Trump official reveals vodka drinking at negotiations in Minsk
In an interview with Politico published on Sunday, John Coale, a deputy to US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Keith Kellogg, offered a glimpse into high-level US-Belarus talks in Minsk last month.
Shortly after the meeting, Belarus released several detained opposition activists, including prominent opposition figure Sergey Tikhanovsky, who immediately left the country for Lithuania.
According to officials in Minsk, Lukashenko pardoned the prisoners at Trump's request and stressed that he acted out of 'humanitarian considerations, to reunify families.' They added that the talks also focused on US-Belarus relations and international issues.
Politico claimed the release 'wouldn't have happened without Coale's efforts to forge a relationship with Lukashenko, including over a long lunch with vodka toasts.' Coale said, 'I did two shots, didn't throw up, but did not do a third one.'
While the lunch was held behind closed doors, footage from the talks released by Belarusian media shows Lukashenko cordially greeting the US delegation, hugging Kellogg, and patting other American officials on the shoulder.
According to Politico, Trump's special envoys are able to pursue informal diplomacy while bypassing traditional State Department channels, which provides opportunities for direct, unconventional engagement.
Lukashenko later said the meeting was respectful, adding that it should not be interpreted as a concession to the West. 'We were not playing at a giveaway... There was a respectful conversation.'
The talks with key Russian ally Belarus took place as the Trump administration made efforts to restore ties with Moscow while seeking to negotiate an end to the Ukraine conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Brazil to defy Trump with push for BRICS cooperation
Brazil plans to strengthen ties with its fellow BRICS nations despite warnings from US President Donald Trump, a senior presidential adviser said on Saturday. Washington had threatened tariffs over the country's relations with the bloc and prosecution of former Brazilian leader Jair Bolsonaro. In an interview with the Financial Times, Celso Amorim stated that the US pressure is 'reinforcing our relations with the BRICS, because we want to have diversified relations and not depend on any one country.' He added that Brazil is also pursuing closer ties with partners in Europe, South America and Asia in order to broaden its diplomatic and economic options. Amorim went on to criticize Trump's actions and pressure as meddling in Brazil's internal affairs, saying the interference dwarfs anything seen 'even in colonial times.' 'I don't think even the Soviet Union would have done anything like this,' he said while denying that BRICS is an ideological group. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose tariffs of up to 50% on Brazilian imports, tying them to Brazil's handling of the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces accusations of orchestrating a coup following his 2022 election defeat. In addition, Trump threatened an extra 10% levy against countries 'aligning themselves' with the BRICS bloc, which he deemed to be 'anti American.' Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva pushed back, warning Trump that he is not 'the emperor of the world' and that his country would not cave in to demands. The US president has been a fierce critic of the group of emerging economies led by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Trump has blasted the bloc over what he described as attempts to 'take over the dollar' stressing that he would spare no effort to preserve its hegemony. Russian officials have said that while BRICS is not pursuing a common currency, 65% of trade among members is now conducted in national currencies. Moscow has also stressed that BRICS was never intended to rival the US, adding that debates about moving away from the dollar are caused by Washington's 'arbitrary' actions.
Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Rubio shares Trump's feelings about Russia-Ukraine conflict
US President Donald Trump is growing impatient with Russia over resolving the Ukraine conflict, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said. Moscow maintains it is open to diplomacy, but has said any settlement must take into account its security concerns. Speaking to Fox News on Saturday, Rubio claimed that while Trump is focused on peace and has done his best to bring hostilities to a close, his overtures to Russia appear to be yielding little result so far. 'He's done everything possible to bring it to an end. I think he is growing increasingly frustrated,' he said. According to Rubio, despite 'good interactions with [Russian President] Vladimir Putin and phone calls, it never leads to anything.' 'He is losing patience, losing his willingness to continue to wait for the Russian side to do something to bring an end to this war that wasn't his, but he wants to see it come to an end,' Rubio added, accusing Moscow of using 'delaying tactics.' His comments come after Trump imposed a 50-day ceasefire deadline on Moscow, warning of 'very severe' new sanctions, including 100% 'secondary tariffs' on countries buying Russian oil. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov warned that the sanctions threat would be interpreted by Kiev as a 'signal to continue the war' rather than to seek peace. He has also described Trump's style as 'rather harsh,' while confirming that 'Moscow intends to continue dialogue with Washington' and follow 'a line of repairing the significantly broken bilateral relations.' Earlier this week, Russia and Ukraine held a third round of direct talks in Istanbul, with Moscow proposing short ceasefires for retrieving wounded and fallen soldiers. Additionally, the Kremlin offered to continue prisoner exchanges and return the remains of fallen soldiers. However, the two sides remain far apart on a potential peace settlement, with Moscow insisting that Ukraine should recognize the loss of five of its former regions that joined Russia in public referendums, withdraw its forces from them, commit to neutrality, and limit its own military capabilities. Kiev has dismissed the terms as an 'ultimatum.'
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Turns out the Kremlin hates von der Leyen about as much as EU lawmakers do
Apparently, trying to hold Ursula von der Leyen accountable is now a Russian op, reports Der Spiegel, citing a new NATO-linked think tank report. The study treats elected oversight and European lawmakers whose job, ideally, involves more than clapping like trained seals every time an unelected Eurocrat lights public money on fire, like elements of some kind of Russian infiltration plot. 'Massive support for this effort was also found by pro-Kremlin media outlets, bloggers, and online influencers, as the Lithuania-based organization specializes in analyzing disinformation and Russian propaganda, which is seen as part of Russia's hybrid warfare against the EU,' Spiegel wrote, describing Russian-linked media 'fueling' a recent von der Leyen non-confidence vote in the EU Parliament. 'Among the larger portals were those of the Russian propaganda channel RT…' According to the advance copy of this report seen by Spiegel, the study reviewed 284 articles from Russian-linked media. Exactly how many of those articles expressed something like only von der Leyen's ouster could save Europe? 90%? 75%? Maybe half? Nope, just 35%. Roughly the same percentage of voting EU lawmakers who favored ejecting her (32.7%). So by this logic, the Kremlin is about as supportive of Ursula as Brussels is. Awkward. Spiegel said that was the most common so-called Kremlin-backed narrative that the study found. Others included the suggestion that von der Leyen is part of a corrupt elite that robbed citizens to fill Big Pharma's pockets. Because apparently, saying that hey, maybe EU contracts shouldn't be inked via disappearing text messages with the CEO of a company, means that you're doing Putin's bidding. Real democracy means that you shut your mouth when you see your overlords doing shady stuff. Another alleged Kremlin line? That Ursula, despite her presidential title, was never elected. As someone who personally refers to her as 'Queen Ursula,' I'm actually surprised that one didn't rank higher. It's not like she won a popular vote or anything. She was handpicked in shady backrooms and then subjected to a simple confirmation by EU lawmakers. Her sole opponent in this so-called 'election' was literally just 'not Ursula.' Only the EU, in all its dystopian delusion, would call that an 'election'. Then there was the claim that she's obsessed with confronting Russia. Which is just, uh, objectively true? I mean, come on. If there are extraterrestrials somewhere out there, they may not know much about Earth, except for the fact that von der Leyen is obsessed with Russia – a phenomenon easily visible from space. Even right before the vote, she accused the lawmakers subjecting her to democratic accountability of being Kremlin stooges just because they wanted her to explain herself. 'There is ample proof that many are supported by our enemies and by their puppet masters in Russia or elsewhere. What we hear from you are movements fueled by conspiracies, from anti-vaxxers, to put in apologists and you only have to look at some of the signatories of this motion to understand what I mean,' she pleaded. Let's back up here. Why exactly did she face this no-confidence vote? Because no one who's elected and accountable at the EU has actually been able to provide concrete details of contract terms for the tens of billions of euros in Covid jabs that she strong-armed European governments into paying for. Jabs that are now so useless they're being dumped in landfills all over Europe, where one-eyed stuffed animals, soggy pizza boxes, and a moldy futon just got their third booster, courtesy of the EU taxpayer. One of those contracts followed a flurry of text exchanges between Ursula and Pfizer CEO, Robert Bourla, which she bragged about to the New York Times right before they pulled a Houdini. The courts have so far politely asked her to explain herself. And that's where we're stuck right now. So frustrated lawmakers figured that they could at least make her publicly squirm with a non-confidence vote in an attempt to get her to cough up at least some of the answers for taxpayers. The result? Ursula's interpretive song and tap-dance routine in Parliament: 'Putin Did It: Paranoia in Three Acts.' She ultimately survived the vote thanks to some budget crumbs thrown at the lefties who were otherwise saying that they would have voted against her. But even they told Politico that it was her 'absolute last chance.' So here comes an obscure outlet that sounds like it's trying a little too hard with the name. It's funded by, let's see… NATO members like the German government, UK Foreign Office, Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, and also the German Marshall Fund, which is practically a NATO mascot. In other words, roughly as independent as a teenager who calls down to his mom for 'room service.' And wouldn't you know it, they galloped in like Queen Ursula's white knight with a whole 'study' backing her mantra that the whole non-confidence vote was little more than a Kremlin plot. They could've just called themselves But sure, let's just call skepticism and the demand for basic accountability a 'Russian disinformation campaign,' and totally ignore the fact that Russian-linked media were mostly just echoing general discontent that has been bubbling up in European coverage and parliament for a while now. As reported by multiple outlets including Politico and Euronews, establishment EU Socialists have been turned off by what they perceive as von der Leyen's overtures to the right-wing. Centrist Renew Europe voices frustration over her increasingly aloof style. Even her own center right European People's Party (EPP) allies have been criticizing her centralized leadership approach. 'EU capitals fume at 'Queen' von der Leyen. Diplomats accuse European Commission president of overreach amid a furor over her trip to Israel,' Politico wrote in 2023. 'From queen to empress: Inside Ursula von der Leyen's power grab,' it wrote last year. 'Her penchant for centralisation, her aloof character and her avoidance of controversial subjects have garnered her the nickname of 'Queen Ursula' in Brussels,' Euronews says. Know what would've been genuinely illuminating? A side-by-side comparison of 'Russian' and 'non-Russian' media coverage, because although I've personally been calling her 'Queen Ursula' for years now, apparently it's been catching on in the mainstream. accuses the Russian-linked press of suggesting that 'von der Leyen was an undemocratically legitimized autocrat.' That's a long-winded way to say 'Queen,' as even the mainstream outlets have been doing lately, and also, apparently her own colleagues, as Euronews suggests. But maybe a broader analysis would've complicated the nice, clean Kremlin-driven narrative angle. And who needs that when Queen Ursula has a throne to protect? Funny how 'Russian disinfo' always seems to show up right when accountability does. If challenging Ursula's behavior makes you a Russian asset, then much of the EU Parliament should probably just register as foreign agents. Because either the Kremlin is now running half of Europe, or needs to make an effort to step out of NATO's basement and touch grass.
