Agra-born adventurer lifts off to edge of space in Blue Origin's spacecraft
An 80-year-old Agra-born adventurer-cum-businessman, Arvinder 'Arvi' Singh Bahal, lifted off to the edge of space aboard Blue Origin's NS-34 mission along with five other crew members on Sunday.
The suborbital flight lifted off from the company's Launch Site One in West Texas at 6:00 p.m. IST, marking another milestone in private human spaceflight.
Bahal was part of Blue Origin's 14th human flight to suborbital space. The flight, lasting 11 minutes, carried a six-member crew to the Kármán line — the internationally recognised boundary that separates Earth's atmosphere from space. Bahal was accompanied by tech entrepreneur Justin Sun, Turkish businessman Gokhan Erdem, Puerto Rican meteorologist Deborah Martorell, British teacher Lionel Pitchford and venture capitalist JD Russell.
Describing Bahal, Jeff Bezos-owned Blue Origin wrote, 'Arvi is a real estate investor born in Agra, India, and now a naturalised US citizen. A lifelong traveler and adventurer, Arvi has visited every country in the world, the North and South poles, and skydived Mount Everest and the Pyramids of Giza'. The 80-year-old holds a private pilot's licence and also flies helicopters.
The India-born adventurer lives in Beverly, Massachusetts and has been a naturalised US citizen since 1979.
Bahal, who grew up near the Taj Mahal, had joined the National Defence Academy in 1962 but left due to a polo accident that caused him partial hearing loss. Later, he worked on a Scottish-owned tea plantation in Darjeeling for nearly four years. By 1970, he ventured into the garment manufacturing business near Delhi. He later migrated to the US.
Besides setting up Bahal Properties — a real estate company he has led since 1975, Bahal has built successful ventures in fashion, sportswear and hospitality over the past 45 years. He recently wrote his first book, Tireless Traveler, and plans to write many more travel books.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
India-UK FTA: Why US, EU will leverage nod to British firms in govt procurement
When the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was signed on July24, the headlines were predictable: Scotch whisky duties, visa quotas for Indian techies, some talk of green hydrogen. What went almost unnoticed was a clause that quietly overturned one of New Delhi's most sacrosanct red lines. For the first time in the country's trade history, foreign companies had been granted a legal foothold inside the government's own spending in Chapter15 of the 650page pact is a provision that allows British firms to bid for Indian central government contracts on nearequal terms with domestic suppliers. Annex15A.i fixes the entry bar at projects above Rs 200crore, roughly 20-25million, and introduces a 20per cent local content threshold: UK suppliers that source or add at least onefifth of value in India are deemed 'ClassII local suppliers', the same status currently reserved for Indian entities under the Make in India text spells it out with clinical precision: 'UK companies will be treated as a 'Class Two local supplier' if at least 20per cent of a company's product or service is from the UK granting them the same status that is currently only ever given to Indian businesses.'The numbers attached to this seemingly technical clause are anything but small. Central government procurement in India is estimated at over $600billion annually, close to 15per cent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). According to internal estimates, about 40,000 highvalue tenders a year—worth roughly 38billion—now fall within the UK-India FTA's scope. 'Even if only 5per cent of eligible tenders are won by UK firms, that's Rs 30,000-Rs 35,000crore a year—an unprecedented outflow of statebacked demand to foreign suppliers,' said a senior Indian official. With government capex (capital expenditure) pegged at Rs 11.1lakh crore in FY25, the clause potentially shifts a nontrivial slice of public spending into a bilateral trade corridor will be mapped with new plumbing. The FTA mandates a dedicated bilingual procurement portal linking India's central tenders to the UK's system within six months of ratification. All ministries and departments are covered. Public sector enterprises are trickier: only PSUs 'operating on behalf of government' are explicitly listed in Annex15B, leaving strategic sectors like power and oil open to will be phased, with Indian ministries given 180days to build compliance systems and train procurement officers. British suppliers will have access from day one, their own eprocurement infrastructure already aligned with FTA New Delhi, this is more than a technical adjustment. The wall that just came down has stood for three decades. India has historically treated government procurement as an instrument of industrial policy, not trade. At the World Trade Organization (WTO), New Delhi refused to sign the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement and argued that procurement was 'nontrade in nature'.India walked away from the EU and RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) negotiations when Brussels and Tokyo insisted on procurement chapters. That this firewall fell in a deal with London is a pivot with both economic and political weight. Earlier, New Delhi had agreed for similar provisions in the UAE's Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA). But at that time, it was argued that Abu Dhabi is largely a trade hub, and the window was more even with the firewalls in the FTA , a faint 'London window' remains. UK firms can source Chinese components, assemble or add value in Britain, and still meet the origin criteria to access Indian public contracts. In complex supply chains like electronics and solar equipment, that margin is wide enough for Chinese inputs to ride through the backdoor—without ever being named on the tender.A useful comparison here is the recent UK-US trade deal, where Washington's paranoia about China was baked into every clause. The pact hardwires 'trusted supply chain' provisions, explicitly excludes critical technologies from any thirdcountry sourcing and gives Washington the right to suspend procurement access if a supplier is even partially owned or controlled by an entity linked to contrast, the India-UK FTA opts for a more layered approach: national security exceptions and valueaddition rules are there, but it stops short of USstyle blanket exclusion. Sensitive sectors like defence and telecom are carved out, yet the text leaves breathing space for UK companies to tap Chineseorigin components as long as they are sufficiently processed in Britain. It is a hedged opening that tries to keep Beijing in the shadows, but unlike the UK-US template, still leaves a narrow London corridor through which Chinese supply chains could minister Piyush Goyal, unveiling the pact, called it a 'gold standard FTA' that 'balances ambition with sensitivity'. But the balance is precisely what critics are questioning. Ajay Srivastava of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) calls the move 'a dangerous precedent'.'Allowing UK firms to compete on nearequal terms could crowd out Indian MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises), which depend heavily on protected access to government contracts. It also dilutes one of India's last remaining industrial policy tools—procurement preferences—to promote domestic manufacturing, innovation and jobs,' Srivastava told INDIA second concern cuts deeper. 'While UK companies gain broad access to India's procurement system, Indian firms remain largely excluded from the UK's closed and highly competitive market. With little reciprocal benefit, this sets a template other partners will now demand,' he fear is echoed from the swadeshi flank too. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM) has warned that granting foreign bidders parity in central contracts is a 'slippery slope', undermining atmanirbharta and exposing small Indian suppliers to a shock they are structurally illequipped to political reverberations are already visible in Geneva and Brussels. EU negotiators are privately signalling they will now lift the India-UK text and drop it into the stalled EU-India FTA. Washington, where procurement access is always on the table, will likely do the same. As a former Indian negotiator puts it: 'Once you write it into one treaty, you've created a benchmark. You can't put the wall back up.'The government's defence rests on reciprocity and strategy. The UK's public procurement market is estimated at 400billion, and under the FTA, Indian firms theoretically gain access to 122billion of that. The agreement requires both sides to publish tenders on a single online portal, free of charge, with full areas—defence, railways, atomic energy and all statelevel procurement—are carved out of the text. Government officials describe the 20per cent local content rule as 'a bridge to Make in India, not a bypass', arguing that it is designed to draw foreign firms into domestic manufacturing rather than replace the asymmetry is hard to miss. Less than 10per cent of UK public contracts go to foreign firms under London's strict procurement regime. In India, by contrast, British suppliers with a light manufacturing footprint could now bid aggressively in sectors from power transmission to urban infrastructure. MSMEs, which enjoy a 25per cent reservation in government tenders and depend on policydriven demand, fear being squeezed as price competition intensifies at the top end of the story here is not just economics but ideology. For years, India's trade negotiators carried a simple mantra into every FTA: tariffs are flexible, procurement is sovereign. On July24, that mantra changed. Whether this is strategic statecraft, using procurement access to pull in UK capital and technology, or a costly concession traded away for limited tariff gains will take years to judge. What is clear today is that India has crossed a line it held for a generation. And as Brussels, Tokyo and Washington read the fine print, they see more than a clause. They see a gate, newly to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Top Google Executive Warns AI Is Coming For Your Job: 'There Is No Middle Class'
A former Google top executive has warned that the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) could disrupt society as the technology eats away jobs, rendering the middle class non-existent. Mo Gawdat, who left Google X as its chief business officer in 2018, said the 'hell' will begin as early as 2027 as AI eliminates white-collar jobs, with no one spared, including software developers, CEOs, and podcasters. "The next 15 years will be hell before we get to heaven," Mr Gawdat told British entrepreneur Steven Bartlett on his "Diary of a CEO" podcast. Citing his own startup, which builds emotional and relationship-focused AI, Mr Gawdat said the company is run by just three people. "That startup would have been 350 developers in the past. As a matter of fact, podcaster is going to be replaced." Mr Gawdat said the emergence of AI will trigger 'social unrest' as people still come to terms with losing their livelihoods and sense of purpose, resulting in rising rates of mental health problems, increased loneliness and deepening social divisions. "Unless you're in the top 0.1 per cent, you're a peasant. There is no middle class," he predicted. "AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is going to get better at everything than humans, at everything, including being a CEO. The one thing they don't think of is AI will replace them, too." Watch: Sydney Sweeney Given 'Digital Snan' At Sangam, Video Viral AI's own language The warning by Mr Gawdat comes in the backdrop of Geoffrey Hinton, regarded by many as the 'godfather of AI', stating that the technology could soon develop its own language, making it impossible for humans to track the machines. "Now it gets more scary if they develop their own internal languages for talking to each other," said Mr Hinton. "I wouldn't be surprised if they developed their own language for thinking, and we have no idea what they're thinking." Mr Hinton added that AI has already demonstrated that it can think terrible thoughts, and it is not unthinkable that the machines could eventually think in ways that humans cannot track or interpret.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Sona Comstar saga: Rani Kapur seeks UK probe into Sunjay Kapur's mysterious death
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in Auto 1. Tata AutoComp, Ichikoh to form JV to acquire Valeo's lighting biz in India London: In a dramatic escalation of the ongoing feud within the influential Sona Comstar family, the mysterious death of Sunjay Kapur has now triggered international scrutiny. RKapur, Sunjay's mother and former Chairperson of Sona Comstar, has formally approached UK authorities, seeking a comprehensive probe into the unexplained circumstances surrounding her son's death in connected with the matter confirmed that an official criminal complaint has been filed with UK authorities. The complaint--lodged by Rani Kapur--calls into question the nature of Sunjay Kapur's sudden demise, pointing to what she describes as "mysterious circumstances," and appeals for urgent intervention by British law enforcement."The developments surrounding Sunjay's death are deeply concerning," a person close to the family said, noting that immediate and thorough action from UK authorities has been an international dimension to the unfolding saga, a source confirmed that authorities in the United States are already monitoring the situation, given that Sunjay Kapur was a US a rare and emotional video interview with ANI -- her first public statement since her son's death -- Rani Kapur broke her silence, expressing her anguish, unanswered questions, and growing concern over the future of the company she co-founded with her late husband. "I still don't know what happened to my son," she said, her voice trembling. "I'm old now. I need closure before I go."Reflecting on the formative years of Sona Comstar, she recalled the sacrifices and vision that built the company. "I remember the early days of Sona--built with care, sacrifice, and love," she shared, suggesting a continuing emotional and moral stake in the company's legacy. Her remarks also subtly counter the company's claim that she has had no involvement in its affairs since Sona Comstar has asserted that Rani Kapur has neither direct nor indirect involvement in the company since that year, her statements appear to contest that narrative. "I am here to remind the world that our family's legacy must not be lost. It must be passed on, as my husband always wanted it to be," she to her advancing age and fragile health, Rani Kapur said she would refrain from further public comment. "My legal team will address everything necessary," she said, indicating that future developments would proceed through legal dispute escalated when Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd , the listed arm of the group, issued a sharp rebuttal. In a regulatory filing with the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), the company dismissed Rani Kapur's claims as "baseless" and "legally untenable," reiterating that she holds no position or authority within the her public appearance, Rani Kapur had reportedly addressed a letter to the board, alleging that she was coerced into signing documents behind locked doors shortly after her son's death--an episode she described as "highly suspicious." She further claimed she was denied access to her own bank accounts and left financially dependent on a few individuals. According to her, no one was authorized to represent the Kapur family on the board. Despite her request to postpone the Annual General Meeting, the company proceeded with it as response, Sona Comstar has served Rani Kapur with a legal notice , demanding she cease spreading what the company calls "false and damaging information." The notice strongly refutes her allegations of mismanagement and coercion, calling them "malafide, false, unwarranted, and uncorroborated." (ANI)
