Alan Dershowitz vows to sue Martha's Vineyard pierogi stand over snub
The polarizing defense attorney, whose famous clients include Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump, described the incident on Thursday's episode of his podcast, 'The Dershow with Alan Dershowitz,' saying he was turned away for political reasons after ordering half a dozen of the traditional Polish dumplings.
'Bigoted vendor at Martha's Vineyard farmers market refused to sell to me because of my political views,' he posted on X earlier this week. 'I'm suing.'
According to Dershowitz, he was waiting for a glass of the 'best orange juice in the world' he had just ordered when he walked across the area to a pierogi vendor.
'So I went there and I said, 'Oh, can I have six pierogi?' And he said, 'No,'' Dershowitz said.
When he asked the vendor if there weren't any left, the answer surprised him.
'No, no, no. We have plenty of pierogi. I just won't sell them to you,' the vendor reportedly said.
When pressed for an explanation, the vendor told Dershowitz he wouldn't sell them to him because he did not approve of his politics, whom he had represented, and whom he supported, according to the controversial Harvard Law professor.
The 'clear implication' was that the vendor opposed Dershowitz because he defended then-first-term President Donald Trump during his first impeachment trial in 2020, and because of a T-shirt he had worn to the farmers market a week earlier.
'I was wearing a 'Proud American Zionist' shirt (in) red, white and blue — and I recall that he looked at it strangely,' Dershowitz said, later referring to the incident as 'pure McCarthyism.'
A video shared on Instagram appears to show a police officer approaching Dershowitz during the incident before pulling him aside.
The person who shared the video said in the caption that they had stopped the polarizing lawyer from 'harassing a vendor' who wouldn't serve him pierogi.
'I made a statement to the police and they threatened to trespass him if he bothered any more vendors,' Instagram user bungee4 wrote. 'Three refused him! The police took a witness statement from me. No one else wanted to do it because he sues everyone here. Total scum!'
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana
Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana originally appeared on Autoblog. Louisiana drivers lingering in the left lane now have even less margin for error. A new law that took effect August 1 allows police to ticket anyone driving just 1 mph under the speed limit in the passing lane without a valid reason. First-time offenders face a $150 fine, a second offense within 12 months rises to $250, and a third can bring $350 or up to 30 days in jail. Lawmakers say the aim is to keep traffic flowing and reduce dangerous slowdowns, but critics argue it's an overreach that could criminalize cautious driving. From Ten Miles Under to Just One The previous rule only targeted drivers going at least 10 mph under the limit in the left lane. The revised statute tightens that to a single mile per hour, with exceptions for overtaking or turning left. Senator Jay Luneau, who introduced the bill, said the idea came from frustration during his commute between Baton Rouge and Alexandria. The stricter approach mirrors other recent driving crackdowns nationwide, such as one state's controversial new speeding law that threatens offenders with jail time. A National Patchwork of Speed Policy Louisiana's change comes amid a broader debate on how states should set and enforce speed laws. While some are clamping down on both fast and slow drivers, others are going the opposite direction. Earlier this year, one state raised its speed limits on certain highways — but paired the move with strict penalties for reckless behavior. These contrasting approaches show the lack of a uniform national standard, leaving drivers to navigate a patchwork of rules as they cross state lines. No One's Above the Law Enforcement isn't limited to everyday motorists. In July, Harry Potter star Emma Watson lost her license after accumulating 12 penalty points for speeding in the U.K., highlighting that stricter driving laws — on either side of the Atlantic — can catch even high-profile of Louisiana's law argue that by making left-lane discipline a serious matter, they can reduce road rage, prevent accidents, and make highways safer for everyone. Will It Change Driving Behavior? The law's supporters believe it will unclog traffic and reduce collisions caused by sudden lane changes or tailgating. Critics warn that it could be used to justify unnecessary stops or escalate minor infractions into costly — even criminal — consequences. Whether it proves effective or becomes another flashpoint in the driver–police relationship remains to be seen. For now, the message from Baton Rouge is clear: the left lane is for passing, not for pacing the limit. Going Just 1 MPH Under Speed Limit Could Land You in Jail in Louisiana first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 12, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 12, 2025, where it first appeared.
Chicago Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
White House orders a review of exhibits at Smithsonian museums ahead of nation's 250th birthday
WASHINGTON — The White House is ordering a wide-ranging review of the Smithsonian museums and exhibitions ahead of the country's 250th birthday with a goal of aligning the institution's content with President Donald Trump's interpretation of American history. In a letter sent Tuesday to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, the White House laid out in detail the steps it expects the organization to take as part of the announced review. The examination will look at all public-facing content, such as social media, exhibition text and educational materials, to 'assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals,' according to the letter. 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the letter said. The Smithsonian said it remained committed to 'scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history.' 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents,' it said in a statement. The review, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, is the latest attempt by the president to bring the country's cultural institutions in line with his vision. In March, Trump signed an executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which accused the Smithsonian of coming under the influence of a 'divisive, race-centered ideology' and called upon it to 'remove improper ideology' from the institution's museums. In February, Trump removed the Kennedy Center's Board of Trustees, replaced them with his supporters and named himself chairman. He vowed to end events featuring performers in drag, indicating he would take on a larger role in dictating the institution's programming schedule. The review of the Smithsonian will initially focus on eight museums — the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The letter said additional museums would be reviewed in subsequent phases. Civil rights leaders have criticized the administration's particular focus on the National Museum of African American History and Culture as efforts to minimize Black Americans' contributions to the country and to recast the obstacles they faced throughout history. The Smithsonian has repeatedly denied allegations that it has changed or removed exhibit details in response to pressure from the administration. Recently, the institution removed references to Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit on the American presidency. A spokesman for the museum said the references, which were added in 2021, were intended to be a temporary measure and said a future exhibit would include details on all presidential impeachments. The review ordered by the White House directs the museums to submit materials from exhibits and drafts for upcoming events within 30 days. Within 120 days, the letter said, museums will be expected to take corrective action, 'replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions.'
San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
White House orders a review of exhibits at Smithsonian museums ahead of nation's 250th birthday
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House is ordering a wide-ranging review of the Smithsonian museums and exhibitions ahead of the country's 250th birthday with a goal of aligning the institution's content with President Donald Trump's interpretation of American history. In a letter sent Tuesday to Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, the White House laid out in detail the steps it expects the organization to take as part of the announced review. The examination will look at all public-facing content, such as social media, exhibition text and educational materials, to 'assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals,' according to the letter. 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' the letter said. The Smithsonian said it remained committed to 'scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history." 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents,' it said in a statement. The review, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, is the latest attempt by the president to bring the country's cultural institutions in line with his vision. In March, Trump signed an executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which accused the Smithsonian of coming under the influence of a 'divisive, race-centered ideology' and called upon it to 'remove improper ideology' from the institution's museums. In February, Trump removed the Kennedy Center's Board of Trustees, replaced them with his supporters and named himself chairman. He vowed to end events featuring performers in drag, indicating he would take on a larger role in dictating the institution's programming schedule. The review of the Smithsonian will initially focus on eight museums — the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The letter said additional museums would be reviewed in subsequent phases. Civil rights leaders have criticized the administration's particular focus on the National Museum of African American History and Culture as efforts to minimize Black Americans' contributions to the country and to recast the obstacles they faced throughout history. The Smithsonian has repeatedly denied allegations that it has changed or removed exhibit details in response to pressure from the administration. Recently, the institution removed references to Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit on the American presidency. A spokesman for the museum said the references, which were added in 2021, were intended to be a temporary measure and said a future exhibit would include details on all presidential impeachments.
