logo
US Rep. Frank Mrvan vows to fight Trump's ‘authoritarian approach,' GOP's ‘cruel' spending cuts

US Rep. Frank Mrvan vows to fight Trump's ‘authoritarian approach,' GOP's ‘cruel' spending cuts

U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan promised to fight President Donald Trump's 'authoritarian approach' as he spoke Thursday of how drastic budget cuts could affect people in Indiana's 1st congressional district.
'I, as a member of Congress, will continue to fight for things that unify us,' Mrvan told a largely friendly crowd of about 150 at the Memorial Opera House in downtown Valparaiso at a town hall meeting that had been postponed due to illness.
The 'community conversation,' as Mrvan's office called it, was one of several held throughout the region Thursday.
'The authoritarian approach will be stopped by the courts, and I believe as time goes by, no one wants to be patient,' he said. The House Oversight Committee will hold people accountable, he predicted.
Mrvan spoke at length about what he sees as the ugly side of what Trump refers to as the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a reconciliation act passed by the House on partisan lines that now faces the Senate.
Mrvan got loud applause when he told the audience he voted against the bill.
'It's cruel and it doesn't pare down the deficit,' he said.
'They are cutting $880 billion out of Medicaid,' Mrvan said. That affects about 227,000 people in his district, about 19,000 children, about 18,000 disabled individuals and 23,000 veterans, he said.
Mrvan had spoken to an East Chicago High School senior, Jake, who asked Mrvan to use him as an example.
Jake, who uses a wheelchair, is being raised by a single mom after his dad died. 'There is a perfect storm affecting Jake,' Mrvan said. He's at risk of losing healthcare access. 'He is absolutely positively a candidate to lose his Medicaid waiver through the state of Indiana,' along with his Social Security disability funding.
The objective of the reconciliation bill is tax breaks for the top 1% of the nation's wealthy and for corporations.
'I am a straightforward legislator. I will tell you exactly what I think,' Mrvan said.
This bill was advocated by people who talked about the deficit and how it's crushing people and the economy. Even as it kicks 14.9 million people out of Medicaid coverage, however, it adds $5 trillion to the deficit, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
'I want to make sure we can have a balanced budget,' Mrvan said, 'without being cruel to individuals.'
As details of the bill emerge, Mrvan said, people are learning it gives tax breaks to owners of professional sports teams and people who own tanning beds. It also wouldn't allow federal courts to hold contempt of court hearings to hold Trump administration officials accountable for defying the courts, and injunctions would be lifted.
Mrvan said he is working to restore the balance of power in Washington, with three coequal branches of government – legislative, judicial and executive – and put checks and balances back in place.
'I'm in the minority, but I'm on bills to stop his authority,' Mrvan said of Trump.
Mrvan fielded many questions from the audience. Among them was his stance on the Trump administration's actions regarding higher education.
The Department of Government Efficiency cut funding for Indiana University's research on Alzheimer's disease research. IU is a leading institution globally for that research.
'There's a return on investment that leads to about $1 billion. It also creates innovation,' he said. 'Pharmaceutical companies from this research are able to create medications that slow the progress of Alzheimer's, which is going on right here in Indiana.'
'If you're not investing in that research, if you're freezing funding for that, if you're not creating medications that slow down the progress, not only do you have more individuals that have to be taken care of – Medicaid – but you have less individuals in the workforce as other individuals are taking care of them, all because of this uncertainty that's going on,' he said.
Free speech is also an issue with the funding cuts for higher education, he said. 'Punishing institutions, organizations, groups because you don't think or say the way I think or say is very dangerous ground to be on,' he said.
Cancer research impacts all of us, he said. One of his proposed amendments to the reconciliation bill was to study the impact on people who were no longer on Medicaid but have cancer. Americans appreciate longevity, 'and cancer is something that robs lives,' he said.
'We lead the world in research,' he said, and bring top researchers from around the world to do this research. 'We want to continue to lead the world and do this research in the United States.'
Mrvan was asked about the hydrogen hub for Northwest Indiana, an environmental issue. 'This creates cleaner air, cleaner water for our area. It allows the steel industry to produce more globally competitive clean steel, and it also adds jobs and wealth to our community,' he said.
The GOP reconciliation bill would make tax credits for the companies that work on this project expire at the end of this year.
'We have to keep fighting for that. It's going before the Senate. We'll have to see what happens,' Mrvan said.
He spoke of bringing federal funding to local communities, including license plate readers for the Porter County sheriff's office. 'Sewers aren't sexy, but it adds to capacity. It adds to the quality of life here locally,' he said.
Protecting Northwest Indiana's economic engines is also important, he said.
'We produce more steel than any other region in the nation,' he noted, so he wants tariffs in place against countries that subsidize steel and illegally dump steel in the United States. China pays energy costs for steel production, which is one form of subsidizing the industry there, he said.
However, he doesn't favor Trump's approach to widespread tariffs. 'I have a nuanced approach,' Mrvan said.
This week, the International Trade Court gave authority back to Congress over tariffs, he said. 'Again, a checks and balances system.'
'We must protect our industries, our vital national security industries,' he said. American-made steel is needed for tanks, planes and other weapons of war.
'You can't go to a tariff war with our enemies and our allies,' he said.
'As I go back to Congress, I will be a stronger voice' because of hearing these questions and comments, Mrvan said. He urged audience members to continue to reach out to him but also to Sens. Todd Young and Jim Banks.
They need to hear what their constituents are concerned about and how their lives are being affected by what's going on nationally, Mrvan said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fellow Republicans: Memorial Day heroes did not die for a party or personality
Fellow Republicans: Memorial Day heroes did not die for a party or personality

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fellow Republicans: Memorial Day heroes did not die for a party or personality

It was heartwarming to see so many Americans on Memorial Day post tributes to fallen heroes. For so many people, this past observance of the national holiday wasn't about barbecues or the unofficial start of summer. It was a day to reflect on the courage and sacrifice of the men and women who gave their lives in service to our country. Predictably, my social media feed was flooded with patriotic posts from politicians — photos at memorials, quotes about sacrifice and tributes to the fallen. The hypocrisy was glaring. The very lawmakers who honor those who 'paid the ultimate price to protect our freedoms' are the ones seemingly disregarding the constitutional principles those heroes gave their lives to defend. Congress is a coequal branch of government, tasked with serving as a check on executive power. Yet too many Republican lawmakers have abandoned that responsibility, choosing loyalty to the president over constitutional duty. In doing so, they've effectively surrendered their legislative authority, allowing — and in some cases even encouraging — President Donald Trump to govern through a record number of executive actions. When Republicans are not turning a blind eye to executive overreach, they're folding under pressure — bullied, threatened and strong-armed by the White House into abandoning core principles and passing legislative monstrosities like the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Voters sent members of Congress to Washington to serve the people — not to act as lapdogs for the president. And while we're on it, the very concept of a 'One Big Beautiful Bill' flies in the face of everything Republicans have long championed. For decades, Republican leaders demanded stand-alone legislation so each proposal could be debated and judged on its own merits - not buried in bloated packages stuffed with poison pills. Yet here we all are, watching the extension of the Trump tax cuts being held hostage inside a massive spending package. And what about the Department of Government Efficiency cuts? If Congress was going to pass a bill of this magnitude, the least it could do is include those cuts and show real commitment to reducing the size of the federal government. Instead, we're staring at a $4 trillion debt ceiling hike. I expect that kind of recklessness from Democrats — not from a Republican-controlled Congress. Republicans used to draw a hard line on debt. Now, GOP leaders are caving to Trump's demands with little resistance. But this isn't about fiscal responsibility — it's about the integrity of the Constitution. It's about Republicans in Congress abdicating their authority and becoming an obedient extension of the White House. The separation of powers is meant to safeguard liberty, not to be brushed aside for political convenience. Democrats aren't off the hook. They're just as guilty — perhaps more so. They lied about President Joe Biden's health and participated in a coordinated cover-up to deceive the American people. I don't need Jake Tapper's book to tell me what I saw with my own eyes: a frail president incapable of executing the duties of his office. In choosing to gaslight the public, Democrats didn't just erode trust. They made it clear that holding on to power matters more than telling the truth, more than transparency, and more than the republic itself. America deserves better. Those men and women that Americans honored on Memorial Day did not die for a party or a personality. They died because liberty, freedom, and democracy are not just ideals to be admired — they are values worth defending, even at the highest cost. Their bravery is not simply a chapter in our history. It is the very foundation upon which our freedom stands. If we truly wish to honor the nation's fallen heroes, it must be through action. That requires preserving the separation of powers, upholding the rule of law and respecting the checks and balances that form the backbone of our republic. The greatest tribute we can offer those who died for our freedom is to prove ourselves worthy of their ultimate sacrifice. Matt Wylie is a South Carolina-based Republican political strategist and analyst with over 25 years of experience working on federal, state and local campaigns.

Analysis: Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up
Analysis: Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up

CNN

time33 minutes ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up

Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greater sense of personal omnipotence than his recent predecessors. But it's not working out too well for the 47th president. Trump might intimidate tech titans to toe the line and use government power to try to bend institutions like Harvard University and judges, but some world leaders are harder to bully. He keeps being ignored and humiliated by Russian President Vladimir Putin who is defying the US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Russian media is now portraying Trump as the tough talker who always blinks and never imposes consequences. The president also thought that he could shape China to his will by facing down leader Xi Jinping in a trade war. But he misunderstood Chinese politics. The one thing an authoritarian in Beijing can never do is bow down to a US president. US officials say now they're frustrated that China hasn't followed through on commitments meant to deescalate the trade conflict. As with China, Trump backed down in his tariff war with the European Union. Then Financial Times commentator Robert Armstrong enraged the president by coining the term TACO trade — 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Everyone thought that Trump would be on the same page as Benjamin Netanyahu. After all, in his first term he offered the Israeli prime minister pretty much everything he wanted. But now that he's trying to broker peace in the Middle East, Trump is finding that prolonging the Gaza conflict is existential for Netanyahu's political career, much like Ukraine for Putin. And Trump's ambition for an Iranian nuclear deal is frustrating Israeli plans to use a moment of strategic weakness for the Islamic Republic to try to take out its reactors militarily. Powerful leaders are pursuing their own versions of the national interest that exist in a parallel reality and on different historical and actual timelines to shorter, more transactional, aspirations of American presidents. Most aren't susceptible to personal appeals with no payback. And after Trump's attempts to humiliate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, the lure of the White House is waning. Trump spent months on the campaign trail last year boasting that his 'very good relationship' with Putin or Xi would magically solve deep geopolitical and economic problems between global powers that might be unsolvable. He's far from the first US leader to suffer from such delusions. President George W. Bush famously looked into the Kremlin tyrant's eyes and 'got a sense of his soul.' President Barack Obama disdained Russia as a decaying regional power and once dismissed Putin as the 'bored kid in the back of the classroom.' That didn't work out so well when the bored kid annexed Crimea. More broadly, the 21st century presidents have all acted as though they're men of destiny. Bush came to office determined not to act as the global policeman. But the September 11 attacks in 2001 made him exactly that. He started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — which the US won, then lost the peace. And his failed second term goal to democratize the Arab world never went anywhere. Obama tried to make amends for the global war on terror and travelled to Egypt to tell Muslims it was time for 'a new beginning.' His early presidency pulsated with a sense that his charisma and unique background would in itself be a global elixir. Joe Biden traveled the globe telling everyone that 'America is back' after ejecting Trump from the White House. But four years later, partly due to his own disastrous decision to run for a second term, America — or at least the internationalist post-World War II version – was gone again. And Trump was back. Trump's 'America First' populism relies on the premise that the US has been ripped off for decades, never mind that its alliances and shaping of global capitalism made it the most powerful nation in the planet's history. Now playing at being a strongman who everyone must obey, he is busily squandering this legacy and shattering US soft power — ie. the power to persuade — with his belligerence. The first four months of the Trump presidency, with its tariff threats, warnings of US territorial expansion in Canada and Greenland and evisceration of global humanitarian aid programs show that the rest of the world gets a say in what happens too. So far, leaders in China, Russia, Israel, Europe and Canada appear to have calculated that Trump is not as powerful as he thinks he is, that there's no price for defying him or that their own internal politics make resistance mandatory.

Soaring U.S. debt doesn't just put America at risk. It could trigger contagion across global markets, IIF warns
Soaring U.S. debt doesn't just put America at risk. It could trigger contagion across global markets, IIF warns

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Soaring U.S. debt doesn't just put America at risk. It could trigger contagion across global markets, IIF warns

Treasury yields spiked recently amid mounting fears that investor demand for U.S. debt is waning just as supply is taking off, with a budget bill in Congress expected to add trillions to the deficit. But the effects of rising debt won't be limited to the American economy, according to the Institute of International Finance. It's not just Americans and the federal government poised to feel the effects of U.S. debt, which has exploded in recent years and could get even worse soon. Borrowing costs in certain countries often move in tandem, meaning volatility in Treasury bonds will create ripples in other debt, according to a recent report from the Institute of International Finance. 'The implications of rising U.S. debt levels are not limited to the domestic economy; they are also likely to trigger significant contagion and spillover effects across global bond markets,' IIF economists wrote on May 22. 'A potential increase in volatility in U.S. Treasury markets—driven by growing market attention to supply-demand dynamics and the composition of borrowing needed to finance anticipated large funding requirements—is likely to transmit to other jurisdictions, though the magnitude of the impact will vary.' U.S. debt has been top of mind lately as a Republican budget bill moving through Congress is expected to add trillions to the budget deficit in the coming years. That's jolted Treasury yields, and weak demand at a 20-year bond auction earlier this month exacerbated fears that investors won't have an appetite big enough for all the red ink coming soon. In fact, Deutsche Bank warned there's a buyer's strike among foreign investors, who are no longer willing to finance massive U.S. fiscal and trade deficits. IIF pointed out that there's a long-standing pattern of sovereign yields moving together, especially in the U.S., U.K., Germany and France, 'reflecting the deep interconnections among these economies through trade and capital markets.' Yield sensitivity is more limited in Japan and other some major emerging markets, according to IIF, but their interconnections were on display recently and showed that volatility can flow in both directions. A weak auction of 40-year Japanese government bonds on Wednesday sent JGB yields higher—and U.S. Treasury rates as well. Days earlier, George Saravelos, head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, predicted higher yields for Japanese assets would make them a more attractive alternative for local investors, encouraging further divestment from the U.S. To be sure, the vastness of the Treasury market and its deep liquidity mean that buyers and sellers will still be drawn to the U.S., but that immense size also crowds out others. IIF said in its report that there are signs of more sensitivity to rising U.S. debt levels among emerging markets, due in part to a shrinking pool of international capital available to sovereign EM borrowers. 'With the U.S. and Euro Area accounting for over 60% of global cross-border debt portfolios, emerging markets and developing countries represent less than 7%—with many individual countries accounting for only a fraction of a percent,' the report said. This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store