Australia's Albanese says Israeli PM Netanyahu ‘in denial' over suffering in Gaza
Mr Albanese's criticism came a day after he announced Australia would recognise a Palestinian state at next month's UN General Assembly. Australia is the latest member of the G20 after France, the UK and Canada to recognise the Palestinian state if certain commitments are met.
The acknowledgement was 'predicated on commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority', Mr Albanese said. Those commitments included no role for Hamas in a Palestinian government, demilitarisation of Gaza and the holding of elections, he said.
The Israeli leader last week approved a widely criticised plan to occupy Gaza City claiming that he had no choice but to "complete the job" and defeat Hamas.
Mr Albanese said Israel's reluctance to listen to its allies contributed to Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. 'He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people," the prime minister told public broadcaster ABC, recounting a Thursday phone call with Mr Netanyahu.
Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state is conditional on 'commitments received from the Palestinian Authority' that Hamas will have no role in any future state.
Mr Albanese argued on Monday that a two-state solution was the best hope to break the cycle of violence and end the suffering and starvation in Gaza.
Mr Netanyahu, addressing a rare press conference, called Australia's plan to recognise a Palestinian state "shameful" even before Mr Albanese had publicly announced it.
"To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it and buy this canard is disappointing, and I think it's shameful," he said. "It is not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes."
Mr Albanese previously seemed wary of dividing public opinion in the country, which has significant Jewish and Muslim minorities, by taking a firm position on the issue of recognising a Palestinian state.
But public mood shifted sharply after Israel said it planned to militarily occupy Gaza, prompting tens of thousands of demonstrators to march across Sydney's Harbour Bridge this month and call for sending humanitarian aid into the besieged Palestinian territory.
Israel's ambassador to Australia on Monday criticised Canberra's decision claiming that it undermined Israel's security.
'By recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas continues to kill, kidnap and reject peace, Australia undermines Israel's security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence," Amir Maimon said in a statement.
New Zealand this week announced it was considering recognising a Palestinian state and prime minister Christopher Luxon's cabinet would make a formal decision in September.
'New Zealand has been clear for some time that our recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if," foreign minister Winston Peters said.
Nearly 150 of the 193 members of the UN have already recognised Palestinian statehood, most of them decades ago.
The US and other Western countries have held off, saying that Palestinian statehood should be part of a final agreement resolving the Middle East conflict.
Israel's war and siege on Gaza has killed over 61,400 people thus far, left almost the entire the Palestinian territory in ruins, displaced most of its 2.2 million people and caused widespread starvation, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run Strip and international aid groups.
Israel launched a ground and air assault on Gaza after some 1,200 people were killed and 251 abducted during a Hamas attack on southern Israel in October 2023.
Most of the hostages have since been freed under ceasefire or other deals, but 50 remain in Gaza. Israel believes around 20 are still alive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
UK demands Israel stop 'unimaginable' Gaza famine as children starve to death
The UK, Australia and other European states demanded Israel allow unrestricted aid into Gaza, describing the humanitarian suffering as "unimaginable" as another five Palestinians die of starvation Horror-stricken Gaza is suffering a 'famine unfolding before our eyes,' a coalition of western countries declared on Tuesday. The UK, Australia and other European states demanded Israel allow unrestricted aid into Gaza, describing the humanitarian suffering as "unimaginable". In a joint statement signed by the foreign ministers of 24 countries, they said famine is "unfolding before our eyes". It said: "The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised.' The grim warning happened as Israel continued to batter the Strip with missiles and ground attacks, killing at least 46 Palestinians since dawn on Tuesday. Another five Palestinians, including two children, died from starvation, taking the toll of those dying from lack of food to 227 since the war in the Strip began. Among those who have starved to death, according to health officials, were 103 children, and Israel has continued pounding the enclave daily. It comes after Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu recently 'completely lost it' with angry response to Keir Starmer. The military has been roundly condemned for its killing of Al Jazeera journalists based on the claim that one of them was a Hamas 'terrorist.' Both the UN and the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer 's office have called for an independent investigation to probe the attack. The 24 foreign minister statement continued: "Due to restrictive new registration requirements, essential international NGOs (non-governmental organisations) may be forced to leave the Occupied Palestinian Territories imminently, which would worsen the humanitarian situation still further. "We call on the government of Israel to provide authorisation for all international NGO aid shipments and to unblock essential humanitarian actors from operating. Lethal force must not be used at distribution sites, and civilians, humanitarians and medical workers must be protected." The statement was signed by the foreign ministers of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK. The military has been roundly condemned for its killing of Al Jazeera journalists based on the claim that one of them was a Hamas 'terrorist.' Both the UN and the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's office have called for an independent investigation to probe the attack. The Government Media Office in Gaza reported that only 1,334 aid trucks out of the supposed 9,000 were allowed into Gaza over 15 days. Wadie Said, professor of law at the University of Colorado, says journalists cannot be targeted in conflicts as they are considered 'protected persons' under international law. The latest Israeli targeting and killing of Al Jazeera's journalists is 'remarkable', he said, in that the Israeli military 'engaged in a campaign of terrorisation of Anas al-Sharif directly. It's no longer being hidden, it's no longer being kept under wraps,' Said told Al Jazeera. The war began on October 7 2023 when Hamas broke out of Gaza and killed around 1,200 in southern Israel, kidnapping 250 and taking them back to the Strip. At least 50 remain in captivity , although only 20 are believed to be alive.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting
As the world witnesses the horrors unfolding in Gaza, a related tragedy continues with chilling regularity: the systematic targeting and killing of journalists. Just as the Gaza journalistic community thought matters could not get any worse, Benjamin Netanyahu's brutal occupying forces carried out yet another cold-blooded murder on Sunday, this time of the Al Jazeera journalists Anas al-Sharif and Mohammed Qraiqea, along with videographers Ibrahim Thaher, Mohammed Nofal and their colleagues. They were sheltering in a media tent near al-Shifa hospital, and were killed by a direct strike. The Israeli war machine, accelerating its stated goal of occupying Gaza, showed no restraint in targeting journalists, in violation of international conventions. So far in this war it has killed 238 of us. The war on Gaza has become the deadliest conflict for journalists and media workers in living memory, with 2024 recording the highest number of journalists killed, the vast majority at the hands of Israeli forces. The systematic targeting and elimination of journalists is not merely a local or regional tragedy; it is a catastrophic breach of international norms regarding the protection of journalists in conflict zones, signalling a global collapse of the moral responsibility in safeguarding those who risk everything to shed light on the realities of war. Gaza is not the only place where journalists are under siege. Threats, intimidation and murderous violence against journalists are on the rise. However, what differentiates Israeli crimes is the impunity with which the occupation forces murder journalists and the indifference shown by leaders of the so-called free world. What is especially shocking is when some media organisations repeat the Israeli regime's false allegations against targeted journalists without verification. By any measure, it is the most dangerous time to be a journalist in recent history. Reporters are threatened, harassed and killed merely for fulfilling their public duty of bearing witness and reporting the truth. Worldwide, the dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones have intensified. In 2023, a journalist or media worker was killed, on average, every four days. In 2024, this grim statistic worsened to once every three days, most of those by Israeli forces. The journalists in Gaza are not parachuted-in international correspondents but local journalists – those who know the land, the people and the stories best. These journalists are not just reporting on Gaza's tragedy; they are living it. This surge in violence against journalists is neither accidental nor isolated. It is part of a broader, deeply worrying trend: the systematic silencing of the media, often orchestrated by autocrats and regimes who seek to conceal their crimes in darkness. This should horrify us all. It is an assault not only on individual reporters but on the entire global public's right to know, to understand the depth of human suffering, and to hold the powerful to account. Beyond the killings of more than 230 journalists, Israel now employs starvation as a tool, with journalists pushed to the brink, collapsing from hunger while reporting. At Al Jazeera, we have lost colleagues and their family members in Gaza, with the latest killing of Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues bringing the total number of the network's journalists killed to nine. Our colleagues have been forced to report not just on the atrocities happening to civilians, but on the direct attacks against those whose only weapon is a microphone or a camera. Despite this, we insist on continuing in our professional duty. We remain committed to reporting unfolding genocide, despite Israeli efforts to blind us and the world. We will tirelessly work to strengthen the teams and to remain faithful to our global audience, who have a right to be informed. But this requires international solidarity, and the exertion of full pressure on Israel to stop targeting and killing journalists and to allow international media access and freedom of operation in the Gaza Strip. The international community must act, urgently and decisively, to safeguard journalists and to protect those who risk everything to inform the world about the continuing humanitarian catastrophe and genocide in Gaza. Journalists must be allowed to perform their duties without fear of violence. Anything less is a betrayal of the most fundamental principles of free expression. We owe it to the courageous journalists in Gaza to amplify their voices. Their work is not merely documentation; it is the first draft of history, whereby future historians will study the horrors of the 21st century's most televised genocide. Access to reliable information about wars and conflicts is not a luxury; it is essential for the wellbeing of global populations, the protection of human rights and the global effort to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable. When journalists are silenced, we all become more vulnerable to disinformation, propaganda and the unchecked abuse of power. We are at a crossroads. If the world continues to tolerate the murder, starvation and persecution of journalists, it is not only journalism that will suffer, but also accountability, democracy and the possibility of a more just future. The international legal framework for the protection of journalists in war must be urgently strengthened and enforced, and governments must be held to account for violations. The international journalistic community, and indeed the world, bears an immense responsibility. The courage, commitment and sacrifice of journalists in Gaza demand nothing less than our full support and unrelenting advocacy. Our inaction will be recorded by history as a monumental failure to protect those who stood at the frontlines of truth. Asef Hamidi is the director of news, Al Jazeera Channel Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Don't believe the hype about nuclear weapons
Polly Toynbee is right to point out that while nuclear war has been pushed down the 'league table of fear', most recently by concerns about the climate crisis, the nuclear threat itself remains 'as great or greater' and should be the subject of much more urgent debate (I changed my mind on banning the bomb, but the threat of nuclear war is growing – and so is complacency, 7 August). All the more surprising, then, that she overlooks some of the more promising steps towards nuclear disarmament. In particular, momentum is building behind the UN treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons, which came into force in 2021 and is now supported by nearly half the countries in the world. The treaty was the focus of much of the debate in Hiroshima, where I attended the 80th anniversary commemorations, and it deserves to be much better known. How disappointing, then, that the UK government is not only failing to support it but is actively trying to suppress information about the impact of nuclear war as one of just three countries to vote against the creation of a UN scientific panel on its effects. Instead, it's choosing to accept a recommendation from the recent strategic defence review to run a PR campaign to convince people of the 'necessity' of a growing nuclear arsenal. If we are to have any success in challenging this, we need to promote a public education campaign that sets out the existential threat posed by nuclear weapons, the flaws in so-called deterrence theory and measures that could immediately reduce risk – taking weapons off hair-trigger alert, for example, and joining China in a 'no first use' policy. Recent polling from More in Common suggests that young people believe nuclear conflict is the greatest threat to Britain. We owe it to them not to give LucasVice-president, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament; former Green party MP I normally agree with Polly Toynbee, and was also on the Aldermaston marches as a child, but she is misguided in believing that a joint European nuclear capability would make us safer from Russian aggression. If Russian tanks were to roll into Poland, does she envisage Europe threatening to take out Moscow? If so, I hope that it would be an empty threat and hence useless; if a real threat, we are on the road to Armageddon. Maybe it would deter a nuclear attack or threat, but is such a situation conceivable? After all, Vladimir Putin could launch a nuclear attack on Ukraine, which has no nuclear umbrella. The more places that have such weapons, the more the risk of misjudged situations. In practice, the nuclear option is useless, unsafe and costly, as well as WestonWillesden Green, London The dangerous myth that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima ended the Pacific war is perpetuated in all the coverage of its 80th anniversary. When I attended an intensive summer course with my students, organised by Hiroshima City University in 2005, we discussed the evidence against this contention. Subsequently, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, in his book Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman, and the Surrender of Japan, laid out the overwhelming evidence that it was the Soviet entry into the war that finally forced the surrender. Nuclear weapons kill people and may destroy the planet – they do not end NewmanEmeritus professor, London Metropolitan University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
