US to remove Syria's HTS from list of foreign terror groups
The group led a rebel offensive in December that toppled the Assad regime, which had ruled Syria for 54 years. Its leader Ahmed al-Sharaa is now the country's interim president.
HTS, also known as al-Nusra Front, was previously al-Qaeda's affiliate in Syria until al-Sharaa severed ties in 2016.
In recent months, Western countries have sought to reset relations with Syria - which has faced heavy sanctions aimed at the old regime.
In late June, President Trump signed an executive order to formally end US sanctions against the country, with the White House saying the move was intended to support its "path to stability and peace".
It added it would monitor the new Syrian government's actions including "taking concrete steps toward normalising ties with Israel" as well as "addressing foreign terrorists" and "banning Palestinian terrorist groups".
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani said the move would "lift the obstacle" to economic recovery and open the country to the international community.
On Friday, Syria said it was willing to cooperate with the US to reimplement a 1974 disengagement agreement with Israel.
Over the weekend, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy visited Syria - the first government minister to do so in 14 years.
He met with al-Sharaa and announced an additional £94.5m support package - aimed at supporting longer-term recovery and countries helping Syrian refugees.
The UK earlier lifted sanctions on Syria's defence and interior ministries.
Ninety percent of Syria's population were left under the poverty line when the Assad regime was ousted after 13 years of devastating civil war.
Al-Sharaa has promised a new Syria, but there are concerns within the country about how the new government is operating - with some suspicious of his radical past.
Only one female government minister has been appointed to date - and al-Sharaa has made almost every other appointment directly.
There have also been multiple violent attacks against minority groups in recent months.
In March, hundreds of civilians from the minority Alawite sect were killed during clashes between the new security forces and Assad loyalists. In April there were deadly clashes between Islamist armed factions, security forces and fighters from the Druze religious minority. And in June at least 25 people were killed in a suicide attack on a church in Damascus.
David Lammy first UK minister to visit Syria since 2011 uprising
From Syrian jihadist leader to rebel politician: How Abu Mohammed al-Jolani reinvented himself
Trump revokes US sanctions on Syria
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Netanyahu, Sharaa, plan to meet in Washington in September
Such a meeting would be a major step towards a normalization agreement between Israel and Syria. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa are expected to meet at the White House ahead of the UN General Assembly in September, i24NEWS reported on Tuesday, citing a Syrian source close to Sharaa. During the meeting, Netanyahu and Sharaa are slated to sign a security agreement "under the patronage" of US President Donald Trump, the report stated. Such a meeting would be a major step towards a normalization agreement between Israel and Syria. Additionally, Gulf sources told i24NEWS that the UAE is continuing its "extensive mediation efforts" between Israel and Syria. A major obstacle is Israel's fear of withdrawing forces from the extended buffer zone in the Golan Heights in the coming months due to concerns that Sharaa has not fully established control over all the armed factions in Syria, particularly in the south of the country, the Gulf sources told i24NEWS. Earlier on Tuesday, Israeli officials denied a claim from Syrian outlet Al-Jumhuriya that Sharaa met Israel's National Security Council head, Tzahi Hanegbi, in Abu Dhabi. Sources told the outlet that, allegedly, this was not "the first such meeting" to take place. Israel noted that Hanegbi is in Washington as part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's delegation visiting the US. Al-Sharaa's administration has made it clear that under any agreement, Israel will not be permitted to operate or strike targets within Syrian territory. Israel, on the other hand, insists on retaining the ability to address security threats, particularly in scenarios where, as demanded by the Damascus administration, Israel withdraws from the buffer zones. On Tuesday, Trump's administration revoked the foreign terrorist organization designation for Syria's Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) on Monday, in a move that aims to help the country rebuild following years of civil war. Reuters contributed to this report.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Syrian activist to TML: Visit to Israel, Knesset was 'unprecedented moment for peace'
Syrian political figure Shadi Martini described his Knesset address as a 'once-in-a-century opportunity' and confirmed holding recent talks with Syria's new president, Ahmed Al-Sharaa. Syrian political activist Shadi Martini confirmed in an interview with The Media Line that he had met with Syria's new president, Ahmed al‑Sharaa, just weeks before addressing the Israeli Knesset. 'It was a very enlightening meeting,' he said. 'We heard a lot of positive messaging from President Al‑Sharaa.' Martini described the visit to Israel as an 'unprecedented moment for peace' and a 'once-in-a-century opportunity' to change the trajectory ofIsraeli–Arab relations. A former hospital director in Aleppo and current CEO of the Multifaith Alliance, Martini was one of two Arab civil society figures who spoke to Israeli lawmakers during the inaugural session of the Knesset Caucus for the Advancement of a Regional Security Agreement. Alongside Saudi journalist Abdulaziz al‑Khamis, Martini advocated for a new regional framework based on moderation and mutual understanding. According to Martini, Syria's post‑Assad leadership is ready to move in a new direction. 'The Syrian leadership is very focused on rebuilding the country and establishing long‑term peace in the region,' he told The Media Line. 'They want to resolve everything through dialogue and diplomacy.' He said Syria's devastation over the past decade with millions displaced has shaped the new leadership's vision. 'They are looking into having a more stable region, which is going to benefit Syria and the Syrian people.' Martini also acknowledged the role regional military events played in regime change. 'The killing of Hassan Nasrallah and last year's Israeli strikes gave the opposition a major boost,' he told The Media Line. 'As Syrians, we deeply appreciated that.' He emphasized that these events helped opposition forces topple the Assad regime in December. The meeting with President Al‑Sharaa included two American religious leaders—one Jewish, one Christian—as well as Martini himself. 'I'm Muslim. One was a rabbi, one was a reverend. We were trying to have a discussion with the president and see his views.' He stressed that Syria's new leadership sees its future aligned with the United States, Europe, and moderate Arab states. 'The current Syrian government is totally detached from the Iranian axis,' Martini said. 'That's one of the reasons they were looking toward the United States, Western Europe, and the moderate Arab countries as their new allies and partners.' Martini described his appearance at the Knesset as both emotional and revealing. 'It was overwhelming,' he said. 'I met so many people, so many members of Knesset from all walks of Israeli political life. That was an interesting eye‑opener.' He said the invitation offered a rare chance to speak directly to Israelis: 'We wanted the Israeli public to hear the voices from the region—from Syria, from Saudi Arabia—to understand where we're coming from, what we want to see in the future, and how we can achieve a better future for both our people.' Still, he acknowledged the risks: 'Doing something for the first time is always overwhelming and has its challenges. But I think we need to be more brave about speaking the truth if we want to move forward.' Martini also warned that continued Israeli military activity inside Syria could undermine diplomacy. 'The nonstop incursions of the Israeli military occupying certain towns and villages in southern Syria, where some Syrians have been killed and wounded—this is really hampering broader peace initiatives.' The event was organized by the Coalition for Regional Security, a think tank established in 2023 to advance Israeli–Arab cooperation. Its founding partner, Lianne Pollak‑David, told The Media Line that the moment was carefully designed to be both symbolic and substantive. 'We must revive the discourse on a regional arrangement,' she said, 'but it's not enough to just have billboards and TV studio discussions. The regional agreement must be the compass for the entire pragmatic camp in Israel.' She added that the presence of both Syrian and Saudi representatives sent a powerful signal. 'These are not just any voices,' she said. 'These are courageous voices from two countries that are often perceived as unreachable. Their presence showed that a regional alliance of moderates is not a dream; it's already taking shape.' Only opposition members attended the caucus event, including Yair Lapid, Benny Gantz, and Gilad Kariv. When asked about the coalition's absence, Pollak‑David noted: 'The coalition was invited. They decided not to show. I believe that for some Knesset members, it simply doesn't align with their agenda.' Gilad Kariv, caucus chairman, declared: 'What must begin with a comprehensive deal to end the war and bring all our hostages home, can and must continue with courageous agreements that will change the face of the region, establish an alliance of moderates against the axis of Iran and its proxies, and bring hope to both peoples in this land.' Ram Ben Barak, a former Mossad deputy director and co‑chair of the caucus, added: 'If we do not turn the military achievements into a diplomatic achievement that will end the war and create a new Middle Eastern political horizon, we will miss a historic opportunity that may not return.' Opposition leader Yair Lapid emphasized: 'Any regional agreement must begin with Egypt taking a 15‑year mandate over Gaza. It's the least bad option—they ruled there in the past.' Benny Gantz, head of the National Unity party, stated: 'October 7th happened, among other reasons, to stop the process of normalization. The just war we are in must end with the return of the hostages and a normalization agreement.' Al‑Khamis, known for his support of regional engagement, also addressed the caucus. 'It is unacceptable for people to be imprisoned in Gaza,' he said. 'If Israel uses this moment to deepen the occupation and humiliate Gaza, it will lose not only Saudi Arabia, but the entire Arab world.' Other participants included Nimrod Dweck, CEO of the Darkenu movement, and Hiba Qasas, executive director of the Uniting for a Shared Future coalition. Dweck described the caucus as 'a powerful answer to the government's dangerous policies in the West Bank.' At the same time, Qasas referenced a recent letter from President Mahmoud Abbas outlining five concrete commitments for reform and disarmament in Gaza. Asked by The Media Line whether he believes it is safe to return to Syria after such a high‑profile visit, Martini replied: 'Oh, well, I hope so. This is not my first time visiting Israel. I've been public about it before, and until now, it wasn't an issue when I was going back to Syria.' A source in the Syrian Foreign Ministry, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Media Line that a review of foreign relations is currently underway. 'Opening up to Israel is not off the table,' the source said, 'but it requires internal consensus and sensitivity to public sentiment.' The coming weeks will determine whether this rare window of opportunity will be seized or lost once again.
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A Senate vote this week will test the popularity of DOGE spending cuts
The House has already approved Trump's request on a mostly party line 214-212 vote. The Senate has little time to spare to beat the deadline for the president's signature. Another House vote will be needed if senators amend the legislation, adding more uncertainty to the outcome. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's a closer look at this week's debate. Advertisement Public media on the chopping block Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount it's due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System to support national programming. The potential fallout from the cuts for local pubic media stations has generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle. Advertisement Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he's worried about how the rescissions will hit radio stations that broadcast to Native Americans in his state. He said the vast majority of their funding comes from the federal government. 'They're not political in nature,' Rounds said of the stations. 'It's the only way of really communicating in the very rural areas of our state, and a lot of other states as well.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said that for the tribal radio stations in her state, 'almost to a number, they're saying that they will go under if public broadcasting funds are no longer available to them.' To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a wide range of a program's funding as wasteful. In recent testimony, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought criticized programming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion. He said NPR aired a 2022 program entitled 'What 'Queer Ducks' can teach teenagers about sexuality in the animal kingdom.' He also cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with 'Sesame Street' about combatting racism. Targeting humanitarian aid As part of the package, Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind about $8.3 billion in foreign aid programs that aim to fight famine and disease and promote global stability. Among the targets: — $900 million to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases and strengthen detections systems to prevent wider epidemics. — $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. — $4.15 billion for two programs designed to boost the economies and democratic institutions in developing and strategically important countries. Advertisement — $496 million to provide humanitarian assistance such as food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. Some of the health cuts are aimed at a program known as PEPFAR, which President George W. Bush, a Republican, began to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries. The program is credited with saving 26 million lives and has broad bipartisan support. On PEPFAR, Vought told senators 'these cuts are surgical and specifically preserve life-saving assistance.' But many lawmakers are wary, saying they've seen no details about where specifically the administration will cut. The administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more efficient and seek contributions from other nations, 'putting American taxpayers first.' U.S. leaders have often argued that aiding other nations through 'soft power' is not just the right thing to do but also the smart thing. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told Vought there is 'plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding,' but he called the administration's attempt to root it out 'unnecessarily chaotic.' 'In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies, you've created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill,' McConnell told Vought. Trump weighs in The president has issued a warning on his social media site directly aimed at individual Senate Republicans who may be considering voting against the cuts. He said it was important that all Republicans adhere to the bill and in particular defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,' he said. Advertisement For individual Republicans seeking reelection, the prospect of Trump working to defeat them is reason for pause and could be a sign the package is teetering. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opted to announce he would not seek reelection recently after the president called for a primary challenger to the senator when he voted not to advance Trump's massive tax and spending cut bill. Getting around a filibuster Spending bills before the 100-member Senate almost always need some bipartisan buy-in to pass. That's because the bills need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and advance. But this week's effort is different. Congress set up a process back when Republican Richard Nixon was president for speedily considering a request to claw back previously approved spending authority. Under those procedures, it takes only a simple Senate majority to advance the president's request to a final vote. It's a rarely employed maneuver. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush, a Republican, had some success with his rescissions request, though the final bill included some cuts requested by the president and many that were not. Trump proposed 38 rescissions in 2018, but the package stalled in the Senate. If senators vote to take up the bill, it sets up the potential for 10 hours of debate plus votes on scores of potentially thorny amendments in what is known as a vote-a-rama. Democrats see the president's request as an effort to erode the Senate filibuster. They warn it's absurd to expect them to work with GOP lawmakers on bipartisan spending measures if Republicans turn around a few months later and use their majority to cut the parts they don't like. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer offered a stern warning in a letter to colleagues: 'How Republicans answer this question on rescissions and other forthcoming issues will have grave implications for the Congress, the very role of the legislative branch, and, more importantly, our country,' Schumer said. Advertisement Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., took note of the warning. 'I was disappointed to see the Democrat leader in his recent Dear Colleague letter implicitly threaten to shut down the government,' Thune said. The Trump administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along.
