New tool to see millions of cancer patients given faster diagnosis
Currently, NHS staff often grapple with fragmented data scattered across spreadsheets, emails, and various records. Cancer 360 eliminates this cumbersome process by digitising existing analogue systems, giving clinicians faster access to critical patient information. This improved efficiency is expected to benefit millions of cancer patients across the country.
The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) heralds this technology as a significant advancement in cancer care, allowing medical professionals to make quicker, more informed decisions, ultimately leading to faster diagnoses and improved patient outcomes.
Dr Vin Diwakar, NHS national clinical transformation director, said: 'Every cancer patient deserves swift, effective care, and our new Cancer 360 solution harnesses data to ensure exactly that. By giving clinicians a comprehensive view of patient pathways, we can identify and address delays immediately.
'The NHS federated data platform (FDP) is already showing its value in transforming cancer care, helping our hard-working staff deliver better outcomes while reducing administrative burden. As Cancer 360 expands to more hospitals nationwide, I'm confident we'll see meaningful improvements in both treatment times and patient experience.'
It is understood that trusts will not have to use the tool, but those not meeting the cancer standard – including that 85% of cancer patients should have started their treatment within 62 days of being referred – may be asked to consider how Cancer 360 could help them meet targets.
As well as helping patients get a faster diagnosis, the DHSC said Cancer 360 will also help cut treatment delays and thus boost survival rates.
The technology has been piloted at Royal United Hospital Bath, and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital.
It helped Chelsea and Westminster Hospital meet the faster diagnosis standard, whereby 75% of patients should receive a diagnosis or ruling out of cancer within 28 days of referral.
Suraiya Abdi, consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist at Chelsea and Westminster Foundation Trust, said: 'The implementation of Cancer 360 has enabled my team to monitor and safely carry our patients through their cancer pathway.
'The tool enables us to have in depth conversations at our weekly meetings regarding a patient's next step as well as allowing us to escalate queries directly to other teams for faster turnaround.
'The tool has reduced the amount of admin time spent by our cancer team therefore enabling them to focus on the patient journey. I have witnessed an improvement in performance, team spirit and most importantly patient experience.'
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said: 'I've seen first-hand the stress and heartbreak that cancer causes in my own family.
'Dependent on archaic pen-and-paper systems, life-saving diagnostics appointments hung on whether a post-it note lost its stick, or a piece of paper went missing. That put lives at risk, and with the technology we have today, there's no reason for any part of our healthcare service to run in such a way.
'Simply by keeping accurate records, the technology we are putting to work today will cut waiting times and save lives, delivering on our plan for change. That way, people can once again trust that their local hospital has the tools it needs to focus on what matters – treating their loved ones and keeping families together for longer.'
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the Government is investing £26 billion in the health service, adding: 'It's a long road but we're already getting our NHS back on its feet, giving patients over three million more appointments, hiring 1,500 new GPs and starting the roll-out of new tech that will save lives.'
The DHSC said Cancer 360, to be rolled out soon, will benefit millions of patients in the next five to 10 years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Baroness Amos to lead NHS maternity and neonatal investigation
Baroness Amos was selected by Health Secretary Wes Streeting after bereaved families expressed a preference for someone with distance from the NHS who is able to bring a fresh pair of eyes to the role, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. Mr Streeting has been meeting bereaved and harmed families who have been let down by maternity and neonatal services across the country, including in some of the worst affected trusts, DHSC added. In June, he announced that a national investigation into 'systemic' failures in NHS maternity care had been launched by the Government after families were 'gaslit' in their search for the truth. Baroness Amos is master of University College, Oxford, and was a UK Government minister and a senior official at the United Nations. Mr Streeting said: 'I have been appalled by the many harrowing stories I've heard from mothers and fathers let down by the NHS. 'Families asked for fresh eyes, independence and compassion – and that's why I've appointed Baroness Amos. Valerie has an outstanding record of leadership and driving change, nationally and internationally. She will work closely with families to uncover the truth, confront problems and drive the improvements needed so every woman and baby receives safe, high-quality care. 'Through our Plan for Change, we will rebuild the NHS to ensure no family suffers like this again.' Baroness Amos said: 'I will carry the weight of the loss suffered by families with me throughout this investigation. I hope that we will be able to provide the answers that families are seeking and support the NHS in identifying areas of care requiring urgent reform.' The investigation will look at up to 10 services in the country. It will also review the maternity and neonatal system, bringing together the findings of past reviews into one national set of actions, the DHSC said. It will begin work this summer and produce an initial set of national recommendations by December. The 10 maternity and neonatal units will be decided by Baroness Amos and her team, alongside the terms of reference of the investigation, which are being developed with families who have experiences of maternity and neonatal care, including in Leeds, Sussex and Nottingham, the DHSC added. The investigation is separate from the National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, which will be made up of a panel of experts and families, and chaired by Mr Streeting. Baroness Amos (PA) Gill Walton, chief executive of the RCM, said: 'We are pleased to hear of the appointment of Baroness Amos as chair of the rapid review. She has a reputation for taking a thoughtful and strategic approach and we welcome her fresh insight into maternity and neonatal safety. 'It is absolutely vital, though, that this review gets under way quickly. When he announced it in June, we welcomed Wes Streeting's commitment to publishing the review by Christmas, a promise he repeated at the Progress in Partnership summit on maternity and neonatal safety last month. 'However, we are already halfway through August, with no terms of reference, no sense of the trusts who are likely to be part of the review or no clarity on how the review will be conducted. 'Every woman and family should leave maternity and neonatal services whole, happy and healthy, and every member of maternity staff should start and end their shift knowing they have provided safe, good-quality care. 'At the moment, that simply isn't the case. Previous reviews and countless Care Quality Commission reports have flagged the same the systemic failings that are at the heart of the issues facing maternity and neonatal care issues time and time again: unsafe staffing, poor workplace cultures, and not listening to women. 'In spite of that, there has been no forward movement. Wes Streeting promised to change that. Thousands of midwives and maternity support workers, and the whole of the maternity community, are desperate for him to keep that promise and deliver the change we all want to see.' The RCM has also urged the review to look at examples of good maternity care, as well as where services are not meeting standards of care.
The Sun
31 minutes ago
- The Sun
NHS struggles to improve under Labour as waiting lists rose in June and patients still facing delays in A&E
NHS LISTS GROW While NHS England said staff 'pulled out all the stops' in June the backlog increased for the second time this year THE NHS is struggling to get better under Labour, figures suggest. Waiting lists rose in June and there are still unacceptable numbers of patients facing day-long delays in A&E, they show. 1 Data confirmed the recent British Medical Association strike was less damaging than previous ones. And while NHS England said staff 'pulled out all the stops' in June the backlog increased for the second time this year, from 7.36million to 7.37million. Dr Becks Fisher, of the Nuffield Trust think tank, said: 'The figures show the NHS waiting list has gone up slightly after falling over most months this year.' She added: 'It is still treating fewer patients than are being referred.' Danielle Henry, of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network, added: 'The NHS needs to rapidly increase the amount of activity it delivers if it is going to successfully reduce waiting lists by one million each year.' Official figures show improvements to A&E delays, cancer treatment times and ambulance response times but doctors said the system was still struggling. Dr Nick Murch, of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: 'Clinicians across the UK are reporting this week as one of the worst they have experienced. "Figures show an unacceptable amount of people — 35,467 — waited over 12 hours in emergency departments, often suffering avoidable harm.' Lib Dem MP Helen Morgan said: 'This Government is doing no better than treading water.' Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'We are getting on with the job of delivering progress in the face of strike action, and we will continue to put patients first.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Baroness Amos to lead NHS maternity and neonatal investigation
Baroness Amos was selected by Health Secretary Wes Streeting after bereaved families expressed a preference for someone with distance from the NHS who is able to bring a fresh pair of eyes to the role, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. Mr Streeting has been meeting bereaved and harmed families who have been let down by maternity and neonatal services across the country, including in some of the worst affected trusts, DHSC added. In June, he announced that a national investigation into 'systemic' failures in NHS maternity care had been launched by the Government after families were 'gaslit' in their search for the truth. Baroness Amos is master of University College, Oxford, and was a UK Government minister and a senior official at the United Nations. Mr Streeting said: 'I have been appalled by the many harrowing stories I've heard from mothers and fathers let down by the NHS. 'Families asked for fresh eyes, independence and compassion – and that's why I've appointed Baroness Amos. Valerie has an outstanding record of leadership and driving change, nationally and internationally. She will work closely with families to uncover the truth, confront problems and drive the improvements needed so every woman and baby receives safe, high-quality care. 'Through our Plan for Change, we will rebuild the NHS to ensure no family suffers like this again.' Baroness Amos said: 'I will carry the weight of the loss suffered by families with me throughout this investigation. I hope that we will be able to provide the answers that families are seeking and support the NHS in identifying areas of care requiring urgent reform.' The investigation will look at up to 10 services in the country. It will also review the maternity and neonatal system, bringing together the findings of past reviews into one national set of actions, the DHSC said. It will begin work this summer and produce an initial set of national recommendations by December. The 10 maternity and neonatal units will be decided by Baroness Amos and her team, alongside the terms of reference of the investigation, which are being developed with families who have experiences of maternity and neonatal care, including in Leeds, Sussex and Nottingham, the DHSC added. The investigation is separate from the National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, which will be made up of a panel of experts and families, and chaired by Mr Streeting. Baroness Amos (PA) Gill Walton, chief executive of the RCM, said: 'We are pleased to hear of the appointment of Baroness Amos as chair of the rapid review. She has a reputation for taking a thoughtful and strategic approach and we welcome her fresh insight into maternity and neonatal safety. 'It is absolutely vital, though, that this review gets under way quickly. When he announced it in June, we welcomed Wes Streeting's commitment to publishing the review by Christmas, a promise he repeated at the Progress in Partnership summit on maternity and neonatal safety last month. 'However, we are already halfway through August, with no terms of reference, no sense of the trusts who are likely to be part of the review or no clarity on how the review will be conducted. 'Every woman and family should leave maternity and neonatal services whole, happy and healthy, and every member of maternity staff should start and end their shift knowing they have provided safe, good-quality care. 'At the moment, that simply isn't the case. Previous reviews and countless Care Quality Commission reports have flagged the same the systemic failings that are at the heart of the issues facing maternity and neonatal care issues time and time again: unsafe staffing, poor workplace cultures, and not listening to women. 'In spite of that, there has been no forward movement. Wes Streeting promised to change that. Thousands of midwives and maternity support workers, and the whole of the maternity community, are desperate for him to keep that promise and deliver the change we all want to see.' The RCM has also urged the review to look at examples of good maternity care, as well as where services are not meeting standards of care.
