Kinship program will begin after rulemaking this summer
Kinship caregivers in approximately half a dozen counties will be part of a new pilot program expected to start this summer designed to help support older New Mexicans and other relatives who take over raising children when parents are unable to do so.
That program is a result of House Bill 252, which establishes the Kinship Caregiver Support Pilot program, signed last week by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham.
Joey Long, a spokesperson for the Aging and Long-Term Services Department, told Source NM that the department does not anticipate services starting before the beginning of the next fiscal year, which begins in July. The process will also include a 30-day public comment period.
According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation, about 36,000 New Mexico children were raised by grandparents or other next of kin in 2023 – an increase from about 30,000 in 2017.
The bill states that the pilot program will be established in five to seven counties in the state with 50 participants chosen in each county. A previous version of the bill identified Rio Arriba, Santa Fe, Taos, McKinley and Doña Ana counties as communities participating in the program, but the specific counties were struck from the final version of the bill.
Long told Source in a written statement that the department is 'assessing geographic areas based on data, stakeholder consultations, and availability of private funding to support participant stipends, as well as other considerations' before choosing communities to participate.
Program participants will eventually be connected to case management assistance, legal assistance, mental health support and respite care.
'Too often kinship caregivers—especially grandparents—are left to navigate complex systems alone while providing childcare,' Kaltenbach said in a statement. 'This pilot program will help us establish more resources to help keep families together and ensure caregivers have the support they need to provide the best care possible.'
The program is a three-year pilot, meaning the state will evaluate the outcomes of all participants to help create a possible statewide program in future years. An annual report with outcomes and recommendations is due each December to the Legislative Finance Committee.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Revenue forecast: NM took in $390 million more last year than previously projected
Aug. 19—SANTA FE — New Mexico took in $390 million more in the just-ended budget year than previously projected, giving lawmakers more wiggle room to respond to federal reductions to health care and food assistance programs. But a projected decrease in oil prices and a tepid outlook for future job growth could signal a looming slowdown to the state's recent revenue boom, top state budget officials told lawmakers during a Tuesday committee hearing. Those trends could also complicate the state's ability to absorb the federal funding changes on a long-term basis, assuming the reductions are left in place. The top budget official in Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration, Finance and Administration Secretary Wayne Propst, said the larger-than-expected revenue collections could allow lawmakers to put more money into two new state trust funds created this year — a behavioral health trust fund and a Medicaid trust fund. "We'd like to see those filled up as soon as possible," Propst told members of the Legislative Finance Committee at a Tuesday meeting in Las Cruces. Moving more state dollars into the trust funds could be the primary focus of a special session Lujan Grisham is expected to call next month. Top Governor's Office staffers have been meeting with legislative leaders in recent weeks about a special session spending package that could exceed $400 million, according to lawmakers involved in the discussions. The federal budget bill signed by President Donald Trump could lead to more than 90,000 New Mexico residents losing health care coverage and the possible closure of rural hospitals, state health officials have warned. The federal budget bill is projected to cost the state an average of $206 million per year over the next five years, executive and legislative branch economists projected. Sen. George Muñoz, D-Gallup, the LFC's vice chairman, said he's especially concerned about federal changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, and said most state agencies should expect largely flat budgets in the coming year. "We've put a lot of money out into the economy, but we haven't seen the returns," he said during Tuesday's hearing. Muñoz also expressed concern that some of the state's revenue growth has been caused by rising inflation, which boosts state gross receipts tax revenue but negatively affects consumers. But Lujan Grisham described the new state revenue estimates as good news, given the state's future funding challenges. "Today's announcement that our state can expect nearly a half-billion dollars in additional revenue will help us protect the essential services for New Mexicans that Washington has abandoned," the governor said in a statement. Positive trends amid looming uncertainty Despite the uncertain future, the revenue estimates released Tuesday show positive recent state labor trends. New Mexico averaged 1,817 new jobs created per month over the first six months of this year, with 2,900 jobs added in June alone, according to Taxation and Revenue Department data. Much of that job creation was in the construction, health care and education fields. Meanwhile, the state lost jobs in the leisure and hospitality industry and also saw its number of federal workers decline. The state's overall growth in gross receipts tax revenue and positive investment returns were among the reasons the state took in more revenue during the fiscal year that ended in June than was projected eight months ago. "The base is higher, but the expectation for growth is lower," said state Taxation and Revenue Department Secretary Stephanie Schardin Clarke. Surging oil production in southeast New Mexico's Permian Basin has been a primary driver of the state's revenue boom over the last several years, while also allowing lawmakers to set aside millions of dollars in the newly-established trust funds for future use. Despite a recent dip in oil prices, the New Mexico State Land Office announced Tuesday it had broken a revenue record from oil and gas leases, driven by a newly implemented 25% royalty rate on certain extraction activities in the Permian Basin. The agency recorded $256 million in revenue at an August auction, in which 10 leases were offered in Lea and Eddy counties. Nine of the leases included the new rate. Preparing for 'rainy days' Looking ahead, legislators are projected to have roughly $485 million in "new" money during the coming fiscal year — a figure that represents the difference between projected revenue levels and current total spending. That budgetary windfall could allow for additional backfilling of safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP. Senate Minority Whip Pat Woods, R-Broadview, said Tuesday some of the money could also be used to provide tax breaks for New Mexico residents, after a tax package approved by lawmakers this year was vetoed by the governor. But Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo, said legislators should also continue with the strategy of investing some incoming revenue for future use. "We're not just blowing money," he said. "We're putting it away for rainy days." In fact, with the total value of the state's various permanent funds having recently surpassed $64 billion, investment income is on track to overtake oil and natural gas as the state's primary revenue source in the coming years, Propst said. But the state's investment largesse could also prompt a new debate over how much of the money should be invested — and how much should be spent more immediately. "We are a very, very fortunate state and it is ironic that we have the poorest population in the nation," said Rep. Rebecca Dow, R-Truth or Consequences, during Tuesday's hearing. Journal business editor Matthew Narvaiz contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court tosses New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for gun buys
Aug. 19—New Mexico's seven-day "cooling off" period for most gun purchases violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday. A three-member panel of the Denver-based court reversed the decision by U.S. District Judge James Browning of Albuquerque, who refused to grant a preliminary injunction in July 2024 to halt enforcement of the law. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, in a statement on Tuesday, appeared to favor appealing the ruling, a sentiment echoed by state Sen. Joseph Cervantes, D-Las Cruces, who co-sponsored the measure during the 2024 legislative session. "We have tried very hard in the Legislature to stay within the lanes that the U.S. Supreme Court has put up," Cervantes told the Journal. "The challenge is that the Supreme Court keeps changing the goal posts." He said the 10th Circuit's conclusion was unexpected, considering that a number of other courts at the same level as the 10th Circuit have upheld such waiting periods as constitutional. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers joined gun shop representatives in lauding the appeals decision. "Justice delayed is justice denied," said Jason Archie, manager of Right To Bear Arms gun shop at 11200 Montgomery NE. "It was represented as a way to prevent crime, but I didn't see that crime went down at all." He said enforcement of the waiting period was a "hassle" that most customers weren't happy about. The legal challenge to the law, which was enacted in early 2024, was filed on behalf of two gun owners, one from Farmington and the other from Albuquerque, who complained about trying to buy a firearm for personal purposes only to be told they had to come back a week later to pick it up. Supporters argued that the waiting period would help reduce gun violence and gun deaths in New Mexico. "Even though the potential to reduce impulsive gun violence might be true, once we acknowledge that the Waiting Period Act likely burdens Second Amendment activity, that potential is outweighed," wrote the appeals panel. The appeals court found that the law applies "a blanket burden across all of society, assuming that everyone is dangerous or unstable before they can exercise their Second Amendment right." In her statement, Lujan Grisham said the decision was "deeply disappointing, plainly wrong and likely to cost lives in New Mexico. New Mexico's waiting period law was carefully crafted to minimize gun violence while respecting Second Amendment rights." She said the dissenting opinion in the ruling even notes that New Mexico's law "is likely to save approximately thirty-seven lives per year." "This ruling ignores a recent binding Tenth Circuit precedent that upheld Colorado's law barring gun purchases by anyone under the age of 21 — a law that requires 18-year-olds to wait three years to purchase a weapon," she added. The ruling also mischaracterizes New Mexico's gun purchase waiting period, saying it applies to "everyone" when, in fact, it doesn't apply to those who sell guns to immediate family members, those with a concealed carry permit and law enforcement officers, the governor stated. "The evidence is clear — waiting periods prevent impulsive acts of violence and suicide, giving people time to step back and reassess their emotions during moments of crisis. I'm disappointed that today's ruling doesn't take this into account," she stated, adding that her administration was reviewing its legal options in reaction to the "misguided ruling." The New Mexico House initially approved a 14-day waiting period in early 2024, but a Senate floor amendment cut the wait time to seven days before the final passage. Meanwhile, Rhode Island, Maryland and New Jersey have adopted a seven-day waiting period, with four states, Colorado, Florida, Illinois and Vermont opting for three days. California has a 30-day waiting period. Browning, after hearing legal arguments and testimony from historian witnesses, also considered the plain language of the Second Amendment. He concluded that the right to acquire a firearm in New Mexico, which mandated the waiting period, didn't impede the right to "keep and bear" a firearm. But the appeals court held the opposite view, stating that "the constitutional injury to the Plaintiffs is so broad and clear that they have met their higher burden entitling them to an injunction changing the status quo." The court reversed Browning's ruling, and sent the case back for further proceedings. Republican legislators predicted this outcome during debate on the bill in 2024, but Democrats nonetheless passed HB 129 without a single Republican vote, stated Brandon Harris, spokesperson for the state Senate Republican Leadership office. Senate Republican Leader Bill Sharer of Farmington welcomed the appeal court ruling, reiterating that "the clear language of the 2nd Amendment says that 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.'" Sharer also questioned the logic behind the law itself, pointing out that "Criminals certainly don't wait seven days before breaking into our homes and threatening our families and properties... What sense does it make to require law-abiding citizens to wait seven days before being able to defend themselves?" Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
NM food banks say they will struggle to provide meals for those who lose federal benefits
U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez, center, gathered leaders of health, housing and food nonprofits to discuss how recently enacted federal cuts will affect New Mexicans, along with how the spending bill will increase prices on health insurance, housing, energy costs and nutrition. (Photo by Patrick Lohmann / Source NM) Cuts to the country's food assistance programs in the recently enacted Congressional spending bill will leave food banks and other charities across the state with less food to feed longer lines of hungry people, leaders warned Monday at a roundtable with U.S. Rep Gabe Vasquez. The federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which gives low-income families money to spend on groceries, currently provides nine times as many meals across the state and country as the entire nationwide network of food charities, Jason Riggs, community initiatives manager at the Roadrunner Food Bank, told Vasquez and other nonprofit leaders at the roundtable. In New Mexico, more than 500 shelters, pantries, schools and hot-meal sites comprise the state's 'food bank,' he said, and that whole network provides only a fraction of what SNAP delivers for families. 'There's no way we can just suddenly multiply everything we do times nine to make that happen. We couldn't do that in 10 years,' Riggs said. 'No business can grow nine times. So any thoughts that, 'Well, charity will take care of this,' are very misguided.' New Mexico officials say federal cuts will probably deepen hunger for children, seniors Vasquez, a New Mexico Democrat who represents the state's 2nd Congressional District in the southern portion of the state, gathered leaders of various nonprofits handling housing, healthcare and nutrition at the food bank's headquarters to elicit testimony about how the cuts will affect New Mexicans, along with how the spending bill will increase prices on health insurance, housing, energy costs and nutrition. Regarding SNAP, Vasquez told Source New Mexico that the upcoming Farm Bill presents Democrats with an opportunity to undo some, but not all, of what the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' will do. The Farm Bill sets SNAP funding levels and other food-related policies. 'Republicans are going to propose a skinny Farm Bill, which is a watered-down version of the Farm Bill. They're going to want to have some bipartisan support for that, and we're not going to give it to them unless we get some concessions back on the priorities that we have,' he said. While he doesn't think Democrats have enough leverage to make Republicans completely reverse their SNAP cuts or other policies they just enacted in the spending bill, he said one concession he'll push for relates to states like New Mexico that are deemed to have high SNAP 'error rates.' The bill currently penalizes states that are found to over- or under-pay SNAP recipients at high rates by making them share a portion of the costs the federal government currently pays to SNAP recipients. In New Mexico, the federal government currently shoulders 100% of the more than $1 billion in annual spending to SNAP recipients. But under the bill, New Mexico will have to share 15% of the total SNAP spending New Mexicans receive because of its high error rate. New Mexico's rate is 14.6%; the national average is 9.83%. Vasquez said he hopes to push Republicans to change both the way the error rate penalty is calculated and give states longer grace periods to bring their rates down to avoid the penalty. 'I think those are common-sense proposals that Republicans should accept, but I don't expect to reverse a lot of that stuff, considering what it represents to the President's overall agenda,' he said, which is 'to cut Medicaid and to cut SNAP and to give taxes to the rich. Otherwise you won't be able to pay for those tax cuts.' States with rates above 10% incur the 15% fee, the highest penalty, which amounts to about $173 million, according to a presentation Monday from the Legislative Finance Committee to an interim legislative committee. NM lawmakers presented with tough choices amid federal cuts to Medicaid, SNAP Even though New Mexico faces a big error rate penalty, LFC analyst Austin Davidson also noted Monday that a provision in the bill allows states with high rates to wait longer before paying the penalty. Assuming the state's rate stays high, New Mexico won't pay the penalty until October 2028 at the earliest, Davidson said. Nonprofit leaders at the roundtable later Monday said that the state's error rate often comes from systemic problems at the state level, not fraud at the individual level, and mistakes are often quickly caught and corrected. According to a presentation from state Health Care Authority officials to the same legislative committee, analysts attribute 35% of the state's error rate to 'agency-caused' miscalculations of benefits or use of outdated information. To bring down the rate in New Mexico, Health Care Authority officials recommended increasing caseworker training at the authority's Income Support Division, along with improving information technology system changes to ensure quality control. The error rate cost is among hundreds of millions of dollars the state is anticipating losing in SNAP funding in the state with the highest rate of SNAP recipients. More than 450,000 New Mexicans use SNAP assistance, which is more than one-fifth of the population. All of them could see reductions in the amount of assistance, according to the Health Care Authority presentation. In addition, about 40,000 New Mexicans will likely lose their SNAP benefits completely due to new work requirements or their immigration status. As for retailers, about 1,700 gas stations, groceries, convenience stores and farmers' markets statewide stand to lose about $1.3 billion in SNAP revenue. Ari Herring, executive director of Rio Grande Food Bank, warned at the roundtable that all the cuts and costs facing the state will coalesce into a much bleaker food system for New Mexicans. 'We're gonna see much, much longer lines. We're gonna see people highly stressed about affordability, and we are gonna have less resources to answer that need,' she said. 'It really is a perfect storm.'
