Evidence mounts that universe's dark energy is changing over time
By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New data involving millions of galaxies and luminous galactic cores is providing fresh evidence that the enigmatic and invisible cosmic force called dark energy - responsible for the universe's accelerated expansion - has weakened over time rather than remaining constant, as long hypothesized.
The findings announced on Wednesday are part of a years-long study of the history of the cosmos, focusing upon dark energy. The researchers analyzed three years of observations by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, or DESI, at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona.
"The DESI results tantalizingly hint at an evolving dark energy," said Arjun Dey, an astrophysicist at the U.S. National Science Foundation's NOIRLab and the NOIRLab project scientist for DESI.
The new analysis used data from DESI's first three years of observations of almost 15 million galaxies and quasars, which are extremely bright galactic cores where a supermassive black hole hungrily consumes surrounding material.
This analysis, combined with other astrophysical data, offers mounting evidence that the impact of dark energy may be weakening over time and that the standard model of how the universe works may need to be revised, the researchers said.
Those other measurements include the light left over from the dawn of the universe, exploding stars called supernovae and the manner in which light from distant galaxies is warped by gravity.
"The new findings, both from DESI and from a number of other experiments, now suggest that whatever is causing the universal expansion may be decaying - that is, decreasing in strength," Dey said. "This once again changes our fundamental understanding of nature, and in particular our understanding of the future of our universe. Will the expansion continue forever, or will the acceleration slow, stop and turn into a deceleration?"
The Big Bang event roughly 13.8 billion years ago initiated the universe, and it has been expanding ever since. Scientists in 1998 disclosed that this expansion was actually accelerating, with dark energy as the hypothesized reason. The physical nature of dark energy is presently unknown.
"DESI data tells us about how the size of the universe has grown over time. We can relate the rate at which it is growing directly to the strength - or energy density - of dark energy at a given time, since dark energy is what causes that growth rate to accelerate," said University of Pittsburgh astrophysicist Jeff Newman, another of the researchers.
The universe's contents include ordinary matter - stars, planets, gas, dust and all the familiar stuff on Earth - as well as dark matter and dark energy.
Ordinary matter represents perhaps 5% of the contents. Dark matter, which is known through its gravitational influences on galaxies and stars, may make up about 27%. Dark energy may make up about 68%.
"Dark energy is definitely one of the most puzzling and mysterious components of the universe. We don't yet know what it is, but we can detect its clear effect on the expansion of the universe," Dey said.
"All the matter in the universe has gravity which should be slowing down the rate of expansion. Instead, we observe that the universal expansion is accelerating, and we attribute this unexpected behavior to dark energy, a component of the universe which exerts a pressure to push things apart - kind of like a negative gravity," Dey added.
The new findings were presented at the American Physical Society's Global Physics Summit in Anaheim, California.
"Our findings in DESI that the dark energy is evolving in time and is not the cosmological constant is probably the most important result about cosmic acceleration since its discovery in 1998 that led to the Nobel Prize in physics in 2011," said cosmologist Mustapha Ishak of the University of Texas at Dallas and co-chair of the working group that analyzed the DESI data.
"The new and unexpected result is likely to change the future of cosmology and our understanding of its standard model," Ishak added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Merck's potential blockbuster cholesterol pill succeeds in late-stage studies
(Reuters) -Merck's oral cholesterol pill succeeded in two late-stage studies, marking a win for the drugmaker as it focuses on the development of growth drivers beyond its cancer drugs and vaccines. The company is searching for its next blockbuster candidate as its major revenue driver, Keytruda, is expected to lose patent protection by the end of the decade. Merck's non-statin cholesterol drug, enlicitide decanoate, is being tested for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, a condition that causes elevated buildup of fat in the blood vessels and can lead to heart attacks and strokes. Enlicitide works by blocking PCSK9, a protein that plays a crucial role in regulating cholesterol levels, while statins block an enzyme the liver uses to make cholesterol. BMO Capital Markets analyst Evan Seigerman said Merck's drug could potentially provide a "multi-billion dollar opportunity" that expands the PCSK9 market beyond current injectable therapies. The drug showed meaningful reductions in LDL-C cholesterol, commonly referred to as "bad cholesterol", when compared to placebo and other oral non-statin therapies, Merck said. However, Leerink analysts have noted that Astrazeneca's AZD0780 is a "credible threat" as it has shown a 50.7% reduction in LDL-C levels during a trial. Merck has not given the details on LDL-C reduction for enlicitide. The drug was tested in patients who have a history of, or are at risk for a type of heart disease, and were treated with a statin. Shares of Merck were up 2% in premarket trading. Verve Therapeutics is also developing a gene therapy to reduce high cholesterol levels, which is expected to be used in combination with other drugs.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
We May Be Living in a Black Hole from a Parent Universe, Here's Why That Matters
A group of physicists just put forward a theory that could shake our understanding of where we came from, and where we're going. According to their new model, our universe may have originated not in a singular explosion, but as a bounce from inside a black hole formed in a previous 'parent' universe. That's right: you could be living inside a black hole. This bold claim comes from a paper led by Professor Enrique Gaztanaga of the Institute of Cosmos Sciences in Barcelona published in Physical Review D. He and his team argue that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning of everything, but rather a cosmic transition point in a cycle that never really starts or ends. The idea centers around the Pauli exclusion principle, which is a well-known quantum rule that prevents identical particles from occupying the same space. Gaztanaga believes this principle prevents the total collapse of matter in a dying universe, forcing it to "bounce" and expand again, forming a new universe inside what we would call a black hole. Here's the twist: unlike many speculative physics models, this one doesn't require exotic particles or untestable fields. The bounce, according to the paper, occurs naturally within Einstein's framework of general relativity. Even the two phases of expansion, what we call inflation and dark energy, can be explained by the dynamics of the bounce itself. What makes this model especially compelling is that it's testable. The team predicts a slightly curved universe and a small but measurable cosmological constant. These could potentially be confirmed by upcoming missions like the European Space Agency's Arrakihs satellite. If proven correct, it would upend one of the most deeply held beliefs in modern physics—that the universe began with a singularity. Instead, we'd be part of an endless chain of universes, each born from the collapse of the last. 'We are not witnessing the birth of everything from nothing,' Gaztanaga writes. 'But rather the continuation of a cosmic cycle.' And if he's right, the Big Bang wasn't our beginning. It was just our turn. We May Be Living in a Black Hole from a Parent Universe, Here's Why That Matters first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 9, 2025
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Calculate That the Entire Big Bang Must Have Taken Place Inside a Black Hole
The standard model of cosmology may be the best explanation we've got for why the universe is the way it is and how it all came to be. But it's not the only explanation. Enter black hole cosmology. It's a radical idea which proposes that the Big Bang — the rapid unraveling of an infinitely dense point, believed to have given birth to the cosmos as we know it — actually took place in a black hole, which itself formed inside a larger "parent" universe. Ergo, all of us — and every star, planet, galaxy, and internet rando — are living inside one of these mysterious singularities. Enrique Gaztanaga, lead author of a new study published in the journal Physical Review D and a professor at the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth, isn't the first to propose this controversial idea. But his team's research offers a new model for imagining how this hypothetical scenario took place. "Our calculations suggest the Big Bang was not the start of everything, but rather the outcome of a gravitational crunch or collapse that formed a very massive black hole — followed by a bounce inside it," Gaztanaga wrote in an essay for The Conversation. Certainly, there are a lot of holes you could poke in the standard model. Why is there more matter than anti-matter, when the universe should be uniform? Why did the universe undergo a period of "cosmic inflation" in which it expanded at faster than light speeds, then stopped? And why does its present day rate of expansion appear to be different depending on how we measure it? Gaztanaga's main gripe seems to be with our current understanding of a singularity. To him, the idea of the universe starting as a point of infinite density is immensely unsatisfying. "This is not just a technical glitch; it's a deep theoretical problem that suggests we don't really understand the beginning at all," he wrote. Gaztanaga also takes aim at other convenient cosmological constructions like dark energy, which is intended to explain why the universe's expansion is mysteriously accelerating. This hypothetical force is thought to make up 68 percent of the universe but is completely unobservable, leaving room for different-minded scientists to call its existence into question. Rethinking singularities could neatly resolve many of these conundrums. We return to Gaztanaga's paper. "Gravitational collapse does not have to end in a singularity," he wrote for The Conversation. "Our maths show that as we approach the potential singularity, the size of the universe changes as a (hyperbolic) function of cosmic time." This is a bold claim. The consensus is that gravitational collapse — like a star imploding into a black hole — must result in an infinitely dense singularity. What Gaztanaga is arguing happens instead is that the collapse not only halt short of completely crushing the matter, but reverses course — a "bounce," in his terminology. "What emerges on the other side of the bounce is a universe remarkably like our own," Gaztanaga explains. "Even more surprisingly, the rebound naturally produces the two separate phases of accelerated expansion — inflation and dark energy — driven not by a hypothetical fields but by the physics of the bounce itself." It's a fascinating explanation, but there's a lot that remains to be proved. It relies on discounting some very well-established physics behind singularities. The standard model may not be perfect, but it's the standard for a reason. It'll take a lot more to dethrone it, and Gaztanaga is optimistic that future missions like the European Space Agency's ARRAKIHS, which will study invisible structures of dark matter to test the model, could reveal the answers we're looking for. More on cosmology: Astronomers Confused to Discover That a Bunch of Nearby Galaxies Are Pointing Directly at Us
