Hartlepool's bus franchise calls rejected by Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen
Under a franchise system, an area's local transport authority awards contracts to private operators allowing them to run services in specific areas or along certain routes.Those who support bus franchising argue it can improve public spending efficiency, as transport authorities can use money from profitable routes to subsidise those that do not make money.
But Houchen disagreed and said the taxpayer would have to pay for the new system."Franchising buses would mean years of costly bureaucracy, handing hundreds of millions to companies like Arriva and Stagecoach, and a significant tax increase on local people - something I've promised never to do," he said."Instead of gambling taxpayers' money on a vague, unworkable idea, we're delivering real improvements now [such as] £1 fares for young people and targeted funding for new services where it's needed most."
Labour-led Hartlepool Council's motion had also called on the combined authority to fund a maximum £2 bus fare across the Tees Valley, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.Under the government-funded National Bus Fare Cap Scheme, many single fares have a maximum price of £3.The North East Combined Authority (Neca) recently went further and capped fares at £2.50. However, the Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) has not lowered the maximum fare.The council also called for "a regular and reliable bus service" to be reinstated to areas with "unreliable" public transport links.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Account tied to Trump nominee posted conspiracy theories about Epstein, the 2020 election and Covid, report says
A social media account tied to President Donald Trump 's controversial pick to take over the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a history of posting various far-right conspiracy theories – the latest eyebrow-raising report to emerge about what is often a nonpartisan nominee. Last week, Trump announced he would nominate Erwin John 'EJ' Antoni III, the chief economist at The Heritage Foundation, the conservative group that created Project 2025, to replace former BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. A surface-level review of Antoni, 37, shows that he is a loyal Trump supporter who has aligned himself with the current administration's ideals – contributing to Project 2025, bashing former president Joe Biden's record, and even being a 'bystander' at the January 6 attack on the Capitol. But a more in-depth look at Antoni's history online indicates that a now-deleted X account, which once used Antoni's name, posted theories about Jeffrey Epstein's death, Covid-19's origins, and the validity of the 2020 presidential election, according to WIRED. A website archive of the account 'PhDofbombsaway,' shows that it used the name 'Dr. Erwin J. Antoni III,' 'Dr. J.,' as well as 'Dr. Curtis LeMay,' – an apparent reference to the Air Force general largely credited with planning and executing mass bombings on Japan during World War II, as well as advocating for nuclear weapon usage. The account's profile picture was of a fiery mushroom cloud, not unlike the one associated with nuclear weapon detonations. 'All or nothing. Do it die,' the account posted in late November 2020 in response to a tweet encouraging Republicans to stand up to 'fraudulently mailed machines.' The account consistently re-posted false claims about election fraud and theories about stolen ballots from prominent accounts. On January 5, 2021, hours before the attack on the Capitol, the account posted a reference to violence in the Bible while responding to a tweet from Trump in which he encouraged Republicans to 'fight.' 'Samson has his arms around the temple pillars, and although he may not survive, he will bring it all down on his enemies,' it posted, referring to the story of Samson receiving strength from God to rise up against his enemies. Last week, photos of Antoni outside the Capitol on January 6 circulated online. The White House confirmed Antoni was present as a 'bystander' who wandered over to see coverage of it on the news. Other posts from the account indicate the person running it was ingrained in far-right rhetoric and conspiracy theories. In November 2019, the account responded to a person theorizing about Epstein's death by suicide, claiming, 'Epstein didn't kill himself.' That theory was widely circulated among far-right communities online and continues to be a central part of concerns about government transparency around Epstein. Later that month, the same account replied to a tweet that seemed to make a sexual innuendo about former vice president Kamala Harris with its own. 'She does her best work when life brings her to her knees,' the account wrote. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Antoni declined to comment to Wired. While the account has since been deleted, Antoni remains present online with an X account that mostly posts Trump-aligned views of the economy or economic data. But his nomination has been subject to criticism even before NBC News reported his presence at the Capitol, or Wired reported about his alleged former X account. The president previously fired McEntarfer, a career civil servant, after expressing dissatisfaction with the BLS's job numbers reports. Trump insinuated, without evidence, that McEntarfer had manipulated the numbers to make the president look bad because the figures did not line up with Trump's rhetoric about the economy. Some economists and lawmakers have expressed concern that Trump's new nominee could be more inclined to alter BLS numbers to appease the president. While there is no rule about who may be the BLS commissioner, they are typically expected to be nonpartisan, given that the BLS is an independent fact-checking arm of the Department of Labor. Upon announcing Antoni's nomination, the president vowed that his nominee would 'ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE.' Antoni previously tweeted, calling for a 'better' way to collect and disseminate BLS data and criticizing the current method of doing so. Antoni's nomination will require Senate confirmation. So far, at least two Democratic senators have called for the Senate to reject Antoni's nomination.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Badenoch vows crackdown on subsidised cars for benefits claimants
Kemi Badenoch has vowed to crack down on subsidised cars for benefits claimants. The Motability scheme received a record £2.8bn of taxpayer cash last year to assist with the funding of new cars for people in receipt of mobility benefits. The Telegraph revealed in March that successful claimants can still apply for subsidised top-of-the-range BMWs worth more than £50,000 despite cuts to welfare support elsewhere. The Conservative leader vowed that only people with 'serious proven disabilities' would be eligible for the scheme if she won power at the next general election. Critics have branded the scheme out of control after it emerged last month that 40 cars were given to people with tennis elbow – a condition the NHS says 'usually goes away with rest'. More than 400 people with sleeping disorders accessed a vehicle through the scheme last year, as well as 20 with a 'food intolerance' and 20 more who cited constipation. Sharing a screenshot of The Telegraph's reporting from earlier this year, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Hard-working taxpayers are funding subsidised cars for constipation and tennis elbow. Here's how we'll stop the scam. 'Motability was created to help people with genuine mobility problems lease a car, scooter or powered wheelchair using part of their disability benefit. 'That's fair. We all want people who truly can't get around to live with dignity. But look what's really happening – 32,000 cars for 'anxiety or depressive disorders '. Even cars for 'tennis elbow', constipation, and food intolerance.' Mrs Badenoch went on to cite Motability's statistics, which show almost one in five new cars registered in 2024 were bought for the scheme. She added: 'We've got pensioners cutting back on heating because of Labour's winter fuel cuts, while a drunk driver can get a brand new car because they've got an 'alcohol problem'. How is that fair? 'Under my leadership, the Conservatives will fix this. Tighten the rules so only serious, proven disabilities qualify. Zero tolerance for scammers and online fraud. End the 'get a free car for anything' culture – because taxpayers deserve fairness.' Hardworking taxpayers are funding subsidised cars for constipation and tennis elbow. Here's how we'll stop the scam🧵👇 — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) August 19, 2025 Earlier this year, Motability Operations admitted to finding more than 5,000 cases of abuse of its taxpayer-subsidised scheme. A total of 5,300 customers – an average of 15 per day – were removed from the service last year after investigations into misuse. As well as helping benefits claimants access cars, Motability covers insurance costs and has installed 66,000 charging points at the homes of people on benefits free of charge. Applicants to the scheme must prove that such conditions affect their mobility to be eligible. Around 815,000 people now qualify for Motability, up from 650,000 two years ago. The average user of a taxpayer-subsidised car is in their 50s. Mrs Badenoch's crackdown is one of the first detailed policy announcements she has made in more than nine months as Conservative leader. She has tended to shy away from detailed commitments to re-establish her party's 'first principles' following its historic loss at the last election, which left it with just 121 seats. The announcements that have been made by Mrs Badenoch include a vow to deport all Channel migrants who reach the UK illegally and a reversal of Labour's tax raid on farmers. Last month, the Tory leader said the word 'disabled' has lost all meaning as a result of Britain's booming welfare society. At a speech in central London, Mrs Badenoch admitted the Tories had not always been 'clear enough' that they were still the party of work in the mould of the late Norman Tebbit. Warning that the UK was 'sitting on a ticking time bomb' of spiralling welfare dependency, Mrs Badenoch said the current size of the state may eventually 'collapse the economy'. Her MPs voted against Sir Keir Starmer's flagship benefit reforms in July because he failed to commit to bringing down the overall welfare bill while also not promising to raise taxes at the next Budget in the autumn.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Business group and MSP hit out at Glasgow congestion charge
The council is to press on with planning for a charge on drivers from outside, with city residents exempt. It has met with opposition from Labour and now others have raised their concerns. READ NEXT:Update on plan for congestion charge on motorists in Glasgow The plan for a future congestion charge were raised in a council paper stating the council has considered a proposal on a workplace parking tax but has recommended to pursue it at the moment. One of the groups opposed to a workplace parling levy was Glasgow Chamber of Commerce which has now stated its opposition to a congestion charge. Stuart Patrick, Chief Executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: "We cannot support a city-wide congestion charge until public transport improvements have been made in line with the conclusions of the Connectivity Commission. "We are very concerned about the possible displacement of business out of Glasgow. We believe the City Council needs support from the Scottish Government to deliver priority transport projects such as the Clyde Metro and the Glasgow City Region Bus Partnership improvement plan." The council said any charge could take years to be implemented. READ NEXT:Opposition to plans for a Glasgow congestion charge on drivers revealed Meanwhile, Monica Lennon, Labour MSP for Central Scotland has written to the council leader, Susan Aitken with concerns over people from outside Glasgow being charged and asking for it to be stopped. She said: 'I want to be clear that I fully recognise the importance of shifting from car dependency to more sustainable travel and transport. 'However, while our communities are underserved by public transport it is wrong to penalise them for the lack of choice available to them. The MSP said: 'If these plans go ahead, residents in South Lanarkshire and my constituents in the wider Central Scotland region could be forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family, or social reasons, including healthcare and education. 'Not only will this exacerbate inequalities, but it will also undermine public confidence in measures to protect our environment.' She added: 'Many of my constituents find it impossible to access the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital by public transport.' A council spokesperson said: 'We remain firmly committed to promoting sustainable transport throughout the city, and whilst we do not control the running or delivery of public transport, we will continue to work with partners on initiatives aimed at improving the city's public transport infrastructure. 'Having fully explored Workplace Parking Licensing and illustrated what a potential scheme in Glasgow could look like, we have no plans to take this forward at this time. 'While it is clear that the exploration of any congestion charging scheme would likely take several years and would require detailed feasibility work to be progressed, the council will engage closely with the required national regulatory review as part of our ongoing work in this area.'
