Here are 3 Social Security myths that can ruin a retirement — make sure you don't let them dash your dreams
Your friend's cousin on Facebook may be a smart guy, but since he's not a tax expert, you might want to avoid taking advice from him on the latest Social Security benefit rules.
If you have questions about Social Security, your best bet for information is the Social Security Administration (SSA) website or your financial advisor.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Still, there are hundreds of friend's cousins out there propagating myths about Social Security on social media. Here are three persistent myths that could wind up hurting your retirement.
Most Americans don't have a retirement tax plan, according to a Northwestern Mutual study. If you're one of them, it could be worth speaking to a financial advisor, since minimizing the taxes you pay in retirement can have a material impact on how much money you'll have to spend.
One thing you'll need to account for is that Social Security benefits may be taxed — contrary to a common myth that they're not. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a tool to help you determine, based on your gross income and the type of benefits you're receiving, whether your benefits are taxable. The IRS also publishes a guide to help you calculate the taxes you might owe.
In general, how much you'll be taxed on your benefits will depend on your income and filing status. To determine whether your benefits are taxable, add half the amount of benefits you've collected during the year to your other income, which may include pensions, wages, dividends, interest and capital gains. If you're married and filing jointly, then take half of each spouse's Social Security benefit and add that to your combined income.
According to the IRS, half of your benefits may be taxable if:
You're single, the head of a household or a qualifying widow or widower (with an income of $25,000 to $34,000).
You're married but you and your spouse lived apart for the tax year and are filing separately (with an income of $25,000 to $34,000).
You're married and filing jointly (with a combined income of $32,000 to $44,000).
Up to 85% of your benefits may be taxable if the calculated income exceeds the upper range in any of the above cases, or if you're married and filing separately but you lived with your spouse at any point during the tax year.
Also, for the 2025 tax year, there are nine states that could tax your Social Security benefits. If you live in Colorado, Connecticut, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont or West Virginia, you may want to familiarize yourself with the rules around taxation of your benefits.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
Another myth is that you have to be retired to collect your retirement benefit. However, you may be able to collect Social Security even if you're still working.
If you haven't reached your full retirement age (FRA) — which ranges from 66 to 67, depending on the year of your birth — some of your benefits may be withheld. They're also more likely to be taxed because you increase the chances that your income is above the threshold for Social Security taxation.
The SSA sets an annual earnings limit for people who haven't reached their FRA but are collecting benefits. For 2025, this limit is $23,400, which includes wages, bonuses, commissions and vacation pay. If you exceed that limit, the SSA will deduct $1 for every $2 you make above $23,400.
In the year you reach your FRA, the 2025 earnings limit is $62,160 for the months before you hit your FRA. In this case, the SSA will deduct $1 for every $3 you make above $62,160. However, once you reach your FRA, there's no limit on how much you can make, which means there's no deduction for earnings.
To help you plan, the SSA provides a Retirement Age Calculator, a Retirement Earnings Test Calculator and an explanation, with numeric examples, of how work affects your benefits.
Some Americans believe their benefits are guaranteed a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) every year, but if you're budgeting based on this assumption, you may need to rethink your planning.
A COLA adjusts your benefit for inflation so that your benefit checks can retain purchasing power. Most years, retirees can expect to receive one (in 2025, the COLA is 2.5%). But, since the COLA calculation is based on inflation — and because of the way it's calculated — it's possible for the COLA to be zero, so you're not guaranteed to see a bump in your benefit every year.
In October of each year, the SSA announces the COLA that will be applied to the following year's benefit payments. The COLA is based on the average Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), calculated monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
According to the SSA, the COLA is 'equal to the percentage increase (if any) in the CPI-W from the average for the third quarter of the current year to the average for the third quarter of the last year.' It's then rounded to the nearest tenth of 1%.
However, if — after rounding — there's no increase in the average CPI-W, then there's no COLA for the year. This occurred in 2009, 2010 and 2015.
Not only is it possible for there to be no COLA in some years, it's also possible that the increase in your benefit amount may not be equal to the COLA multiplied by your benefit. This occurs because the COLA is applied to your primary insurance amount (PIA), which is the benefit you would receive if you elected to start receiving benefits at your FRA without adjustment for early or delayed retirement.
These myths can affect your retirement planning and cost you money. When planning for retirement, you may want to engage a qualified financial advisor and use reputable sources for information — no matter how well-meaning your friend's cousin may be.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026
Nestle said Wednesday it will eliminate artificial colors from its U.S. food and beverages by the middle of 2026. It's the latest big food company making that pledge. Last week, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills also said it plans to remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and from all foods served in K-12 schools by the middle of 2026. The move has broad support. About two-thirds of Americans favor restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove ingredients like added sugar or dyes, according to an AP-NORC poll. Both California and West Virginia have recently banned artificial dyes in foods served in schools. On Sunday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas signed a bill requiring foods made with artificial dyes or additives to contain a new safety label starting in 2027. The label would say they contain ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' in Australia, Canada, the European Union or the U.K. The federal government is also stepping up its scrutiny of artificial colors. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry. Nestle has pledged to remove artificial dyes before. Early in 2015, the company said it would remove artificial flavors and colors from its products by the end of that year. But the promise didn't hold. Nestle said Wednesday it's been removing synthetic dyes from its products over the last decade, and 90% of its U.S. portfolio doesn't contain them. Among those that do is Nesquik Banana Strawberry milk, which is made with Red 3. Nestle said Wednesday it wants to evolve with its U.S. customers' changing nutritional needs and preferences. 'Serving and delighting people is at the heart of everything we do and every decision that we make,' Nestle's U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026
Nestle said Wednesday it will eliminate artificial colors from its U.S. food and beverages by the middle of 2026. It's the latest big food company making that pledge. Last week, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills also said it plans to remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and from all foods served in K-12 schools by the middle of 2026. The move has broad support. About two-thirds of Americans favor restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove ingredients like added sugar or dyes, according to an AP-NORC poll. Both California and West Virginia have recently banned artificial dyes in foods served in schools. On Sunday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas signed a bill requiring foods made with artificial dyes or additives to contain a new safety label starting in 2027. The label would say they contain ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' in Australia, Canada, the European Union or the U.K. The federal government is also stepping up its scrutiny of artificial colors. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry. Nestle has pledged to remove artificial dyes before. Early in 2015, the company said it would remove artificial flavors and colors from its products by the end of that year. But the promise didn't hold. Nestle said Wednesday it's been removing synthetic dyes from its products over the last decade, and 90% of its U.S. portfolio doesn't contain them. Among those that do is Nesquik Banana Strawberry milk, which is made with Red 3. Nestle said Wednesday it wants to evolve with its U.S. customers' changing nutritional needs and preferences. 'Serving and delighting people is at the heart of everything we do and every decision that we make,' Nestle's U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bezos arrives in Venice as protesters say his star-studded wedding highlights growing inequality
VENICE, Italy (AP) — Multi-billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez arrived in Venice on Wednesday ahead of their star-studded weekend wedding, an event that has galvanized a wide assortment of activist groups protesting it. Bezos waved from a water taxi as he and Sanchez arrived at the dock of the Aman Hotel, a five-star hotel on the Grand Canal, with two security boats in tow. The event has drawn protests by groups who view it as a sign of the growing disparity between the haves and have-nots, while residents complain it exemplifies the way their needs are disregarded in the era of mass tourism to the historic lagoon city. About a dozen Venetian organizations — including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners and university groups — have united to protest the multi-day event under the banner 'No Space for Bezos,' a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight. They have staged small-scale protests, unfurling anti-Bezos banners on iconic Venetian sites. They were joined Monday by Greenpeace and the British group 'Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, to unfurl a giant banner in St. Mark's Square protesting purported tax breaks for billionaires. On Wednesday, other activists launched a float down the Grand Canal featuring a mannequin of Bezos clinging onto an Amazon box, his fists full of fake dollars. The British publicity firm that announced the stunt said it wasn't a protest of the wedding 'but against unchecked wealth, media control, and the growing privatisation of public spaces.' There has been no comment from Bezos' representatives on the protests. The local activists had planned a more organized protest for Saturday, aiming to obstruct access to canals with boats to prevent guests from reaching a wedding venue. They modified the protest to a march from the train station after claiming a victory, asserting that their pressure forced organizers to change the venue to the Arsenale, a more easily secured site beyond Venice's congested center. 'It will be a strong, decisive protest, but peaceful,'' said Federica Toninello, an activist with the Social Housing Assembly network. 'We want it to be like a party, with music, to make clear what we want our Venice to look like." Among the 200 guests confirmed to be attending the wedding are Mick Jagger, Ivanka Trump, Oprah Winfrey, Katy Perry and Leonardo DiCaprio. Venice, renowned for its romantic canal vistas, hosts hundreds of weddings each year, not infrequently those of the rich and famous. Previous celebrity weddings, like that of George Clooney to human rights lawyer Amal Alamuddin in 2014, were embraced by the public. Hundreds turned out to wish the couple well at City Hall. Bezos has a different political and business profile, said Tommaso Cacciari, a prominent figure in the movement that successfully pushed for a ban on cruise ships over 25,000 tons traveling through the Giudecca Canal in central Venice. 'Bezos is not a Hollywood actor,'' Cacciari said. 'He is an ultra-billionaire who sat next to Donald Trump during the inauguration, who contributed to his re-election and is contributing in a direct and heavy way to this new global obscurantism.'' Critics cite Amazon's labor practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments and Bezos' political associations as reasons for concern. Activists also argue that the Bezos wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over residents' needs. They cite measures such as the day-tripper tax — which critics argue reinforces Venice's image as a theme park — as ineffective. Chief among their concerns is the lack of investment in affordable housing and essential services. City officials have defended the wedding. Mayor Luigi Brugnaro called the event an honor for Venice, and the city denied the wedding would cause disruptions. "Venice once again reveals itself to be a global stage,'' Brugnaro told The Associated Press, adding he hoped to meet Bezos while he was in town. Meanwhile, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, issued a statement saying Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an 'important donation.' Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but said contact began in April, well before the protests started.