Why First Solar Stock Dived by Almost 18% Today
Many parts of the U.S. were sunny on Tuesday, but that happy situation didn't extend metaphorically to solar energy stocks. Quite a few took major hits that trading session on the latest developments in the legislative sphere.
One of the industry's victims was First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR), which went dim with a nearly 18% decline in its share price. That decline was far steeper than the 0.8% slip of the S&P 500 index that day.
The tax credits might come to an abrupt end
President Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill remains a massive bone of contention in Congress, and has been the subject of much criticism and debate among lawmakers. It's also undergoing change as Senators adjust it in an effort at compromise.
On Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee proposed speeding up the elimination of tax credits for solar and wind energy. Under current law, these do not expire until 2032; under the new proposal, they would be reduced by 60% next year and phased out entirely in 2028.
This contrasts with the bill's stance on tax credits for other forms of energy, specifically nuclear, hydroelectric, and geothermal. In its current form, the proposed law would actually extend these credits to 2036.
Bulls should remain bullish
Although there is likely far more horse trading to come before the Senate finally settles on a form of the bill it can accept, renewable energy will almost certainly remain a target.
Investors are right to be concerned about the effect on solar and other types of green energy companies, although this feels like an over-reaction -- the better companies in this segment should be able to adjust to the demise of tax credits.
Should you invest $1,000 in First Solar right now?
Before you buy stock in First Solar, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and First Solar wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Some success for Carney, not a win for the G7
If Mark Carney's task at the G7 was handling Donald Trump while he was in the Rocky Mountains, the Prime Minister can tick it off as job done. There was no big explosion. There were signs the rookie Prime Minister was an able host and Trump handler. The U.S. President called a trade deal with Canada achievable, even if he still wants tariffs. He agreed to several joint G7 statements, including one on the Iran-Israel conflict, although he treated the G7 position as irrelevant after he left a day early to deal with that crisis. For Mr. Carney, judged against the limited standards of hosting a summit with Mr. Trump, it was a success. For the G7 as a group, it wasn't. This was a G6-plus-one, and they couldn't bridge the big things. They are miles apart on trade. They couldn't agree on a common position on Ukraine. In personal diplomacy with Mr. Trump, Mr. Carney had a decent outing. He sucked in his cheeks stoically and silently during a joint photo op Monday when the U.S. President rambled about how Russia's Vladimir Putin should be allowed back into the group to make it the G8 again. He flattered Mr. Trump in his opening statement by saying the G7 would be nothing without U.S. leadership, and Mr. Trump's personal leadership. Mr. Trump called the Prime Minister 'Mark,' and said nice things about him. The personal PM-to-POTUS relationship is still good. Check. That beats the last G7 in Canada in 2018, when Mr. Trump took exception to then-prime minister Justin Trudeau's relatively mild comment about trade, disavowing the joint summit statements. The rift was never mended. Carney answers questions as leaders' summit wraps up; Canada, India agree to restore regular diplomatic services This time, Mr. Trump expressed a touch of optimism about some kind of Canada-U.S. trade deal. The two leaders agreed to accelerate talks for some kind of interim deal – though Mr. Trump said he still wants tariffs. Still talking on trade, no implosion. Good enough for now. Of course, Mr. Trump flew off a day early and told reporters on Air Force One that tariffs are quicker and easier and he still thinks Canada should become the 51st state. In retrospect, that felt almost inevitable. Mr. Trump started a post-departure squabble with France's President Emmanuel Macron over the Iran-Israel conflict via a social media post, too. But the G7, the group, didn't succeed. Everyone knew going in that for all the others, the goal was to avoid a clash with Mr. Trump. They wanted to show a little common action. Talks over a final communiqué had been scrapped for narrow statements. There was no joint statement of support for Ukraine and pressure on Russia. A Canadian government source said the U.S. wouldn't agree to one – but Mr. Carney brushed it off, noting he'd made his own statement on Ukraine as G7 chair and had run all the wording past G7 leaders at dinner, including Mr. Trump. At any rate, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had travelled across the world on a night when Russia launched a deadly attack on Kyiv, but Mr. Trump wasn't there when he arrived. Canada followed European countries in announcing new sanctions and substantial military aid, but the future of crucial U.S. support for Ukraine was left as a question hanging in the air. Coyne: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6 It sometimes seemed like some G7 leaders were stubbornly trying to return to a world before the stubborn Mr. Trump. Mr. Macron made an economically literate argument for Western nations to solve trade-imbalance issues together, without tariffs. But Mr. Trump wants tariffs. On his way back to Washington, he told reporters that if there aren't bilateral deals, he'll just tell each country how much they have to pay. As G7 host, one of Mr. Carney's tasks was to moderate the group and drive a common agenda. They agreed on some things and issued statements, for example, on developing critical minerals. There's still a rift on trade. No joint position on Ukraine. They issued a common statement on Iran but by the time Mr. Trump was in the air, he was off on his own. Mr. Macron painted the summit as a success, noting the leaders issued six joint statements on issues ranging from critical minerals to transnational repression. 'You can't ask the Canadian chair to settle all the issues of the world today, either,' Mr. Macron said. 'That would be unfair. But he held the group together.' Sort of. Mr. Carney told reporters it was an opportunity for frank discussions and building relationships, which will carry through, for example, till next week's NATO summit. And for as long as Mr. Trump was there, there was no blow-up. For Mr. Carney, that was important. But for the G7, it was a summit that couldn't muster common purpose.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Colombia's Senate approves labor bill that would mean more pay and protections for workers
BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Colombia's Senate on Tuesday night approved a labor bill that is expected to grant workers more overtime pay while making it harder for companies to hire employees on short-term contracts. The bill's approval comes as tensions have been increasing between the Senate and President Gustavo Petro over reforms to the economy and health system that have polarized the nation's politics and tested the separation of powers in Colombia's fragile democracy. Petro has repeatedly accused Congress of blocking his reforms and last week issued a decree that called on Colombia's elections agency, the National Registrar, to organize a referendum on labor laws. The agency said Tuesday it would wait for Colombian courts to decide if it was legal for it to organize the referendum, because the Senate had voted against the referendum last month. Petro has threatened to change Colombia's constitution, by calling for a constituent assembly, if his request for a referendum on labor laws is not granted, and in a post on X Tuesday, said that those who did not approve the referendum were committing 'treason.' Opposition leaders have accused the president of developing an authoritarian streak, as he tries to override decisions made by Congress. The labor bill approved by Colombia's Senate on Tuesday includes many of the changes to Colombia's labor laws proposed by Petro's party, the Historical Pact. It increases surcharges paid to employees who work Sundays and also makes companies pay more for late evening shifts, which is likely to apply to many retailers, restaurants and hotels. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The bill also says delivery apps must formally hire delivery workers as freelancers or as full-time employees and help to pay for their health insurance. Business associations in Colombia oppose the changes, arguing they will raise the cost of employing people and could ultimately increase unemployment. Currently, 56% of Colombian workers labor with no contracts, in what is known as the informal economy. Economists expect the reforms to push more people into informality, while supporters of the bill argue they are just pushing for the restoration of rights workers had in the early 1990s, before Colombia began to make labor laws more flexible. The Senate and House of Representatives must now reconcile the differences in the bills each chamber drafted and then agree on a final version of the bill. Petro wrote in a message on X that he will continue to push for the referendum until legislators from both chambers have voted on a final bill.
Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney knows he has to choose Trump over China
Article content Well, at least he didn't walk out. While U.S. President Donald Trump left the G7 meeting in Kananaskis Monday night, it wasn't in the huff the world witnessed at Charlevoix in 2018. This time, after a day of huddles and the signing of a U.K.–U.S. mini-deal that slashed auto tariffs, Trump hurried back to the White House because of 'what's going on in the Middle East.' His exit left Prime Minister Mark Carney and the remaining five leaders to hammer out the rest of the agenda, from trade to security to artificial intelligence, while keeping a nervous eye on the Iran-Israel war. Article content Article content Throughout the meeting, Carney didn't step on any mines, but did make a major pivot. In welcoming Trump to Canada, Carney diplomatically thanked him 'for his leadership' and that of the United States in the G7, and praised Trump further at the start of the meeting. It's a far cry from his tone during the spring election campaign, when Carney depicted Trump as an existential menace to Canadian sovereignty that only he and the Liberal party could contain. Article content Article content Article content The goal was not just to run a smooth meeting: Carney wants a trade deal before the summer is out. And he may get one. Trump committed to doing a deal within 30 days, despite the two leaders' very different philosophies on tariffs. Trump and Carney talked for 30 minutes of a larger 70-minute Canada-U.S. bilateral meeting, which Carney later described as 'Fantastic.' Article content Article content But the summit's most revealing moment came not from Carney or Trump, but from Brussels. On Monday, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen conceded bluntly, that 'Donald is right' on the threat posed by China, which is flooding international markets with state-subsidized goods. While the EU's solution is greater trade among allies, instead of an international tariff regime, the end game is the same: isolate Beijing and undercut its economic and geopolitical influence.
