
The Netanyahu trial: Power, corruption, and the fight to avoid justice
Accused of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust in a trio of cases that span luxury gifts, media manipulation, and corporate favoritism, Netanyahu's trial is more than a legal proceeding, it is a referendum on power, justice, and democracy in 'Israel'.
- Background -
Netanyahu served three separate terms as Prime Minister: from 1996 to 1999, from 2009 to 2021, and again beginning in 2022. But corruption allegations have trailed him for decades, resurfacing again and again with increasing intensity. Those accusations finally crystallized in 2019 when he became the first sitting 'Israeli' Prime Minister to be indicted.
- The charges: A closer look -
Netanyahu faces criminal charges in three interrelated corruption cases.
Case 1000: The Gifts Affair
Between 2007 and 2016, Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, allegedly accepted nearly USD 300,000 in luxury gifts, including cigars, champagne, and jewelry, from Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan and Australian billionaire James Packer. In return, Netanyahu allegedly used his office to lobby for Milchan's financial and legal interests, including a US visa renewal and tax exemptions.
Case 2000: The Media Deal
Netanyahu is also accused of attempting to strike a deal with media mogul Arnon Mozes, publisher of Yedioth Ahronoth, to receive more favorable coverage in exchange for legislation that would weaken a competing pro-Netanyahu outlet, Israel Hayom.
Case 4000: Regulatory Favors
In the most serious case, Netanyahu is accused of promoting regulatory decisions that benefited Shaul Elovitch, former controlling shareholder of Bezeq, 'Israel's' telecom giant, in exchange for positive coverage on Elovitch's news site, Walla.
Ghost cases
Two additional investigations, Cases 1270 and 3000, were dropped before trial. The first involved allegations of a bribery offer to a judge in exchange for dropping charges against Netanyahu's wife. The second focused on a controversial submarine deal with Germany, where Netanyahu's cousin, who represented the manufacturer, allegedly stood to benefit.
While Netanyahu avoided formal charges in both cases, they further fueled the perception of systemic abuse of power.
- What's at stake? -
If convicted of bribery, Netanyahu could face up to 10 years in prison, while fraud and breach of trust carry penalties of up to three years. But politically, he remains protected, at least for now. "Israeli" law allows him to remain in office unless convicted and exhausted of appeals.
Analysts say this loophole has turned the Prime Minister's office into a shield, and Netanyahu appears determined to use every ounce of its protection.
- A history of legal escapes -
This is not Netanyahu's first brush with the law. As early as 1997, he was investigated for trying to appoint a sympathetic attorney general. In 1999, he was suspected of accepting lavish renovations from a government contractor. Both cases were ultimately dropped.
Still, the current charges are the most serious yet, and the most persistent. Since the trial began in 2020, it has moved at a glacial pace, bogged down by delays, political instability, and a global pandemic.
- Delays, distractions, and smokescreens -
Critics accuse Netanyahu of using national crises, including repeated wars in Iran, Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon, to delay court appearances.
His government has also tried to reshape the legal landscape itself. In 2023, Netanyahu's far-right coalition launched a controversial judicial overhaul that critics saw as a direct attempt to weaken the very courts trying him. The move triggered mass protests and divided 'Israeli' society, though it was shelved following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas operation. In one striking instance, he was set to testify in March 2025 but avoided the hearing after ordering a surprise attack on Gaza, effectively postponing the trial again.
- Negotiating justice -
Behind closed doors, Netanyahu has reportedly sought plea deals, including one in which he would plead guilty to lesser charges in Case 1000. But he has refused to accept any verdict that would require his resignation or a ban from politics.
In June 2025, US President Donald Trump weighed in, calling the trial a 'witch hunt' and urging for it to be canceled or for Netanyahu to be pardoned, remarks that triggered outrage from 'Israeli' opposition figures who accused Trump of meddling.
- The bigger question -
As Netanyahu's legal battle drags on, its implications go far beyond one man. His critics say he has turned the justice system into a tool for political survival, delaying, discrediting, and even attempting to dismantle it.
Regardless of the verdict, the damage may already be done. Institutions have been weakened, public trust has eroded, and the precedent has been set: that a sitting Prime Minister can use the machinery of state to fend off justice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Bawaba
9 minutes ago
- Al Bawaba
Ceasefire talks progress in Cairo as Israeli strikes kill dozens in Gaza
Published July 15th, 2025 - 06:14 GMT On Tuesday, over 60 Palestinians were reportedly killed, including an entire family with women and children, in strikes on shelters and residential areas. ALBAWABA- Cairo is currently hosting high-level Egyptian-Qatari-Israeli meetings aimed at securing a ceasefire in Gaza, with discussions centered on humanitarian access, medical evacuations, and the return of stranded individuals. An Egyptian source reported to Al Arabiya noticeable progress, with consensus emerging on several key humanitarian aspects of the proposed deal. Talks are expected to continue for two days, as Egypt pushes to remove obstacles blocking a final agreement and ensure adequate aid flows into the besieged enclave. As part of the negotiations, Israel has presented a revised 'third deployment map' outlining its proposed military positions during the suggested 60-day truce. According to sources cited by the Jerusalem Post, Tel Aviv has shown increased flexibility, particularly regarding troop deployment along the southern Gaza-Egypt border, between the Morag and Philadelphi corridors. The updated plan includes reducing Israeli military presence to a two-kilometer buffer zone near Rafah, with signals that further troop withdrawals may be possible during the ceasefire period. 👉 Second ultra-Orthodox party quit government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a day after a similar withdrawal from ruling coalition 🗳️ Withdrawal of two Haredi parties leave government with only 61 seats in Knesset — Anadolu English (@anadoluagency) July 15, 2025 Despite these developments, core disputes persist. Hamas continues to demand a full Israeli withdrawal to pre-March ceasefire positions. At the same time, Israel remains hesitant, previously insisting on maintaining a larger three-kilometer zone and control of the Morag corridor separating Rafah from Khan Younis. While Israeli media outlets have described the Doha-mediated negotiations as making 'dramatic progress,' deadly Israeli airstrikes across Gaza continue unabated. On Tuesday, over 60 Palestinians were reportedly killed, including an entire family with women and children, in strikes on shelters and residential areas. Also Read 82 killed, 247 wounded in Gaza today amid ongoing Israeli assault A similar death toll was recorded the day before, reinforcing what many rights groups are calling a routine campaign of mass killing under the guise of security operations. Amid this military escalation, political instability deepens in Israel. On Wednesday, a second ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) party withdrew from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, following a similar move the previous day by Degel HaTorah. These back-to-back defections leave the ruling bloc with only 61 seats in the Knesset, placing Netanyahu's government on the brink of collapse at a critical juncture in the war and ceasefire negotiations. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (


Roya News
2 hours ago
- Roya News
Unearthed 2014 article shows Zohran Mamdani's early advocacy for Palestinian rights
A resurfaced college article has shed light on Zohran Mamdani's long-standing support for the Palestinian cause, years before he became a leading figure in New York politics. Mamdani, now 33 and the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, co-authored the piece as an undergraduate at Bowdoin College, where he co-founded the school's chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). Published on January 10, 2014, in Bowdoin's student paper, The Bowdoin Orient, Mamdani's article strongly endorsed the American Studies Association's (ASA) decision to join the academic boycott of 'Israeli' institutions, a move aimed at pressuring 'Israel' to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. 'The American Studies Association, a group of scholars on American culture and history, recently decided to honor the call of Palestinian civil society to boycott Israeli institutions,' Mamdani wrote. 'This academic and cultural boycott aims to bring under scrutiny the actions of the Israeli government and to put pressure on Israeli institutions to end the oppressive occupation and racist policies within both Israel and occupied Palestine.' The piece criticized 'Israeli' universities for what Mamdani described as active and passive complicity in 'Israel's' military occupation. He accused them of prioritizing soldiers in admissions, discriminating against Palestinian students, developing remote-controlled bulldozers for home demolitions, and conducting research for the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF), with some institutions operating from illegal settlements built on occupied land. Mamdani rejected claims that the boycott stifled free speech, arguing instead that it had sparked wider debate about 'Israeli' human rights abuses. He specifically challenged then-Bowdoin College President Barry Mills, who opposed the boycott, accusing him of ignoring Palestinian suffering: 'Mills regrettably makes no mention of Palestinians or Palestine… When Mills speaks of the 'free exchange of knowledge, ideas, and research,' he does so while privileging partnerships with Israeli institutions over basic freedoms for Palestinians, including the rights to food, water, shelter and education.' The mayoral nominee praised Bowdoin professors who supported the ASA resolution and urged students and faculty to sign a pro-boycott petition.


Roya News
2 hours ago
- Roya News
Syria condemns 'Israeli' strikes on Suwayda, vows to defend its sovereignty
Syria's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday strongly condemned what it called a 'treacherous Israeli aggression' following a series of coordinated airstrikes and attacks on southern Syrian territory, accusing 'Israel' of deliberately escalating tensions in the region and pledging to defend the country through all legal means. In an official statement, the ministry said the strikes had resulted in the deaths of both military personnel and civilians. 'This aggression represents a new escalation, carried out through deliberate air raids and coordinated attacks on Syrian land,' the ministry said, calling it part of a continued pattern of 'Israeli' violations of Syrian sovereignty. 'The attacks occurred at a calculated time and within a suspicious context aimed at undermining Syria's national stability and increasing tensions in the region,' the statement added. The Foreign Ministry stressed that Syria reserves its full right to defend its land and people, affirming that it will use all tools guaranteed by international law to confront aggression and protect national security. It also reaffirmed the government's commitment to safeguarding all Syrians, including members of the Druze community, who it said are now facing direct threats as a result of 'Israeli' attacks. The strikes come amid ongoing violence in the southern governorate of Suwayda, home to Syria's Druze minority, where deadly clashes between Druze fighters and Bedouin tribes erupted over the weekend. On Tuesday, Syrian Defense Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra announced a complete ceasefire in the city following talks with local leaders. Government forces had entered Suwayda earlier in the day and raised the Syrian flag at key checkpoints. Shortly afterward, 'Israel' announced that its military had begun striking Syrian regime positions in the Suwayda region, citing the need to protect the Druze minority and ensure the demilitarization of the border zone. In a joint statement, 'Israeli' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz said the strikes targeted forces and weapons 'brought into Suwayda to carry out operations against the Druze.' 'We are acting to prevent the Syrian regime from harming them,' the statement read. The 'Israeli' military claimed it struck several vehicles in the area, and Syrian state media confirmed the attacks. The Syrian government, however, rejected 'Israel's' stated justification. The Foreign Ministry's statement denounced the attempt to use the Druze as a pretext for foreign interference and stressed Damascus' commitment to protecting all of its citizens. The recent clashes in Suwayda have left more than 100 people dead, including Druze fighters, civilians, and members of the Bedouin community, according to war monitors and Syrian officials. Government forces were deployed to restore order but quickly became entangled in the fighting.