Top European holiday destination to let British travellers skip lengthy passport queues this summer
HOLIDAYMAKERS heading to Portugal will face shorter airport queues THIS WEEK with Brits able to use e-gates.
The sunshine destination will become the first country to allow UK passport holders to use the system since Sir Keir Starmer struck a deal with Brussels.
1
Travellers have had to queue to have their passports stamped when arriving for their break since the UK left the European Union - often leading to long queues.
Around 2.5 million people head to Portugal each year with more with 300,000 heading to the Algarve. Around 50,000 Brits live in the country.
It has now been confirmed that holidaymakers heading to Faro airport will be able to use the hi-tech system.
Europe relations Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests - good for bills, borders and jobs.
"It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers.
"Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week."
Only last month, EU relations minister Thomas-Symonds strongly hinted that Brits will face less time waiting at border control.
He said: 'I would love to see you being able to go through the border more quickly in that way.
'That's certainly something we've been pushing with the EU and I think that will be something that will be very helpful to British people.'
The Prime Minister revealed details of Brits using e-gates during the first summit between Britain and the European Union.
But the use of e-gates had to be given the green light by individual countries.
The PM came under fire by explicitly saying that ''Brits travelling to Europe will now be able to use e-gates'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper.
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Jet2's new flights to connect the UK to two Spanish beach cities
JET2 will launch exclusive new flights from the UK to two affordable Spanish cities. Leaving from regional airports, Brits can head over to Malaga and Majorca with the airline from next summer, and they'll continue through the winter months. 4 Jet2 has revealed new winter routes for 2026 - with tickets already on sale. One of the exclusive routes goes from Bournemouth to Malaga. This route will begin in July 2026 and continue until November of that year. The Spanish city is a great place for winter sun as it has highs of 24C in October, and it's only two hours away from the UK. Malaga has more than 105 miles of sandy beaches making it the perfect spot for sunbathing. The beaches are usually bordered by palm trees and adorned with colourful parasols. It's also popular for watersports enthusiasts, and there's hundreds of restaurants too. The other exclusive route from Jet2 is from London Luton to Palma Majorca. The route is already in action for summer 2025, and will continue until November. It will then pause before beginning again in March 2026 and continuing through to November. The Sun explores Majorca 4 Flights will begin again in February and March 2027. The capital of Majorca, Palma, is a popular winter holiday destination because daytime averages in winter are usually around 17C. Although temperatures during December have highs of 26C in recent years. Playa de Palma and Cala Major are two of Palma's best beaches, with golden sands and crystal-clear seas. There's the option to sunbathe, but the city centre has lots of culture to see and explore. The winter time will inevitably offer a more relaxed time away as it's out of peak season. Jet2 has converted a number of summer seasonal routes into year-round flights too. The extended routes are from Bristol to Athens in Greece and Almeria, Bilbao and Murcia in Spain. The flights are already on sale. Jet2 launched new flights from UK airport for first time ever earlier this year. The airline also revealed plans for a new winter sun destination where it's 24C in December.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Downing Street ‘welcomes' ECHR debate as Badenoch launches exit probe
Downing Street has welcomed discussion about changing how the European Convention on Human Rights operates. A Number 10 spokesman said on Friday it is 'important' there is discussion on how the system works, after Alain Berset, the secretary-general of the Council of Europe, said in a rare interview there should be 'no taboo' about changing the rules of the agreement. It comes as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the ECHR had become a 'sword used to attack democratic decisions' and launched a review into whether she would commit to leaving the agreement. Asked about Mr Berset's remarks, a Number 10 spokesman said on Friday: 'Border security is vital to national security, and we welcome efforts to ensure the European Convention on Human Rights is being applied correctly and allowing countries to protect their borders. 'It's important there is discussion on how the ECHR operates to ensure it can safeguard human rights while meeting the needs of democracies. The Prime Minister has been clear on this, it should be parliament that makes the rules on immigration and government that makes the policy.' On Friday, Mrs Badenoch announced a review to be spearheaded by her shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson, to look into whether the UK should withdraw from the treaty which underpins human rights law. 'The ECHR is now being used in ways never intended by its original authors,' she told a Westminster event. 'It should be a shield to protect, instead, it's become a sword, a sword used to attack democratic decisions and common sense. 'This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity.' She said she was tasking her shadow minister Lord Wolfson with examining 'what the unintended consequences might be' if the UK were to leave the ECHR. 'Because it is clear that the ECHR is a major issue, I'm not asking Lord Wolfson if we should leave, that's a political not a legal question,' she said. 'I'm asking him to set out how we would leave and to consider what the unintended consequences might be, not least in Northern Ireland, if we decide to go down this route, we must do so knowingly.' Shadow home secretary Chris Philp suggested earlier on Friday that the ECHR could not be reformed. He told the BBC: 'I don't really take that very seriously. There have been previous attempts to do it.'
