
Experts say a certain tick bite might make you allergic to red meat
It's nearly peak tick season and bites from the bugs may come with dangerous consequences for meat lovers — and everyone exposed.
Three species are associated with a red meat allergy that can manifest in response to a bite, researchers found recently.
The allergy is known as alpha-gal syndrome, which is also a potentially life-threatening condition. Scientists think that the sugar molecule certain tick species carry, called alpha-gal, gets into people's bodies, can disrupt their immune systems, and lead to a possibly deadly allergic reaction.
Previously, it was believed that lone star ticks, which are found east of the Rocky Mountains, were the only species capable of triggering the disease.
'It was a very surprising finding to us,' Hanna Oltean, an epidemiologist at Washington State Department of Health, told Science News on Tuesday.
Oltean was the corresponding author of a study published in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.
The study described the 2017 case of now-retired wildlife biologist Cathy Raley, who woke up with hives and later stopped being able to swallow at her home in Washington state.
Another study detailed a similar incident in 2022 when a 45-year-old Maine woman discovered a western black-legged tick on her left bicep after walking on a wooded path. Nearly 10 days after the bite and following a meal of roasted rabbit, the unidentified subject began to experience abdominal pain. That pain continued after eating red meat.
'A severe episode of diarrhea and vomiting hours after beef consumption prompted the patient to visit a healthcare provider 20 days after the tick bite,' the study's authors said. The woman was able to resume eating red meat ten months after her first symptoms.
The tick that had bitten her was a deer tick. There are dozens of species found across the United States.
'U.S. health and public health professionals should be aware of AGS outside the established lone star tick range,' the researchers warned.
Even among healthcare providers, alpha-gal syndrome is not very well-known. There have been about 110,000 suspected cases across the U.S. from 2010 to 2022. However, researchers think that may be an undercount. Delayed symptoms can also make it hard to diagnose.
Developing alpha-gal can cause a serious allergic reaction called anaphylaxis that can be deadly without treatment with a shot of prescription medicine called epinephrine, also known as adrenaline.
There's no cure for the condition, and reducing exposure is the best defense against tickborne illness.
Oltean says ticks commonly come out and seek 'blood meals' between March and May. However, warmer temperatures driven by climate change have meant ticks appear earlier, stay later, and thrive in a wider geographic range.
'It's important for people to be aware of the risk so that they can take appropriate precautions,' Oltean said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
2 days ago
- NBC News
CDC says parents can decide with doctors if healthy kids get Covid shots
The nation's top public health agency posted new recommendations that say healthy children and pregnant women may get Covid vaccinations, removing stronger language that those groups should get the shots. The change comes days after U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that Covid vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. But the updated guidance on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's website sends a more nuanced message, saying shots 'may' be given to those groups. 'The announcement from earlier this week sounded like CDC was going to fully withdraw any statement that could be construed as a recommendation for these vaccines in these populations,' said Jason Schwartz, a Yale University health policy researcher. 'It's not as bad as it could have been.' Kennedy announced the coming changes in a 58-second video posted on the social media site X on Tuesday. No one from the CDC was in the video, and CDC officials have referred questions about the announcement to Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. On Thursday, the CDC updated its website. The agency said that shots may be given to children ages 6 months to 17 years who do not have moderate or severe problems with their immune systems. Instead of recommending the shots, the CDC now says parents may decide to get their children vaccinated in consultation with a doctor. A subtle update to a CDC page on the adult immunization schedule indicated a similar change for the recommendation for pregnant women, excluding them from the routine recommendation made for other adults. 'The old COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children under 18 and for pregnant women have been removed from the CDC vaccine schedule,' a HHS spokesperson said in a statement. 'The CDC and HHS encourage individuals to talk with their healthcare provider about any personal medical decision.' That kind of recommendation, known as shared decision-making, still means health insurers must pay for the vaccinations, according to the CDC. However, experts say vaccination rates tend to be lower when health authorities use that language and doctors are less emphatic with patients about getting shots. Childhood vaccination rates for Covid are already low — just 13% of children and 23% of adults have received the 2024-25 Covid vaccine, according to CDC data. Talk of changing the recommendations has been brewing. As the Covid pandemic has waned, experts have discussed the possibility of focusing vaccination efforts on people 65 and older — who are among those most as risk for death and hospitalization. A CDC advisory panel is set to meet in June to make recommendations about the fall shots. Among its options are suggesting shots for high-risk groups but still giving lower-risk people the choice to get vaccinated. A committee work group has endorsed the idea. But Kennedy, a leading anti-vaccine advocate before becoming health secretary, decided not to wait for the scientific panel's review. The new vaccine recommendation changes, their timing and the way there were announced have created confusion that can be 'incredibly harmful to the success of vaccination programs,' Schwartz said. 'It would be understandable if the public is completely baffled in terms of what the federal government thinks and what the science suggests ... about the evidence for the safety and value of these vaccines,' he added.


The Herald Scotland
5 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kennedy shouldn't decide who gets a COVID-19 vaccine
The announcement was made in the same way quack wellness influencers and dimwitted conspiracy theorists announce things: via a video posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, currently known as a fact-resistant den of looniness and hate. "I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule," Kennedy said in the clip. "Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children." RFK Jr. wants to make it harder to get COVID-19 boosters. Also, he's dumb. Kennedy, of course, provided no evidence to support his decision. He's allergic to evidence, and I assume he treats that allergy by taking occasional dips in sewage-filled creeks like any normal person whose noggin hosts a deceased brain worm might do. Back in the old days, when reality existed and the people in charge had actual qualifications, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employed an independent vaccine advisory panel that used this cool old concept known as "science" to determine who should get vaccines. Now, I guess, a leathery weirdo who spent much of his life lying about vaccines being dangerous gets to decide. Jesse Goodman, a former chief scientist at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and a Georgetown University infectious disease specialist, told the journal Science that vaccine decisions shouldn't come from administrators: "Those questions should be discussed in an advisory committee." Because, of course, they should. Kennedy thinks he's smarter than actual scientists, and it's going to kill us The CDC, prior to Kennedy opening his mouth, recommended that Americans older than 6 months get an annual coronavirus vaccine. There is evidence supporting the importance of pregnant women being vaccinated against the coronavirus, there is evidence supporting kids getting the booster and there is zero credible evidence supporting Kennedy's conspiracies that the vaccines are doing more harm than good. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Now, thanks to Kennedy's "I'm smart, science is dumb" policy, it's unclear how insurance companies will cover COVID-19 boosters for certain demographics, or whether shots will even be available to pregnant women or children without underlying conditions. The guy in charge of America's health is a self-obsessed conspiracy nut It's possible this will all work out fine, but it's also possible that it won't, and the key thing to remember is that Kennedy is one of the most consistently full-of-crap people on the planet. In 2024, RFK Jr. claimed that there wasn't "a single healthy kid who died from" COVID-19. But as The New York Times reported: "A review of data on 183 pediatric (COVID-19) deaths from 2020 to 2022 found that 32 percent of children who died did not have another medical condition." Opinion: Democrats want a liberal Joe Rogan to help them win elections. I'm right here. So I guess those healthy kids who died don't count in Kennedy's warped and wildly inaccurate world. Or maybe they're just collateral damage in his ongoing crusade against real science. Whatever RFK Jr. says to do to stay healthy, you should do the opposite When getting a vaccine, as with many decisions related to our health, it's important to look at statistical science. When it comes to the coronavirus vaccines, any potential risks are far, far lower than the risks associated with getting COVID-19. By contrast, I'd argue this: The risk of taking anything Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says about health seriously is far, far greater than the risk of doing the exact opposite of what he recommends. If Kennedy posted another evidence-free video on X saying the best way to avoid chronic hand pain is to NOT drive a nail through your palm, I would buy a nail gun and get down to palm-puncturing as swiftly as possible. America's health is in the hands of a well-established fool. It's embarrassing, and it will make staying healthy harder for all of us. It will also, unquestionably, make more people sick. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at


NBC News
5 days ago
- NBC News
RFK Jr. says COVID-19 vaccine no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on Tuesday that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is no longer recommending COVID-19 shots for healthy children and pregnant women. NBC News medical reporter Erika Edwards reports on the implications of the 27, 2025