
Nationwide fire truck shortage impacting Mass. departments. IAFF asks for investigation.
The Quincy Fire Department secured funding for new fire trucks in 2022, but now three years later they still don't have them. Manufacturing delays are forcing them to buy used trucks from other cities. Now, the International Association of Firefighters is asking the U.S. government to step in and investigate the companies who build the vehicles.
"We are waiting on an engine and a ladder right now, and it has been three and a half years," said Quincy Fire Chief Joe Jackson. "The build times to actually get these trucks built has quadrupled. It's a huge problem being able to plan. Some of these trucks that I'm ordering now, are likely to be received by another fire chief, and I think about that, and it's so weird."
Constant maintenance on old trucks
The fire department has some trucks in service that are more than 20-years-old. They are only able to keep them in service because they have two maintenance workers who constantly work on them. This is only made possible because car dealer Dan Quirk donated the department a large maintenance space on his property. Without the space, Chief Jackson says they wouldn't be able to keep this going.
"Most communities have to send their apparatus to the dealership to be worked on," explains Chief Jackson. "If one of these old trucks needs a radiator that's $10,000. That's ten-grand on a 30-year-old truck, and you have no choice."
"This is a 2003, so we are looking at 25-years-old right now," said maintenance worker Kevin Mellor, pointing to a truck he's working on. "After a certain time, to be compliant with the NFPA standards, after 20 years the truck should go into a reserve."
Increased cost of fire trucks
The department bought one of their trucks 10 years ago for $900,000. Their latest ones cost $2 million with a potential 4-year wait time to get.
"Prior to COVID, it was 10 months for an engine, 12 months with a ladder," explained Chief Jackson.
The chief says there are only a few major companies that manufacture fire trucks. He says those companies tell him the delays are due to global supply issues, increased costs, and a struggle to find workers at the factories.
The International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) says the lack of competition in the fire truck marketplace has led to billions of dollars in backlogged trucks from around the globe.
"We contacted the Department of Justice and the FTC to investigate this, and to make sure that what is happening can either be halted or mitigated," said Jay Colbert with IAFF.
Spike in demand, labor shortage
Chief Jackson and Colbert say there are three large companies who manufacture the majority of the trucks. WBZ reached out to all three, with one of them, the REV Group, getting back to us about the delays. They gave WBZ this statement.
"An unprecedented spike in demand and ongoing skilled labor shortages have contributed to increased costs and delivery times across the industry," said a spokesperson for the REV Group, "We take our responsibility to deliver for America's first responders seriously and have increased our fire and emergency vehicle production by nearly 30% in the last two years, and developed new lines of semi-custom trucks that deliver in under a year."
The company says they also do not use dynamic or floating pricing. Once they agree on a price with a fire department, they stick to that price even if the costs to build increase before it's built. REV Group says data from the Fire Apparatus Manufacturers Association shows that fire truck demand from 2011-2020 increased by 43% from 2021 to 2023.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor 1
28 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Next-Gen Shelby GT500 Looks Menacing in New Spy Shots
Since the debut of the S650 Mustang in 2023, we've been waiting for a hardcore Shelby model. Rumors of the high-performance muscle car have been circulating for years, but nothing's been made official. That'll likely change soon, judging by these spy photos of a seemingly complete Shelby GT500 mule captured driving around Michigan. Our spy photographer managed to snag some detailed photos of this camouflaged GT500 prototype stalking around on the street ahead of a reveal likely to take place later this year. The front fascia wears a thick layer of netting and tarp to conceal changes to the front end, though we can see wider openings for the upper and lower grilles, as well as some outer bulges on the hood. Photo by: KGP Photography Photo by: KGP Photography Photo by: KGP Photography The rear end is more of the same, with a makeshift blanket covering the bumper, and polka-dot camouflage on the fenders and trunk lid. The thin quad-exhaust pipes are clearly not production ready, while the wing looks to be lifted straight from the lesser Mustang GT . The wheels and tires are the most fascinating part of this tester. Look closely, and you'll see the tires measure 305/30ZR20 up front and 315/30ZR20 in the rear—coincidentally, these are the same exact sizes found on the last-generation GT500. The tires themselves are Pirelli P Zero Rs with "Prototype Use Only" text on the sidewalls. Unlike the last GT500 prototype we saw, this one isn't using carbon fiber wheels, but more traditional alloys. In all likelihood, this wheel and tire setup will likely be the base offering for the upcoming GT500, with a carbon fiber wheel and stickier tire offered as the sportier option. Photo by: KGP Photography There's no official word on what sort of engine will power the next GT500, but we have a pretty good idea of what to expect, thanks to a leaked union memo from the Dearborn engine plant in Michigan. The document, whose contents were confirmed by the Detroit Free Press through internal sources, showed plans to produce an engine nicknamed "Legend." The plant currently builds the supercharged 5.2-liter V-8 found in the Raptor R. That same motor powered the last GT500 , making 760 horsepower and 625 pound-feet of torque. So it makes sense for the factory to supply the next car's engine, too. Power is still a question mark, though we wouldn't be surprised to see the next GT500 make over 800 hp, possibly matching the track-ready Mustang GTD . Judging by how ready-for-production this prototype looks, we probably won't have to wait much longer to find out. Gallery: 2026 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 Spy Shots 22 Source: KGP Photography More on the Upcoming GT500 2026 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500: Everything We Know Leaked Document Hints at New Shelby GT500 Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )


Motor Trend
an hour ago
- Motor Trend
The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Charges *Slower* Using Tesla's NACS Port?!
As more EVs are built with the North American Charging System (NACS) port, the charging convenience that was once a main selling point for any Tesla is opening up to more vehicles. NACS, designed by Tesla and for years exclusive to that automaker, is innovative, user-friendly, and capable. 0:00 / 0:00 More important, a NACS port allows non-Tesla EVs to use some 20,000 Tesla Superchargers that are part of the largest and most reliable public fast-charging network. Hopefully, it'll make clunkier plugs like CHAdeMO, J1772, and CCS history. But at this moment of transition, Supercharging a non-Tesla EV isn't necessarily the fastest way to charge. For a vehicle like the the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5, it's quicker to use an adapter to plug this NACS-equipped car into the CCS plug commonly found at other DC fast-charging stations. Doing so, we saw a maximum charging rate of 266 kW versus 126 kW using NACS and a Supercharger. For this test, MotorTrend charged the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5—newly equipped with a NACS port—at both a 325-kW Tesla V4 Supercharger and a 350-kW Electrify America charger. The results reveal new layers of complexity in EV charging that may end up frustrating EV drivers before it makes life easier. Tesla Supercharger vs. Electrify America MotorTrend's real-world fast-charging test zaps an EV's battery from 5 to 100 percent and reports the results on how much range has been added for 70-mph highway driving. After 15 minutes of charging, the Supercharger pumped 90 miles' worth of electricity into the Ioniq 5. The Electrify America station delivered 152 miles in the same period. We've traditionally tested non-Tesla EVs at Electrify America stations, as they represent the second most common fast chargers, behind Tesla's units. It made more sense to us—as it will to most owners, we assume—to plug the Ioniq 5 and its new charging port into a Supercharger capable of delivering well in excess of the Hyundai's claimed 250-kW peak charging power. Unfortunately, any owner doing that is likely to be disappointed. The power plateaued at 126 kW from 5 to 73 percent in our test, and a Hyundai spokesperson confirmed that MotorTrend's Supercharger experience matched what customers should expect. (We'll explain the why in greater detail below.) To test the Ioniq 5's true charging capability, we pivoted back to an Electrify America station using a NACS-to-CCS adapter. The difference means that, in the time it takes to use the bathroom and grab a snack, someone using the Electrify America station has enough additional energy to drive for an extra 51 minutes compared to the Supercharger user. Staying plugged in for longer brought the state of charge closer to parity, but EV road tripping goes faster when you make shorter and more frequent stops. These differences call into question why you'd even bother to use your non-Tesla EV at a Supercharger. As the 2025 Ioniq 5 demonstrates, going elsewhere will be quicker and more effective with certain EVs. What? Why? How? It's Complicated The auto industry typically talks about fast charging in terms of kilowatts (kW), a measure of power. Before the Supercharger network opened to a wider audience, EV drivers generally just needed to know that if the power number on the charger was equal to or larger than what their vehicle could accept, they could expect the full juice. In theory, at least. Reliability issues and battery preconditioning nuances often prevent this in reality. But the idea was easy enough to understand: Plug a 240-kW 2024 Ioniq 5 into a 350-kW Electrify America station, and you should get 240 kW. In the new era, EV drivers also need to understand how much voltage a fast-charging station can deliver—a number that isn't widely advertised by charging providers. Tesla's newest V4 Superchargers, which are fed by older V3 power cabinets, can only output up to 500 volts, while every other 350-kW charger can deliver 1,000 volts. The 2025 Ioniq 5's larger battery pack operates at 697 volts (though it's often referred to as an 800-volt electrical architecture), and one of the principles of charging a battery is that the power input needs to be higher than the pack voltage or else the electricity moves in the wrong direction: out of the battery pack. The fact that a 697-volt Hyundai can charge at all on a 500-volt Tesla Supercharger is a tiny feat of modern engineering. Plugged into a Supercharger, the Ioniq 5 sends electricity through its motor windings to step up the voltage before delivering it to the battery pack. That process has a maximum power limit of 126 kW, as we observed. Give it time, and this confusion should—hopefully—fix itself. Tesla has announced that 1,000-volt Superchargers are coming to North America this year, but the timeline for when and how quickly they'll roll out is as certain as any other timeline thecompanyhaseverindicated. Other charging providers such as EVgo and Ionna are also opening new dispensers with NACS connectors that can hit 1,000 volts. Supercharging Could Still Be Faster There's still real potential that using a Supercharger for your NACS-equipped EV could be faster when you account for all the variables aside from time spent plugged in. Anyone who's road tripped a non-Tesla EV in recent years has charging horror stories. Long lines, broken equipment, slow connections, and human error can all cause infuriating delays. I will never forget the time MotorTrend's long-term 2023 Ioniq 5 demonstrated its great charging capability by going from 5 to 80 percent in about 20 minutes on a 350-kW Electrify America plug—after a two-hour wait behind a pile of other EV drivers. Meanwhile, Tesla Superchargers are common, nearly foolproof in their operation, have a reputation for reliability, and typically have abundant plugs available. According to recent U.S. Department of Energy data, Tesla has more than 2,500 Supercharger stations across the country, comprising nearly 30,000 individual plugs between them (some older stations aren't open to non-Tesla EVs). Electrify America says it has fewer than 1,200 stations with fewer than 5,000 plugs. With this, Tesla offers easy EV charging instead of the chaotic ambiguity of other networks, even if the actual charging is slower and takes longer. It's All Good News The good news is that buyers of new EVs with built-in NACS now have more options than ever—the choice is yours to decide what's the timeliest approach. For now, Ioniq 5 buyers will probably want to keep a CCS to NACS adapter in the car. But as NACS becomes the standard across EVs and the public charging stations, we see a future where that adapter won't be needed anymore.


Motor Trend
an hour ago
- Motor Trend
2025 Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve First Test: Do You Really Need the Infiniti Version?
Pros Luxury for less ProPilot Assist 2.1 is great Powerful engine Cons Thirsty engine Small third-row seat Still nearly $90,000 The 2025 Nissan Armada is all-new, but it remains related to the Infiniti QX80. As with, say, a Chevrolet Tahoe and Cadillac's Escalade, there are obvious mechanical links between the Nissan and Infiniti, but unlike those (and other mainstream SUVs with luxurious relatives), there exists some overlap between the Armada and the QX80—if you opt for the fancy Platinum Reserve trim level tested here. The nicest Armada available offers such overtly luxurious amenities that you might wonder if Nissan's marketing department has gone to war with Infiniti's. And when you look at the Armada Platinum Reserve's price, you really start to question if you should bother looking at the Infiniti QX80 at all. 0:00 / 0:00 For the 2025 model year, the Nissan Armada is a mostly new machine. It's slightly larger, wears buff new bodywork, sits on a new platform, and drops the old model's V-8 engine in favor of a more modern twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6. While the loss of two cylinders and some displacement might seem like downgrades on paper, the reality is that the V-6 makes 25 more horsepower and 103 lb-ft more torque than last year's naturally aspirated V-8. It also trades its seven-speed automatic transmission for a nine-speed auto for improved acceleration and better fuel efficiency. This combination is good to tow up to 8,500 pounds, and the Armada includes a Class 4 tow hitch and seven-pin harness preinstalled. Both the Platinum Reserve and the Pro-4X include an integrated trailer brake controller, as well as a new-to-Nissan Trailer Blind Spot Monitoring system, which can check your blind spots (trailer included) after inputting the length of the trailer in the system configuration, but that extra visibility is limited to 33 feet. This is part of the latest camera system on the Armada that includes the 3D around-view monitor, invisible hood view, and front wide view—a wide-angle front camera to let you see ahead of your bumper to keep from hitting parked cars, buildings, curbs, and other roadway obstacles at low speeds. A particularly useful feature on the rather large Armada. Steering wise, the new Armada drops the electrohydraulic power steering for a fully electric rack, allowing the 2025 Armada to have a quicker steering ratio and not feel like you're constantly moving the wheel just to park it in a space or garage. Further, you gain wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay on all Armadas, and the SL and higher trim levels feature wireless device charging in the center console. Helping put the Platinum Reserve on top of the Armada lineup is a Klipsch premium audio system with 12 speakers plus a subwoofer and a 600-watt amplifier. Helping the Platinum Reserve overlap with the QX80 is pretty much everything else this loaded SUV comes with, all of which also is offered on the Infiniti, including a new air suspension, the same twin-turbo V-6, and more. My, What Nice Stuff You Have One Armada feature that especially will catch your attention is the ProPilot Assist 2.1 system that allows hands-free driving. First, while standard on this version of the Armada, in order to get equivalent tech on the QX80 you must step up to its second trim level, the QX80 Luxe. A win for the Platinum Reserve, to be sure, though the less capable but still decent 1.1 system is available elsewhere in the Armada family, including the Pro4X off-road version we've tested previously. ProPilot is one of the smoothest-braking semi-autonomous systems we've experienced, and it is so deft that you don't realize it's hitting the brakes. Rather, it feels like it's just letting off the gas and using the natural engine compression to slow the big Armada down. But no, it's applying the brakes and slowing down quite smoothly and wonderfully in response to traffic or obstacles ahead. It also seems very competent at driving itself around the SoCal interstates and freeways surrounding MotorTrend's L.A. headquarters, easily dealing with drivers cutting us off and stop-and-go traffic. It never wants to brake aggressively, so it is smooth and confidence-inspiring in operation. While it does feel like it holds to the left of the lane a little too much, it's also not the worst offender in doing this and is mostly centered within our point of view behind the wheel. Again, that this fatigue-reducing driver assist is standard as part of the NissanConnect three-year free trial period is a wow factor for the Nissan. Like other limited hands-free systems, there are only certain roadways it will work on and after three years, you'll need to pay to keep those 'HD maps' up to date. New Tech, New Spaciousness The new Armada's 14.3-inch 'monolith' digital instrument panel is very bright at night and, when set at its brightest, can almost drown out the head-up display projected onto the windshield. But there is some good news: You can turn that brightness down without digging around in several pages of menus hunting for the darn thing. With more and more vehicle controls industry-wide being buried in more and more menus, having something as critical as instrument screen brightness still handled by a touch button on the dash is a welcome change. You'll find it right on the panel, and it's obvious when you look at it because the steering wheel doesn't obscure it. Simplicity can equal luxury, it turns out! We will say we're not the biggest fans of pushbutton gear selectors and would rather have a lever or a dial. We understand why Nissan did it—Lincoln, for example, has similar controls in the Navigator full-size SUV, too—we're just not fans of it. A column shifter would achieve the same console-space-saving goals, though we get that buttons are easier to design around than a physical shifter, and that allows for a cleaner and more open interior design. It's also nice to have a power telescoping and tilt function steering column. Hopping into the captain's chair in the second row is a very comfortable experience for this over 6-feet-tall writer, but those seats are not powered. It's all manual, but having the ability to slide the middle seat back and forth is still a nice way to share available legroom. It's all the same leather material for the front and rear seats, too. The rear seats feature their own climate control system with heated seats, and both second-row passengers can power their devices using the two USB C ports or the 12-volt port on the back of the center console. The third row is still tight for anyone other than small children even with the second-row seat fully forward, but those rearmost seats power-fold up and down with a switch in the cargo area. There are two fold-down buttons for the second-row seat backs but getting them back up remains a manual matter. Overall, we really don't have any other major complaints about the Armada's packaging. It's a great but huge vehicle, and parking is a struggle for street parking in the city. But that's where the 360 cameras come in so handy, and we wish more vehicles came standard with one. It helps so much when you're trying to park a huge monster of a truck like the Armada and make sure you don't curb those expensive 22-inch aluminum wheels. Smaller Engine, Similar Performance Drive the 2025 Armada Platinum Reserve, and you might come away surprised it's powered by a 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6 (that is, if no one told you what was under the hood). Despite this fully loaded Platinum Reserve's 6,082-pound curb weight, that smaller engine helps the SUV get around with ease thanks to its 516 lb-ft of torque, which arrives at just 3,600 rpm. You'll be able to merge smoothly thanks to its 6.3-second 0–60-mph capability, which trails the last-generation, V-8-powered Armada Platinum (we last tested one in 2022) by 0.1 second. Wait, the new Armada is … slower? If only just—but remember, the old one was about a hundred pounds lighter. Nevertheless, the V-6 feels far less winded when pushed than the 5.6-liter V-8 it replaces, impressive given its size. And beyond 60 mph, the turbo engine catches up, posting a quicker 14.7-second quarter-mile time (0.1 second better than the 2022 Armada) at a faster 95.0 mph (versus 94.2 mph). The new Armada also stops shorter from 60 mph (in 121 feet versus 124), while its fresh suspension helps it post higher lateral grip (0.77 g versus 0.74) and a notably quicker figure-eight lap time (27.6 seconds compared to the old Armada's 28.3). Disappointingly, given the switch away from the V-8, it's big and it's hungry. Even at its best, the highway mileage is only EPA-estimated at 19 mpg. That then drops to 16 mpg in the city and has a combined rating of just 17 mpg. Those figures are up big time from the old Armada's 13/18/15 mpg figures when equipped with four-wheel drive, but still. Oh, and keep in mind that it also requires premium fuel to get full power out of that twin-turbo V-6, though the Nissan can be fed regular without issue. But Back to That Infiniti… But as far as luxury goes, the Armada drives well and rides merely decently (it can't match a Jeep Wagoneer's cushiness, and the 22-inch wheels ride harshly over bad pavement), while the cabin is classier than before if not quite Infiniti-level, and loaded with every toy you can get on the QX80. So, we ask again, as we did when the new Armada first launched: Why consider the Infiniti at all? A would-be Infiniti customer might reconsider even looking at the similarly priced QX80 Pure AWD. At $86,840, the Armada you see here costs $705 less and includes similar features like ProPilot Assist 2.1, 22-inch wheels, and air ride off the bat. The only plus for the QX80 Pure AWD is two more speakers and flush-fit exterior door handles—and that Infiniti badge. You'd have to be an Infiniti diehard or keen on the fancier badge to not choose the Armada Platinum Reserve here. And consider that it takes that same Infiniti customer an extra $11,800 to upgrade to the QX80's Luxe trim that matches this Armada Platinum Reserve feature for feature. The Infiniti seems to have a ride quality and overall interior styling advantage over this specific Nissan, which doesn't seem to manage its 22-inch wheels as neatly as the QX80 and has less shiny stuff inside. While we're not Nissan product planners and therefore can't speak to the apparent overlap between the newest Armada and QX80 SUVs, it's certainly good news for savvy shoppers eyeing a feature-laden full-size three-row SUV. Looking for luxury on a budget? The 2025 Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve brings Infiniti levels of fancy for less.