logo
Masters of wit caught in a storm of change

Masters of wit caught in a storm of change

Straits Timesa day ago
Life's Like This! by Straits Times senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew and The House Of Lim by then Straits Times artist Cheah Sin Ann were among the comics published in The Sunday Times on Nov 20, 1994.
Their take on life is different – sharper, more biting.
Through artful strokes, cartoonists illuminate, entertain and provoke, often leaving a lasting impression after the ink dries or the screen fades.
Their licence to wield humour like a knife for social or political commentary has earned them fans and critics.
Senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew, 58 , knows this well. His long-running strip, Chew On It! , which began as Life's Like This! in 1991, has chronicled everyday idiosyncrasies for three decades.
'I'm partial to doodling about things that I find exasperating, for example, littering and people who cycle on pedestrian walkways,' he says.
A cartoon on job loss (top left) caused by artificial intelligence from senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew.
PHOTO: ST FILE
But poking fun, even at mundane issues, has never been an easy business. Mr Lee recalls a 1994 cartoon satirising a television advertisement that claimed better colour quality than a rival's. His comic character quipped: 'If I can already see their more vibrant colour difference in my set here, why should I still go and buy theirs?' The TV company didn't find it funny.
Cartoons have been a part of Singapore's media landscape since the late 19th century.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun
Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3
Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA
Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder
Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean
Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges
Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat
One of the earliest known satirical publications, The Straits Produce, was published in 1868 and modelled on Britain's Punch magazine. Printed by the Straits Times Press, it skewered colonial society and politics, but ceased publication in the 1930s.
The Straits Times itself started featuring cartoons and caricatures in the 1930s, when the paper was under editor George William Seabridge. During his editorship from 1928 to 1942, Seabridge also increased the number of pages and introduced photographs, creating a visually more appealing product.
From around 1953, special pages in the Sunday edition of The Straits Times were devoted to syndicated comics . These early strips included The Cisco Kid, 'your Wild West favourite', the adventures of Tarzan, the misadventures of Blondie and her husband Dagwood, and Peanuts featuring Snoopy and Charlie Brown.
Over time, these comics adapted to the changing world. Blondie, for instance, evolved from a carefree flapper girl to a middle-class housewife who started a catering business. In the 1990s and early 2000s, syndicated strips like Calvin And Hobbes, Garfield, and Baby Blues struck a chord with readers.
Writer and researcher C.T. Lim, 53, who has studied the history of cartooning in Singapore, notes that when the paper had more space, it tended to run serialised adventure comic strips like Tarzan. When space shrunk, gag-oriented strips such as Garfield became the norm.
Alongside syndicated cartoons, editorial cartoons by the paper's artists began to appear in the late 1950s, often taking sharp aim at political or social issues.
In an opinion piece in 2015 for The Straits Times, American journalist Tom Plate spoke about the editorial cartoonist's 'crazy mind that could twist a lance into your brain to make a point that you knew in your heart was true'.
As he explained in the article headlined 'Cartoonists – the 'mad men' of journalism': 'At their lampooning best, which is when they are at their meanest, they hardly ever show any mercy – only respect for the truth... even if it is the truth as they see it.'
Political humour
After the Japanese Occupation in 1945, local cartoonists picked up their pens to push for political change and challenge colonial authority.
Researcher Mr Lim describes the late 1950s as The Straits Times' most vibrant era for political cartooning, driven by intense public debate over decolonisation and independence. This climate encouraged cartoons that critiqued political leaders and social issues.
A key figure then was cartoonist Tan Huay Peng, known for his sharp social commentary. Mr Lim highlights a May 2, 1959, cartoon by Mr Tan that used boxing imagery to represent the fierce election campaigning that year.
A cartoon on May 2, 1959, by Mr Tan Huay Peng on the fierce election campaigning that year.
PHOTO: ST FILE
In an online article 'The history of comics and cartoons in Singapore and Malaysia', Mr Lim notes that the British in colonial Singapore allowed and encouraged a certain amount of freedom of speech that was part of the Western democratic tradition.
'They wanted to ensure those who inherit their colonies were English-educated and friendly to their economic and strategic interests,' he writes.
But from 1961, when Singapore was self-governing but not yet independent, political cartoons became rare.
Mr Lim attributes this to three factors: the tense political climate; a view among senior leaders from the People's Action Party that The Straits Times was too critical of it, despite the paper's favourable stance towards the party ; and the nature of political cartoons being satirical.
'For the PAP, politics was not a matter of a game or a sport as portrayed in political cartoons. It was a matter of life and death, especially during the volatile political climate of that period,' says Mr Lim.
Discussions to bring back political humour resumed in the late 1970s, with group editor Peter H.L. Lim viewing political satire as a sign of Singapore's growing political maturity, Mr C.T. Lim says in another article, 'Singapore political cartooning', for the Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science.
An example was a series of cartoons on the lighter side of the 1979 by-elections by Straits Times cartoonist Shamsuddin H. Akib titled 'Sham's election smile' . In one strip, an old woman tells a child how she wishes every day were campaigning day so that strangers would come and see her and make her feel important.
Former Straits Times cartoonist Shamsuddin H. Akib's work on Feb 6, 1979.
PHOTO: ST FILE
However, in 1981, the unexpected victory of opposition candidate J.B. Jeyaretnam in the Anson by-election led to criticism of The Straits Times' election coverage. Political cartoonists again had to retreat, says Mr C.T. Lim.
By the 1990s, there was a gradual loosening of editorial boundaries. Mr C.T. Lim observes that more space for editorial cartoons returned when Mr Goh Chok Tong became prime minister in 1990.
Indeed, in 1991, The Straits Times hired six Filipino artists, three of them political cartoonists. Their target was often everyday issues and international affairs, which they depicted in cartoons and op-ed illustrations.
Cartoonist Miel joined The Straits Times in 1992 and one of his first cartoons was on the changeover of prime ministers within two months in Japan, drawn as an origami. It won him an in-house annual award.
'We were allowed to have our opinion, but there was a discussion and we would work towards a consensus,' he says about how editorial cartoons were developed. 'There was no outright 'no you cannot do it' but we would work towards what could be easily digested.'
Retired cartoonist Miel's origami on the changeover of Japan's prime ministers was published on July 7, 1994.
PHOTO: ST FILE
Mr Miel, 61, who retired from the paper in 2025, adds: 'The role that we played was to make it easy for people to understand the changes taking place, the policies.'
Senior executive artist Manuel A. Francisco, 55, who joined the paper in 2007, says restrictions often 'force you to think out of the box and to be more creative'.
'It has been easier to do economic and social issues, but for political and religious issues, we have to be careful,' he says.
As to how he comes up with the visuals, he says that symbolic images pop up in his head as he reads a story he has to illustrate . For instance, going through an article about corruption, an alligator in a suit came to mind.
In an environment where political cartooning had boundaries, comic strips like 'The House Of Lim' offered another form of commentary. The daily strip by Cheah Sin Ann ran for eight years straddling the 1980s and 1990s. It featured a relatable Singaporean family spanning three generations and its appeal lay not just in the familiar characters but also how he would build up a situation only to end with an unexpected punchline.
A report on June 15, 1991, on a book containing The House Of Lim comics.
PHOTO: ST FILE
Heyday over?
The rise of digital media has led to declining newspaper revenues globally, resulting in fewer opportunities for editorial cartoonists and the disappearance of many syndicated comic strips from print.
According to a 2012 study by The Herb Block Foundation, the number of full-time editorial cartoonists in American newspapers dropped from about 2,000 at the start of the 20th century to over 250 by 2000, and to fewer than 20 in locally owned outlets by 2023.
American cartoonist Rob Tornoe, writing in Editor & Publisher magazine, noted that in 2022, Australia's two major media companies – News Corp Australia and Nine Entertainment – axed all comic strips from their publications.
McClatchy, a US media group, dropped editorial cartoons in 2021, citing changing reader preferences.
Cartoonist Lee says cartoons lose some of their impact on a smartphone screen compared with the large canvas of a printed newspaper page. He adds that the proliferation of digital content – from webtoons to manga – creates fierce competition for attention.
'There are so many things grabbing every reader's attention on their devices,' he says.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered the creative space with its ability to generate images. But artists remain sceptical of its ability to match human insights or wit.
Straits Times art editor Lee Hup Kheng, 62, says AI can imitate visual styles and churn out cartoon-like images and animations, but falls short of crafting original, personal cartoons that capture an artist's voice, humour and life experiences.
'In editorial cartooning, the real magic comes from raw feelings like anger, frustration, happiness – real human emotions that machines just don't have,' he says.
'A fellow cartoonist once told me, 'AI lacks soul'. That's the case. For now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction
‘Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

‘Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction

Find out what's new on ST website and app. SINGAPORE – The first sign that something was amiss was when Mary's (not her real name) husband shut himself inside the bedroom, ignoring his wife and two young sons. The once loving husband and father turned violent, wrecking things at home, kicking doors in the middle of the night. One day, he collapsed in the living room, his body slouched against the wall, with a vape in hand. Since The Straits Times launched its anti-vaping campaign, Vaping: The Invisible Crisis , on July 13, several readers have written in to share their experiences about loved ones vaping. Some said they never knew the effects vapes had on a user's health, while others called for vaping legislation to be strengthened. Three readers e-mailed ST about how vaping and Kpods, which contain the powerful anaesthetic drug etomidate , have ruined their families. Used in hospitals for inducing sedation during medical procedures, etomidate is designed to be injected directly into the veins under clinical supervision and never intended to be inhaled. When vaped, etomidate enters the lungs directly, potentially triggering spasms, breathing difficulties, seizures and even psychosis. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Las Vegas Sands' new development part of S'pore's broader, more ambitious transformation: PM Wong Singapore Economic headwinds do not dampen outlook for new Marina Bay development: Las Vegas Sands president Business MAS records net profit of $19.7 billion, fuelled by investment gains Singapore Man charged with attempted murder of woman at Kallang Wave Mall Singapore CDL's long-time director Philip Yeo to depart after boardroom feud Singapore Ex-cleaner jailed over safety lapses linked to guard's death near 1-Altitude rooftop bar Life The Violinist, Singapore's first animated historical film, set for August 2026 release Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years Sons scared of father For years, the two boys, aged seven and nine, had always known their father to be a loving and doting man. But everything changed when the man, 41, used Kpods. Mary, 35, said her husband was so depressed he could not work, and got fired from his technician job. Mary, who works in marketing, said her husband spiralled into repeated episodes of violence, emotional outbursts and dangerous behaviour while using Kpods. One night, the family heard him destroying things around the home as they hid in the bedroom. The next morning, they saw their microwave badly damaged. The microwave that Mary's husband damaged and destroyed after using Kpods. PHOTO: COURTESY OF MARY Mary's younger son, who has autism, became afraid of his father. She said: 'They used to be close and would play badminton together. But he soon became fearful of his father. My husband would also snap at my older son. He was traumatised and anxious after being yelled at so many times.' In May, Mary moved to her mother's place with her sons, and has filed for divorce. She said: 'We dated for 10 years and were married for nine. Now, I don't even know who he is any more. Kpods broke our marriage and shattered our children.' Calling for stronger laws to tackle vaping, Mary added: 'I don't want another family to go through what we went through.' 'My sons are like zombies' One mother, who wanted to be known only as Ms Lim, 53, said she had seen her sons experience seizures from Kpods. When her 27-year-old son got a job as an antique shop assistant after his release from prison in July 2024, Ms Lim was hopeful about his future. Then, he was introduced to Kpods at a nightclub. He became sluggish, skipped work often and got fired. The Singaporean homemaker lives with her husband, who works overseas. She said: 'I can monitor my (older) son only using the CCTV in our home. I see him walking around like a zombie, and my neighbours would tell me they see him walking unsteadily and vaping openly in the park.' Her younger son was also addicted to vapes before he was convicted and jailed for assault in February. Ms Lim sent ST videos of her younger son trembling and struggling to close the gate to their flat after using Kpods in 2024. Her older son was fined by the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) four times for vaping. She said: 'Every time he gets fined and his Kpods get confiscated, he just gets new ones.' Ms Lim's 27-year-old son (left) using Kpods. PHOTO: COURTESY OF MS LIM Ms Lim said her older son has attempted suicide three times due to Kpods. In February, she bought him an e-bike after he promised to quit Kpods and get a job as a deliveryman. She found out he sold the e-bike to gamble and buy more vapes. Ms Lim said: 'I hope possessing and using vapes will become a crime that offenders can be jailed for. If that means my son getting jailed, then so be it. Because once he is behind bars, he will no longer have access to Kpods.' Possessing, using and buying e-vaporisers carry a maximum fine of $2,000. She added: 'My (older) son has attempted suicide before, and we have stopped him. But if he continues using Kpods, it would only be a matter of time before he dies.' Daughter vaped in toilet with boys When Sara (not her real name) received a call from her daughter, 13, at 4.30am to fetch her from a mall in Yishun, she feared the worst. The teen had been caught by the police vaping in a handicap-accessible toilet with three older boys. Sara, 55, who works in social services and is widowed, first found the girl's vape stash in her drawer in 2024. Different types of vapes belonging to Sara's 13-year-old daughter. PHOTO: COURTESY OF SARA Sara said: 'She used to vape secretly, but then vaped openly. She was caught vaping in Orchard (Road) and in Serangoon.' Sara said she had approached agencies for help, but still feels helpless. Her daughter is at a residential girls' home undergoing rehabilitation. To fuel her addiction, she would borrow money from friends and sell her clothes and make-up online for quick cash. She even stole money from her late father's drawer. Sara said: 'I have gone beyond depression, helplessness, tears and frustration. I need to maintain the relationship I have with her. That is all I have. 'But when I remind her about the damaging health effects vaping has, she just sniggers at me. I am at my wits' end.' Referring to ST's anti-vape campaign, she said: 'With this push, I hope there will be a review of the law and (it will) open up space for conversations on this issue. Kids are suffering. Parents are suffering.' Classify etomidate as a drug: Vikram Nair Mr Vikram Nair, chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Home Affairs and Law, acknowledged the growing problem of vaping in Singapore and called for a much stricter regime for etomidate. Mr Nair, who is an MP for Sembawang GRC, said: 'I am in favour of etomidate being classified as a drug. The main purpose is for harsher penalties for those trafficking it. This would also permit ordering mandatory treatment for addicts and those caught using it.' Referring to the ST video of an HSA officer diving into a moving car to stop a suspected vape peddler from escaping, Mr Nair said: 'HSA is doing the best they can about this issue. I have seen stories on their crackdowns and the dramatic video with the car. 'But if the penalties are somewhat limited after their arrests, there is only so much that can be done under the current framework.' Former Jurong GRC MP Tan Wu Meng said more than 10 Clementi residents, mostly young parents, had spoken to him in 2025 of their concerns of vaping before he retired from politics in April. He said one 13-year-old girl told him she was worried her friends could get vapes so easily. In January and March, Dr Tan raised the issue in Parliament. He brought up a case of a parent reporting the child to the police for vaping, and the child getting fined by HSA. Dr Tan then called for agencies to consider helping children curb their addiction rather than handing them fines. He told ST: 'We won't want vaping to be a crack in Singapore's defences against illegal drugs. So, the legislation needs to be looked at, and the agencies need to study ways to handle such vaping devices more effectively and with more muscle.'

High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack

Singapore Law Watch

timea day ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack

High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Source: Straits Times Article Date: 15 Jul 2025 Author: David Sun The High Court emphasised the severity of his actions, highlighting the betrayal of public trust and the disastrous consequences of drink driving, despite his compensation. Despite severe penalties and jail time, some drivers continue to gamble with their lives and those of others, said the High Court. And in the case of Jeremiah Ng En You, 36, who killed one person and injured six others in December 2021, the heaviest punishment for him will be the lifelong burden of knowing that his irresponsible and selfish action of drink driving claimed an innocent life, it added. On July 14, the High Court published its grounds of decision for dismissing Ng's appeal against his seven-year jail sentence for dangerous driving causing death. It had made the judgment on March 19. The court noted that while he had shown remorse by making voluntary compensation of about $457,000, such efforts were outweighed by the harm caused by the accident. Ng was sentenced in October 2023 after pleading guilty to one count of drink driving and another for causing the death of a Gojek driver by driving in a dangerous manner. He will also be disqualified from driving for 12 years after his release. The district judge who sentenced him at the time had said he treated the roads 'like the Grand Prix driving circuit'. On the night of Dec 23, 2021, Ng had dinner with his brother and two friends at his office in Tampines Street 93, and drank four cans of beer. When they left at about 11pm, Ng got behind the wheel of his brother's car, while the brother sat in the front passenger seat. He sped along Tampines Avenue 1 at around 11.10pm, travelling at between 157kmh and 169kmh, even though the speed limit there is 60kmh. As he approached the junction of Tampines Avenue 1 and Tampines Avenue 10, he slowed down to between 122kmh and 130kmh, but lost control of the vehicle as he was about to turn left. Instead, the car went straight, smashing through the centre divider along Tampines Avenue 10 and crashing into the side of a car driven by a Gojek driver who had two passengers at the time. The private-hire car then struck the right side of a second car and the front of a third car. A motorcycle was passing between the Gojek car and the second car at the time, and the motorcyclist was crushed between both vehicles. The second car also hit the right side of a nearby taxi. Officers who arrived at the scene shortly after found Ng reeking of alcohol. They arrested him after he failed a breathalyser test. The 59-year-old Gojek driver was pronounced dead at 12.01am the next day after he was taken to Changi General Hospital. Six others, including the two passengers in the Gojek car, were injured. The motorcyclist who was crushed between the two cars had the most significant injuries, including traumatic brain injury and fractures that left him with long-term disabilities. In its grounds of decision for dismissing Ng's appeal against his sentence, the High Court said this was considered one of the most serious cases of dangerous driving while under the influence of drink. It said: 'It is plainly foolish and hazardous to drive in this manner on any occasion. Our public roads are not a racetrack.' The High Court added that this warranted the maximum jail term of 10 years, which was reduced by 30 per cent on the basis that Ng pleaded guilty. It said that while it was honourable and remorseful of Ng to make voluntary compensation of around $457,000, this was outweighed by the death, injuries and property damage caused. Hence, it could not find sufficient mitigating reasons to reduce the sentence. For dangerous driving causing death, an offender can be jailed for between two and eight years as a first-time offender. If the offender is a serious offender, he can be jailed for between one year and two years more. The penalties for drink driving for a first-time offender is a jail term of up to 12 months, a fine of between $2,000 and $10,000, or both. Offenders may also face driving bans. The High Court said: 'In a country where order and general public safety define daily life, the decision to drive under the influence stands out not just as a reckless act, but as a dangerous betrayal of public trust. 'Drink driving is not just about broken laws or a mere lapse in judgment; it is about preventable tragedies and an act of seeming convenience with potentially disastrous consequences.' Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Ng En You Jeremiah (alias Huang Enyou) v Public Prosecutor [2025] SGHC 135 Print

Woman opened bank accounts that received over $640.7m including scam proceeds, earned $170k commissions
Woman opened bank accounts that received over $640.7m including scam proceeds, earned $170k commissions

Straits Times

timea day ago

  • Straits Times

Woman opened bank accounts that received over $640.7m including scam proceeds, earned $170k commissions

Shaffiq Alkhatib The Straits Times July 14, 2025 A woman who incorporated a wholesale trading firm whose bank accounts later received more than US$500 million (S$640.7 million), including scam proceeds, was sentenced to one year and six months' jail on July 14. Singaporean Zin Nwe Nyunt, 58, had admitted that she did not know where the money came from. In earlier proceedings, the court heard that in August 2021, police received information that an Australian investment scam victim had transferred US$1.8 million to several bank accounts maintained by companies in Singapore. Three of the companies later transferred more than $480,000 in scam proceeds to a bank account belonging to a firm called Unione, which Zin Nwe Nyunt had incorporated. In March, she pleaded guilty to two counts of working together with a male Myanmar national - her husband's childhood friend - to carry out a business of providing a payment service in Singapore without a licence. She had earned "commissions" of over $170,000, while Nyan Win, the man she worked with, received over $110,000. The latter, a 61-year-old Singapore permanent resident, had earlier pleaded guilty to similar charges and is expected to be sentenced on July 30. It all started in 2019 when a Myanmar national known as Ko Phillip, who purportedly operated a commodities trading business, told Nyan Win that he was looking for someone to incorporate a company in Singapore to assist him in his business. The company in Singapore would then open corporate bank accounts, which would be used to receive and transfer funds on Ko Phillip's instructions. Under this arrangement, he offered Nyan Win a commission of 0.5 Myanmar kyat (0.03 Singapore cent) for every US$1 received. Nyan Win was interested in this opportunity. However, he was uncertain whether he could set up a corporate bank account through Piyar International, a company that dealt with motor vehicles, where he was a director. Without revealing details, Deputy Public Prosecutor Ryan Lim told the court in March that this was because banks had previously closed Piyar's corporate bank accounts. Nyan Win then approached Zin Nwe Nyunt's husband and told him about this potential business opportunity with Ko Phillip. As the husband was holding a full-time job, he suggested that Zin Nwe Nyunt assist in the new firm's incorporation instead. It was later agreed between Zin Nwe Nyunt and Nyan Win that the corporate bank accounts would be controlled by Nyan Win. Commissions would then be split between the pair. Zin Nwe Nyunt incorporated Unione and, at different times, opened one corporate account each with three banks. She then handed over information, including the internet banking details, to Nyan Win. DPP Lim said that from 2020 to 2021, Nyan Win liaised with Ko Phillip to make arrangements for money to be sent to Unione's corporate bank accounts. Zin Nwe Nyunt and Nyan Win did not know where the funds came from. However, the pair also did not perform any checks to ascertain the nature of the funds received or the legitimacy of Ko Phillip's claims that he was operating a "commodities business". Between January and July 2020, Nyan Win used one of Unione's bank accounts to receive more than US$150 million before the money was transferred out. On July 21, 2020, the bank closed the account due to many suspicious transactions. Following the closure of this account, Zin Nwe Nyunt took instructions from Nyan Win and opened a corporate account with another bank. Between July 2020 and April 2021, Nyan Win used this new account to receive more than US$250 million before the money was transferred out. DPP Lim said that between Aug 18, 2020, and March 24, 2021, a third bank account was used to receive more than US$127 million and over US$119 million was transferred out. On July 14, Zin Nwe Nyunt's bail was set at $20,000. She is expected to begin serving her sentence on Aug 15. Click here to contribute a story or submit it to our WhatsApp Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store