Irish Government will ‘fully' cooperate with Omagh Bomb Inquiry
The Irish premier said that work with the inquiry team and and chairman had already begun, while Tanaiste Simon Harris said the Irish Government 'will not be found wanting'.
Mr Harris, who is also Ireland's foreign minister, said he wanted to provide a 'categoric' assurance that his Government would find a legal mechanism to ensure all requested material is supplied to the UK inquiry into the 1998 attack.
There is a significant cross-border element to the investigation into the Omagh bomb, as the attackers travelled across the border with the bomb ahead of the devastating blast in Co Tyrone.
Everybody in Ireland remembers the horror of that sunny August afternoon in Omagh, and today will be another stark reminder of the pain and suffering caused to so many families as the commemorative hearings begin
Simon Harris
A judge who called on the UK Government to set up an inquiry also urged the Irish Government to establish its own probe.
Ministers in Dublin decided against holding their own separate inquiry but have pledged to co-operate with the UK one.
Ahead of the first substantive hearings beginning in Omagh on Tuesday, some relatives of the bereaved had questioned whether the Irish authorities would hand over all requested information.
Michael Gallagher, whose son Aiden was killed, was particularly vocal on the issue.
Asked about the cooperation of the Irish Government, Mr Martin said: 'We have worked with the inquiry team and officials in my previous department – the Department of Foreign Affairs – would have engaged with the chairman of the tribunal and inquiry team, along with officials with the Department of Justice who are working with Department of Foreign Affairs.
'I've made it very clear that we have to cooperate fully with the inquiry team, just as we did in previous inquiries, where we passed legislation to enable us to provide information to such either inquests or inquiries.'
Mr Harris, who was on visit to Stormont in Belfast on Tuesday, moved to offer reassurance to the families.
'Everybody in Ireland remembers the horror of that sunny August afternoon in Omagh, and today will be another stark reminder of the pain and suffering caused to so many families as the commemorative hearings begin,' he said.
'Testimony over the coming weeks will be difficult, especially for those who lost loved ones, and for those who responded first as the news broke, but it is important to remind ourselves of the full horror of that brutal attack, to remind ourselves of the purpose of this inquiry.
'When I was taoiseach, the Government took a clear decision to assist the Omagh Inquiry. That commitment was made clear, publicly, at the preliminary hearing last August.
'The programme for Government repeats that commitment in no uncertain terms, stating plainly that we will 'play our full part in legacy processes… including facilitating and supporting the Omagh Inquiry'.
'The cross-border nature of the assistance, to an inquiry established under UK law, means that it takes some work to get the details of the mechanisms of co-operation right, but we are actively engaging in this work and we will not be found wanting.'
Mr Harris was challenged on the issue as he fielded questions from reporters at Parliament Buildings.
'I want to be categoric here that the Irish Government will ensure full co-operation with the inquiry,' he said.
'Our absolute, overstated, clear aim here is to make sure that all questions are answered through this inquiry, and can I say I think today is a very, very difficult and painful day for the families, for the families of victims, for the families of the many that were injured.
'It is a stark reminder of the horror and the evil that was experienced on that day in 1998, and I think of all of the victims today. I think of all of the families as well.
'And I heard Michael Gallagher's comments earlier. Michael Gallagher, a good man who has worked so hard for truth and for justice, and I want to absolutely assure him, and I want to assure all of the families that the Irish Government will co-operate.'
He added: 'It is about finding the mechanism, because, obviously, Ireland is a sovereign country, the mechanism for engagement, but that will be found.
'There will be a way forward, and we will all work to make sure that victims, their families, the people of Northern Ireland, the people of this island, get answers and get truth.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cash-strapped councils spend £2 of every £5 on debt and pensions
Councils are spending an average of £2 in every £5 on staff pensions and debt interest payments before a penny is allocated to essential services. Some 18pc of council tax revenue is used to service the cost of huge loans taken out over the last decade, as local authorities struggle to cut costs and face greater demand for services. Staff pension contributions account for a further 23pc of revenues on average, meaning that 41pc is swallowed up before any money is spent on core services such as social care and bin collection, according to official figures obtained by The Times. Cuts to central government funding mean local authorities have accumulated large piles of debt to cover their costs. Councils now collectively owe at least £148.5bn – a 60pc rise since 2015. Many councils have also borrowed money to fund costly real estate investments, regeneration initiatives and infrastructure projects. At the same time, council pension obligations have soared. A Telegraph investigation previously found that 12 Scottish, nine English and three Welsh local authorities now shell out more than a third of their council tax on staff pension contributions, with the total bill exceeding £730m a year. The Local Government Pension Scheme already pays 2.3 million retirees, and another five million current and former workers are building up generous, inflation-linked pensions. Rising piles of debt are raising concerns about the sustainability of council finances. Birmingham and Thurrock are among the six councils to have declared themselves effectively bankrupt over the last five years. The Local Government Association has warned that as many as a quarter of councils were likely to need a government bailout in the next two years to avoid bankruptcy. Local authority funding comes from multiple sources, including government grants, but tax receipts represented more than half of English councils' core spending power last year, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Homeowners and renters are having to endure soaring council tax rates across the country despite cuts to services as councils attempt to plug gaps in their finances. Almost half of properties in England now face bills of at least £2,000, while the number of households on the hook for a £5,000 bill has quadrupled. Nine in 10 areas across England endured the maximum 4.99pc council tax rise in April. Parts of Scotland and Wales were slapped with even higher increases. Residents also face paying hundreds of pounds more for services once covered by their council tax bills, as cash-strapped authorities introduce new levies by stealth. Birmingham City Council has come under fire for introducing a so-called 'rat tax' after removing free pest control services to save £400,000. Instead, residents have to pay a £24 fee as the Midlands city is battling severe rat infestations made worse by bin worker strikes. At the same time, town hall bosses are enjoying record salaries, with almost 4,000 local authority staff receiving more than £100,000 in 2023-24, up by more than a quarter in a year. Joanna Marchong, of the TaxPayers' Alliance campaign group, said that council debt had 'spiralled out of control'. She added: 'Local authorities have accumulated a substantial debt burden by making risky investments or ploughing money into other imprudent or failed projects, like Birmingham's disastrous IT system or Nottingham's Robin Hood Energy. 'Now, we are seeing the consequences of ever-higher council tax bills for residents.' Pete Marland, of the Local Government Association, said: 'Local government finances remain in a fragile position, the impact of which has been cumulative for some time. 'A sustainable, long-term financial model for local government must lead to all councils having adequate resources to meet growing cost and demand pressures.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour is sneaking through a wealth tax in all but name
It's impossible to overstate how dangerous this moment is for Britain. The economic choices of the chancellor this autumn will determine whether we as a country leave the door ajar, even if only slightly, for the aspirational and the affluent. The attitude of this Government, and sadly the last government to some extent, has so far has been little short of hostile. Changes to inheritance tax, a second home premium on council tax, VAT on private schools and the abolition of non-dom status are just the headline policies that make this country an increasingly barren economy for those with the temerity to be successful. After overnight reports that the Government is also considering radical reforms to council tax and stamp duty, it could be Christmas come early for Lord Kinnock and all the other Labour politicians who suffer from that most toxic of traits in British politics: the politics of envy. What is the proposal? Well, according to reports, what Labour are considering is a replacement of stamp duty and council tax with a tax on the value of a property, paid by the owner. It's not all bad, at least at face value. These proposals are based on a report by the think tank Onward, which seeks to radically reform council tax and stamp duty, two of Britain's worst, most despised taxes. The proposal is to replace the levies with a 'horizontal, proportional' property tax. Councils would levy an average rate of 0.44 per cent on homes up to the value of £500,000, with a minimum charge of £800. Revenues from this would go to local government. Above £500,000 there would be a national property tax at an annual rate between 0.54 per cent between £500,000 and £1,000,000. Above £1,000,000 it would be 0.81 per cent. These revenues would go to the national government. Confusingly, there are reports that the national property tax element would only be levied at the point of sale, although that would surely mean a loss of revenue. As part of a wholesale reform of the taxation system, these proposals are not without merit. There are reasonably sound, non-distortionary tax systems with echoes of these measures. If accompanied by, for example, the abolition of inheritance tax, capital gains tax, corporation tax, the higher rate of income tax as well as stamp duty and council tax then the introduction of a tax directly proportional to the value of a property could be a feasible measure. But as for Labour's interpretation of these proposals, there are not just questions to be asked, there are fears to be addressed. Key to Onward's proposal is that any properties that have already been charged stamp duty at the point of purchase would be exempt from the national property tax. Will this be the case with Labour's policy if it is to bring it in? Also key is that it is revenue neutral, with the aim being to reshape the system in a less distortionary way while ensuring no increase in borrowing: a sound principle. Do not bet against Labour dismissing these questions though, and using the positive headlines of abolishing stamp duty to justify a revenue-raising tax raid on the nation's wealth. Because critically, if Labour does advance these proposals, it will not be accompanied by the broader reforms to the tax system needed. Instead, what we will more likely end up with is a wealth tax in all but name. A wealth tax that allows cowardly politicians to temporarily delay the confrontation with reality they need: the fact that we simply cannot go on spending the way we are. It would also protect the Prime Minister's vulnerable left flank. And at the level that is being proposed — a tax on the value of all homes above £500,000 — this will not be a mansion tax, it will be a family home tax. It almost feels hollow to warn of the many high earners and high net wealth individuals that may end up leaving Britain under these policies if they are bungled. Because in so many cases they've already left.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
State pension age could rise to 70 as DWP launches huge new review
FEARS have been raised that the state pension age could be increased to 70 as the Government has ordered a huge new review. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has commissioned the review of the official retirement age and said she would be considering automatic increases. 2 The review will look at whether it could be worth linking the state pension age to life expectancy. Ministers are considering changes to the state pension age as part of a bid to boost public finances. The state pension age is currently set at 66. Under current plans, it will rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028. It's then set to rise again to 68 between 2044 and 2046, with a review to be carried out every six years. Using 2022 projections, the average 66-year-old man in 2025 is projected to live another 19.2 years. This is expected to rise another 1.9 years by 2050. For women, the average 66-year-old can expect to live another 21.8 years. Their life expectancy will also increase by 1.9 years by 2050. Officials fear that with rising life expectancy and dropping birth rates, the cost of health and social care will increase dramatically in the coming years with an ageing population. How to track down lost pensions worth £1,000s It's estimated that a quarter of the UK's population will be aged 65 or older by 2050. Suzy Morrissey, who has been commissioned to review the official retirement age, said she will look at the experience of other countries that already automatically link payments to life expectancy. This is the case in Denmark, which recently raised its retirement age to 70. The call for evidence will also look at the mechanisms used in countries such as Finland, Italy and the Netherlands. Ms Morrissey said: "Most of us will expect to receive at least some state pension once we reach state pension age. "The impact of decisions around state pension age are far-reaching. Therefore, I want to make sure I have heard views from a broad range of organisations, experts and individuals throughout the course of my review, including those who have an interest in the wider social and economic impacts of an ageing society." Some experts have warned that automatic increases could create "chaos" in retirement plans. Former pensions minister and partner at LCP, Sir Steve Webb, told The Telegraph that automatically linking life expectancy to the state pension age could have increased it by up to eight years. "Having a completely automatic formula to move from changes in life expectancy to changes in state pension age could cause chaos for people's financial planning," he said. "Every time the population projections are updated, this could move the dates for pension age changes by up to a decade, which would make it impossible for people to plan for their retirement finances." Meanwhile research by Just Group found 62% of people retire before receiving the state pension, sometimes due to redundancy or ill health. Therefore increasing the state pension age further could mean more people being forced to retire before they can receive the state pension. Plus, the research showed more than 40% of current state pension recipients said the payments account for the majority of their income. How does the state pension work? AT the moment the current state pension is paid to both men and women from age 66 - but it's due to rise to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046. The state pension is a recurring payment from the government most Brits start getting when they reach State Pension age. But not everyone gets the same amount, and you are awarded depending on your National Insurance record. For most pensioners, it forms only part of their retirement income, as they could have other pots from a workplace pension, earning and savings. The new state pension is based on people's National Insurance records. Workers must have 35 qualifying years of National Insurance to get the maximum amount of the new state pension. You earn National Insurance qualifying years through work, or by getting credits, for instance when you are looking after children and claiming child benefit. If you have gaps, you can top up your record by paying in voluntary National Insurance contributions. To get the old, full basic state pension, you will need 30 years of contributions or credits. You will need at least 10 years on your NI record to get any state pension.
