Defence in Meyiwa Murder Asks for Charges to Be Dropped as Trial Pauses Again
Image: Picture: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers
The murder trial of soccer star Senzo Meyiwa took another unexpected turn on Thursday, with lawyers for the five accused telling the court they plan to apply to have all charges dropped. This happened right after the state officially closed its case in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.
State Prosecutor George Baloyi stood up and told the court, 'It is precisely three years since the state started leading evidence. We now formally close our case.'
This marks the end of the prosecution's side of the trial. Now, it is up to the defence to decide whether the accused will testify or whether they will try to stop the trial completely by arguing that the state has failed to prove anything against them.
Defence lawyers said they plan to bring an application under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act. This law allows a judge to dismiss charges if the state has not shown enough evidence to continue with the trial.
Charles Mnisi, who represents accused number three, said they were waiting on a decision from the Legal Aid Board to provide funds for the application. That decision is expected by 6 August. Mnisi then asked the judge to postpone the matter to 7 August, and Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng agreed.
But Thursday's court session was not just about legal arguments. There was also more drama over the treatment of accused number five, Fisokuhle Ntuli.
Earlier in the week, Ntuli told the court he was being mistreated at Kgosi Mampuru Correctional Centre in Pretoria. He said he was not allowed to speak to his lawyer or family and was denied basic items he needed in prison. Judge Mokgoatlheng ordered that Ntuli be transferred to Leeuwkop Correctional Centre in Sandton.
On Thursday, top officials from Correctional Services came to court to explain the situation. They said Ntuli had been moved to the high-security C Max section of the prison after he was allegedly caught with a cellphone during a search on 8 July. Ntuli denied this and said it was not true.
His lawyer, Zandile Mshololo, told the court that his rights were being violated. She insisted that the court's transfer order must remain in place and that her client had been treated unfairly.
The area prison boss, Emmanuel Khoza, admitted there had been delays and mistakes but said the court's order had made it harder for the prison to manage discipline. He warned that they might appeal the judge's decision. 'We feel disempowered,' he said. 'But we apologise and commit to making sure the court runs smoothly.'
Judge Mokgoatlheng did not back down. 'You can bring a formal application if you want the decision changed,' he said. 'But for now, my order stands.'
Mnisi also backed the judge, saying courts have the power to run their processes. He blamed the correctional centre for delaying the court each day. 'This court starts late because accused persons are not brought on time,' he said.
The five men on trial — Ntuli, Mnisi's client Mncube, plus Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, Bongani Ntanzi, and Mthokoziseni Maphisa — are all accused of being involved in the murder of Meyiwa, who was shot at the Vosloorus home of his girlfriend, singer Kelly Khumalo, in 2014.
All five have pleaded not guilty to murder, attempted murder, armed robbery, and illegal possession of firearms and ammunition.
With the state's case now closed and the trial postponed again, the spotlight will now be on the defence. If their application to drop the charges succeeds, it could bring the trial to an early end.
The court is set to resume on 7 August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa seeks apartheid damages case delay, but victims' families argue perpetrators are dying
The court was told that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. President Cyril Ramaphosa has asked the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to stay a damages case brought by families of victims of apartheid-era crimes. However, lawyers for the applicants have warned that the alleged perpetrators are old and dying. The legal action, initiated by 25 families and survivors of apartheid victims – including relatives of the Cradock Four – seeks R167 million in constitutional damages. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa launches commission of inquiry into apartheid-era justice delays The applicants accuse the government of blocking the investigation and prosecution of murder cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Ramaphosa has since established a commission of inquiry chaired by retired judge Sisi Khampepe to investigate the lack of prosecutions. Ramaphosa urges court to delay apartheid damages case On Wednesday, Advocate Timothy Bruinders, representing Ramaphosa and government, argued in court that the commission should be allowed to complete its work before the damages case proceeds. 'There was notice put out by judge Khampepe in which she set out what the progress will be over the next month. 'I think she has just started work on it so it's settled that there is a commission,' he told the court. Bruinders pointed out that both the TRC and the families had previously called for the establishment of such a commission to investigate the apartheid-era crimes. 'The reason for the commission of inquiry is because the facts are as yet unknown,' he said. ALSO READ: Mbeki accused of trying to save his reputation by intervening in apartheid lawsuit Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen, however, raised a concern about whether it was not the applicants' prerogative to go ahead or withdraw their case. Bruinders responded that the case relied on the commission's findings in order for the court to make a ruling on damages. He argued that former National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli did not provide enough detail to conclude that interference occurred in one of the TRC cases. 'One could conclude from that there was an attempted interference.' Watch the case below: Bruinders added that the government and president sympathise with the families. 'They don't have closure. As they say, the prosecutions haven't happened. 'This is of concern to any government who cares about its citizens and those who died in fighting for what he ultimately sees now in the Constitution.' He emphasised that the government's interest lies in uncovering the truth. 'It is not to fight the families on procedural matters. One can imagine how that would go down politically. I do not think it would go down very well.' Victims' families demand justice Later, Advocate Matthew Chaskalson – representing the families – criticised the government's request to the court to delay the damages case, particularly as it had years to establish the commission. 'The applicants are seeking justice for crimes that were committed 30 and 35 years ago. That's the period we are dealing with. 'The perpetrators of these crimes have either already died or are dying at a rapid rate,' he said, pointing out that most suspects are now likely in their 70s. Chaskalson told the court that the applicants themselves are aging and that some have already died. 'They do not have time to wait indefinitely for the commission of inquiry to report and for relief to be recommended,' the lawyer said, adding that the applicants are entitled to their day in court while they are still alive. He further argued that commissions of inquiry have a tendency to 'drag on and on'. 'It is an extraordinarily optimistic proposition to put forward the idea that this commission will be able to do a thorough job on its investigation and report in four months' time, which is all it has left of the originally six months.' The court has reserved the judgment. NOW READ: Khampepe Commission is the right platform for Mbeki, Mabandla to tell their story, court rules
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
DJ Sumbody murder: Here's why Katiso ‘KT' Molefe thinks he should get bail
Molefe asked the court to grant him a 'reasonable' bail amount. Controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe insists that being charged with murder should not automatically disqualify him from being granted bail. Molefe appeared in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court on Wednesday for his formal bail application. The alleged mastermind was arrested alongside three hitmen in connection with the murder of South African artist Oupa John Sefoka, widely known as DJ Sumbody. Sefoka and his bodyguards, Sibusiso Mokoena and Sandile Myeza, were gunned down in a hail of bullets in Woodmead, Gauteng, in November 2022. Katiso Molefe linked to more murders At the time of his arrest for Sefoka's killing, Molefe was out on R100 000 bail after the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria overturned a lower court's decision to deny his release. He had initially been arrested in connection with the murder of Vereeniging engineer Armand Swart, who was shot 23 times outside his workplace on 17 April 2024. The businessman has also recently been charged in connection with the murders of Hector Buthelezi, known as DJ Vintos, and Don Tindleni. Buthelezi and Tindleni were fatally shot in separate incidents in 2022 and 2023, respectively. Not a flight risk During Wednesday's proceedings, Molefe's affidavit – read out by his lawyer, Advocate Michael Hellens – revealed personal details to support his bail application. Molefe stated that he is 61 years old and a former teacher. He owns a R3 million home in Winchester Hills, bought with his estranged wife, and a second property in Sandhurst – purchased for R12 million and now valued at R17 million – where he lives with his three sons. 'I've lived in the Greater Johannesburg area for my whole life and have strong physical, familial, and emotional ties to this area. 'All of my most important business and family ties are in Gauteng and the Free State,' Molefe said. ALSO READ: Firearms used in DJ Sumbody's murder linked to 10 other high-profile cases He further argued that he has no intention of fleeing, pointing out that he has already surrendered his passport to the police. 'The passport will expire on 7 July 2032. I've only travelled beyond the borders of South Africa within the past five years to Hong Kong, China, and several times to Swaziland. 'As far as relatives outside of Republic of South Africa are concerned, my daughter lives in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, but we, unfortunately, do not have a strong bond,' the affidavit reads. Katiso 'KT' Molefe appeared at the Alexandra Magistrate's Court on Wednesday as his bail application continued. He was arrested last month in connection with the murders of #DJSumbody and #DJVintos. Video by @nigelsibanda#TheCitizenNews August 6, 2025 'I submit that it should be clear, as I have confirmed that my intention is to remain in the Republic of South Africa and I do not intend in daring to live the life of a fugitive from justice, as such a prospect is simply unthinkable in the circumstances. 'I have no such expectation. I have nowhere to go. I have no other person to be. I have no other home and I have no other way of existing. I, therefore, submit that I'm not a flight risk.' Katiso Molefe's family responsibilities and business interests Molefe disclosed that although he and his wife have been separated since 2020, they are still legally married. They share four children. He has three additional children with one woman and a son with another based in Durban, bringing his total number of children to nine, including the daughter living in the UAE. 'I'm responsible for the maintenance of all the minor children and also contribute to their adult needs as and when it becomes necessary.' READ MORE: Two more murder cases linked to suspects in DJ Sumbody killing He revealed that he earns a cumulative income of R200 000 from his business activities spanning financial insurance, real estate, vehicles, logistics and construction. Molefe also owns a Mercedes SL600 worth R400 000, a V-Class Mercedes valued at R1.8 million, and a 2023 Range Rover worth R1.2 million. 'I actually recently sold the V-Class Mercedes in order to pay for legal fees and to pay for bail.' Request for bail and previous conviction Molefe asked the court to grant him a 'reasonable' bail amount, stating he could sell additional assets if needed. He also highlighted that he had previously been granted bail despite facing a serious charge. 'The Pretoria High Court [found] that exceptional circumstances has existed for my release on bail, not withstanding the fact that I've been charged with the count of murder.' The accused further indicated that he was fully aware of the possible sentence that could be imposed for murder. READ MORE: DJ Sumbody's murder exposes connection between crime and power 'I'm also aware that one only has one life to live from the perspective of the sentence in the powers of the courts.' Molefe argued that while he has no prior convictions in South Africa, he does have a criminal record in the United Kingdom (UK) for importing marijuana. 'I committed that crime 20 years ago using an alias.' He was deported and banned from entering the UK. Intention to plead not guilty Meanwhile, Molefe stated his intention to plead not guilty to all charges, claiming the state's case is weak. 'There appears to be practically nothing upon which my arrest was based.' He assured the court he would not interfere with witnesses or the investigation. 'I have been up on bail for approximately a month. There is and will be no evidence that at any stage did I interfere with any investigation, witness or evidence. 'Nor did I do so prior to my arrest on the previous occasion, or whilst the incarcerated pending bail. 'I further submit that I have no access to evidentiary material held by the investigating officer and there is no likelihood I would interfere with the investigation of the case.' Molefe also requested that his bail conditions remain the same as those previously imposed by the Pretoria High Court. The state, however, argued that Molefe is a dangerous individual who poses a threat to society The bail application has been postponed to 14 August. NOW READ: DJ Sumbody's family welcomes the arrests of suspects and thanks police
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa seeks to postpone R167 million damages case until inquiry completion
President Cyril Ramaphosa has earlier signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa has called on the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to pause the R167 million constitutional damages case filed by families of victims and survivors of apartheid-era atrocities. He argues that the case should be delayed until the judicial commission of inquiry concludes its work, ensuring that all relevant facts are fully established before proceeding. Ramaphosa has earlier signed a proclamation for the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry to determine whether attempts were made to prevent the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes. Advocate Tim Bruinders SC, arguing on behalf of Ramaphosa and the government, said it is vital that all the facts first be established before the constitutional damages case is served before court. He said the commission will shed more light on why, and to what extent and by whom, efforts or attempts were made to influence or pressure the South African Police Service or the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to stop investigating or prosecuting TRC cases. According to Bruinders, it is at this stage impossible for Ramaphosa and the government to issue an affidavit in the constitutional damages case if the facts are not clear. 'In fact, we do not know at this stage what the true facts are,' he said. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen questioned whether it is not the prerogative of the applicants (the survivors and families) to proceed with their constitutional damages case as they deem fit. Judge Nicolene Janse van Nieuwenhuizen listening to the arguments of Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC on Wednesday during President Cyril Ramaphosa's application for a stay of the constitutional damages case brought by the families of apartheid era victims. Image: Zelda Venter Bruinders responded that the facts must first become clear - something which a commission can establish by calling witnesses - before a court could decide on damages. 'These are families who have the sympathy of the government. They don't have closure. This is a concern for any government, but the facts must still be explored,' he said. Bruinders added that the government wanted the truth as to why these cases were not investigated and prosecuted. But it first needed the facts. Judge Janse van Nieuwenhuizen also questioned whether it was not possible for the court hearing the constitutional damages claim to deal with the cases of each of the 25 families and to establish the facts then. But Bruinders said as witnesses usually do not testify in motion court proceedings, such as this, the commission of inquiry is in a better position to establish the facts, as it has the tools to investigate the issues. Advocate Matthew Chaskalson SC, for the families, implored the judge not to stay the constitutional damages case. He said the families have been waiting for between 30 and 50 years for justice. Chaskalson added that the commission of inquiry can go on for months before it makes any recommendations. He pointed out that the commission can only make recommendations, which are not binding on the president. He accused the president of not wanting to choose where he stands in this matter. In asking that the case not be delayed, Chaskalson said the applicants and their legal teams are confident that they have a good case in the constitutional damages matter. Judgment is reserved. Cape Argus
