Life on Mars? It probably looks like something you'd find in your stomach
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. María Rosa Pino Otín is a Professor and researcher of Microbiology, Universidad San Jorge
We often forget how wonderful it is that life exists, and what a special and unique phenomenon it is. As far as we know, ours is the only planet capable of supporting life, and it seems to have arisen in the form of something like today's single-celled prokaryotic organisms.
However, scientists have not given up hope of finding what they call LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor, the ancestral cell from which all living things we know are descended) beyond the confines of our planet.
Since humans started dreaming about Martians, scientific understanding has changed significantly. The most recent vehicles to have traversed the Red Planet's surface – the Perseverance and Curiosity rovers – have identified compounds and minerals that suggest its conditions may once have been habitable, but that is the extent of it.
Right now, Mars is a reddish desert landscape – attractive but dead, and certainly not home to any little green men.
Other nearby planets offer even less hope. Mercury is a scorched rock too close to the sun, Venus' atmosphere is dry and toxic, and the others in our solar system are either made of gas or very far from the sun. So, apart from Mars, the search for other forms of life is focused on satellites, especially those orbiting Jupiter and Saturn.
Europa and Enceladus – moons of Jupiter and Saturn, respectively – appear to have large oceans of water under a thick crust of ice that could potentially harbour organic molecules, the building blocks for the origin of life as we know it. These would be nothing like E.T. – they would look more like the simplest terrestrial single-celled organisms.
Looking further afield, more than 5,500 planets have been detected orbiting stars other than the sun. Only a few are considered potentially habitable and are currently being researched, but as Carl Sagan said in Contact, "the universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, seems like an awful waste of space."
Before the 1960s, the conditions on the solar system's most promising satellites would have seemed impossible for life.
The prevailing belief until then was that life could only occur under the conditions where we saw multi-cellular organisms survive. Water, mild temperatures between 0⁰ C and 40⁰ C, pH in neutral ranges, low salinity, and sunlight or an equivalent energy source were considered essential for life.
However, in the mid-20th century, microbiologist Thomas D. Brock discovered bacteria living in the hot springs of Yellowstone National Park, where temperatures exceed 70⁰C. Though unrelated to the search for extraterrestrial life at the time, his discovery broadened its scientific possibilities.
Since then, organisms known as extremophiles have been found inhabiting a range of extreme conditions on Earth, from the cold of cracks in polar ice to the high pressures of the deep ocean. Bacteria have been found attached to small suspended particles in clouds, in extremely saline environments such as the Dead Sea, or extremely acidic ones, such as Rio Tinto. Some extremophiles are even resistant to high levels of radiation.
What was most surprising, however, was finding them inside ourselves.
In the 1980s, two Australian doctors, Barry Marshall and Robin Warren, began studying gastroduodenal ulcers. Until then, the condition had been attributed to stress or excess gastric acid secretion, which did little to help cure the condition.
Warren was a pathologist, and having identified bacteria in gastric biopsy samples from patients, he realized that they had to be considered a cause of the disease. However, he had to fight against the dogma that microorganisms could not grow in the highly acidic environment of the human stomach.
Warren conducted his research alone until 1981, when he met Barry Marshall, a fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. He approached Marshall and asked if he would like to work alongside "that crackpot Warren who's trying to turn gastritis into an infectious disease."
In 2005, Barry Marshall and Robin Warren received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discovery of Helicobacter pylori and its role in gastric diseases, a discovery that revolutionized the field of gastroenterology.
H. pylori has an amazing array of factors that help it survive in hostile environments, such as flagella that allow it to surf stomach fluids to get close to the stomach wall, breaking through the protective mucus layer and attaching itself to it.
Using the enzyme urease, H. pylori degrades urea in the stomach into ammonia and CO₂, creating a higher pH microclimate that allows it to reproduce. As its numbers increase, it releases exotoxins that inflame and damage gastric tissue in the stomach. This is how ulcers eventually develop, as the underlying connective tissue is exposed to the acidity of the stomach.
RELATED STORIES:
— If Mars has microbe fossils, a laser and rock quarry in Algeria could help find them
— Extremophiles on Mars could survive for hundreds of millions of years
— We finally know where to look for life on Mars
Their discovery showed that even tucked away in our innards – in the walls of our stomachs, subjected to vinegar-like pH levels, total darkness, the violent movements of our digestive systems, harmful enzymes and churning tides of food – life is able to resist and proliferate.
The study of extremophile micro-organisms offers the hope that on other bodies in the solar system, or on one of the 5,500 known exoplanets, even in extreme conditions, the extraordinary phenomenon of life may be present. The Martians we dream of today might look more like H. pylori than anything else.
Originally published on The Conversation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
How many stars are there in space?
Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you'd like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@ Exactly how many stars are in space? – MeeSong, Brookline, Massachusetts Look up at the sky on a clear night, and you'll see thousands of stars – about 6,000 or so. But that's only a tiny fraction of all the stars out there. The rest are too far away for us to see them. Yet astronomers like me have figured out how to estimate the total number of stars in the universe, which is everything that exists. Scattered throughout the universe are galaxies – clusters of stars, planets, gas and dust bunched together. Like people, galaxies are diverse. They come in different sizes and shapes. Earth is in the Milky Way, a spiral galaxy; its stars cluster in spiral arms that swirl around the galaxy's center. Other galaxies are elliptical – kind of egg-shaped – and some are irregular, with a variety of shapes. Before calculating the number of stars in the universe, astronomers first have to estimate the number of galaxies. To do that, they take very detailed pictures of small parts of the sky and count all the galaxies they see in those pictures. That number is then multiplied by the number of pictures needed to photograph the whole sky. The answer: There are approximately 2,000,000,000,000 galaxies in the universe – that's 2 trillion. Astronomers don't know exactly how many stars are in each of those 2 trillion galaxies. Most are so distant, there's no way to tell precisely. But we can make a good guess at the number of stars in our own Milky Way. Those stars are diverse, too, and come in a wide variety of sizes and colors. Our Sun, a white star, is medium-size, medium-weight and medium-hot: 27 million degrees Fahrenheit at its center (15 million degrees Celsius). Bigger, heavier and hotter stars tend to be blue, like Vega in the constellation Lyra. Smaller, lighter and dimmer stars are usually red, like Proxima Centauri. Except for the Sun, it's the closest star to us. Red, white and blue stars give off different amounts of light. By measuring that starlight – specifically, its color and brightness – astronomers can estimate how many stars our galaxy holds. With that method, they discovered the Milky Way has about 100 billion stars – 100,000,000,000. Now the next step. Using the Milky Way as our model, we can multiply the number of stars in a typical galaxy (100 billion) by the number of galaxies in the universe (2 trillion). The answer is an absolutely astounding number. There are approximately 200 billion trillion stars in the universe. Or, to put it another way, 200 sextillion. That's 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000! The number is so big, it's hard to imagine. But try this: It's about 10 times the number of cups of water in all the oceans of Earth. Think about that the next time you're looking at the night sky – and then wonder about what might be happening on the trillions of worlds orbiting all those stars. Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@ Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live. And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Brian Jackson, Boise State University Read more: Are there any planets outside of our solar system? Why does gravity pull us down and not up? Why are planets round? Brian Jackson receives funding from NASA.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Does the color purple really exist?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The world is awash with the color purple — lavender flowers, amethyst gemstones, plums, eggplants and purple emperor butterflies. But if you look closely at the visible-light portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, you'll notice that purple (which is different from bluish hues of violet and indigo) is absent. That's because purple may be made up by our brains; It exists only because of how the brain processes color. So does that mean purple doesn't really exist? Not necessarily. The answer lies within the mind-boggling way that our brains perceive and combine different wavelengths on the visible light spectrum. "I would actually say that none of color actually exists," said Zab Johnson, an executive director and senior fellow at the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania. "It's all the process of our neural machinery, and that's sort of both the beauty and the complexity of it all at the same time." Sign up for our newsletter Sign up for our weekly Life's Little Mysteries newsletter to get the latest mysteries before they appear online. All color begins with light. When radiation from the sun hits Earth, a range of wavelengths are present. There are long wavelengths, like infrared rays and radio waves, and shorter, high-energy wavelengths, like X-rays and ultraviolet rays, which are damaging to our bodies, Johnson told Live Science. Toward the middle of the electromagnetic spectrum lies visible light — the light our brains can see — which represents only about 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. This is what we perceive as the colors of the rainbow. On one end of the spectrum are longer wavelengths, which we perceive as red, and on the other are shorter wavelengths, which we perceive as indigo and violet. Our perception of color involves specialized receptors at the back of our eyeballs, called cones, that detect visible light. Human eyes have three types of cones: long wave, mid wave and short wave. Each is sensitive to particular wavelengths. Long-wavelength cones take in information on reddish light, mid-wavelength cones specialize in green, and short-wavelength cones detect blue. Related: What color is the universe? When light hits our eyeballs, these three receptors take in information about the light and their respective wavelengths and send electrical signals to the brain. The brain then takes that information and makes an average deduction of what it's seeing. "Our machinery is sort of doing this complex sort of calculation of these three different ratios all the time," which forms our perception of color, Johnson said. For example, if long-wavelength and mid-wavelength cones are triggered, the brain infers that we're seeing orange or yellow. If mid-wavelength and short-wavelength cones are activated, the brain will make a conclusion of teal. So what about purple? When short-wavelength (blue) and long-wavelength (red) cones are stimulated, your brain "makes something that's actually not out there in the world," Johnson said. Red and blue are on opposite ends of the visible spectrum: When the brain encounters these wavelengths, it ends up bending this linear visible spectrum into a circle. In other words, it brings red and blue together to make purple and magenta, even though that's not what light is really doing. As a result, purple and magenta are known as "nonspectral" colors, because they don't really exist as actual electromagnetic radiation. Nonspectral colors like purple are made of two wavelengths of light. In contrast, spectral colors — red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and, importantly, violet and indigo — are made of just one wavelength. RELATED MYSTERIES —Why is the sky blue? —Why do we see colors that aren't there? —What would colors look like on other planets? Regardless of its physical existence, purple has captivated people for millennia, noted Narayan Khandekar, director of the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies at Harvard Art Museums. For example, ancient Phoenicians ground up sea snails to make a color known as Tyrian purple, which was reserved for royal or ceremonial robes. Today, purple is still often associated with wealth, power and even magic. "So that connection still exists, even though there are other versions of purple available now," he told Live Science. So, whether manufactured in our minds or made from ground-up shellfish, purple is unique and deserves closer look. "It doesn't really exist in nature. And so when you can create it, it has this extra value," Johnson said. "Now purple is even more special."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Deep-sea mining threatens sea life in a way no one is thinking about, and Trump's order could clear the way for operations soon
Picture an ocean world so deep and dark it feels like another planet – where creatures glow and life survives under crushing pressure. This is the midwater zone, a hidden ecosystem that begins 650 feet (200 meters) below the ocean surface and sustains life across our planet. It includes the twilight zone and the midnight zone, where strange and delicate animals thrive in the near absence of sunlight. Whales and commercially valuable fish such as tuna rely on animals in this zone for food. But this unique ecosystem faces an unprecedented threat. As the demand for electric car batteries and smartphones grows, mining companies are turning their attention to the deep sea, where precious metals such as nickel and cobalt can be found in potato-size nodules sitting on the ocean floor. Deep-sea mining research and experiments over the past 40 years have shown how the removal of nodules can put seafloor creatures at risk by disrupting their habitats. However, the process can also pose a danger to what lives above it, in the midwater ecosystem. If future deep-sea mining operations release sediment plumes into the water column, as proposed, the debris could interfere with animals' feeding, disrupt food webs and alter animals' behaviors. As an oceanographer studying marine life in an area of the Pacific rich in these nodules, I believe that before countries and companies rush to mine, we need to understand the risks. Is humanity willing to risk collapsing parts of an ecosystem we barely understand for resources that are important for our future? This audio article was produced by News Over Audio (Noa) and ElevenLabs, using an AI voice. Listen to more articles from The Conversation, narrated by Noa. Beneath the Pacific Ocean southeast of Hawaii, a hidden treasure trove of polymetallic nodules can be found scattered across the seafloor. These nodules form as metals in seawater or sediment collect around a nucleus, such as a piece of shell or shark's tooth. They grow at an incredibly slow rate of a few millimeters per million years. The nodules are rich in metals such as nickel, cobalt and manganese – key ingredients for batteries, smartphones, wind turbines and military hardware. As demand for these technologies increases, mining companies are targeting this remote area, known as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, as well as a few other zones with similar nodules around the world. So far, only test mining has been carried out. However, plans for full-scale commercial mining are rapidly advancing. Exploratory deep-sea mining began in the 1970s, and the International Seabed Authority was established in 1994 under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to regulate it. But it was not until 2022 that The Metals Company and Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. fully tested the first integrated nodule collection system in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone. The companies are now planning full-scale mining operations in the region. With the International Seabed Authority still debating regulations, The Metals Company appealed to President Donald Trump and applauded his order on April 24, 2025, to expedite U.S.-issued licenses for seabed mining outside national waters under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act. The U.S. is one of a handful of countries that never ratified the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea and set up its own licensing regime. The International Seabed Authority strongly opposes Trump's move. Several countries have called for a moratorium on seabed mining until the risks are better understood. The mining process is invasive. Collector vehicles scrape along the ocean floor as they scoop up nodules and stir up sediments. This removes habitats used by marine organisms and threatens biodiversity, potentially causing irreversible damage to seafloor ecosystems. Once collected, the nodules are brought up with seawater and sediments through a pipe to a ship, where they're separated from the waste. The leftover slurry of water, sediment and crushed nodules is then dumped back into the middle of the water column, creating plumes. While the discharge depth is still under discussion, some mining operators propose releasing the waste at midwater depths, around 4,000 feet (1,200 meters). However, there is a critical unknown: The ocean is dynamic, constantly shifting with currents, and scientists don't fully understand how these mining plumes will behave once released into the midwater zone. These clouds of debris could disperse over large areas, potentially harming marine life and disrupting ecosystems. Picture a volcanic eruption – not of lava, but of fine, murky sediments expanding throughout the water column, affecting everything in its path. As an oceanographer studying zooplankton in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, I am concerned about the impact of deep-sea mining on this ecologically important midwater zone. This ecosystem is home to zooplankton – tiny animals that drift with ocean currents – and micronekton, which includes small fish, squid and crustaceans that rely on zooplankton for food. Sediment plumes in the water column could harm these animals. Fine sediments could clog respiratory structures in fish and feeding structures of filter feeders. For animals that feed on suspended particles, the plumes could dilute food resources with nutritionally poor material. Additionally, by blocking light, plumes might interfere with visual cues essential for bioluminescent organisms and visual predators. For delicate creatures such as jellyfish and siphonophores – gelatinous animals that can grow over 100 feet long – sediment accumulation can interfere with buoyancy and survival. A recent study found that jellies exposed to sediments increased their mucous production, a common stress response that is energetically expensive, and their expression of genes related to wound repair. Additionally, noise pollution from machinery can interfere with how species communicate and navigate. Disturbances like these have the potential to disrupt ecosystems, extending far beyond the discharge depth. Declines in zooplankton populations can harm fish and other marine animal populations that rely on them for food. The midwater zone also plays a vital role in regulating Earth's climate. Phytoplankton at the ocean's surface capture atmospheric carbon, which zooplankton consume and transfer through the food chain. When zooplankton and fish respire, excrete waste, or sink after death, they contribute to carbon export to the deep ocean, where it can be sequestered for centuries. The process naturally removes planet-warming carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Despite growing interest in deep-sea mining, much of the deep ocean, particularly the midwater zone, remains poorly understood. A 2023 study in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone found that 88% to 92% of species in the region are new to science. Current mining regulations focus primarily on the seafloor, overlooking broader ecosystem impacts. The International Seabed Authority is preparing to discuss key decisions on future seabed mining in July 2025, including rules and guidelines relating to mining waste, discharge depths and environmental protection. These decisions could set the framework for large-scale commercial mining in ecologically important areas such as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone. Yet the consequences for marine life are not clear. Without comprehensive studies on the impact of seafloor mining techniques, the world risks making irreversible choices that could harm these fragile ecosystems. This article, originally published March 25, 2025, has been updated with Trump's order to expedite mining licenses. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Alexus Cazares-Nuesser, University of Hawaii Read more: Deep seabed mining plans pit renewable energy demand against ocean life in a largely unexplored frontier Secrets of the Octopus Garden: Moms nest at thermal springs to give their young the best chance for survival Scientists envision an 'internet of the ocean,' with sensors and autonomous vehicles that can explore the deep sea and monitor its vital signs Alexus Cazares-Nuesser receives funding from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Past research received funding from The Metals Company Inc. through its subsidiary Nauru Ocean Resources Inc.
