
Nationwide fire truck shortage impacting Mass. departments. IAFF asks for investigation.
"We are waiting on an engine and a ladder right now, and it has been three and a half years," said Quincy Fire Chief Joe Jackson. "The build times to actually get these trucks built has quadrupled. It's a huge problem being able to plan. Some of these trucks that I'm ordering now, are likely to be received by another fire chief, and I think about that, and it's so weird."
Constant maintenance on old trucks
The fire department has some trucks in service that are more than 20-years-old. They are only able to keep them in service because they have two maintenance workers who constantly work on them. This is only made possible because car dealer Dan Quirk donated the department a large maintenance space on his property. Without the space, Chief Jackson says they wouldn't be able to keep this going.
"Most communities have to send their apparatus to the dealership to be worked on," explains Chief Jackson. "If one of these old trucks needs a radiator that's $10,000. That's ten-grand on a 30-year-old truck, and you have no choice."
"This is a 2003, so we are looking at 25-years-old right now," said maintenance worker Kevin Mellor, pointing to a truck he's working on. "After a certain time, to be compliant with the NFPA standards, after 20 years the truck should go into a reserve."
Increased cost of fire trucks
The department bought one of their trucks 10 years ago for $900,000. Their latest ones cost $2 million with a potential 4-year wait time to get.
"Prior to COVID, it was 10 months for an engine, 12 months with a ladder," explained Chief Jackson.
The chief says there are only a few major companies that manufacture fire trucks. He says those companies tell him the delays are due to global supply issues, increased costs, and a struggle to find workers at the factories.
The International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) says the lack of competition in the fire truck marketplace has led to billions of dollars in backlogged trucks from around the globe.
"We contacted the Department of Justice and the FTC to investigate this, and to make sure that what is happening can either be halted or mitigated," said Jay Colbert with IAFF.
Spike in demand, labor shortage
Chief Jackson and Colbert say there are three large companies who manufacture the majority of the trucks. WBZ reached out to all three, with one of them, the REV Group, getting back to us about the delays. They gave WBZ this statement.
"An unprecedented spike in demand and ongoing skilled labor shortages have contributed to increased costs and delivery times across the industry," said a spokesperson for the REV Group, "We take our responsibility to deliver for America's first responders seriously and have increased our fire and emergency vehicle production by nearly 30% in the last two years, and developed new lines of semi-custom trucks that deliver in under a year."
The company says they also do not use dynamic or floating pricing. Once they agree on a price with a fire department, they stick to that price even if the costs to build increase before it's built. REV Group says data from the Fire Apparatus Manufacturers Association shows that fire truck demand from 2011-2020 increased by 43% from 2021 to 2023.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASCAR still mulling championship format for 2026 and/or beyond
NASCAR is still going through the process of deciding its championship for the foreseeable future, but much to the chagrin of some fans, NBC Sports will still have a oversized say-so in what direction the sport goes. A playoff committee has been assembled, and has met multiple times this year, and is comprised of drivers, Hall of Fame inductees, broadcasters, officials, media members and broadcast executives. It's been a polarizing topic over the past week with every indication pointing towards NASCAR retaining a playoff format of some kind instead of reverting back to a season long points format. NASCAR's managing director of racing communications, Mike Forde, detailed on Wednesday's episode of his officially sanctioned 'Hauler Talk' podcast about the state of those conversations. 'We're going to have a discussion with our broadcast partners at NBC,' Forde said. 'NBC does have a seat at the table and they have a member of their team [on the playoff committee]. … There are other people at NBC who have a huge voice. Obviously, they are spending a lot of money to broadcast NASCAR. They do have a large seat at the table, so we'll be talking to them and getting their opinions on that. I feel like people have kind of scoffed at that move and have been incredulous that NBC does have such a huge voice — that feels strange to me. I feel like that is a pretty obvious thing that we need to do. They have a big voice because they write the biggest check. 'But once we come upon a menu of options, we do plan to have a fan council survey that goes out to get the fans' point of view. I know Mark Martin has put an X poll out there, Jeff Gluck has put an X poll out there, so we are also going to take a survey of our fans — that's part of our plan anyway.' Forde said a change won't be made from the status quo unless NASCAR feels very strongly that it is the right thing to do. 'TBD on really when the next step is and if we have enough time to get changes in place for 2026,' Forde said. 'I think that's something we'll work towards but making that happen as we're getting closer to the middle of August to talk to NBC and have a full-blown meeting and the aftermath of what that will be –may be a little bit tricky — but I wouldn't completely rule out 2026 changes, either. … There are really lots of opinions, so I think it's just boiling it down to the top four, getting with NBC, then getting back to the committee and then getting with NASCAR leadership to say here's what it is. 'Now, can we do that in time and feel good about it for 2026? What it comes down to is we don't want to feel like we are pushing through a change that we're going to have to change again. We want to feel really, really good about. If that can happen for 2026, great. If not, I think we're comfortable waiting for 2027.' The current format is a 16-driver, three round elimination gauntlet that is eventually decided by a one-race best-finisher-take-all finale between a final four. The format heavily rewards winning through advancing into the tournament but also advancing from round-to-round. Before this format, NASCAR used a 10 (and later 12) driver, 10-race points battle after the regular season in which the participants were the drivers highest in championship points re-seeded based on their regular season running order. Prior to that was the season long points battle which emphasized average finish over the course of the whole year.

Wall Street Journal
16 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Jury Says Tesla Must Pay $243 Million Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
A Florida jury found Tesla TSLA -1.82%decrease; red down pointing triangle was partly to blame over a fatal 2019 collision involving a vehicle equipped with the company's driver-assistance software, awarding the plaintiffs nearly $329 million in damages. It marks the first time a jury has awarded damages in a lawsuit related to Tesla's driver-assistance features and a major setback for Elon Musk's electric-vehicle company. The jury concluded the automaker failed to provide sufficient warnings or instructions for its Autopilot feature in the 2019 Tesla Model S involved in the accident, making the car unreasonably dangerous.

CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $329 million in Autopilot crash
FacebookTweetLink A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $329 million to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court ordered Tesla to pay $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages to the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and to her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. The plaintiffs had sought $345 million. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. A judge rejected Tesla's efforts to dismiss the case earlier in the summer, and experts said this may encourage other litigants against the EV maker. 'I think it's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a professor at Marquette University Law School, who said this may make future settlements more expensive for Tesla. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its auto-pilot technology.' Friday's verdict could impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. Shares fell 1.8% on Friday. Tesla plans to appeal, according to published reports. The Austin, Texas-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to several requests for comment. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019, incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software. That's a big deal.' Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Last month, Tesla posted its biggest quarterly sales decline in more than a decade, and profit fell short of Wall Street forecasts.