the 256,000-student system to take a new out-of-state position as University of California president, system officials said Friday.
"We are fortunate to have had Chancellor Milliken at the helm of the UT System for almost seven years,' said UT System Regents' Chair Kevin P. Eltife in a statement. 'The board and I are grateful for our close and very productive relationship with him, and we are proud of what we accomplished together. He has led the UT System admirably and innovatively."
John Zerwas, the University of Texas System's executive vice chancellor for health affairs and who served seven terms in the Texas House of Representatives, will serve as acting chancellor when Milliken leaves in June, according to a news release from the UT System.
Milliken was named the new president of the University of California on Friday, and will enter that role in August, according to statements from UC and UT.
This is a developing story; check back for details.
Disclosure: University of Texas System has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
U.S. Seniors Nearly Double Cannabis Use In Just Two Years, Study Finds
U.S. Seniors are turning to cannabis more than ever, with use nearly doubling in the past two years, a new study shows. Published this week in JAMA Internal Medicine, four researchers from the University of California and NYU Langone Health found that monthly cannabis use among adults aged 65 and older increased from 4.8% in 2021 to 7% in 2023, resulting in a 45.83% increase. The reasons for this increase are attributed to several factors, including greater access to cannabis. As of today, medical cannabis is legal in 39 states and Washington D.C., while 24 states have also legalized it for recreational use. The situation was slightly different in 2021, when medical cannabis was legal in 36 states and recreational use was legal in 17 states. In 2021, New York, Virginia, New Mexico, and Connecticut legalized cannabis for recreational use. The rise in access to cannabis, both medical and recreational, helps explain why more older adults are using it, especially as more people become aware of medical programs and the health issues cannabis can help treat. This cross-sectional study analyzed 15,689 adults aged 65 and older using data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a nationwide survey of people in the U.S. who aren't living in institutions. The findings show that, between 2021 and 2023, cannabis use among older adults in the U.S. saw a significant rise, with some groups showing especially sharp increases. People with a college or postgraduate degree, for example, went from 4.9% to 8.3% in cannabis use. Among those earning $75,000 or more, cannabis use more than doubled, from 4.2% to 9.1%. Married adults also showed a big jump, going from 3.8% to 7.4%. Older adults living in states where medical cannabis is legal were more likely to use it, and that number kept climbing from 5.4% to 7.9%. 'It shouldn't be surprising that use is becoming increasingly more common among people who live in states that allow medical cannabis, which could be due to increased availability or social acceptability,' said Joseph Palamar, the study's senior author in a press statement, adding that 'with respect to income, those with the highest incomes had the lowest prevalence of cannabis use in 2021, but by 2023 this group had the highest prevalence, which may indicate who has access to medical cannabis given its costs.' The most dramatic increase came from people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whose usage doubled from 6.4% to 13.5%. People with chronic conditions like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure also reported using cannabis more. And those dealing with two or more chronic illnesses saw use rise from 3.5% to 8.2%. The authors of this study concluded that these findings show a real shift in how older adults are using cannabis, especially those living with chronic illnesses, and that people with multiple health conditions were more likely to use it. However, they also highlighted that 'the use of cannabis products, especially with psychoactive properties, may complicate chronic disease management among older adults.' These new findings line up with what earlier studies have shown. Back in 2020, a study published in the same journal looked at data from nearly 15,000 adults over 65 using the same national survey and found that cannabis use among older adults had already been on the rise for years, jumping from just 0.4% in 2006 and 2007 to 2.9% by 2015 and 2016. In recent years, researchers have also started to study how long-term cannabis use affects older adults. For example, a study published last year suggested that taking low doses of THC over time may not only help protect the brain from aging but also boost memory, improve cognitive function, and support seniors's overall well-being and longevity. This likely has to do with a key cellular pathway called mTOR, which is a protein that helps control how cells use energy and build new connections in the brain, which are important for learning and memory.
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Clarence Thomas' Former Clerk Warns Trump Did Something 'Truly Outrageous'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A law professor and former clerk to conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called President Donald Trump's decision to publicly turn against the Federalist Society and one of its top figures, Leonard Leo, "truly outrageous." Trump critized the Federalist Society for "bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations" after the U.S. Court of International Trade, which included a Trump-picked judge, ruled the emergency law invoked by Trump did not give him authority to impose sweeping tariffs on other countries. Trump also called Leo a "sleazebag." "Why would President Trump turn his back on one of his greatest, if not his greatest achievements from the first term, appointing three justices," John Yoo told a Wall Street Journal Opinion podcast released Monday. Newsweek reached out to Yoo for comment via email and filed a contact request form with the Federalist Society on Wednesday. Why It Matters Last week Trump sharply criticized the influential legal group the Federalist Society and Leo, a co-chair of its board and former executive vice president, blaming them for court rulings that blocked his sweeping tariff agenda. During his first term, Trump took advice from the group in selecting judges, but in a social media post on Thursday, the president took a sharp turn against the group saying he used to trust them "but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions." Trump has repeatedly targeted judges and lawyers who oppose him or impede his agenda, including calling for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg after he temporarily blocked deportation flights to El Salvador in March. At the same time, Trump has had a lasting impact on the judiciary, helping to shape a conservative-leaning bench through his appointments. What To Know In Monday's episode of the Wall Street Journal Opinion podcast, Potomac Watch, Yoo said it was "truly outrageous to accuse Leonard Leo, one of the stalwarts or the conservative movement, of being something like a traitor and using judicial appointments to advance his own personal agenda." University of California Professor John Yoo poses for a portrait in downtown San Francisco, California on Fri. April 15, 2016. University of California Professor John Yoo poses for a portrait in downtown San Francisco, California on Fri. April 15, 2016. Michael Macor/San Francisco Chronicle via AP The University of California at Berkeley law professor and constitutional scholar who authored the 2020 book Defender in Chief: Donald Trump's Fight for Presidential Power, reiterated that not only did he find Trump's decision to call out Leo and the Federalist Society "outrageous," but noted that "on a larger political and legal level, I don't understand it." Trump's Truth Social post calling out Leo and the group, read, "I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations," followed a ruling on Wednesday from the U.S. Court of International Trade striking down many of his administration's sweeping tariffs. The three judges on the panel, which ruled that the tariffs went beyond the president's power, included one who was appointed by Trump during his first term—Judge Timothy Reif. However on Thursday, a federal appeals court temporarily suspended the lower court's order, allowing the White House to continue collecting import levies for now. Leonard Leo, co-chariman of the Federalist Society board of directors, speaks at the Cambridge Union on March 11, 2025 in Cambridge, U.K. Leonard Leo, co-chariman of the Federalist Society board of directors, speaks at the Cambridge Union on March 11, 2025 in Cambridge, The Cambridge Union Yoo continued: "Why would President Trump turn his back on one of his greatest, if not his greatest achievements from the first term, appointing three justices. You named them, Paul, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, which reinforced Justices Alito and Thomas on the Supreme Court in building a really solid regionalist majority, not a conservative majority, not politically Republican majority, but a majority that believes in interpreting the Constitution based on its original meaning." The Supreme Court's conservative majority has played a pivotal role in recent decisions, most notably the 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark case that had protected abortion rights for nearly 50 years. Leo is a key financial backer of the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which filed a legal challenge against Trump's tariffs. A longtime leader at the Federalist Society, Leo used his networks to help Trump nominate conservative Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett. Yoo has been outspoken against Democratic politicians including former President Joe Biden and spoken favorably about Trump, having previously called for Republican district attorneys to prosecute Democrat officials who had, in his opinion, wronged Trump and his allies, as well as saying Biden's suggested Supreme Court reforms were a "political ploy" that revealed "how radical some of the ideas that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden now are pressing." What People Are Saying Mike Davis, founder of the Article III Project, told The Hill: "They [the Federalist Society] abandoned President Trump during the lawfare against him. And not only did they abandon him — they had several FedSoc leaders who participated in the lawfare and threw gas on the fire." Leonard Leo told The New York Post in late May: "I'm very grateful for President Trump transforming the Federal Courts, and it was a privilege being involved. There's more work to be done, for sure, but the Federal Judiciary is better than it's ever been in modern history, and that will be President Trump's most important legacy." Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, responded to last Wednesday's ruling on X: "The judicial coup is out of control." Raúl Torrez, the attorney general of New Mexico—one of the states who sued over the tariffs—said in a statement to Newsweek after the ruling: "This ruling is a major victory for our communities, our businesses, and our economy. The Court's decision confirms what we have long argued: these tariffs were imposed unlawfully and will cause real harm to working families, small businesses, and local industries." What Happens Next The plaintiffs in the case that led the Court of International Trade to strike down tariffs have to file their papers with a federal appellate court by June 5. The government must reply by June 9. In the meantime, the U.S. is expecting several final offers from trade partners over individually negotiated deals.
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Tesla protesters claim a victory as Elon Musk leaves Trump's side
Advertisement 'That first one on Feb. 15 was me and like 50 people,' Donovan said. 'And then the next week it was a hundred more people and then a hundred more after that, and it's just grown.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Tesla Takedown has since expanded into an international movement, staging demonstrations at Tesla factories, showrooms and other locations in countries including Australia, Britain, France and Germany as well as across the United States. The campaign's U.S. growth has been fueled in large part by anger over Musk's leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency, which has slashed government spending and dismissed tens of thousands of federal workers while gaining access to sensitive personal data. Musk departed the administration after his involvement in politics hurt his companies, especially Tesla. Sales of the company's cars have tumbled since Trump took office and the start of protests against the company. Advertisement David S. Meyer, a sociology professor at the University of California, Irvine, who studies corporate protest movements, said the anti-Tesla movement had been surprisingly effective. 'Most corporate boycotts and corporate actions don't work and don't last,' he said. 'They're a blip and fade away.' The Tesla protests, however, 'gave people something to do to express their dissatisfaction with Trump in general and DOGE in particular, and made Musk's participation in those a liability for Tesla.' Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. A White House spokesperson said the protests were not the reason Musk had stepped away from his government role. 'He had to go back to his companies,' the spokesperson said. The challenge for Donovan, whose academic research focuses on misinformation, and the other activists is keeping their movement going now that Musk appears to be pulling back from politics. Alice Hu, a political activist who has organized protests at Tesla locations in New York, said organizers were determined to continue, drawing on people's distress over Trump's policies and Musk's support of right-wing causes. 'We want to apply as much pressure as possible to Elon Musk himself,' Hu said. 'We want to send a message to the Trump regime that there is a mass movement and that people are watching, and there will be consequences for what they are doing to our government.' The group is planning around 50 protests for June 28 -- Musk's birthday -- according to its website. Donovan said she hoped the protests would expand beyond picketing in front of Tesla locations. On a recent conference call that drew several hundred participants, organizers laid out plans to begin urging city and state governments to sell their Tesla stock and to stop doing business with Musk's other businesses including Starlink, the satellite communications service. Advertisement Donovan has firsthand experience with heated policy and political debates. Before joining Boston University, she was the research director at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard University. After leaving the center in 2023, she filed a complaint to Harvard's president contending that she was let go because of pressure from Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, which was a subject of her research and has financial ties to the university. In a statement, a spokesperson for Harvard said Donovan's allegations of unfair treatment and donor interference were 'false.' Meta declined to comment. Hu has political experience as well. A graduate of Columbia University, she founded a climate activist group, Planet Over Profit, that held demonstrations targeting Citi last year. A handful of celebrities have supported the Tesla Takedown protests. Actors Alex Winter and John Cusack have participated in organizing calls. Winter contacted Donovan early on and offered to create a Tesla Takedown website. He declined to comment for this article. In April, Tesla reported that its profit fell 71% in the first three months of the year after it sold 15% fewer cars compared with a year earlier. Many Tesla owners are selling or trading their cars in, and prices of used Teslas have fallen sharply. In early April, Tesla's stock price was down by around 54% from a December high, although it has regained much of that ground in recent weeks and is now down 29%. Advertisement In an April conference call to discuss Tesla earnings, Musk addressed the demonstrations, saying, without evidence, that the protesters were paid. 'They're obviously not going to admit that the reason that they're protesting is because they're receiving fraudulent money or that they're the recipients of wasteful largess,' he said. Hu and Donovan said they were not paid or funded by anyone to protest against Tesla. In March, Trump defended Musk and Tesla at a White House event in which he looked over a display of five different Tesla models and said he would buy one of them, a Model S luxury sedan. 'I think he's been treated very unfairly by a very small group of people,' Trump said. 'And I just want people to know that he can't be penalized for being a patriot.' One challenge for the protest movement is preventing it from becoming linked to recent acts of vandalism against Tesla. The company's cars, dealerships and chargers have been spray-painted, set on fire and damaged in other ways around the world. Musk and Trump have described these incidents as the work of 'terrorists.' The White House spokesperson said the Justice Department was investigating the vandalism. Donovan and Hu say they urge protesters to refrain from violence and demonstrate peacefully. But the posters and signs some demonstrators have displayed at Tesla Takedown events often take an aggressive tone. At one March demonstration in lower Manhattan, a line of protesters strode down the street toward a Tesla dealership, holding a large banner with the words, 'Burn a Tesla, Save Democracy,' painted against flames on a white background. In Germany protesters recently projected images and videos on the walls of Tesla's plant outside Berlin. They showed Musk making a Nazi-like, stiff-armed salute along with slogans like 'Heil Tesla.' Advertisement While the protests were originally aimed at Musk and Tesla, many events have started attracting people who see them as a way to demonstrate their opposition to other administration initiatives. At a recent demonstration at the Tesla store in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Beth Ann Thorrez was dressed in a penguin suit -- a poke at the Trump tariffs levied against countries around the world, including one uninhabited island populated largely by penguins. Several protesters said they would speak only on the condition of anonymity, saying they feared attacks from supporters of Trump and Musk, or punitive actions by the federal government. Donovan said death threats arrive in her email inbox and social media accounts almost every day. But she finds encouragement and resolve, she said, in how the demonstrations have grown. The events in Boston where Donovan is often present typically draw hundreds of participants and have taken on a carnival atmosphere. A marching band provided entertainment at one recent gathering; a chorus sang at another. 'A lot of people who are not incredibly political in their daily lives are coming out and joining,' she said. 'You see a lot of adults, grandparents, kids. I'm energized by it.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
